Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

13
Methods to enhance site Methods to enhance site viability viability 16.02.12 16.02.12

description

Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12. Some examples. Joint venture approaches/risk sharing Local investment models – e.g.TIF Value engineering – tenure, mix, phasing affordable delivery Deferred land receipt. What is deferred land receipt?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

Page 1: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

Methods to enhance site viabilityMethods to enhance site viability

16.02.1216.02.12

Page 2: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

Some examples..

• Joint venture approaches/risk sharing

• Local investment models – e.g.TIF

• Value engineering – tenure, mix, phasing affordable delivery

• Deferred land receipt

Page 3: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

What is deferred land receipt?What is deferred land receipt?

• Deferred land receipt is taking payment for land later in the development programme

• This might be staged payments or a lump sum consideration

• Payment could be made at the end of the development period or at a given point during construction

Page 4: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

How can it assist?How can it assist?• Potentially offers a larger land receipt to the

landowner• Allows payment to be structured to tie in with land

owner priorities – works well with sites with large infrastructure outlays/abnormal costs

• Allows developers to avoid large capital outlay and substantial finance costs early on the programme

• Allows developer to concentrate on developing infrastructure/public realm/other key outputs earlier, rather than just accelerating house building

• Can work well with phased development

Page 5: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

BenefitsBenefitsFor land owner:• A larger receipt and in some instances on very

marginal sites, a receipt• Key regeneration priorities phased to be delivered

early in project

For developer:• Avoids substantial capital outlay at start of project• Avoids finance costs of the large outlay• Allows sales revenue to be captured before land

payment• Allows more flexibility in cashflow

Page 6: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

• What are the political competing pressures/financial constraints on land?

• What would make it easier to be creative with land disposal?

• What opportunities can deferring receipts bring?

• Are there marginal sites where deferring receipts may positively impact on delivery?

• How might HRA flexibilities work with these models to deliver? On surplus and existing developed land.

Breakout QuestionsBreakout Questions

Page 7: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

BREAK

Page 8: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

Finding a Development PartnerFinding a Development Partner

Things to consider …Things to consider …• Getting the timing right• De-risking the site to make it

attractive• Disposing of sites in geographical

packages• Choosing attractive contract and

payment terms• Value for Money

Page 9: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

Disposal RoutesDisposal Routes

• Unfettered Open Market Sale

• Joint Ventures

• OJEU compliant procurement

- Competitive Dialogue

- Restricted OJEU

- DPP

Page 10: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

A Delivery Partner PanelA Delivery Partner Panel

• A fast and efficient ‘one stop shop’ for the procurement of development and construction-related works

• Works can be procured via a mini tender process as opposed to a fully OJEU compliant procurement process

• Available to partner organisations like Local Authorities & Registered Providers

• Re-procurement of new panel

Page 11: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

3 Stage Mini-Tender Process3 Stage Mini-Tender Process

Page 12: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

• What is your current approach to procuring partners and the disposal of land?

• How have OJEU, JVs and partnering through development assisted delivery in your organisation?

• What is you experience of using delivery panels?

• What criteria would you use to procure a delivery panel?

• What are your views on a pan-London register of public land holdings?

Breakout QuestionsBreakout Questions

Page 13: Methods to enhance site viability 16.02.12

FEEDBACK