Micro Strain Wireless Sensors Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring 2008
Transcript of Micro Strain Wireless Sensors Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring 2008
MicroStrain IncMicroStrain, Inc.
Wireless Sensors forWireless Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring
Steve Arms, Presidentsales@microstrain [email protected]
© MicroStrain, Inc. 2008 all rights reserved
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s Smart SensorsSmart Sensors
DisplacementDisplacement OrientationOrientation WirelessWireless
DVRTDVRT®® MicroMicro--AHRSAHRSGG--LinkLink®,®, VV--LinkLink® , ® ,
SGSG--LinkLink®, ®, TCTC--LinkLink®®
Automated test Automated test & & semiconsemicon mfgmfg
Unmanned Unmanned systemssystems
Machine Machine monitoringmonitoring&& s os o gg sys ssys s monitoringmonitoring
© microstrain, inc. 2008
Sensing Sensing the Futurethe Futurethe Futurethe Future
Wireless sensors, in the billions, will become Wireless sensors, in the billions, will become deeply embedded within structures &deeply embedded within structures &deeply embedded within structures & deeply embedded within structures & machines. machines.
Sensed information will be automatically Sensed information will be automatically compressed & forwarded for conditioncompressed & forwarded for conditioncompressed & forwarded for condition compressed & forwarded for condition based maintenance.based maintenance.
© microstrain, inc. 2008
Market Size?Market Size?Wireless sensor market will reach $4.6 Billion by Wireless sensor market will reach $4.6 Billion by 2011, up from $500 Million in 2007*2011, up from $500 Million in 2007*
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s Partners:Partners:
•• Navy: NAVAIR/NAVSEANavy: NAVAIR/NAVSEA•• Bell HelicopterBell Helicopter•• SikorskySikorsky•• CaterpillarCaterpillar
© microstrain, inc. 2008
*ON World report, "WSN for Smart Industries”, Nov 2007www.assetmgmtnews.com “Industrial Sector Embraces Wireless Sensors” Jan 2008
The Economist April 28th – May 4th
2007“We’re wearing out…plan to replace us soon”
2007
Problem:Problem:Problem:Problem:
Wh ill l billi fWh ill l billi fWho will replace billions of Who will replace billions of dead batteries?dead batteries?dead batteries?dead batteries?
© microstrain, inc. 2008
Solution*:Solution*:Solution :Solution :•• Harvest & store energy from strain vibrationHarvest & store energy from strain vibration•• Harvest & store energy from strain, vibration, Harvest & store energy from strain, vibration,
light, and light, and motionmotion
•• Use power management to balance the energy Use power management to balance the energy ““checkbook”checkbook”
•• Use embedded processors to compress data, Use embedded processors to compress data, compute fatigue lifecompute fatigue lifecompute fatigue lifecompute fatigue life
*D.L. Churchill et al., “Strain Energy Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Smart Structures and Materials SPIE vol 5005 pp 319 327 2003
© microstrain, inc. 2008
Smart Structures and Materials, SPIE, vol. 5005, pp. 319–327, 2003
M.J. Hamel et al., “Energy Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Operation and Data Transmission”, US Patent #7081693, issued July 25th, 2006
AircraftMonitoringg
The case forThe case forThe case for The case for monitoringmonitoring
•• Boeing F/ABoeing F/A--18 18 designed for 6,000 flight hours designed for 6,000 flight hours
•• Existing hardwired multiExisting hardwired multi--channel monitoring channel monitoring allows F/Aallows F/A--18 to reach 13,000 flight hours18 to reach 13,000 flight hours
•• New aircraft req’d to achieve the additional New aircraft req’d to achieve the additional flightflight--hours would cost ~$11Bhours would cost ~$11B
© microstrain, inc. 2007
