Michelle berryman pres 1

54
the comparative context JOURNEYS ACROSS THE DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM Michelle S Berryman, FIDSA [email protected] @MicBerryman 30 August 2012

Transcript of Michelle berryman pres 1

Page 1: Michelle berryman pres 1

the comparative contextJOURNEYS ACROSS THE

DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM

Michelle S Berryman, [email protected]@MicBerryman

30 August 2012

Page 2: Michelle berryman pres 1

2

AGENDA FOR TODAYSetting the Stage

Defining the Customer Journey

Identifying Competitors & Comparators

Exploring the Digital Ecosystem

Telling the Story

Drawing Conclusions

Page 3: Michelle berryman pres 1

3

settingTHE STAGE

Page 4: Michelle berryman pres 1

4

a few

YEARS AGO...

Page 5: Michelle berryman pres 1

5

We were working for a consumer electronics company.

They made a lot of products. Some of them competed with this.

Page 6: Michelle berryman pres 1

• Through their website

• Through online retailers such as Amazon.com, Buy.com, Newegg.com, etc.

• Through online channels for traditional retail outlets such as Best Buy, Costco, Target, etc.

• Through online channels for wireless carriers (in some cases)

Their products were sold online

• Traditional retailers and wireless carriers

• They had no physical retail presence of their own

6

And in brick & mortar retail outlets

Page 7: Michelle berryman pres 1

They hired us to provide insight into how they could deliver a better web experience for their customers.

7

Page 8: Michelle berryman pres 1

Independent of this assignment, we had some ideas and a general philosophy that guided our thinking — and still does.

8

Page 9: Michelle berryman pres 1

We believe a website doesn’t just compete with other websites in its category.

9

Page 10: Michelle berryman pres 1

It competes with Nike+, Amazon, Skype, Mint, CNN and 100,000 other sites, social channels, apps and digital moments.

10

Page 11: Michelle berryman pres 1

We thought about this, and sketched out the genesis of a new methodology.

11

Page 12: Michelle berryman pres 1

the original idea:MAP THE JOURNEY TO THE NEED.

COMPARE ACROSS COMPANIES.MEASURE THE EXPERIENCE.

IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES.

12

Page 13: Michelle berryman pres 1

13

defining theCUSTOMER JOURNEY

Page 14: Michelle berryman pres 1

I have a need.

I’ve found a solution.

14

this is our mental model

SIMPLE, CLEAN & DIRECT

A

B

Page 15: Michelle berryman pres 1

A

B

this is reality

SO MANY CHOICES & DISTRACTIONS

Page 16: Michelle berryman pres 1

I have a need for a product or service.

I’ve found a solution that matches my needs.

I buy it.

I use it.

How do I . . . ?

Can I . . . ?

I want to . . .

I need to . . .

I need to replace it.

I want another one.

Should I buy the same one again?

Is there a newer one?

Should I buy a different brand?

Are there reasons to interact with the brand on an on-going basis?

What is the brand doing to maintain my awareness level?

How is the brand building passion or loyalty with me?

16

the journey doesn’t end at the solution

WE CREATE A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BRAND

Consideration Transact Use Expand Phase Agnostic

Page 17: Michelle berryman pres 1

Digital Channel Usage: • To what extent are digital

channels leveraged (e.g. website, social media, partnerships, content syndication)?

Experience Consistency: • How consistent is the

experience across digital channels?

• How integrated/aligned is the brand throughout the experience

Social/Community: • Are there ways to interact

with the brand on social platforms?

• How are social/community interactions handled?

• Are they integrated with accepted platforms?

Differential Treatment: • To what extent are

customers differentially treated?

Consideration Transact Use Expand Phase Agnostic

basic methodology

GO DEEP & GO BROAD

Findability: • Once a user establishes

a need, how easily can the company be found within the competitive landscape?

Acclimation: • How is the company

acclimating prospects (features and experiences)?

Product Positioning: • How are offerings

positioned/leveraged?• How are offerings

presented alone and integrated together?

• Are offerings shown in a comparative context with competitive offerings?

