Millenium Developmental Goals Emman Francisco

8/11/2019 Millenium Developmental Goals Emman Francisco

1/40

Poverty Alleviation in the UN

Millennium DevelopmentGoals (MDGs): Problems

and Initiatives in thePhilippines

Presented by:

Emmanuel Ryan P. Francisco, RN


2/40

REPORT OUTLINE

I. Background on the MDGs

II. Highlights of the Second Philippines Progress Report on theMDGs

A. Poverty Situation

B. Meeting Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger

C. Environmental Situation/Challenges and Priorities for Action

III. Crosscutting Challenges and Priorities for Action

A. Hindering Factors

B. Facilitating Factors

C. Parallel Initiatives

D. Implications on the Philippine Economy


3/40

In September 2000, 189 member states of the United

Nations adopted the Millennium Declaration

The Millennium Declaration confirmed the commitment

of member states of the United Nations to peace andsecurity, respect for human rights, good governanceand human development

The Millennium Declaration also committed the member

states of the United Nations to achieve quantifiabledevelopment goals and targets (the MDGs) until 2015

(15 years) that will at least ensure that developmentinitiatives are effectively eradicating poverty and promotingsustainable human development

Millennium Declaration


4/40

The MDGs are Owned by All MDGs are not just the national governments commitment to

UN or the world; most important: they are their commitmentsto their own people

The MDGs are our own development challenges for somedecades, now gaining a new opportunity from global andnational momentum of solidarity

The Goals are global in their scope, but targets andindicators can be tailor-made to shorter time scales, highertargets & local circumstances.

The MDGs are national commitments, but theirachievements (or failures)are at the local level

MDGs ownership by local governments, by thebusiness/private sector such as NGOs/Pos/civil societyplays a vital role and can make a huge difference in thenational and global achievements of MDGs


5/40

1990 to 2000 2001 to 2005


6/40

Baseline Current Target by Probability of

(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining the

MDG year closest (2002/2004) 1/ Targetsto 1990) 2/

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

Proportion of population below theSubsistence threshold 24.3 a 13.8 d 12.15 High

Poverty threshold 45.3 a 30.4 d 22.65 High

Proportion of families below the:

Subsistence threshold 20.4 a 10.4 d 10.2 High

Poverty threshold 39.9 a 24.7 d 19.95 HIgh

Proportion of households with per capita

intake below 100% dietary energy 69.4 b 56.9 34.7 High

MDGs: Rate of Progress


7/40

Baseline Current Target by Probability of


MDG year closest (2002/2004) 1/ Targets

to 1990) 2/

Promote gender equality and empower

women

Ratio of girls to 100 boys

Elementary education 95.8 c 101.8 e 100 High

Secondary education 104.5

c

115.9

e

100 HighReduce child mortality

Under 5-mortality rate (per 1,000 children) 80 40 26.7 High

Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 live births) 57 29 19 High

Halt and begin to reverse the incidence

of malaria & other diseasesHIV prevalence


8/40


MDG year closest (2002/2004) 1/ Targetsto 1990) 2/

Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

% underweight among 0-5 yo children 34.5 27.6 17.25 Medium

Achieve universal primary educationElementary participation rate 3 85.1 a 90.05 100 Medium

Improve maternal health

Maternal mortality rate 209 172c

52.2 Medium

Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 48.9 70 Medium

Achieve universal primary education

Elementary cohort survival rate 68.4 a 69.8 83.3 Low

MDGs: Rate of Progress


9/40

SDC Res. No. 1 2003

Expanding functions

and composition of

MC IHD

DILG MC 2004 152

Guide to LGUs in

the Localization of

the MDGs

MTPDP 2004 2010

hews closely to the

MDGs

Strong

commitment of

the business

sector and civil

society

Investment identification

per goal and target in MTPIP

2005 2010

Strong support

of donor

community for

the MDGs

Legislative

support of

Congress

Enabling Environment for the MDGs


10/40

Poverty Situation


11/40

FIGURE 1: Poverty Incidence of Population by Region, 2003

Legend

Below national average (7.3 - 30.4)

