Milliman Asbestos Valuation 2004 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Las Vegas, Nevada September 13, 2004...
-
Upload
jonas-patrick -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Milliman Asbestos Valuation 2004 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Las Vegas, Nevada September 13, 2004...
Milliman
Asbestos Valuation
2004 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar
Las Vegas, Nevada September 13, 2004
Claus S. Metzner, FSA, FCAS, MAAA, Aktuar – SAVActuary, Milliman, Inc.
Milliman 2
Asbestos Valuation Asbestos Reserve Valuations have received and are
receiving a great deal of publicity Asbestos Reserve Valuations have led to substantial
restatement of reserves for many companies – both primary insurers and re-insurers – “surprises” are commonplace
Asbestos Reserve Valuations are an on-going concern of rating agencies and regulators
Why this level of concern? This level of uncertainty? What are our options? Complexity of valuation – “black box” effect - increases
uncertainty and anxiety What can we learn from the “Asbestos” Experience?
Milliman 3
Asbestos Valuation
What are we faced with?• a large number of claimants• multiple defendants• long latency periods • a number of coverage years• different coverages (products; premises/ops, etc.)• varying policy limits• limited information• complex financial arrangements
What are we to do?
Milliman 4
Asbestos Valuation
Develop techniques to deal with: A gigantic allocation problem between
• The manufacturer/installer/distributor: the insured defendant • The insurers of the manufacturer, etc• The re-insurer• The retrocessionaire
Need to obtain/quantify expert knowledge from claim and legal staff to master the problem
Need to develop monitoring/reporting tools that help avoid “surprises” and mitigate the “black box” effect
Milliman 5
Asbestos Valuation
Step I: The Insured Develop the “Universe” of claims for each insured Consider the type of claim: products versus
premises/operations, etc. Consider the length of the reporting period Consider legal costs Consider inflation (all kinds) Consider issues of bankruptcy
Milliman 6
Asbestos Valuation What do we know/what can we find out for Step I?
Historical reporting patterns Historical frequency and severity Claim knowledge Legal knowledge
Goal: develop a set of assumptions and a model for the projection of the ultimate claims and the allocation to coverage period Quantifying the “expert knowledge” Developing Monitoring Tools
• Claims function• Management function
Milliman 7
Asbestos Valuation
After we have all the assumptions, how do we model the results ?(the assumptions are developed with the help of claim and legal experts!) Assumptions are generally not just a best estimate Assumptions have a distribution, a range, of possible
outcomes Model on a stochastic basis (note: less than perfect
approximations are useful – the output of the model provides information as to the sensitivity of key assumptions)
The assumptions form the basis for monitoring: “actual” versus “expected”
Milliman 8
Asbestos Valuation
Step II: The Insurer Once we have obtained the model output (note –
this is a range of outputs!) can apply coverage charts to obtain the range of ultimate losses Policy limits important Primary versus excess Other special coverage conditions (manuscript forms)
Milliman 9
Asbestos Valuation Having developed the range of ultimate losses for each
insured, can now subtract the payments to date to obtain a range of reserves for each insured
Note 1: pay special attention to validation routines on an account by account basis – the “smell test” – using the collective knowledge of claim and legal experts
Note 2: consider if a covariance adjustment is appropriate – i.e. will everything go bad at the same time? - if no co-variance adjustment is used, the range may be misstated on the high side; if complete independence assumed, the range may be misstated on the low side
Each company’s mix of business by state, by type of insured, etc. should be considered
Milliman 10
Asbestos Valuation
“Smaller” insureds with reported asbestos claims – some alternatives for the valuation Use the information gained from the modeling process
for large accounts to group small accounts Treat each group as if it were a single account and
model Use a review of emerging claims to assess products
and premises/operations coverage Use a review of the types of accounts to evaluate
potential impact of policy limits
Milliman 11
Asbestos Valuation
IBNR A very difficult subject but note the following
• Major asbestos defendants have long since been identified and are presumably already modeled – see Step I
• Minor defendants are emerging - model how many additional accounts may report claims in the future and apply frequency/severity assumptions per account – in the alternative, model number of emerging claims (note that policy limits may not apply – c.f. reinsurance impact)
• Consider where you are on the “reporting” curve• May want to consider issues of “modeling risk” as part of
IBNR
Milliman 12
Asbestos Valuation
Step 3: Assess Reinsurance Recoverable
Reinsurance Program for each coverage/underwriting year can be applied to each outcome of the ultimate losses to develop a range of reinsurance recoverable consistent with the gross ultimate losses Consider: dimunition/exhaustion of coverage due to other types
of claims and previous payments Consider: facultative/treaty/etc. Consider: what accounts are generating IBNR and will the
emergence of the IBNR claims even trigger reinsurance Consider: creditworthiness
Milliman 13
Asbestos Valuation
The previous steps have taken us through the process of developing a gross and a net liability for the primary insurer
Now we come to the re-insurer
Milliman 14
Asbestos Valuation
What are some key differences between the primary insurance valuation problems and the reinsurance valuation problem? Re-insurer has less information than the primary insurer Potentially more heterogeneous book of business Generally higher attachment points Generally longer lags until claims are reported Potential that primary companies’ reserving problems lead
to a (massive) understatement of reinsurance recoverable by primary companies and understatement of re-insurer’s liability
Milliman 15
Asbestos Valuation Possible remedies for the lack of data
For primary companies representing a large portion of the exposure, investigate who the major insured accounts were for the years in question – then follow primary process with superimposed reinsurance program
Adjust reported data for
• Perceived reserve inadequacies
• For better/worse than average reporting of data
– Quality and timeliness and relative case basis reserve adequacy are important
Consider the limits profile of the primary company
Consider the source of the primary company’s IBNR (products vs non-
products; size of claim anticipated)
Milliman 16
Asbestos Valuation
Retrocessionaire Issues Even less data available Longer report lags “Spiral” may be critical – e.g. London Excess Market
IBNR very important, but the least amount of information is available
Consider if the market under review – e.g., LMX – can be viewed as a pool
Milliman 17
Asbestos Valuation
Management Information/Monitoring Assumptions provide the basis for monitoring on a
quarterly basis• Monitoring doesn’t mean changing the answer• Monitoring means assessing when we should “drill down”• Monitoring means an on-going information flow and
dialogue with– Claim/legal experts– Management– Others– Explanation of “what’s going on”
Milliman 18
Asbestos Valuation
Monitoring Tools Actual versus expected payments Actual versus expected newly reported
accounts Actual versus expected number of new
claimants Actual versus expected average values Etc.
Milliman 19
Asbestos Valuation
Summary Key issues
• Long latency period
• Multiple coverage years
• Complex legal issues
• Complex financial structures
• Lack of data
Milliman 20
Asbestos Valuation
Summary Key Approaches
• Gain as much information as possible
• Use expertise of claim and legal staff to develop assumptions
• Model results stochastically– Assumptions are documented
– Can measure impact of change in environment as reflected in revised assumptions
• Use consistent underlying assumptions to model primary, excess, reinsurance layers
Milliman 21
Asbestos Valuation Summary
Expect to be “surprised” Keep monitoring and updating
• We are engaged not just in a loss reserve project but in financial reporting
• Remove the “black box” effect Stay in close contact with claim and legal professionals
What Else Do We Know Similar reserving problems in other areas: Construction Defect, for
example Similar approaches to reserving may be our best opportunity to stay
current with emerging liabilities