Monetization: • What are the paths to

monetization and how are they presented (e.g. click to chat, trial offer, buy, etc.)?

• What can be purchased online and how?

Usage: • How does the company

help customers maximize their experience?

• Are training or educational services offered?

Support: • How is support and

customer service positioned?

• What primary support interactions are offered?

Engagement: • Are there relationship-

based efforts to keep customers loyal between purchases?

• Is there a compelling reason to interact with the company on an ongoing basis between purchases/transactions?

Page 18: Michelle berryman pres 1

18

identifyingCOMPETITORS & COMPARATORS

Page 19: Michelle berryman pres 1

our “client”

JIMMY CHOO

Page 20: Michelle berryman pres 1

identifying competitors

THIS PART IS EASY

Clients generally have a pretty good idea about their competitive set.

It’s our job to look beyond their list to find those companies from which a client can learn.

And we need to apply both macro and micro lenses.

20

Page 21: Michelle berryman pres 1

Christian LouboutinLuxury women’s footwear. Signature red lacquered soles. Luxury Institute’s “Most Prestigious Women’s Shoes” 2007, 2008 & 2009

Manolo BlahnikLuxury women’s footwear since 1972. Blahnik stilettos have become symbols of pure classical style for the 21st century. Famously worn by “Sex and the City” character, Carrie Bradshaw.

PRADAItalian fashion label specializing in luxury goods for men and women since 1913. The brand became a premium status symbol in the 1990s.

Christian DiorOne of the world’s top fashion houses and largest luxury groups. Owns Louis Vuitton. Founded in 1946. Marlene Dietrich wore Dior. New .com site launched in 2011.

Brian AtwoodCouture fashion designer known for thigh-high boots. “High chic. High drama. High heels.” (.com is in development)

Shanghai TangChina’s only luxury brand. Style is inspired by traditional Han Chinese clothing of the 1920s and 30s modernized for the 21st century. No shoes — yet! Compete in handbags and accessories.

21

jimmy choo competitors

SIMILAR PRODUCTS AT SIMILAR PRICES

Page 22: Michelle berryman pres 1

We look for brands that might:

• Have similar cache.

• Appeal to a kindred audience or market segment.

• Be in the same industry, but have a radically different business model and/or target audience.

• Be aspirational.

• Have analogous history.

• Be faced with similar challenges.

22

comparator brands

THEY’RE MUCH HARDER TO DEFINE

Page 23: Michelle berryman pres 1

Toms ShoesInexpensive, casual footwear based on the Argentine alpargata design. The opposite of haute couture. For every pair of Toms Shoes purchased, Friends of Toms, a non-profit affiliate, gives a pair of new shoes to a child in need.

Virgin Atlantic AirwaysCool, sexy and glamourous. Harkens back to a bygone era of travel with perfectly primped flight attendants. The biggest fully flat bed, an in-flight bar, and London terminals equipped with salons to help you get properly coiffed before or after a flight.

W HotelsStarwood's luxury boutique hotel brand. Marketed towards a younger crowd. Spare, minimalist modern decor and hip, informal names such as the "Living Room" for the lobby. Concierge service is called “Whatever, Whenever.”

VertuManufacturer of luxury mobile phones. Prices range from $5,500 to $330,000+. The screens are made of ultra-thin sapphire crystal that takes fifteen days to create. Every key is individually ground and cut from sapphire. Known for exquisite attention to detail.

23

jimmy choo comparators

UNIQUELY DIFFERENT BUT RELEVANT

Page 24: Michelle berryman pres 1

24

exploring theDIGITAL ECOSYSTEM

Page 25: Michelle berryman pres 1

Listen to what your client tells you about their industry, business and competition — but don’t draw conclusions.

Dismiss previous assumptions.

Suspend belief.

Probe for as much information as possible — from the client and the digital ecosystem.

Let the evidence guide you.

25

you’re a scientist

UNCOVER THE FACTS

Page 26: Michelle berryman pres 1

Always work with a partner.

Take copious notes.