Above national average(30.5 - 54.2)

Source

NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003

ARMM 53.1

Cordillera Region 31.2

Metro Manila 7.3

Ilocos Region 30.2

Cagayan Valley 24.5

Central Luzon 17.7

CALABARZON 18.8

MIMAROPA 47.9

Bicol Region 48.4

estern Visayas 39.1

Central Visayas 28.4

Eastern Visayas 43.3

estern Mindanao 49.4

Northern Mindanao 44.3

Southern Mindanao 34.4

Central Mindanao 38.4

CARAGA 54.2


12/40

Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold, Poverty Incidence of Families and Population

by Region: 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003

Philippines 11, 451 12, 267 27.5 24.7 33.0 30.4

NCR 15, 693 16, 796 5.7 5.0 7.6 7.3

CAR 13, 066 13, 976 30.7 24.8 37.6 31.2

Region I 12, 685 13, 276 29.4 24.4 35.1 30.2

Region II 11, 128 11, 409 25.2 19.3 30.4 24.5

Region III 13, 760 14, 342 17.3 13.7 21.4 17.7Region IV-A 13, 657 14, 616 15.2 14.9 19.1 18.8

Region IV-B 11, 995 12, 406 36.3 39.7 45.2 47.9

Region V 11, 372 12, 354 45.3 40.5 52.6 48.4

Region VI 11, 313 12, 275 36.6 31.3 44.4 39.1

Region VII 9, 656 9, 779 31.5 23.7 36.2 28.4

Region VIII 9, 518 10, 802 37.5 35.5 45.1 43.3Region IX 9, 116 10, 414 38.5 44.1 44.8 49.4

Region X 10, 503 11, 609 37.9 37.9 43.8 44.3

Region XI 10, 264 11, 276 27.7 28.1 33.1 34.4

Region XII 10, 466 11, 303 40.7 32.0 46.8 38.4

Caraga 10, 896 12, 000 43.7 47.3 50.9 54.2

ARMM 12, 192 12, 739 53.7 45.7 59.8 53.1

Poverty Incidence

of Population (%)Region

Annual Per Capita Poverty

Threshold (in Pesos)

Poverty Incidence

of Families (%)

FIGURE 2 S b i t I id f P l ti b R i 2003


13/40

FIGURE 2: Subsistence Incidence of Population, by Region 2003

Legend

Below national average

Above national average

Source

NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study, 2003

ARMM 24.1

Cordillera Region 13.4

Metro Manila 0.6

Ilocos Region 11.2

Cagayan Valley 7.6

Central Luzon 4.2

CALABARZON 4.9

MIMAROPA 22.9

Bicol Region 26.6

Western Visayas 17.7

Central Visayas 14.6

Eastern Visayas 21

Western Mindanao 32.8Northern Mindanao 25.4

Southern Mindanao 17.6

Central Mindanao 18.4

CARAGA 31


14/40

Annual Per Capita Food Threshold, Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population

by Region: 2000 and 2003

2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7, 707 8, 134 12.3 10.4 15.8 13.8

NCR 9, 570 9, 974 0.7 0.4 1.0 0.6

CAR 8, 744 9, 117 13.7 9.8 17.9 13.4

Region I 8, 552 8, 903 11.4 8.1 15.2 11.2

Region II 7, 560 8, 026 9.3 5.6 11.8 7.6

Region III 8, 764 9, 338 4.2 2.9 5.5 4.2Region IV-A 8, 782 9, 189 5.1 3.7 6.5 4.9

