MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

96
How and Why MI-LIFE is Making a Difference in Michigan MDE/AdvancED Michigan NCA Spring School Improvement Conference April 14, 2011 Steve Hecker Jane Perzyk MI-LIFE www.mi-life.org

description

This presentation will be delivered at the MDE Advanc-Ed School Improvement Conference in Lansing, MI, on April 14, 2011.

Transcript of MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Page 1: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

How and Why MI-LIFE

is Making a Difference in

Michigan

MDE/AdvancED Michigan NCA Spring School Improvement ConferenceApril 14, 2011

Steve HeckerJane Perzyk

MI-LIFEwww.mi-life.org

Page 2: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

2

What is MI-LIFE?

The Michigan Leadership Improvement Framework

Enhancement is a professional learning program for school

administrators developed through a grant from the Microsoft

Partners in Learning Program to the Michigan Department of

Education.

Page 5: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

5

MI-LIFE Mission

All participants will acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes to

become 21st Century Leaders who have an ultimate impact on improving student achievement.

Page 6: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

6

Preparing 21st century students for success in high school, post-secondary education, and multiple careers during

their lifetime requires more of educators than ever before.

It requires 21st century

Page 7: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

1. How can we prepare school leaders to become 21st Century Leaders who have an ultimate impact on improving student achievement for all students?

2. How can we support school leaders to become models of 21st century learning for their staff and for their students?

3. How can we engage school leaders to develop common understandings and build consensus around 21st century learning and leadership?

4. How can we provide a technology-rich professional learning program that has practical application to the everyday work of school leaders?

Four big questions…

7

Page 8: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Strand II - Leadership

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP

OPERATIONAL RESOURCE MNGT.

SHARED LEADERSHIP

CURRICULUM

INSTRUCTION

ASSESSMENT

Strand I – Teaching & Learning

Strand III - Personnel & Prof. Learning

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING

Strand IV - School/ Community Relations

PARENT/FAMILY INVOLVEMENT

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Strand V - Data & Information

Management

DATA MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

Curriculum focuses on the Michigan School

ImprovementFramework

Page 9: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

9

Comprehensive Needs Assessment

Accountability Requirements

Page 10: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Our world has changed 

digital virtual

global

10

Page 11: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

11

Our educational community has

changed 

Page 12: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

12

Our teachers have changed 

Page 13: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Our students have changed 

13

Page 14: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Their future has changed

“We need to prepare students for their future, not our past.”

--Ian Jukes, educator and futurist

14

Page 15: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory NCREL http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/skills/agelearn.htm

21st century skills

15

Page 16: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

16

Unit 1

Building 21st Century Leadership

Intersecting Data

Page 17: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

17

Supervising the Instructional Process

Creating a Culture of Shared Leadership and Capacity for Continuous Improvement

Unit 2

Aligning Systems - online

Page 18: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

How does it work?Face-to-Face Session 1 Intersession Work

Face-to-Face Session 2

18

Page 19: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

19

Levels of PerformancePerformance Assessment

Overall performance is assessed based on ……….

Fail Accomplished Developing Beginning

Does not complete

Contains all elements..

Missing some elements..

Missing many elements…

Returned with instructor comments for revision

Page 20: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

20

SBCEUsSessio

nCourse In-class

hoursPerformanc

e Assessment

Total hours

SBCEUs

1 Overview/ Leadership

8 14.5 22.5

2 Leadership 8 14.5 22.5

3 Data 8 14.5 22.5

4 Data 8 14.5 22.5 9.0

Unit 1

5 Systems ONLINE 16 29.0 45.0

6 Culture/Capacity 8 14.5 22.5

7 Instructional Supervision

8 14.5 22.5 9.0

Unit 2

TOTAL 64 93.5 180 18.0 SBCEUs

Page 21: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Course/Program Evaluation

21

• Conducted at the conclusion of each course

• Online

• Anonymous

Page 22: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

22

University Credits

Page 23: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

23

Michigan Department of

Education Endorsement Must have an

administrator

certificate to

receive an

Endorsement

Page 24: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

MI-LIFE Delivery Sites 2008-2011

COHORT 1January 08-February 09 11 Locations, 12 Groups

COHORT 2September 08-June 098 Locations, 11 Groups

COHORT 3October 09-May 10

4 Locations

Cohort 4August 10-April 11

6 Locations 24

Page 25: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

MI-LIFE Proposed Delivery Sites 2011-12

25Wayne Macomb Oakland

Cass

Jackson

Monroe

Wex-Miss

AMA ESD

Genesee

Cohort 5

Alpena-Montmorency-Alcona ESD

Genesee ISD

Jackson ISD

Lewis Cass ISD

Macomb ISD

Monroe ISD

Oakland Schools

Wayne RESA

Wexford-Missaukee ISD

Page 26: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Let’s sit in on a session or two