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s NAVY NAVY PhIPhI, II, & III SBIRs: , II, & III SBIRs: H li t St t l H lth M it i S tH li t St t l H lth M it i S tHelicopter Structural Health Monitoring System Helicopter Structural Health Monitoring System (patents issued & (patents issued & pending)pending)
© microstrain, inc. 2008Patents pending
Pitch Link w/ Energy Harvesting, Sensing, Data Pitch Link w/ Energy Harvesting, Sensing, Data Storage, & WirelessStorage, & Wireless Communications*Communications*Storage, & Wireless Storage, & Wireless CommunicationsCommunicationsMicroStrainMicroStrain, Inc. patents pending, Inc. patents pending
RF antenna
Sikorsky H-60 Blackhawk
Circuit board module, microprocessor, and
electrochemical batteryy
Piezoresistive strain gauge
Electrical insulation EMIElectrical insulation, EMI shielding,
& protective covering(shown transparent for
illustration purposes)
Piezoelectric energy harvesting elementsharvesting elements
© microstrain, inc. 2008
* S.W. Arms et al., “Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensors for Helicopter Damage Tracking”, AHS Phoenix, AZ, May 2006
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s Wireless Wireless Strain & Load Sensing NodesStrain & Load Sensing Nodes
Fractal antennas
Components on both sides
dComponents on 1 side
Patents Pending © microstrain, inc. 2008 all rights reserved
Measuring Strains
Wirelessly
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s Wireless Wireless Strain System Strain System di d l i idi d l i ipatents pending data logging transceiverspatents pending data logging transceivers
© microstrain, inc. 2008
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s embedded embedded firmware: firmware: optimized optimized for strain gaugesfor strain gauges
•• Wireless offset adjust Wireless offset adjust •• Wireless gain adjustWireless gain adjust•• Wireless control of sample ratesWireless control of sample ratese ess co t o o sa p e atese ess co t o o sa p e ates•• Wireless shunt cal Wireless shunt cal –– bits to bits to microstrainmicrostrain•• LowLow tempco’stempco’s::•• Low Low tempco stempco s: :
offset: offset: --.007%/C , span: .007%/C , span: ..015%/015%/C C •• Mux’dMux’d pulsed & regulated bridge excitationpulsed & regulated bridge excitation•• Mux dMux d, pulsed & regulated bridge excitation, pulsed & regulated bridge excitation
© microstrain, inc. 2008Patents pending
How accurate areHow accurate areHow accurate are How accurate are MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’sMicroStrain sMicroStrain s
wireless strainwireless strainwireless strain wireless strain gauges?gauges?gauges?gauges?
Lockheed Martin Aerospace (LMA)Lockheed Martin Aerospace (LMA)F tiF ti T tiT ti E i tE i tFatigue Fatigue Testing Testing EnvironmentEnvironment
© microstrain, inc. 2006
Lockheed Martin Aerospace Lockheed Martin Aerospace Accuracy Accuracy dd d ld l **Tests: Tests: Hard Hard Wired vs. Wireless Wired vs. Wireless Strain*Strain*
(Baldwin Precision Calibrator used for strain input)(Baldwin Precision Calibrator used for strain input)
•• HBM HBM MGCplusMGCplus ®®
vs.vs. MicroStrainMicroStrain
Wireless vs. Hard-Wired Correlation y = 1.0002x + 1.1267R2 = 1
7000
8000
vs. vs. MicroStrainMicroStrainVV--Link Link ®®
•• Each system Each system provided bridge provided bridge 4000
5000
6000
7000
nk (m
icro
stra
in)
p gp gexcitation excitation
•• R^2=1R^2=1•• Max wirelessMax wireless
1000
2000
3000
Wire
less
V-L
i
Max wireless Max wireless error: 2.5 error: 2.5 ustrainustrain
00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Hard-wired HBM MGCplus (microstrain)
© MicroStrain, Inc. 2008, all rights reserved
* S.W. Arms et al., “Wireless Strain Measurement Systems for Aircraft Test”, Aerospace Test Expo, Anaheim, CA, Nov 2006
