METHODS AT THE WORLD CONSTRUCTION CHAMPIONSHIP …

METHODS

AT THE WORLD CONSTRUCTION CHAMPIONSHIP (WCC)

within the team nomination

Building Information Modeling and design

2021

2

Contents

1. Purpose and scope 3

2. Terms and definitions 3

3. Regulations 5

4. Qualification criteria 6

5. Procedure of the nomination 6

6. “Homework” Stage 6

6.1 Description 6

6.2. Task 7

6.3. Recommendations on forming team composition 8

6.4. List of recommended software packages 8

7. Final stage 10

7.1. Description 10

7.2. Task 11

7.3. Requirements to the composition of teams 12

7.4. Recommendations on forming team composition 12

7.5. Hardware and software conditions of the site 14

7.6. List of software packages 15

8. Expert Jury and assessment strategy 16

8.2. Description of work of the Expert Jury at the "Homework" stage. 16

8.3. Description of work of the Expert Jury at the Final Stage 18

8.4. Technical Experts 18

8.4.1. The Developer Organization shall send Technical experts in the number, multiple of teams

to organize and conduct the nomination. 18

9. The procedure for determining the winners 18

10. Appeals 19

11. Rights, powers, and obligations 19

12. Replacements 19

13. Awards 19

Annex No. 1 Form of the final assessment protocol 21

Annex No. 2 Form of providing the Organizer with a list of Participants / Finalists 22

Annex No. 3 General assessment criteria for the Tasks 23

Annex No. 4 Timing schedule of the nomination 29

3

1. Purpose and scope

These methodological recommendations of the International Construction Championship (hereinafter

referred to as the Methodology) determine the procedure and conditions of conducting World

Construction Championship (hereinafter referred to as the Championship) within the team nomination

“Building Information Modeling and design”.

The Methodology of team nomination " Building Information Modeling and design" is developed for

revealing the level of competence and complex evaluation of knowledge, skills and abilities of

specialists, carrying out activities in the field of designing with application of BIM-technologies at

industrial construction facilities.

2. Terms and definitions

Abbreviation Spelled out in form

Jury/Expert jury A group of experts evaluating the results of the tasks performed by the

Participants across categories

Task/Task of the

Championship

The Task to be performed, and according to whose results the Participants

demonstrate their knowledge level, abilities, and skills in the nomination

Quotas Number of places for specialists of Participant Organizations established

by the Organizing Committee for each nomination in the final stage of the

Championship

Nomination Name of the activity (profession) for which the Championship

competitions are held

Organizer A team of diverse specialists supervised by the Russian Federation

Ministry of Construction, and the Rosatom State Corporation, that is

responsible for organizing and holding the Championship

Participant

Organization

An Organization whose specialists take part in Championship

competitions/General Partner-Participant

Organizing

committee

Federal Organizing Committee of the Championship

Official site Website for the Championship that contains complete, reliable, and

updated information about the Championship

Site The site of the nomination, the place where the Participant/team of

Participants complete the Tasks for the final stage of the Championship

Participant / Team of

Participants

Specialist / Team of specialists taking part in the Championship

competitions

Organization-

developer

An Organization not participating in the competitions but providing

methodological support for nominations

Technical expert

A representative from the Developer Organization that works on the site

where the final stage in the Championship is held, and provides support for

holding nomination competitions and the work performed by the Jury

Finalist Specialist participating in the final competitions of the Championship

Championship The World Construction Championship (WCC) shall mean the

international championship in industrial facility construction

4

Project Pilot project "Expansion and Reconstruction of the National Medical

Research Centre the Federal State Budgetary Institution "Dmitry Rogachev

NMIC DGOI" of the Russian Ministry of Health".

5

Official Nomination

resource

Website that provides interaction between the Organizer, the Jury Experts,

the Participants in all stages of the Championship on the nomination.