Page 27: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

27

Unit 1

Building 21st Century Leadership

Page 28: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

28

Stimulate, inspire and challenge educational leaders to confront and cultivate their personal and professional leadership capacity

Course Goal

http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/directions/blueprint1/fs3.htm

Page 29: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Leadership Session 1

Review selected leadership resources

Conduct a Web search

Identify leadership behaviors

Develop an online leadership survey

29

Page 30: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

30

Survey Question Types

Choice

Date and Time

Heading

Name and Address

Open Ended

Rating Scale

Ranking

Yes or No

Leadership Session 1 Handout #4 – Question Types

Page 31: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

31

Examples1. I engage staff in collaborative decision making.

Yes No

2. Indicate the extent to which I engage staff in collaborative decision making.

Frequently Sometimes Rarely Never

Page 32: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

32

Examples

1. How long have you been in your current position?

2. How long have you been in your current position?

Less than 5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 16-20 years 21 years or more

Page 33: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

33

Examples

4. Rate your perception of my communication skills.

2. Describe my communication skills.

Page 34: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Create and Administer Survey

Page 35: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Leadership Session 2

Create a Gap Analysis visual representation of leadership skills

Conduct a Force Field Analysis of leadership skills

Develop a Leadership Improvement Plan

35

Page 36: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Deepen Your Understanding

Overall TaskFrom the Leadership Strand of the MI School Improvement Framework, select one Standard and prepare a presentation that demonstrates a deep understanding of the benchmarks/key characteristics of that Standard.

Recorder will capture the presentation in one of the following applications: Word document, PPT slide, Excel spreadsheet, recording or other creative method!

36

Strand II - Leadership

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP

OPERATIONAL RESOURCE MNGT.

SHARED LEADERSHIP

INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS

Page 37: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

37

Presentations

Design a billboardCreate a jingleWrite a poemRecord a skit

Design a graphicWrite or record a two-minute speech

Page 38: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Sample Project

Page 39: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Sample Project

Page 40: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Sample Project

Page 41: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Sample Project

Page 42: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

42

Leadership Plan Preparation

Leadership Survey

Gap Analysis

Force Field Analysis

Page 43: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Leadership Improvement Plan

Page 44: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Participant Reflections

• The leadership survey and analysis was … personally humbling as I "saw" myself through the eyes of others…

• …Apparently, I had not been communicating my methods, motives and actions as well as I thought…

Page 45: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

45

Unit 1

Intersecting Data

Page 46: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

46

“Commit to data analysis as a continuous process, not an event.”

Douglas Reeves

Douglas Reeves, The Learning Leader/Looking Deeper Into the Data, Ed Leadership, December 2008/January 2009. The Intersection of Instruction and Assessment: The Classroom. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

Page 47: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Understand various types of dataIdentify multiple sources of data for each type of data

Examine data intersection processesEngage in conversations about the implication of data intersection results on student achievement

Write Data Narrative Statements

Understand various data systems

Data Session 1

47

Page 48: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Student Learning

(Achievement)

Types of Data

Adapted from the work of Victoria L. Bernhardt

School Processes(Context)

Demographics

Perceptions

Sources of Data

The basis, root or origin of the data, i.e. where/how did we get the data?

The classification or category of the data

48

Page 49: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Demographics

Student Learning

School Processes

Perceptions

Intersecting Four Types of Data

“It is not until we intersect all four measures, at the school level and over time, that we are able to answer questions that will predict if the actions, processes, and programs that we are establishing will meet the needs of all students.”

Victoria L. Bernhardt, Multiple Measures, ASCD, March 1998

Adapted from the work of Victoria L. Bernhardt49

Page 50: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

50

Investigation Preparation

Multiple Types and Sources of Data

Intersecting Data

Data 4 SS

Page 51: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

51

Data InvestigationScoring Guide

Page 52: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Data Session 2

Present data investigations

Listen to and discuss Doug Reeves’ interview

Analyze data investigations for root causes

Explore Web based data sources

Conduct a data driven culture gap analysis

Prepare for Aligning Systems Online Course52

Page 53: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Insert an example?

Page 54: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

54

Log in

Select

Page 55: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

55

Post your reaction to the Doug Reeves’ interview statement:

“Results are not sufficient.”

Then reply to someone else's

posting.