Wired vs. Wireless Gauge Comparison on DSTO F 18 C t B l T t B dDSTO F-18 Center Barrel Test Bed
• Two wireless SG-• Two wireless SG-Links sampled at 10 Hz
• DSTO wired system collected strain datacollected strain data at peaks
• Time synchronized• Time synchronized at beginning & end of testof test
© microstrain, inc. 2008
DSTO F-18 Center Barrel Test Bed
© microstrain, inc. 2008
DSTO F-18 Center Barrel Test Bed(m
icro
stra
in)
(
© microstrain, inc. 2008
(microstrain)
MILMIL--STD 810STD 810MILMIL--STD 810 STD 810 Test ResultsTest ResultsTest ResultsTest Results
MILMIL--STD STD 810F tests 810F tests (three pitch link modules tested)(three pitch link modules tested)
MethodMethod Test ParametersTest Parameters ResultsResults501.4 501.4 -- High TemperatureHigh Temperature 85 degrees C 85 degrees C
2 hour soak2 hour soakPassed*Passed*
501.4 501.4 -- Low TemperatureLow Temperature --55 degrees C55 degrees C2 hour soak2 hour soak
Passed*Passed*
503 4503 4 -- Temperature ShockTemperature Shock 85 degrees C85 degrees C --45 degrees C45 degrees C Passed*Passed*503.4 503.4 Temperature ShockTemperature Shock 85 degrees C 85 degrees C 45 degrees C45 degrees Cwithin 5 minuteswithin 5 minutes
PassedPassed
*TC Offset *TC Offset --0.007% of FS/deg C0.007% of FS/deg CTC Span 0.015% FS/deg CTC Span 0.015% FS/deg C
l il i ff d b d ff fd b d ff f513.5 513.5 –– AccelerationAcceleration Centrifuge testCentrifuge test60 g continuous60 g continuous20 minutes20 minutes
Passed, no observed effect of Passed, no observed effect of acceleration on outputacceleration on output
© microstrain, inc. 2008
Communicating gWirelesslyy
2.4 GHz license 2.4 GHz license free bands: free bands:
(802 ) &(802 ) &WiFiWiFi (802.11.x) & (802.11.x) & Zi bZi b (802 15 4)(802 15 4)ZigbeeZigbee (802.15.4)(802.15.4)
i t f lli t f llcoexist peacefullycoexist peacefully
802.15.4 Channels
15, 20, 25, & 26
802.15.4 Channels
15, 20, 25, & 26
are non-overlapping
with 802.11b
are non-overlapping
with 802.11b
802.15.4 Channels
15, 16, 21, & 22
are non-overlapping
802.15.4 Channels
15, 16, 21, & 22
are non overlappingpp g
with 802.11.bare non-overlapping
with 802.11.b
S h i iSynchronizing Wireless &
Wired Networks
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s Data AggregatorData Aggregator™™MicroStrain sMicroStrain s Data AggregatorData AggregatorSynchronizes both wireless & wired sensor nets *Synchronizes both wireless & wired sensor nets *
© microstrain, inc. 2008 patents pending
* S.W. Arms et al., “Energy Harvesting, Wireless Structural Health Monitoring System”, 4th ESHM, Cracow, Poland, Jul 2008
MicroStainMicroStain Data AggregatorData Aggregator(TM) (TM) Features:Features:
•• Open Open architecture, UC Linux operating system architecture, UC Linux operating system
•• Synchronizes wired & wireless sensor networksSynchronizes wired & wireless sensor networks
•• Data Data are collected from various sensors, at widely different are collected from various sensors, at widely different sample rates, and aggregated sample rates, and aggregated into into a single, scalable a single, scalable data data basebase
•• Multiple bus interfaces supported:Multiple bus interfaces supported:•• CANCANCANCAN•• IEEE802.15.4IEEE802.15.4•• EthernetEthernet•• RS232/RS422 (HUMSRS232/RS422 (HUMS))
© microstrain, inc. 2008Patents pending
Timing Results Summary*Timing Results Summary
• Synch beacon sent once at start of test only providedSynch beacon sent once - at start of test only - provided ~5 ms timing accuracy over 2 hours, subjected to -40 to +85 C.
• Synch w/ periodic (60 sec) beacon provided +/- 50 us timing accuracy over 13 hours, subjected to -40 to +85 C.g y , j
• Conservative approach: send resynch beacon every 20 minutes to achieve sub millisecond timing accuracy whenminutes to achieve sub-millisecond timing accuracy when temperatures may be extreme.