Resource address: https://bim-wcc.ru

Resource and process

model, RPM

Interconnected data used to manage and optimize the processes of

construction work in the composition, including but not limited to:

− resource estimates;

− the schedule of work performance taking into account the

decomposition for work zones and power of links;

− process charts of work performance and working processes;

− resource sheets.

3. Regulations

The task was developed on the basis of the project documentation of the pilot project "Expansion and

Reconstruction of the National Medical Research Centre the Federal State Budgetary Institution

"Dmitry Rogachev NMIC DGOI" of the Russian Ministry of Health". The facility of the Task was

chosen due to the relevance and importance of the introduction of information technology in the

construction, including in the current environment of epidemiological situation associated with the

spread of coronavirus infection COVID-19.

List of regulations and documents used in the development of the task:

1. ISO 19650-1:2018 Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil

engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM) — Information

management using building information modelling — Part 1: Concepts and principle;

2. ISO 19650-2:2018 Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil

engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM) — Information

management using building information modelling — Part 2: Delivery phase of the assets;

3. ISO 16739-1:2018 Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for data sharing in the construction

and facility management industries — Part 1: Data schema;

4. ISO 29481-1:2016 Building information models — Information delivery manual — Part 1:

Methodology and format;

5. ISO/TS 12911:2012 Framework for building information modelling (BIM) guidance;

6. ISO 22263:2008 Organization of information about construction works — Framework for

management of project information.

7. Resolution* of the Government of the Russian Federation No.87 dated February 16, 2008

"On the composition of sections of project documentation and requirements for their

content" (as amended on September 17, 2018);

8. GOST* (Russian state standard) 21.110-2013 System of design documentation for

construction (SDDC). Specification of equipment, products and materials”;

9. Set of Rules* 333.1325800.2017 "Information Modeling in Construction Industry. Rules of

generating information model of facilities at different stages of life cycle";

10. Set of Rules* 331.1325800.2017 "Information Modeling in Construction Industry. Rules of

exchange between information models of facilities and models used in software packages".

https://bim-wcc.ru/

6

11. Set of Rules* 404.1325800.2018 "Information Modeling in Construction Industry. Rules

for developing project plans implemented with the use of information modeling

technology".

* The documents were used for reference.

4. Qualification criteria

A team consisting of specialists involved in different parts of the Task at two stages of its execution

that meet the qualification criteria may take part in the nomination:

Item

No.

Requirement Content of requirement

1 Requirements to

qualification characteristics

and profession

Compliance of functional responsibilities with the following

positions:

- chief project architect,

- chief project engineer,

- PTD (Production and Technical Department) engineer,

- cost consultant engineer

- lead engineer.

5. Procedure of the nomination

5.1. The Participant Organizations shall, within the period specified in the nomination timing schedule

(Annex No. 4), select specialists on the qualification criteria for Participants in accordance with

Section 4 of the Methodology.

5.2. The Participant Organizations, within the period specified in the nomination timing schedule,

shall send to the Organizer information about the selected Participants according to the Form for

providing the Organizer with a list of Finalists (Annex No. 2) and ensure their registration on the

Official resource of the Nomination and the Championship's Official website https://pro-wcc.ru in the

section "For Participants".

5.3. Within the framework of the "Homework" stage, the Participant Organizations shall be offered to

perform the Task, which is the basis for further generation and execution of the Tasks of the

Championship Final Stage on the basis of the object information and resource and process models

created by the team.

5.4. The Participants shall be entitled to contact the Organizer and (if applicable) the Expert Jury for

additional information and explanations in the course of performing their Homework.

6. “Homework” Stage

6.1 Description

6.1.1. Within the period specified in the nomination timing schedule (Annex No. 4), the Participant

Organization team shall independently execute the Task and place the work result on the Official

Nomination resource. The result of the Task shall be checked for

https://pro-wcc.ru/

7

compliance with the criteria and rules of the work results assessment (Annex No. 3). Form of

participation - on-the-job in the Participant Organizations.