Region IV-B 8, 078 8, 339 17.4 17.7 24.1 22.9

Region V 8, 047 8, 372 23.3 20.3 29.3 26.6

Region VI 7, 983 8, 386 17.4 12.9 23.1 17.7

Region VII 6, 759 7, 016 16.9 11.2 20.7 14.6

Region VIII 7, 080 7, 696 19.1 15.5 24.8 21.0

Region IX 6, 574 7, 245 21.0 27.9 25.8 32.8

Region X 7, 296 7, 999 19.2 19.7 23.8 25.4

Region XI 7, 087 7, 751 12.8 13.5 16.7 17.6

Region XII 7, 235 7, 804 17.9 14.0 22.6 18.4

Caraga 7, 667 8, 353 24.4 24.5 30.7 31.0

ARMM 8, 313 8, 737 23.9 18.6 28.5 24.1

Region

Annual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence

Threshold (in Pesos) of Families (%) of Population (%)


15/40

FIGURE 4: Percentage of Households with Less than 100% Energy Adequacy


16/40

FIGURE 5: Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds


17/40

Meeting Goal 1: Eradicate

Extreme Poverty and Hunger


18/40

Priority Policies andPrograms

Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)

Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries underthe National Health Insurance Program(NHIP)

Wholesale portfolio of the Peoples Credit

and Finance Corporation (PCFC)

Implementation of asset reform programs

Delivery of human development services


19/40

MDGs Amount(in US$ million)

% Share toTotal MDG-

Related ODA

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty & hunger 6,259.4 77.40

2 - Achieve universal primary education 557.9 6.90

3 - Promote gender equality 3.8 0.05

4 - Reduce child mortality 139.9 1.73

5 - Improve maternal health 157.0 1.94

6 - Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria & other diseases 25.3 0.31

7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 943.31 11.67

TOTAL 8,086.6 100.00

Summary of ODA for completed & ongoing projects,by MDG category, from 2001-2005, in million US$

Sourc e: NEDA-PMS

Official Development Assistance

for MDGs


20/40

INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005 2010

MDGs COST(in PhP Billion)

1 - Eradicate extreme poverty & hunger 1,294.2

2 - Achieve universal primary education 56.7

3 - Promote gender equality -

4 - Reduce child mortality

69.95 - Improve maternal health

6 - Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria & other diseases7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 198.8

8 Global partnership for development 125.1

TOTAL 1,744.7

Sourc e: NEDA-PIS

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP


21/40

INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIPAND COLLABORATION

Government (executive,legislature, judicial)

LocalGovernment

CSOs,Academe

LocalGovernment

Private/Business

DonorCommunity


22/40

Environmental Situation

and Challenges


23/40

Goal 7: Ensure Environmental

Sustainability Forests resources and watersheds Biodiversity resources

Coastal and marine resources Air quality

Water resources

Waste and toxic chemicals


24/40

Area Proportion to Total

(Hectares) (%)

7,168,400 100

2,560,872 36

Broadleaved 2,448,864

Mixed 24,618

Coniferous 87,390

4,030,588 56

Broadleaved 3,847,284

Mixed 69,861

Coniferous 113,443

247,362 3

329,578 5

Source: Forest Management Bureau (FMB)

Total Forest

Mangrove

Plantation

Forest Cover by Forest Type, 2003

Closed Forest

Open Forest

Category


25/40

Area Reforested, 1990-2003 (in hectares)