Screen cap EVERYTHING.

Engage in detailed reviews with your partner.

Reference the Areas of Inquiry and the Customer Journey often.

Score each brand against each Area of Inquiry.

26

you’re a scientist

BE METHODICAL IN YOUR APPROACH

Page 27: Michelle berryman pres 1

Explore the brand.

• At a high level, get a sense for the brand.

• Learn about the breadth and depth of their offerings.

• Understand the digital brand presence.

• Engage with the brand in as many channels and forums as possible.

• Audit the digital ecosystem for tone, voice and intent.

27

click & capture

GO EVERYWHERE & FOLLOW EVERY LINK

Page 28: Michelle berryman pres 1

28

Pick a product or service.

• Learn about it.

• Try to buy it.

• Use it like the target audience does.

• Try to get it serviced or repaired.

• Find the manual.

• Find user forums.

• Find support forums and online communities.

• Engage with users.

click & capture

GO EVERYWHERE & FOLLOW EVERY LINK

Page 29: Michelle berryman pres 1

29

click & capture

LEAVE THE .COM

Page 30: Michelle berryman pres 1

30

click & capture

COLLECT. ANALYZE. UNDERSTAND.

Page 31: Michelle berryman pres 1

Look again — literally. Do a visual scan of your screen caps.

Discuss your findings.

Revisit the online channels as necessary to validate and verify your findings and your hypotheses.

31

prepare to be surprised

BRANDS TELL UNEXPECTED STORIES

Page 32: Michelle berryman pres 1

Revisit the areas of inquiry and the stages of the customer journey AGAIN.

Was your client right?

• About their own digital ecosystem?

• About their competition?

What did you learn?

32

prepare to be surprised

BRANDS TELL UNEXPECTED STORIES

Page 33: Michelle berryman pres 1

34

tellingTHE STORY

Page 34: Michelle berryman pres 1

34

initial perceptions

DESCRIBE THESE BRANDS

Page 35: Michelle berryman pres 1

listen to the brand

JIMMY CHOO CROWD SOURCES STYLE

Page 36: Michelle berryman pres 1

36

listen to the brand

TOMS IS A MOVEMENT FOR GLOBAL GOOD

Page 37: Michelle berryman pres 1

JIMMY CHOOGrowing social engagement with participatory contests and crowd-sourced photos.

Aspirational brand with a strong fan base.

Clear desire for engagement from customers and fans.

Choo 24:7 mixes elite fashion with aspiring fashionistas.

37

high-level analysis

SHOW US YOUR SHOES

TOMSMassive social engagement.

Customers *love* the brand.

Wearing TOMS is a statement about giving and caring.

Makes consumerism feel good.

Page 38: Michelle berryman pres 1

With 1.2 million fans on Facebook and 99,000 followers on Twitter, Jimmy Choo has a large interested and socially active fan base.

Engage in more two-way dialogue.

Respond to fans.

Create opportunities for fans to “live chat” with designers and fashion critics via Facebook forums or similar.

38

recommendation

CREATE TWO-WAY DIALOGUE*

*Based on a very high-level and rapid ecosystem scan performed specifically for this presentation. No review of competitor sites was performed.

Page 39: Michelle berryman pres 1

Is this what you expected from Jimmy Choo or TOMS?

40

Page 40: Michelle berryman pres 1

40

initial perceptions

DESCRIBE THESE BRANDS

Page 41: Michelle berryman pres 1

41

listen to the brand

APPLE IS FRIENDLY, CONFIDENT & ASSURING

Page 42: Michelle berryman pres 1

42

listen to the brand

IBM INSPIRES CHANGE

Page 43: Michelle berryman pres 1

43

listen to the brand

CISCO IS SOCIAL, APPROACHABLE & HUMAN

Page 44: Michelle berryman pres 1

listen to the brand

SKYPE IS AN EDUCATION JUGGERNAUT

Page 45: Michelle berryman pres 1

Is this what you expected from each brand?

46

Page 46: Michelle berryman pres 1

Findability(How easily can the company be found in the competitive landscape?)