© microstrain, inc. 2008
* S.W. Arms et al., “Energy Harvesting, Wireless Structural Health Monitoring System”, 4th ESHM, Cracow, Poland, Jul 2008
M ki th tMaking the most of the 2.4 GHz
ISM band
MicroStrain’sMicroStrain’s ScaleableScaleable Wireless Wireless NetworksNetworks
TDMA/CSMA:TDMA/CSMA: 600 nodes*3 600 nodes*3 chch= = 1800 1800 strain gauges, all updating @ 5Hzstrain gauges, all updating @ 5Hzadd FDMA:add FDMA: 1800 strain gauges*16 radio1800 strain gauges*16 radio chschs== 28,80028,800 strain gaugesstrain gaugesadd FDMA: add FDMA: 1800 strain gauges 16 radio 1800 strain gauges 16 radio chschs 28,80028,800 strain gaugesstrain gauges
Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) &
Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA)
© microstrain, inc. 2008 patents pending
Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA)
How many nodes will the system support?How many nodes will the system support?Aggregate sample rate: ~10K / total sensor channelsAggregate sample rate: ~10K / total sensor channelsAggregate sample rate: 10K / total sensor channelsAggregate sample rate: 10K / total sensor channels
10000Synchronized TDMA/CSMA Capacity
10001000
500
Update rate (samples/sec)
100
node
s
250
200
100
50
25
10
Max
# o
f n 20
10
5
2
1
0.1
11
0
Active channels per node (1 min, 8 max)
© microstrain, inc. 2008 patents pending
Flight Testsg
Bell M412 Flight Test *Bell M412 Flight Test *•• MicroStrainMicroStrain
piggypiggy--backed backed p ggyp ggyon Bell’s on Bell’s planned flight planned flight teststests
•• Wired (slip Wired (slip rings) datarings) datarings) data rings) data could be could be collected collected simultaneouslysimultaneouslysimultaneously simultaneously w/ wireless w/ wireless datadata
Patents pending © microstrain, inc. 2008
* S.W. Arms et al., “Tracking Pitch Link Dynamic Loads with Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensors”, AHS 63nd Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, VA, May 2007
FlightFlightFlight Flight TestTestResultsResults•• Energy harvesting Energy harvesting wireless wireless component (pitch link) component (pitch link)
installed installed on on Bell M412 Feb 2007 (first time ever flown)Bell M412 Feb 2007 (first time ever flown)
•• Passed Passed –– inin--flightflight EMIEMI evaluationsevaluationsinin flight flight EMI EMI evaluationsevaluations–– rotor rotor track track & balance verification& balance verification–– wireless data wireless data collection during scripted collection during scripted flight with flight with
no indication of data loss.no indication of data loss.© microstrain, inc. 2008
Bell M412 Wired Bell M412 Wired vs. Wireless vs. Wireless Pitch Link Flight Test DataPitch Link Flight Test DataPitch Link Flight Test DataPitch Link Flight Test Data
from 2 separate & distinct strain gaugesfrom 2 separate & distinct strain gaugesWireless PitchLink Loads
VNE dive test Flight Record #3664 Hz wireless sensor sample rate - 500 Hz slip ring sample rate
1.5
0.5
1
ed)
-0.5
00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Out
put (
Nor
mal
ize
-1
0.5
500 Hz Slip Ring
-1.5
Time
64 Hz Wireless
© MicroStrain, Inc. 2008, all rights reserved
MicroStrainMicroStrain, Inc. High Sample Rate Bench Test:, Inc. High Sample Rate Bench Test:hardhard--wiredwired reference bridge vs. wireless pitch linkreference bridge vs. wireless pitch linkhardhard wired wired reference bridge vs. wireless pitch linkreference bridge vs. wireless pitch link
(two separate & distinct strain gauge bridges bonded to a single steel plate in 4(two separate & distinct strain gauge bridges bonded to a single steel plate in 4--pt bending)pt bending)
ostr
ain)
Stra
in (m
icro
© MicroStrain, Inc. 2008, all rights reserved
ConclusionsConclusions•• An energy harvesting wireless pitch link load An energy harvesting wireless pitch link load
B ll 412 h b d l d b hB ll 412 h b d l d b h
Conclusions Conclusions
sensor Bell 412 has been developed, bench sensor Bell 412 has been developed, bench tested, & flight testedtested, & flight tested
•• Under extremely low usage levels, the amount Under extremely low usage levels, the amount of energy generated exceeds the amount of of energy generated exceeds the amount of gy ggy genergy consumedenergy consumed
•• This enables an onThis enables an on--board wireless load sensor board wireless load sensor to operate perpetually without battery to operate perpetually without battery maintenancemaintenancemaintenance. maintenance.