Year Total

Govern

ment

Percent Non-

Govern

ment

Percent

Sector

2003 15,087 13,195 87.5 1,892 12.5

2002 25,620 20,682 80.7 4,938 19.3

2001 31,440 26,524 84.4 4,916 15.6

2000 27,632 21,740 78.7 5,892 21.3

1999 42,165 31,183 74 10,982 26

1998 42,368 33,219 78.4 9,149 21.61997 66,236 49,301 74.4 16,935 25.6

1996 46,096 18,869 40.9 27,227 59.1

1995 65,233 21,841 33.5 43,392 66.5

1994 49,551 18,032 36.4 31,519 63.6

1993 19,211 6,347 33 12,864 67

1992 40,593 24,304 59.9 16,289 40.11991 93,039 73,602 79.1 19,437 20.9

1990 191,663 153,949 80.3 37,714 19.7

Annual

Average53,995

Source: DENR Annual Report


26/40

Biodiversity Resources

Philippinesone of the megadiverse countries in the

world

higher regard for the endemism of localspecies

butmost severely threatened of the

megadiverse countries


27/40

Coastal and Marine Resources

rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife

natural areas for recreation/tourism

Water resources

disparities in water supply coverage acrossregions

depletion of ground water especially in MetroManila and Metro Cebu

pollution of water sources


28/40

Air Quality

pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and

major urban centers on the level of suspended particulates (TSP), airquality is not within standards

Waste and Toxic Chemicals solid waste generation in Metro Manila is

estimated at 5,345 tons per day

urbanization inevitably increased the use of

chemicals no integrated treatment facility for hazardous

waste


29/40

Priority Policies andPrograms

Adoption of Sustainable ForestManagement

Revised Forestry Code of the Philippinesand the Watersheds Code

Various biodiversity acts

Fisheries Code and AFMA

Clean Air Act


30/40

Challenges and Priorities forAction

Sustainable and more productive utilization ofnatural resources

Focus and strengthen the protection of

vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas Create healthier environment for the population

Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters

Ensure environmental accountability for allindustries


31/40

CROSS-CUTTING

CHALLENGES.


32/40

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Government Expenditure Program by Sector

FY 2000-2005

Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense

CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND

PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Source: DBM, Bud get of Expenditure and Sources of Financing

FINANCING THE MDGs


33/40

Sector/Year 2001 2002 2003 2004

Economic Services 15,982,070 45,484,830 52,853,500 58,700,890

(15%) (32%) (33%) (34%)

Social Services 28,979,110 26,352,690 34,001,700 36,135,990

(27%) (19%) (21%) (21%)

General Public Services 63,375,820 69,580,140 73,954,470 78,545,740

(58%) (49%) (46%) (45%)

Total Public Expenditures 108,337,000 141,417,660 160,809,670 173,382,620

FINANCING THE MDGs

Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector, 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)

Source: DBM, Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing




34/40

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

7080

2001 2002 2003 2004

ODA Commitments by Sector

FY 2001-2004 (US$ million)Agriculture, agrarianreform and naturalresources

Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment

Infrastructuredevelopment

Social reform anddevelopment

Industry and services

Sourc e: NEDA-PIS



FINANCING THE MDGs


35/40

CROSS CUTTING CHALLENGES

AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Reduce disparities across regions

Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programsand projects

Enforce full/stricter implementation of laws & ensurepassage of MDG-supportive bills

Strengthen monitoring and implementation

Scale-up campaign for localization

Develop an advocacy plan

Intensify multisectoral partnership & collaboration


36/40

Facilitating Factors

Strong global support for MDGs by the UnitedNations, ASEAN, and other multilateralorganizations;

Expanding national support among

policymakers for MDGs (e.g., creation of theHouse Committee on MDGs, issuance of EOon the MDGs);

Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation

(e.g., focusing of MTPIP investments onMDGs)

Increasing awareness and participation ofprivate sector, LGUs in MDG-related

programs


37/40

Hindering Factors

Resource constraints (i.e., MDG financinggap of about $1.5 billion yearly);

Lack of support by creditors for the Debt

for MDG Projects/Debt for Equity in MDGProjects initiative;

Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded

by some LGUs; and Lack of disaggregated data to monitorMDGs at local levels.


38/40

Parallel Initiatives

Participation in the High-Level PlenaryMeeting on MDGs

Formulation of the Plan of Action forPoverty Reduction (2006-2010)

Enhance the current Poverty ReductionStrategy and Program Framework

Advocacy for the Philippine proposal onDebt for Equity in MDG Projects


39/40


40/40

Millenium Developmental Goals Emman Francisco

Documents

Transcript of Millenium Developmental Goals Emman Francisco