Discussion Board Practice

Page 56: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Participant Reflections

• The data investigation allowed me to continue to look at our subgroups, and by using PowerPoint the impact was intensified…

• As a result of the activities and intersession assignment I found new and better ways to work with data...

• …I feel very confident coaching staff through the process of being effective data consumers now.

Page 57: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Aligning SystemsOnline Course in

Blackboard“Systems thinking is a discipline for seeing

wholes. It is a framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing

patterns of change rather than static ‘snapshots.’"

--Peter Senge

Page 58: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

1-Group Discussion onRed Bead* Lessons

• Lesson 1: It's the system, not the workers 

• Lesson 2: Quality is made at the top 

• Lesson 3: Rewarding or punishing the Willing Workers had no effect on the outcome 

• Lesson 4: Rigid and precise procedures are not sufficient to produce the desired quality 

*Dr. W. Edward Deming

Page 59: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Blackboard Group Discussion

Page 60: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Identify an initiative you are undertaking and analyze its systemic implications

2-Impacting SystemsReflective Inquiry

Assignment

Page 61: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Reflective Inquiry TopicsResponse to Intervention

New reading program

Positive Behavior support

Online grading system

Common assessments

Year-long writing plan

Failure is not an option

Activity period modification

MIBLSi Initiative

New reading assessment program

Alt ed and MEAP/MME analysis

Marzano strategies

Page 62: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

3-Steady State of Systems Discussion

BoardThe first law of systems is that even if you understand the problem, the system will fight like mad to hold itself where it is.

---W. Patrick Dolan

Describe an example from your own experience

Page 63: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Blackboard Group Discussion

Page 64: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

4-Aligning Systems Gap Analysis

Page 65: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Participant Remarks

• The most significant learning point for me in this module was to view my work from multiple perspectives, including the balcony view...

• …I would not hesitate to take another course on-line sometime in the future.

Page 66: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

AbstractCulture explores the health or toxicity of the

environment in a district/school. Learners develop powerful strategies to create the right

culture for a purposeful and robust professional learning community that ultimately impacts student learning.

GoalPrompt educational leaders to develop healthy cultures and promote shared leadership.

66

Culture/Capacity

Page 67: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Climate and CultureSchool climate and school culture are two distinct

but highly interrelated and interactive dimensions of school life.

Page 68: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

School climate is driven by the school

culture..

..a school can have a healthy culture or a

toxic culture68

Page 69: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

It is the historically transmitted pattern of meaning that wields astonishing power in shaping what people

think and how they act.

Educational Leadership, Volume 59 Number 8, May 2002, Pages 6-11 -The Culture Builder - Roland S. Barth

“How the culture is developed”

69http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/sde/lowres/sden26l.jpg

Page 70: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Professional Collaboration

Affiliative Collegiality

Self Determination/Efficacy

3 Major Indicators of a Healthy School Culture

From: School Culture Assessment Manual, Gary Phillips & Christopher Wagner70

Page 71: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Intersession Overall

AssignmentExamine the health/toxicity of your school.

Create a “photo-story” and prepare a presentation that represents the culture of your school.

Save to your flash drive and bring to next session.

71

Page 72: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Culture Projects

Page 73: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Leadership Capacity

LINDA LAMBERT is professor emeritus and director of the Center for Educational Leadership at California State University

Hayward

Handout #6 – Leadership Quadrants

" Leadership is about learningtogether toward a shared

purpose, rather than a specific role, position, or individual with

formal authority.“Linda Lambert

73

Page 74: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

HighLeadership

Capacity

MediumLeadership

CapacityLow

Leadership Capacity

Leadership for allLearning for allSuccess for all

No compelling purposeIndividualistic

Few community conversationsFragmented

Polarized Principal-dependentNo professional

cultureUnsuccessful with

children

“What Does Leadership Capacity Really Mean? Linda Lambert – NSDC Journal“ http://www.nsdc.org/members/jsd/lambert262.pdf

74

Page 75: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Six critical factors for building leadership

capacity1. The school community’s core values must focus its priorities.

2. As teacher leadership grows, principals must let go of some authority and responsibility.

3. Educators must define themselves as learners, teachers, and leaders.

4. We must invest in each other’s learning to create reciprocity.

5. The first tenet of leadership capacity is “broad-based participation.”

6. Districts must negotiate the political landscape to provide professional time and development, a conceptual framework for improvement, and tailored succession practices (fitting the principal to the school).

