MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Plans for MICE PI detectors

& Shielding

MICE CM16, RAL Oct 11, 2006V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli

for the small PID team Bonesini, Chimenti, Cremaldi, Giannini, Graulich,

Gregoire, Karazdov, Orestano, Sandstrom, Summers, Torun, Tortora, Tsenov, and more

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

PID Summary Talk at CM16 in Fermilab the picture Intense test beam activity in the summer (FNAL & Frascati) comforted the basic design of all detector components Upstream setup converging towards review (Thu & Fri )

TOF0, 2 planes 48*48 cm2 CKOV I TOFI, 2 planes supported by thin shield slab 42*42 cm2 seems enough, radii of holes accordingly thick shield slab, magnetically connected to small (“GG cage”)

Downstream setup converging towards a consensual design push to much larger apertures quenched since CM15

thick shield slab, magnetically connected to small (“GG cage”) hole 25 to 30 cm radius, Rikard will say TOFII, 2 planes supported by thin shield slab hole 30 to 35 cm radius, Rikard will say detector 60*60 cm2 EMCal 1) Kloe light (KL) preshower plane 90*90 cm2 2) fully active scintillator catcher hole 100*100 cm2 or so Getting also close to finally simulate it all adequately

 

veryusefuleveningyesterday

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

fully Active Scintillator

The new emerging layout

as compact as possible

activepreshower

Downnstream Up&Downnstream

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Only TOF II (and I) within a cageEMCal completely outside !

Virostek wallunchanged

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Hamamatsu R4998

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Oxford

thanks to the “GG cage”

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

beautifully small fields

ie zero, with additional local shield

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Frascati test beam, in July

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

On line first comforting results

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Offline analysis of full DAQ data

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

How about real time of flight?

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

This seems to be why, unfortunately …..

will cost us money ….. CFDs or ADCs

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

TOF 0 & I

confirmed by Tom

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

CKOV I ready to review too

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Fermilab in July

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Light from Aerogels read from HARP/MICE tubes

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

CKOV I on its way to MICE hall

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Downstream: TOF II

more later

60*60 cm2

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Downstream:baselines for EMCal

Finally! To be optimized now

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Frascati in July

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

EMCal test beam results

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Test beam in G4MICE : in progress

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

goodtagged as a lowerpriority

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Only TOF II (and I) within a cageEMCal completely outside !

Virostek wallunchanged

as compact as possibleSW right behind KL

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Connection to the “Virostek wall “

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Mag fields can be lived with

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Local shield can do it

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

a solution is at hand

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

Staging “philosophy”In the, likely, case that funding will be limited

NO resources should be wasted

with interim temporary solution

1 plane of TOF0 TOF I TOF II

are the highest priority. Full aperture, cover entire phase space, √2 worse performance acceptable for quite a while Must deploy resources accordingly Second planes next priority, except for one counter (cross calibration) per station

MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino

CM16 may have finally brought us a consensual baseline

also for the downstream setup

Thanks to all those that helped clearing the picture

A downstream review appears closer today

Funding remains a serious threat

Focus now on updating the TRD chapter

G4MICE runs with proper geometry files and field maps