Patents pending © MicroStrain, Inc. 2008, all rights reserved
Conclusions (con’t)( )• An accurate time synchronization capability has been
developed for wireless & hard wired sensor networksdeveloped for wireless & hard-wired sensor networks that does not require GPS to maintain synchronization.
• The system supports a wide range of e-harvesting nodes, including strain, pressure, torque, & temperature; as well as wired inertial & GPS sensorsas well as wired inertial & GPS sensors.
• Data Aggregator node is stand-alone includes mobileData Aggregator node is stand alone, includes mobile phone capability & scalable web-enabled database
© MicroStrain, Inc. 2008, all rights reserved
MicroStrain Competitive AdvantagesMicroStrain Competitive Advantagesp gp g
Features Benefitsembedded intelligenceembedded intelligence sense, record, & report sense, record, & report
damage & fatiguedamage & fatiguepatent pending data loggingpatent pending data loggingtransceiverstransceivers
eliminates costly wiringeliminates costly wiring
patent pending energy patent pending energy harvestersharvesters
eliminates battery eliminates battery maintenancemaintenance
base station GSM/SAT uplinkbase station GSM/SAT uplink no human intervention no human intervention required to get reportsrequired to get reports
l ff l bl ff l bwireless offset, calibrationwireless offset, calibration fast installation & testfast installation & test
© MicroStrain, Inc. 2008, all rights reserved
Abo t Mic oSt ain IncAbo t Mic oSt ain IncAbout MicroStrain, Inc.About MicroStrain, Inc.
36 l ( l 4 i t )36 l ( l 4 i t )•• 36 employees (plus 4 interns)36 employees (plus 4 interns)•• 80% revenue from product sales80% revenue from product sales•• products developed w/ SBIR fundsproducts developed w/ SBIR funds•• growing at 35%/yeargrowing at 35%/yearg g /yg g /y•• zero debtzero debt•• no outside investment to dateno outside investment to date•• no outside investment to dateno outside investment to date
© MicroStrain, Inc. 2008, all rights reserved
Want more info?
New products & white papers:
www.microstrain.com/customer-docs.htm
References:References:•• M.J. Hamel et al., M.J. Hamel et al., “Energy “Energy Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Operation and Data Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Operation and Data
Transmission”, Transmission”, US US Patent #7081693, issued July 25Patent #7081693, issued July 25thth 20062006
• D L Churchill et al “Strain Energy Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Networks• D.L. Churchill et al., Strain Energy Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Networks, Smart Structures and Materials”, SPIE, vol. 5005, pp. 319–327, 2003
• S.W. Arms et al., “Wireless Wireless Strain Measurement Systems for Aircraft Strain Measurement Systems for Aircraft Test”Test”, Aerospace Test Expo Anaheim CA Nov 2006Aerospace Test Expo, Anaheim, CA, Nov 2006
• S.W. Arms et al., “Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensors for Helicopter Damage Tracking”, American Helicopter Society (AHS) 62nd Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ May 2006AZ, May 2006
•• S.W. Arms, C.P. Townsend, D.L. Churchill, M. S.W. Arms, C.P. Townsend, D.L. Churchill, M. AugustinAugustin, , D.YearyD.Yeary, P. Darden, , P. Darden, N. Phan, “N. Phan, “Tracking Pitch Link Dynamic Loads with Energy Harvesting WirelessTracking Pitch Link Dynamic Loads with Energy Harvesting WirelessN. Phan, N. Phan, Tracking Pitch Link Dynamic Loads with Energy Harvesting Wireless Tracking Pitch Link Dynamic Loads with Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensors”, Sensors”, AHS 63nd Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, VA, May 2007AHS 63nd Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, VA, May 2007
• S.W. Arms, J.H. Galbreath, C.P. Townsend, D.L. Churchill, N. Phan, “Energy gyHarvesting, Wireless Structural Health Monitoring System”, 4th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Cracow, Poland, July 3rd, 2008
Acknowledgements:Acknowledgements:
V t EPSC RVermont EPSCoRNavy/NSF/DHHS SBIR
B ll H li tBell HelicopterCaterpillar
DSTO M lbDSTO MelbourneSikorsky
L kh d M tiLockheed Martin
Thank You!Thank You!© microstrain, inc. 2008