“What Does Leadership Capacity Really Mean? Linda Lambert – NSDC Journal“ http://www.nsdc.org/members/jsd/lambert262.pdf

75

Page 76: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso
Page 77: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso
Page 78: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso
Page 79: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Mistakes we tend to make when dealing

with the resisters and saboteurs

• we pay way too much attention to them• we vilify them• we focus on their attitudes

Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices for Enhancing Student Achievement, Rick DuFour & Robert Eaker

79

Page 80: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Participant Reflections

• I took candid shots in every setting I could think of that would reflect my school's culture...

• Looking at our school through the lens of someone else is powerful! ... This assignment enabled me to celebrate those things in our school that work well, and that I am proud of…

Page 81: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Instructional Supervision

“Schools need leadership from principals who focus on advancing student and staff

learning.”

Rick DuFour, The Learning-Centered Principal

Page 82: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Instructional Leadership

82

Page 83: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Our professional vocabulary has embraced terms such as…

“constructivist learning”“discovery learning” “cooperative learning” “differentiated instruction” “multiple intelligences”

From: Supervision for Learning by James M. Aseltine, Judith O. Faryniarz and Anthony J. Rigazio-DiGilio - Chapter 1. Reconceptualizing Supervision and Evaluationhttp://www.ascd.org/publications/books/106001/chapters/Reconceptualizing_Supervision_and_Evaluation.aspx 83

Page 84: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

84

Paradigm shift

Page 85: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

85

“By concentrating on teaching, the instructional leader of the past emphasized the inputs of the learning process.

Richard DuFour, The Learning-Centered Principal, Educational Leadership Volume 59 Number 8 May 2002

By concentrating on learning, today's school leaders shift both their own focus and that of the school community from inputs to outcomes and from intentions to results.”

Page 86: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Essential questions

What is it we want our students to learn?

How will we know when they have learned it?

What are we going to do if they have not learned it? (How do we deliver instruction to ensure they learn it?)

– Rick DuFour86Richard DuFour, The Learning-Centered Principal, Educational Leadership Volume 59 Number 8 May 2002

Page 87: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Participant Reflections• …I have found myself thinking about a

'learner centered' approach to observations in place of my traditional 'teacher centered' approach…

• I love the notion of focusing on student achievement and not teacher instruction. Such a simple concept and yet such a mind shift for so many of us…

Page 88: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

MI-LIFE Cohort 4Evaluation

comments/results

Page 89: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

“It is my sincere belief that every person wanting to become a school administrator should have to complete this course. I found it very helpful even though I have been an administrator since 1996.” “As a young administrator, this program has given me a terrific opportunity to more closely examine what I have been doing, and how I would like to approach things in the future. Overall, an excellent opportunity and a very valuable program.”

Evaluation Comments

Page 90: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

1. The goals of the MI-LIFE program were made clear (by the instructors, during orientation, by course materials).

2. As a result of my participation in MI-LIFE I know more about school leadership than I did before taking the MI-LIFE courses.

3. Participating in the MI-LIFE program has helped me to become more skilled using technology. 4. There was a good balance between technology tools and leadership covered in the course

content. I5. will continue to use the technology tools and applications that I learned in MI-LIFE in my work

as an administrator. 6. Much of what I have learned can be applied to challenges I've faced in my current position. I7. will apply the leadership skills that I've learned in MI-LIFE to my work as an administrator. 8. On average, I was an active participant in the MI-LIFE courses. 9. I felt comfortable asking instructors for help when I needed it. 10. The instructors were able to engage participants in critical discussions of the topics covered. 11. The instructors were prepared and knowledgeable. 12. I would recommend MI-LIFE to other educational administrators. 13. My time was well spent in the MI-LIFE training program. 14. I have used strategies learned in MI-LIFE to improve my school improvement planning. 15. I have used MI-LIFE activities and tools at my workplace. 16. My training through MI-LIFE has had a positive impact on student achievement. 17. My training as a MI-LIFE participant has improved my relationships with teachers and staff. 18. My training as a MI-LIFE participant has improved my relationships with parents. 19. My training as a MI-LIFE participant has improved my relationships with students. 20. My training as a MI-LIFE participant has improved my relationships with other administrators. 21. How do you describe your satisfaction with the overall implementation of the MI-LIFE program.

Final Evaluation Questions

I have used strategies learned in MI-LIFE to

improve my school improvement planning.

Much of what I have learned can be applied to

challenges I've faced in my current position.

This course was excellent! Thanks for all you

have done to improve me as an effective

administrator.

Page 91: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso
Page 92: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso
Page 93: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso
Page 94: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Find us!www.mi-life.org

Page 95: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Register for Cohort 5www.mi-life.org

Page 96: MI-LIFE School Improvement Conference Preso

Follow us!

Michigan Leadership Improvement Framework Enhancement

MILIFE