design methods of

MVRDVwiny maas, jacob van rijs, nathalie de vries

Allard JollesSustainable architecture and urbanism, Solar energy in architecture and urban

planning and Groundscrapers and subscrapers.

michael lengkey

25209009

passion for integratingdivergent uses in one bybreaking away from theconventional, cellulararrangement

broad-minded and receivedarchitectural thinking approaches

the traditional demarcationsbetween the different disciplinesare absent

MVRDV

rem koolhaas(OMA)

le corbusier

innovation and creativity

mvrdvMVRDV in general

modern

www.mvrdv.nl

www.world architecture news.com

contextual approaches

turning conventionalarchitecture on itshead takes on awhole new literalsense.

universal thinking

characteristicsof each clients

emphasised the

conflicting

character of the

various program

components by

weaving them

together.

michael lengkey

25209009

mirador, madrid (housing)

mvrdv

www.mvrdv.nl

www.world architecture news.com

show of as symbol

(landmark) dividing in variety of

different types for different

life-styles

divers program has different needs for phasing, positioning and size

huge and unique

michael lengkey

25209009

d e s i g n INTENTION

dividing in variety of different

types for different life-styles to translate the social

character

comfortability

comfortability

nature/environmental explore

to translate the social character

reflect the urban context

• reduce energy usage

dnb nor HQ, oslo norway (public buildings)

mvrdv

www.mvrdv.nl

www.world architecture news.commichael lengkey

25209009

show of as symbol

(landmark)

d e s i g n INTENTION

highlighting

mvrdv

www.mvrdv.nl & MVRDV greatest hits

issue data

organizational

issue

datapotential

experimentation

examined

various program components

spatial

limitation

d e s i g n m e t h o d s

FINAL

clients involved

Key Methods:

“IDENTIFICATION AND

INVESTIGATION”

collecting and comparing the idea (specialization)

michael lengkey

25209009

traditional

modern

e n v i r o n m e n t a l

it’s no surprise that the buildings of MVRDV are oftendescribed as “hungry boxes”, stuffed with largechunks of complex data that translate into boxyshapes that can accommodate shifting interiorpossibilities. at the frontline of a more ecologicallyconscious generation, MVRDV seek to create a morefluid relationship between indoors and outdoors,inhabitants and nature. for that purpose, light and thesurrounding landscape are incorporated in the design.

bukan hal yang mengejutkan bahwa bangunan-bangunan/karya-karya MVRDV sering didefinisikansebagai “hungry boxes” (kotak-kotak lapar) yangmemuat issues/problems yang kompleks yangditerjemahkan/diaplikasikan ke dalam bentuk kotakyang mengakomodasi berbagai macam kemungkinaninterior.sebuah generasi yang concern/peduli denganlingkungan, MVRDV berusaha menciptakan lebihbanyak hubungan yang lebih luwes/fleksibel antararuang dalam dan ruang luar serta penghuni dan alam.oleh karena itu, pencahayaan alami dan lingkungansekitar dihubungkan dalam satu kesatuan pada desainbangunan.

MVRDV have a utopian quality eventhough critics would be tempted to slamsome of their plans as Le Corbusier-inspired modernist dystopias.

Conclusion

architectural theories:

“environmental”feat

“good design architectural”

source : www.mvrdv.nlmichael lengkey

25209009

references

1. www.mvrdv.nl (18 September 2009, Pkl. 09.00-selesai)

2. world architecture news.com

3. MVRDV greatest hits (pdf format by Nathalie de vries)

michael lengkey

25209009

DANK JE WEL

michael lengkey

25209009