Acclimation(What is the company doing to acclimate prospects - features and experiences).

Product Positioning(How are products/offers defined and differentiated in the market?)

Monetization(What can be purchased online and how? What are the paths to monetization?)

Usage and guidance(How does the company shepherd users through the purchase/application/registration process)

Support Content & Availability(is the content available, contextual and appropriate?Does the site provide multiple ways to get help?)

Engagement(Site engagement and interaction nuance as well as communication style along multiple touch-points)

Digital Channel(To what extent are digital channels leveraged - e.g. websites, social media, partnerships, content syndication?)

Experience Consistency(Is there consistency between messaging, graphics, etc?)

Social & Community(Does the site support a community or sharing of information? Can users engage on social platforms?)

Differential Treatment(Are each user type segmented within the experience?Is the experience tailored to differentiated users?)

4

3

3

4

3

3

3

2

4

2

2

Score:

Low 0 1 2 3 4 High

Competitive Analysis: Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of current and potential competitors, to provide both strategic context and to identify opportunities.

Comparative Analysis: Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of comparable alternatives, processes, products, sets of data, or systems, to provide both strategic context and to identify opportunities.

4

4

4

3

3

3

4

4

4

4

3

3

2

4

2

1

3

1

2

3

1

1

4

4

3

3

4

4

3

4

4

4

4

3

4

4

4

3

4

2

1

4

2

2

4

3

4

3

3

3

4

3

2

3

4

4

4

4

3

3

2

3

2

3

3

3

3

2

2

3

1

2

1

1

3

1

2

3

1

0

1

1

3

1

1

1

1

3

Areas of Inquiry Client

Competitor Brands Comparator Brands

Brand“A”

Brand“B”

Brand“C”

Brand“D”

Brand“E”

Brand“F”

Brand“G”

Brand“H”

sample deliverable

COMPETITIVE & COMPARATIVE SCORECARD

Page 47: Michelle berryman pres 1

47

sample deliverables

DETAILS, ANALYSIS & PRESENTATION

Page 48: Michelle berryman pres 1

49

drawingCONCLUSIONS

Page 49: Michelle berryman pres 1

Methodology explores the “why” and “how” of customer behavior and experience, as well as the “what,” “where” and “when”

Properly applied, the methodology should be very

systematic, repeatable and guided by the areas of inquiry

Balanced approach that serves marketing, business and IT groups simultaneously.

Outcomes represent a snapshot in time, but are based on definitive evidence.

Hypotheses are validated through quantifiable metrics — particularly with regards to community and social engagement.

49

qualitative

PERCEPTION-BASEDquantitative

EVIDENCE-BASED

Page 50: Michelle berryman pres 1

The competitive/comparative assessment is often performed in conjunction with another proprietary methodology called Flow Score.

Attraction – How are visitors reaching the site?

Attention – How do visitors interact with the site?

Appeal – How do visitors react to the site within social media?

Benefit – How does the site affect a visitor’s opinion of the company?

Impact – How does the site drive visitors to complete desired actions?

50

yin and yang

BUILDING A BIGGER TOOLBOX

Page 51: Michelle berryman pres 1

51

yin and yang

SIMILAR PROCESS, DIFFERENT LENS

Page 52: Michelle berryman pres 1

We use the competitive/comparative methodology to gain insights and to inspire our team - as well as our clients.

We expect to be amazed when we start a new project.

We know clients will be astounded by the outcomes.

52

insight & inspiration

IT’S A TWO-FOR-ONE, GUARANTEED

Page 53: Michelle berryman pres 1

“I had no idea we were competing against [brand].”

“I’m amazed at the social presence of [brand]. We’re nowhere near that.”

“Thank you. I can use this information to make sure this project is properly funded.”

“I wouldn’t have thought to use Facebook as a platform for support and continuing education for our customers.”

“Fascinating.”

53

inspiration abounds

EVERY JOURNEY IS A LEARNING EXPERIENCE

Page 54: Michelle berryman pres 1

Thank you.

[email protected]@MicBerryman