Microbial Criteria and Testing - Probability, Sampling and ... · on statistically based sampling...
Transcript of Microbial Criteria and Testing - Probability, Sampling and ... · on statistically based sampling...
Microbial Criteria and Testing -Probability, Sampling and Sampling
Plans*Don Schaffner, Ph.D.
Rutgers - The State University of NJ
* Adapted from ICMSF vol 2
About the source text• This book was the only comprehensive publication
on statistically based sampling plans for foods. 2nd ed. (1986). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN: 0802056938.
• Revised as: Microorganisms in Foods 7: Microbiological Testing in Food Safety Management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002. ISBN: 0306472627. Available from Kluwer Publishers
• Part 2 of the old book is available as a free download
• http://www.icmsf.org/pdf/icmsf2.pdf• Excel spreadsheets and other tools
• http://www.icmsf.org/main/software_downloads.html
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 2 of 31
Spreadsheet screenshot
Probability, populations and samples• The population is everything• The sample is what we observe• Let’s say we run 1000 tests:
• we get a positive result 112 times• we estimate the chance of a positive sample to be 0.112 or
11.2%• We run another 1000 tests:
• positive results 914 times• chance is: 0.914 or 91.4%
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 4 of 31
Sampling plan• A good sampling plan based on poor data, or poorly
selected samples is worthless…• A simple example plan:
• Take 10 samples• If more than 2 are positive, reject• Why more than? Think about c = 0
• In sampling lingo:• n = 10• c = 2
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 5 of 31
Operating Characteristic curve
n = 10c = 2
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 6 of 31
Understanding the OC curve60%
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 11 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 01 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 01 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 01 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 10 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 11 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 01 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 01 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 11 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 01 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 01 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 10 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 00 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 00 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 01 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 00 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 11 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 01 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 01 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 10 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 01 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
20%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 01 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 7 of 31
Consumer and Producer risk• Consumers risk is the probability that an unacceptable
lot will be accepted• i.e. lot with high contamination will not be detected
• Producers risk is the probability that an acceptable lot will be rejected
• i.e. lot with low contamination will be rejected• Note that acceptance and reject are relative to a
particular purpose• Animal food may have lower standards than human food• Infant formula may have a higher standard than other foods
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 8 of 31
Principles of Drawing Samples• Can’t sample the entire shipment• Population
• What we want to make inferences about• Samples
• What we can observe• Probability
• Confidence that what we observe tells us about what we want to know
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 9 of 31
What is a Lot?• Ideally a lot is a quantity of food produced and handled
under uniform conditions• Rarely occurs in practice• Two or more batches may make up a lot• Temperature differences in a pallet or truck• Heterogeneity of lots makes interpretation difficult• Lot size tradeoff
• more tests will cost more but positive results mean a smaller amount to reject
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 10 of 31
What is a Sample?• Random sample
• Random number table, random number generator
• Stratified sampling• Useful if a lot is composed of several production batches• Accessed separately, pooled if uniform
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 11 of 31
Stratified sampling
Lot 1
2030 30
35
200
250
Sub-lot A Sub-lot B Sub-lot C
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 12 of 31
Sample size matters
375g
*
25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g 25g
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 13 of 31
Compositing matters• N = 60 is 60 times the
cost of N = 1• What if you pool the 60?• Pool, mix and pull
1/60th?
N = 60
*
*
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 14 of 31
Field sampling
15 of 31
Example from Xu and Buchanan• Nsample ↑ = detection
probability ↑• Not linear• Double n does not
double probability • Contamination sites
↑ = detection probability ↑
• Also not linear
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 16 of 31
Z vs. other methods• Top is random
• Nine 3*3 areas are missed, others “over” sampled
• Middle is random stratified• No 3*3 areas missed• All have one x
• Bottom is z• Fourteen 3*3 areas are always missed• This has consequences!
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 17 of 31
Sampling plan has consequences• Random and
Stratified-Random are roughly equal
• Z-pattern is much more variable
• Higher andlower
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 18 of 31
Practical considerations• Hazard - as the hazard increases, the probability of
accepting a lot which should be rejected should be reduced
• Uniformity - more uniform foods need fewer samples, less uniform foods need more samples
• Stratification - useful for sub-lots• Record of consistency - reduced sampling for
suppliers with good track recordSample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 19 of 31
Practical considerations• Practicality - perishability
may not allow time for sampling
• The ability to discriminate may not improve much with increased sampling
• Reliability increases as the square root of the number of samples
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 20 of 31
Two-class plans• Results are
• positive or negative• concentration above or below a critical threshold
• n = number of samples• c = maximum number of unacceptable samples• m = unacceptable concentration
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 21 of 31
Two-class plans• Example
• n=10, c=2 means:• take 10 samples• if 2 or fewer are positive, accept• if 3 or more are positive, reject
• Stringency increases• as n increases• as c decreases
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 22 of 31
Two-class plan OC curves
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 23 of 31
Three-class plans• Three class plans are for situations where
microbiological quality can grouped into three classes: good, marginal and poor
• n = number of samples• m = unacceptable concentration• c = maximum number of unacceptable samples at “m”• M = reject lot if any count greater than M is obtained
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 24 of 31
Choice of Plan According to Purpose• Type and seriousness of the hazards• Conditions under which the food will be handled
and consumed
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 25 of 31
Choice of Plan According to Purpose
Moderate, limitedBacillus cereusCampylobacterStaphylococcusYersina
Moderate, extensiveE. coli O157:H7SalmonellaShigella
SevereClostridium bot.Salmonella typhiVibrio cholera
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 26 of 31
Choice of Plan According to Purpose
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 27 of 31
Choosing between 2 & 3 class plans
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 28 of 31
Choosing m and M
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 29 of 31
Satisfactory “Probability of Acceptance”?• Comparing two different plans
• Lenient 3-class plan (n=5, c=3)• will accept 5% defective (M) and 30% marginal (m) 3 out of 4
(Pa = 0.75) times• one out of four lots rejected - clearly serious enough to compel
change!• Stringent plan (n=20, c=0)
• will accept 5% defective 1 out of 20 (Pa = 0.05) times• will accept 0.5% defective 19 out of 20 (Pa = 0.95) times• even 1/20 reject may be enough to compel change
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 30 of 31
Sampling and FSMA/Preventive Controls/HACCP
• The current trend is away from microbiological testing to inspect safety into a product
• PC/HACCP focuses on immediate measurements (temperature, pH, etc.) that if in control can ensure safety
• Microbial testing is still useful: • validation of HACCP plans• benchmarking suppliers or processes
• See “FSMA: Testing as a Tool for Verifying Preventive Controls” by Buchanan and Schaffner, Food Protection Trends, 2015 35(3):228-237.
Sample and Testing - United Fresh - 2019 31 of 31