6.1.2. Results received later than the time specified in the timing schedule will not be reviewed by the

Expert Jury.

6.1.3. Participant Organizations independently ensure the availability of recommended software

packages at the work places of the Participants to execute the Task of the "Homework" stage.

6.1.4. As part of the stage Task execution for the Participant Organizations, the Organizer shall:

- register the Participants and provides access to the Nomination Official resource on the Internet;

- place the Task on the Nomination Official resource for the stage with instructions;

- provide consultations to the Participant Organizations during the period of the stage Task execution.

6.2. Task

Based on the object digital information models of the facility, the team of the Participants is required

to develop a consolidated object digital information and resource and process model of construction.

Item

No.

Name Contents

1 Initial data 1) digital object information models of sections

AR, KR, OV, TH of the Project in IFC format;

2) design documentation on the Project in PDF

format, in the scope sufficient to develop the object

and resource models.

2 Task 1) to develop object digital information models

for ES and VK sections;

2) to develop a consolidated object digital

information model;

3) to optimize design solutions;

4) to develop BEP (BIM Execution Plan) as a

part of:

a) Rules of information interaction;

b) Rules of naming and preparation of

elements;

c) Rules of preparation of the final

package of material for the

competition;

5) to develop a resource and process model of

construction (RPM) in the form of estimate

documentation.

The Organizer shall publish the composition of

initial data on the Project in the form of object digital

8

information models and requirements to them at the

time of issue of the task.

6.3. Recommendations on forming team composition

At this stage of the Participant Organization is recommended to form a team of specialists:

1. BIM-manager;

2. Specialist in resource and process modeling;

3. Specialist in production planning;

4. Specialist in architectural and structural design;

5. Specialist in the design of engineering systems and networks;

6. Specialist in power supply section design;

7. Specialist in the design of the water supply and sewerage section.

In accordance with paragraph 7.3 of this Methodology, the Participant Organization shall send a team

of five Participants from the above mentioned specialists to the final stage of the Championship.

6.4. List of recommended software packages

Software Manufacturer Software name

Software for modeling capital construction object

Bentley Systems OpenBuildings Designer

Graphisoft Archicad

Autodesk Architecture, Engineering & Construction Collection

MagiCAD Group MagiCAD

Renga Software Renga

Nanosoft NanoCAD

Intergraph SmartPlan Foundation

Intergraph SmartPlant 3D

Neolant Polynome

Visual planning systems

EC "ASE" Multi-D Project

Bentley Systems SyncroPro

9

Autodesk Navisworks Simulate

10

Transport planning systems

Transoft solution Autoturn

Autodesk Vehicle Tracking

Modeling systems for construction layout plan

Credo-dialogue CREDO GENERAL PLAN

Consistent Software GeoniCS GENERAL PLAN

7. Final stage

7.1. Description

7.1.1 The final stage shall be held within the period specified in the timing schedule of the nomination

(Annex No. 4) in Sochi. The form of participation in the Championship is full-time, with a day release.

7.1.2 Participants shall arrive at the place of the final stage within the period specified in the timing

schedule of the nomination.

7.1.3 No later than 1 (one) day before the start of the Championship competition, Participants will

receive uniforms with the symbols of the Championship.

7.1.4 Prior to the start of the Championship competitions, the Participants shall undergo a General

labor protection and safety briefing, and participate in a General organizational meeting in the

Championship region. The time and place shall be determined by the Organizer and announced

additionally.

7.1.5 At the venue of the final stage, the Participants shall receive registration badges, participate in

the official opening ceremony of the Championship final stage and start to perform their Tasks. The

Organizer has the right to make changes in the schedule of the final stage of the Championship upon

notice of the Participants.

7.1.6 The time allowed to complete the Task is no more than 20 hours, including the lunch break. The

schedule may be changed by the Organizer upon notice of the Finalists at least one day before the

beginning of the Championship specified in the nomination timing schedule (Annex No. 4).

