Microkinetic Modeling of the Water Gas Shift Reaction on Copper and Iron Catalysts Caitlin...
-
Upload
darwin-bias -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
5
Transcript of Microkinetic Modeling of the Water Gas Shift Reaction on Copper and Iron Catalysts Caitlin...
Microkinetic Modeling of the Microkinetic Modeling of the Water Gas Shift Reaction on Water Gas Shift Reaction on Copper and Iron CatalystsCopper and Iron Catalysts
Caitlin Callaghan, Ilie Fishtik & Ravindra DattaCaitlin Callaghan, Ilie Fishtik & Ravindra Datta
Fuel Cell CenterFuel Cell CenterChemical Engineering DepartmentChemical Engineering DepartmentWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcester, MAWorcester, MA
August 19, 2002August 19, 2002
22
Research ObjectivesResearch Objectives
Develop a predictive microkinetic model for Develop a predictive microkinetic model for LTS and HTS water gas shift catalystsLTS and HTS water gas shift catalysts Identify the rate determining stepsIdentify the rate determining steps Develop reduced modelDevelop reduced model
Simulate the reaction for different catalysts Simulate the reaction for different catalysts (e.g. Cu, Fe, etc.)(e.g. Cu, Fe, etc.)
Eventual goal is Eventual goal is a prioria priori design of catalysts for design of catalysts for the water-gas-shift-reaction in fuel reformers the water-gas-shift-reaction in fuel reformers for fuel cellsfor fuel cells
33
Model TheoryModel Theory Mechanism assumed to proceed via a set of Mechanism assumed to proceed via a set of
ERs involving the ERs involving the active sitesactive sites ( (SS), ), surface surface intermediates intermediates ((IIii), and ), and terminal speciesterminal species ( (TTii).).
The generic The generic rate expression rate expression for each reaction is for each reaction is given by:given by:
n
iiji
q
kkjkjojs
11
0TIS
Ref. Fishtik & Datta
jijkjo
jijkjo
i
n
ik
q
kj
i
n
ik
q
kjj
PRT
EexpA
PRT
EexpAr
110
110
44
Developing the ModelDeveloping the Model
Identify (Identify (qq))surface intermediates: surface intermediates:
H2OS, COS, CO2S, H2S, HS, OHS, OS, HCOOS
UBI-QEP methodUBI-QEP method used to generate ERs and calculate the energetic characteristics (H, Ea) of each ER based on three types of reactions:
1. AB(g) + S ABS2. AB(g) +S AS + BS3. AS + BCS ABS + CS
Pre-exponential factors from transition state theorytransition state theory
101 Pa-1s-1 – adsorption/desorption reactions
1013 s-1 – surface reactions
55
Elementary ReactionsElementary Reactionsss11 : : HH22O + S O + S HH22OS OS
ss22 : : CO + S CO + S COS COS
ss33 : : COCO22S S COCO22 + S + S
ss44 : : HS + HS HS + HS HH22S + S S + S
ss55 : : HH22S S HH22 + S + S
ss66 : : HH22OS +S OS +S OHS + HSOHS + HS
ss77 : : COS + OSCOS + OS COCO22S + S S + S
ss88 : : COS + OHSCOS + OHS HCOOS + SHCOOS + S
ss99 : : OHS + S OHS + S OS + HS OS + HS
ss1010 : : COS + OHS COS + OHS COCO22S + HSS + HS
ss1111 : : HCOOS + S HCOOS + S COCO22S + HS S + HS
ss1212 : : HCOOS + OS HCOOS + OS COCO22S + OHSS + OHS
ss1313 : : HH22OS + OS OS + OS 2 OHS2 OHS
ss1414 : : HH22OS + HS OS + HS OHS + HOHS + H22SS
ss1515 : : OHS + HS OHS + HS OH + HOH + H22SS
Adsorption and DesorptionReactions
66
Cu(111) Fe(111)
s1101 1014 0 13.6 0 17.2
s2101 1014 0 12.0 0 32.0
s34 1012 101 5.3 0 6.9 0
s41013 1013 15.5 13.0 24.5 7.6
s56 1012 101 5.5 0 7.1 0
s61013 1013 25.4 1.6 19.9 12.0
s71013 1013 0 17.3 20.6 4.5
s81013 1013 0 20.4 9.0 12.2
s91013 1013 15.5 20.7 12.4 29.1
s101013 1013 0 22.5 10.3 10.9
s111013 1013 1.3 3.5 4.4 1.8
s121013 1013 4.0 0.9 19.3 0
s131013 1013 29.2 0 24.6 0
s141013 1013 26.3 0 24.8 0
s151013 1013 1.3 4.0 3.4 3.2
Reaction EnergeticsReaction Energetics
Pre-exponential Pre-exponential factors factors PaPa-1-1ss-1-1
(adsorption/ (adsorption/ desorption desorption steps) steps)
ss-1-1 (surface (surface reaction)reaction)
Activation Activation energies energies (kcal/mol)(kcal/mol)
77
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Temperature (oC)
Co
nve
rsio
n o
f C
O
Xue
Cu13model
Equilibrium
Simulation of Microkinetic Simulation of Microkinetic Model for Cu(111), 13-stepModel for Cu(111), 13-step
Ref. Fishtik & Datta, Surf. Sci. 512 (2002).Expt. Conditions
Space time = 0.09 s
FEED: COinlet = 0.15
H2Oinlet = 0.20
CO2 inlet = 0.05
H2 inlet = 0.05
Ref. Xue et al. Catal. Today, 30, 107 (1996).