7.1.7 Becoming familiar with the workplace and Task:

- Participants are allowed to perform the Task only after passing the briefing on labor protection and

safety at the workplace;

- immediately before the beginning of the Task, the Jury Experts conduct an introductory briefing of

the Participants regarding the work regulations at workplaces, and acquaint the Participants with the

content of the Task and the evaluation criteria;

- no more than 30 minutes are allotted to conduct an introductory briefing and provide explanations

on the work regulations, which are not included in the total time for completing the Task.

7.1.8 Beginning and completion of work

The Participant Organization team must wait for instructions from the Technical Expert to begin and

complete the Task. In case for reasons beyond the control of the Participant Organization team, they

11

had to interrupt the Task, they shall immediately report the forced stop to the Technical expert. In this

case, the cause and start and end time of the stop shall be officially recorded.

- after confirmation by the Jury expert, the Participant Organization team shall have the right to receive

additional time equal to the time of forced stop. The amount of extra time shall be determined by a

panel decision of the Expert Jury and shall be recorded in the Protocol of an emergency situation.

7.1.9 Abnormal situations

Any deviations from this Methodology and the provisions IN the General Procedure for the

Championship regarding the competitions during the final stage shall be considered as an abnormal

situation. The decision on an abnormal situation is made by Jury experts by a simple vote taken by

experts, while preparing the corresponding report sheet.

7.1.10 Communication and contacts by Participants and Jury experts

Any communication by Participants while executing the Tasks shall be regulated by the General

procedure of the Championship and by this Methodology.

7.1.11 Illness or accidents

In case of accident or sudden illness, the Participant shall first of all inform the Jury experts on the

site.

The Expert jury shall make a collective decision on whether it is possible to compensate for the time

lost by the Participant Organization team. If the Participant Organization team has to withdraw from

further participation in the Championship, it receives points for the amount of work performed at the

moment of the event.

7.2. Task

The Participant team is required to perform modeling of the Digital Construction Organization Project

(DCOP) in the selected system of software environments containing interconnected data for

construction process management.

Item

No.

Name Contents

1 Initial data All team developments performed as part of the Homework stage.

2 Tasks 1) to execute the construction organization project on the basis

of the object digital information model, interconnected with

the resource model, and also including the interconnected

data for the analysis and optimization of construction

processes;

2) to determine the need for building structures, materials and

equipment, labor, machinery and mechanisms with the

distribution by the structure construction periods;

3) to form RPM on the basis of analysis of construction

production methods according to the presented criteria (see

Annex No. 3);

4) to compare sequential, parallel and line production

construction methods with respect to the facility;

12

5) to create presentation materials on the basis of RPM and

DCOP;

6) to visualize the facility construction process.

7.3. Requirements to the composition of teams

At this stage, the Participant Organization shall be required to form a team of five specialists selected

from the seven specialists specified in paragraph 6.3 of this Methodology.

The composition of the team of Finalists shall be strict in number, but not in functionality, and may

be agreed with the Organizer additionally at the request of the Participant Organization.

7.4. Recommendations on forming team composition

Item

No.

Recommendation Contents of the recommendation

1. Education

Higher industry-specific education on the basis of specialist

degree programs, bachelor's programs,

master's degree programs, work experience in the position

held at least 1 year.

Specializations:

- organization of construction production;

- design of buildings and housing;

- design of engineering systems for industrial and civil

buildings.

as well as:

Higher education (non-industry-specific) - bachelor’s

programme, specialist's programme, master’s programme

and complementary professional education or professional

retraining programs in the field of organization of

construction production and/or design of civil buildings and

housing and work experience in the position held not less

than 1 year.

Complementary professional education - professional

development programs in the field of information modeling

technologies.

2. Abilities and skills - to use national and international regulatory and

technical documentation in the field of design;

- to calculate technical and functional systems of the

design facility;

- to plan the construction works;

- to analyze analogs of equipment and materials to

implement technical solutions;

- to develop an information model of the capital

construction object in various CADs;

13

- to have experience in creating object information

models in any of the systems specified in Section 7

of the Methodology.

14

3. Competence - the national and international legislative and

regulatory acts in the area of design work in

construction;

- the national and international technical regulation

documentation in the field of design work in

construction;

- methods of designing engineering systems and

structures of buildings and housing;

- the features inherent in the software to develop object

digital information models for capital construction

projects.

4. Experience - obtaining and analysis of initial data;

- setting up software tools for working with

information models;

- development of an object digital information model

section in accordance with the information modeling

project implementation plan.

- creation of the consolidated object digital

information model of the capital construction project

- quality control of the consolidated object digital

information model of the capital construction project.

7.5. Hardware and software conditions of the site

7.5.1. The hardware conditions are the same for each Participant including but not limited to the

requirements specified in Table 7.3.

Operating System Microsoft® Windows® 10 (64-bit version)

Windows 10 Enterprise

Windows 10 Professional

CPU type Intel Xeon or i-Series multi-core processor or equivalent AMD processor

with SSE2 technology support.

Memory 64 GB RAM

15

Screen and resolution 1920 x 1200

with support for full color True Color mode

Video adapter Video card with DirectX 11 and Shader Model 5 support

Location and type of

media

100 GB of free disk space

SSD

Pointing device Device compatible with MS-Mouse or 3Dconnexion

Browser Google Chrome latest version

7.5.1. Hardware conditions may be changed by the Organizer unilaterally for the conditions with

similar characteristics or to increase the total capacity of devices.

7.6. List of software packages

7.6.1. List of software packages used in the final stage:

Software Manufacturer Software name

Visual planning systems

EC "ASE" Multi-D Project

Bentley Systems SyncroPro

Autodesk Navisworks Simulate

Systems for valuation and creation of estimate documentation

Nomitech CostOS

StroySoft Atomsmeta

STC (Scientific and technical

center) "Hector" Hector 5D

RPE (Research and Production

Enterprise) "AVS-N" BIM-estimate

Transport planning systems

Transoft solution Autoturn

16

Autodesk Vehicle Tracking

Modeling systems for construction layout plan

Credo-dialogue CREDO GENERAL PLAN

Consistent Software GeoniCS GENERAL PLAN

Quality control systems for object digital information models

Nemetschek Solibri

7.6.2. The list of software may be supplemented upon the requests of Participant Organizations sent

to the Organizer by February 15, 2021 at 18.00 (MSC). The final list of software shall be announced

not later than 5 days before the start of the Championship final stage.

8. Expert Jury and assessment strategy

8.1. Composition of the Expert Jury

8.1.1. Composition of the Expert Jury at the Homework stage:

- Representatives of Participant Organizations - 1 expert from each organization;

- Technical experts - 2 experts;

- Supervisory Group (hereinafter referred to as the Supervisory Group), consisting of:

- Representative of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "Dmitry Rogachev NMIC DGOI" of

the Russian Ministry of Health - 1 expert*.

(* - "Dmitry Rogachev NMIC DGOI" requirement, is responsible for the evaluation of the

technical and organizational solutions proposed by the Participants of the Championship in terms of

the object specificity)

- representative of BuildingSMART International - 1 expert**

(** - participates in the work of the Expert Jury due to a special award from buildingSMART

Russia);

- Representative of FAO FCS (Federal Autonomous Organization Federal Centre for

Standardization) - 1 expert***

(*** - participates in the work of the Expert Jury as the Chief Methodologist on IM from the

Ministry of Construction, Housing and Utilities of the Russian Federation);

- Representative of SC (sub-committee) 5 of TС (technical committee) 465 - 1 expert****.

(**** - participates in the work of the Expert Jury as a representative of the professional

community. Shall be selected in advance).