88
Simulation of Microkinetic Simulation of Microkinetic Model for Cu(111), 15-stepModel for Cu(111), 15-step
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Temperature (oC)
Co
nv
ers
ion
of
CO
Experiment
Equilibrium
Simplified Model
Expt. Conditions
Space time = 1.80 s
FEED: COinlet = 0.10
H2Oinlet = 0.10
CO2 inlet = 0.00
H2 inlet = 0.00
99
Simulation of Microkinetic Simulation of Microkinetic Model for Fe(111), 15-stepModel for Fe(111), 15-step
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Temperature (oC)
Co
nve
rsio
n o
f C
O
Experiment
Fe15model
Equilibrium
Expt. Conditions
Space time = 1.17 s
FEED: COinlet = 0.10
H2Oinlet = 0.10
CO2 inlet = 0.00
H2 inlet = 0.00
1010
Reaction Route AnalysisReaction Route Analysis A A Reaction RouteReaction Route is the result of a linear combination is the result of a linear combination
of of qq+1 ERs that produces the desired overall reaction.+1 ERs that produces the desired overall reaction.
210 Possible Reaction Routes were found including210 Possible Reaction Routes were found including Empty Roots Empty Roots
The net reaction is zero.The net reaction is zero. Non-Empty RootsNon-Empty Roots
The net reaction is the WGSR.The net reaction is the WGSR.
31 Unique Reaction Routes remain31 Unique Reaction Routes remain 17 Routes previously examined (17 Routes previously examined (Fishtik & Datta, Surf. Sci. Fishtik & Datta, Surf. Sci.
512 (2002).)512 (2002).)
14 14 New RootsNew Roots based on based on ss1414 & & ss1515 contribution contribution
1111
Unique Reaction RoutesUnique Reaction RoutesRR1 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s8 + s11 RR2 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s9 RR3 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s10
RR4 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + 2s6 + s7 - s13
RR5 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s10 + s11 - s12 + s13
RR6 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s9 + s10 + s13
RR7 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s8 + s11 - s12 + s13
RR8 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 - s8 + 2s10 - s12 + s13
RR9 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s8 + 2s9 + s12 + s13
RR10 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s8 + s9 + s11 + s13
RR11 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s7 + 2s11 - s12 + s13
RR12 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s7 + 2s9 + s13
RR13 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 - s7 + 2s10 + s13
RR14 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 - s7 + 2s8 + 2s11 + s13
RR15 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + 2s6 + s8 + s12 - s13
RR16 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s8 + s9 + s12
RR17 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s11 - s12
RR18 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s15 RR19 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s6 + s8 + s12 + s15 RR20 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s7 + s9 + s14
RR21 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s10 + s14
RR22 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s8 + s11 + s14
RR23 = s1 + s2 + s3 - s4 + s5 + s7 - s13 + 2s14
RR24 = s1 + s2 + s3 - s4 + s5 + s7 + s13 + 2s15
RR25 = s1 + s2 + s3 - s4 + s5 + s7 + s14 + s15
RR26 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s7 + s11 - s12 + s14
RR27 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s8 + s9 + s12 + s14
RR28 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s10 + s13 + s15