8.1.2. Composition of the Expert Jury at the Final stage:

- representatives of Participant Organizations - 1 expert from each Participant Organization;

8.2. Description of work of the Expert Jury at the "Homework" stage.

8.2.1. The qualification criteria for the experts are set forth in the Regulations on the work of Expert

Juries.

17

8.2.2. Technical experts shall form the composition of the Supervisory group before the beginning of

the "Homework" stage.

8.2.3. The technical experts shall develop and submit checklists to the Expert Jury to assess the

completion of the Homework.

8.2.4. The Homework is assessed by a full Expert Jury as part of the Expert Jury meeting. Format of

participation: remote.

8.2.5. During the meeting the Chairman of the Expert Jury, his Deputy are elected and the composition

of the Expert Jury is approved.

18

8.2.6. The results of the meeting shall be recorded in minutes and signed by the members of the Expert

Jury.

8.2.7. Upon recommendation of the Chairman, the composition of the Expert Jury may be completed

within the period up to the day of the beginning of the Championship (in case if the Participant

Organization submits an application for participation in the Championship after the Jury composition

is approved).

8.2.8. The winner Organization "For the best object digital information model" - a special award from

BuildingSMART Russia - shall be determined during the meeting.

8.3. Description of work of the Expert Jury at the Final Stage

8.3.1. The personal composition of the Jury at the final stage shall be formed by the procedure of

drawing, which shall be carried out in accordance with the Regulations on the work of the Expert Jury

from among the experts of the Participant Organizations. If, in the course of the drawing, an expert

from the Participant Organization gets the team from his/her Organization, the drawing shall be

repeated.

8.3.2. Representatives of the Surveillance Group, who are members of the Expert Jury at the

"Homework" stage, may be present at the Championship venue, observe the processes of performance

of tasks by the Participants, attend the Participants' presentations of their results and ask questions

during the presentations. Representatives of the Surveillance Group are not bound to specific teams

of the Participants.

8.3.3. The Expert Jury (representatives of the Participant Organizations) shall discuss and assess the

teams of Participants and determine the winners.

8.3.4. Representatives of the Surveillance Group may be present at the presentation of the summative

assessments by the Expert Jury. Representatives of the Surveillance Group shall not have the right to

assess the result of the Task performance by the teams of Participants, but the Expert Jury may take

into account the opinion of the Representatives of the Surveillance Group when assessing, if such

opinion is justified and does not contradict the requirements for the Task performance.

8.3.5. The Representatives of the Surveillance Group shall be a part of the Review Board as its full

members and shall perform the functions specified in the Regulations on the Nomination Review

Boards.

8.4. Technical Experts

8.4.1. The Developer Organization shall send Technical experts in the number, multiple of teams to

organize and conduct the nomination.

8.4.2. The work of the Technical Experts shall be regulated by the General Championship Procedure.

9. The procedure for determining the winners

9.1. The winners (first place) and prizewinners (second and third places) shall be determined by the

Expert Jury based on the assessment of the results of the teams of the Participant Organizations. The

winner shall be the team with the highest number of points according to the criteria and rules for

assessment of the Task results (Annex No. 3).

19

9.2. In case two or more teams have scored the same number of points, the Organizer shall ensure that

an additional stage of assessment is conducted on the basis of a predetermined set of additional criteria

that do not correlate with the main ones.

9.3. The Expert Jury shall execute the final protocol in accordance with Annex No. 1 to this

Methodology and submit it to the Organizer.

10. Appeals

10.1 Within the framework of the final stage of the Championship, the Participants may lodge an

appeal against the quality of the evaluation done on the results, and the work done by the Jury for the

evaluation and tallying procedure.

10.2 The appeal is filed on the terms and conditions established by the Regulation on the appeal

commissions for nominations.

10.3 Appeals are reviewed by the Appeals Commission.

11. Rights, powers, and obligations

The rights, powers, and obligations borne by the Participants, Expert Juries, Technical Experts, and

the Organizer are established in the General Procedure for the Championship.