RR29 = s1 + s2 + s3 + s5 + s8 + s11 + s13 + s15
RR30 = s1 + s2 + s3 - s4 + s5 + s8 + s12 - s13 + 2s14
RR31 = s1 + s2 + s3 - s4 + s5 + s8 + s12 + s14 + s15
RRRR11 – formate reaction route – formate reaction route
RRRR22 – redox reaction route – redox reaction route
RRRR33 – associative reaction route – associative reaction route
1212
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Temperature (oC)
Co
nve
rsio
n o
f C
ORR Contributions on Cu(111)RR Contributions on Cu(111)
RR2
RR1 & RR3
TotalMechanism
Equilibrium
1313
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Temperature (oC)
Co
nv
ers
ion
of
CO
RR Contributions on Fe(111)RR Contributions on Fe(111)
RR1, RR3,RR18 & RR19
TotalMechanism
Equilibrium
1414
Reaction Route CombinationReaction Route Combination
The ERs of each dominant RR are The ERs of each dominant RR are combined to generate a “net” RRcombined to generate a “net” RR
Simplified Model involving only 13 ERsSimplified Model involving only 13 ERs
ERER ss11 ss22 ss33 ss44 ss55 ss66 ss77 ss88 ss99 ss1010 ss1111 ss1212 ss1313 ss1414 ss1515
CuCu
FeFe
1515
Quasi-Equilibrium ReactionsQuasi-Equilibrium Reactions Identified by affinity calculationsIdentified by affinity calculations ss11,,ss22,,ss33,,ss44,,ss55,,ss77,,ss1111
All intermediates represented except All intermediates represented except OHSOHS
n
iiji
q
kkjkojojj PKA
RT 11
lnlnlnln1
Reducing the ModelReducing the Model
Quasi-Steady State SpeciesQuasi-Steady State Species OHS
Rate Determining StepsRate Determining Steps Copper: Copper: ss66,,ss88,,ss1010,,ss1515
Iron: Iron: ss66,,ss88,,ss1010,,ss1212,,ss1515
1616
12-Step, 4-Route, 4-RDS Model12-Step, 4-Route, 4-RDS Model
s1: H2O + S H2OS EQ
s2: CO + S COS EQ
s6: H2OS + S OHS + HS RDS
s8: COS + OHS HCOOS + S RDS
s10: COS + OHS CO2S + HS RDS
s12: CO2S + OHS OS + HCOOS RDS
s15: OHS + HS OS + H2S RDS
s2 + s3 + s7: CO + OS CO2 + S EQ
s3: CO2S CO2 + S EQ
1/2(s4 + s5): HS 1/2H2 + S EQ
s3+1/2s4+1/2s5 + s11: HCOOS CO2 + 1/2H2 + S EQ
1818
WGSR MechanismWGSR Mechanismr6
r8 r10 r12 r15
r
1
6
r
1
8
r 1
10
r 1
12
r 1
15
r
A6
A8 = A9 = A10 = A12 = A15
1919
Overall Rate ExpressionOverall Rate Expression IRRs and ERs combine to indicate the IRRs and ERs combine to indicate the
dominant rates of each RRdominant rates of each RR Cu(111):Cu(111): rr1212 neglected neglected
Fe(111):Fe(111): rr1212 included included
Overall Rate ExpressionOverall Rate Expressionrr = = rr88 + + rr99 + + rr1010 + + rr1212 + + rr1515
2020
Simplified ModelSimplified Model
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Temperature (oC)
Co
nve
rsio
n o
f C
O
13-step mechanism Cu(111)
simplified model Cu(111)
equilibrium
15-step mechanism Fe(111)
simplified model Fe(111)
2121
ConclusionsConclusions
A reliable predictive microkinetic model for the WGS A reliable predictive microkinetic model for the WGS reaction on Cu(111) and Fe(111) is developed.reaction on Cu(111) and Fe(111) is developed.
Only a limited number of RRs dominate the kinetics of Only a limited number of RRs dominate the kinetics of the process (RRthe process (RR11,RR,RR33,RR,RR1818,RR,RR1919).).
Prediction of simplified models compare extremely well Prediction of simplified models compare extremely well with the complete microkinetic model.with the complete microkinetic model.
The addition of The addition of ss1414 and and ss1515 dramatically affected the dramatically affected the model for WGS on copper; the model for iron model for WGS on copper; the model for iron remained unaffected. RRremained unaffected. RR1818 requires further requires further investigation.investigation.