12. Replacements

12.1. Participant Organizations shall ensure that there is a reserve team of Participants for the

nomination to replace Finalists if unforeseen circumstances arise, and there is a forced cancellation of

participation for the Participants from the first team in the final stage of the Championship.

12.2. The number of reserve Participants shall be equal to the number of main Participants.

12.3. Participants from the reserve team shall meet the qualification criteria specified in the

Methodology.

12.4. Reserve team participants shall register on the official website of the Championship, and fill out

a Participant questionnaire in the “For Participants” section.

12.5. Participants can be replaced no later than 2 (two) weeks before the start of the final stage of the

Championship. The time the replacement is made is considered to be the date the Organizer sends a

response to the Participant Organization that acknowledges the replacement.

12.6. The Organization participating in the Championship shall replace the Participant drawing from

the reserve team of Participants by sending an official notification to the Organizer indicating the

reason for the replacement, and that gives data about the Participants from the main and reserve teams,

and then receives a response from the Organizer that confirms the replacement.

13. Awards

13.1 The winners and prizewinners are provided with monetary awards in accordance with the General

Procedure for holding the Championship.

20

13.2 A special prize from BuildingSMART Russia for the best object digital information model made

at the Homework stage is provided.

21

Annex No. 1

Form of the final assessment protocol

PROTOCOL

of the Expert Jury final assessment in the team nomination " Building Information Modeling and

design"

"___" ______________20___

Item

No.

Name

of the Participant Organization of the Championship

Point count Place taken

2

3

4

5

…

Jury Experts:

___________________ / _____________ /

22

Annex No. 2

Form of providing the Organizer with a list of Participants / Finalists

Main composition of Participants/Finalists:

Item

No.

Full

Name

Position Organizati

on

E-mail Contact

phone

Specialty

within the

nomination

(if

applicable)

Registration

mark on the

Official

website (yes

/ no)

Team nomination “Information modeling and design”

Reserve team of Finalists:

Item

No.

Full

Name

Position Organizati

on

E-mail Contact

phone

Specialty

within the

nomination

(if

applicable)

Registration

mark on the

Official

website (yes

/ no)

Team nomination “Information modeling and design”

…

Head of a Participant Organization

___________________ /____________/

23

Annex No. 3

General assessment criteria for the Tasks

Item

No.

Criteria Points*

1 Assessment of completeness and quality of the object digital information model of

the facilities of the "Homework" stage

1.1. Availability of object digital models and compliance of technical solutions with the

project documentation issued as initial data

1.1.1 Digital object models of ES and VK sections in the volume allowing to form

RPM are presented

5

1.1.2 Digital models of ES and/or VK section are not presented 0

1.2. Availability of a consolidated object digital information model

1.2.1 The consolidated object digital information model is presented 10

1.2.2 The consolidated object digital information model is not presented 0

1.3. Presence of BIM Execution Plan

1.3.1 The BIM Execution Plan is presented in full, including rules of information

interaction, rules of naming and preparation of elements and rules of

preparation of the final package of material for the competition.

30

1.3.2 The BIM Execution Plan is presented in the scope of rules of information

interaction, rules of naming and preparation of elements.

20

1.3.3 The BIM Execution Plan is presented in the scope of rules of information

interaction

10

1.3.4 BEP is not presented 0

1.4. Correct binding of the summary model to geographical and elevation coordinates

1.4.1 The object digital model is precisely bound to the base geographic coordinates

of intersection of at least two points of axes and two elevation marks

5

24

1.4.2 Correct binding of the summary model to geographical and elevation

coordinates is not implemented

0

1.5. Availability of RPM in the form of local estimate calculations associated** with the

object digital information model in the current prices

1.5.1 Local estimate calculations associated with the object digital information

model in the current prices are presented

30

1.5.2 Local estimate calculations associated with the object digital information

model are presented, but not in the current prices

20

1.5.3 Local estimate calculations are presented in the current prices, but not

associated with the object digital information model

10

1.5.4 Local estimate calculations are not presented 0

1.6 Audit of the object digital information model of the building, detection of physical

and intellectual collisions (performed on the basis of the summary IFC2x3 model

file using Solibri Office v9.10.8)

1.6.1 The relative** total number of errors to the total number of elements of the

object digital information model (critical, medium level, non-critical) for a

standard set of checks in Solibri system is less than 15%

20



standard set of checks in Solibri system is 15 to 50%

10



standard set of checks in Solibri system is greater than or equal to 50%

5

Maximum number of points per stage 100

2. Assessment of RPM and digital construction organization project of the Final stage

25

2.1. Availability of a construction organization project based on the object digital

information model, which includes interconnected*** data to manage construction

processes

2.1.1 The construction organization project connected with resource and object

digital information model is presented

5

2.1.2 The construction organization project connected with resource information

model is presented

3

2.1.3 The construction organization project connected with object digital

information model is presented

2

2.1.4 The construction organization project is presented 1

2.1.5 The construction organization project is not presented 0

2.2. Determination of the need for building structures, materials and equipment, labor,

machinery and mechanisms with the distribution by the structure construction

periods

2.2.1 The need for building structures, materials and equipment, labor, machinery

and mechanisms with the distribution by the facility construction periods is

determined

5

2.2.2 The need for building structures, materials and equipment, labor, machinery

and mechanisms is determined without the distribution by the construction

period of the facility.

3

2.2.3 The need is not defined 0

2.3. Generation of RPM based on the analysis of construction production methods by

several criteria****

2.3.1 The substantiation is presented that RPM is optimal in relation to four or more

criteria of efficiency of construction production processes

40

2.3.2 The substantiation is presented that RPM is optimal in relation to three criteria

of efficiency of construction production processes

30

2.3.3 The substantiation is presented that RPM is optimal in relation to two criteria


20

26

2.3.4 The substantiation is presented that RPM is optimal in relation to one criterion


10

2.3.5 No substantiation is presented that the criteria of efficiency of the construction

production processes are taken into account in the generation of the RPM

0

2.4 Comparison of sequential, parallel and line production methods of the

facility construction

2.4.1 The substantiation report of the team's analysis of three methods of

construction production is presented, the most effective one in terms of the

previously selected criteria is justified

30

2.4.2 The substantiation report of the team's analysis of two methods of construction

production is presented, the most effective one in terms of the previously

selected criteria is justified

20

2.4.3 The substantiation report on the team's analysis of one of the methods of

construction production is presented

10

2.4.4 The substantiation report on the team's analysis of construction production

methods is not presented

0

2.5. Creation of presentation materials: visualization of the facility and construction

process Presentation of RPM and DCOP

2.5.1 The RPM and Digital CPD (construction planning design) are demonstrated

with an oral presentation of the main parameters and results

10

2.5.2 The RPM was demonstrated with an oral presentation of the main parameters

and results

5

2.5.3 The RPM and Digital CPD have not been demonstrated 0

2.6. Visualization of DCOP by building construction period

2.6.1 The visualization of the DCOP by building construction period is

demonstrated

5

2.6.2 No visualization 0

2.7. Answers to the questions of the Expert Jury

2.7.1 The team answered 5 of 5 questions satisfactorily 5

27






Maximum possible point total 100

* Within each criterion, a point is assigned by the Expert Jury to determine whether the Participating

Organization team work result meets the requirements. The points are not summed up.

** Principle of points calculation on the basis of automated quality assessment of summary digital

object information models of Solibri system:

1. The total number of elements of the consolidated object digital information model for all

sections of the consolidated model is calculated.

2. All non-conformance assessments (critical, average, not critical errors) detected by Solibri

Office v9.10.8 system are summed up by rule blocks:

● BIM Validation Architectural

● BIM Validation Structural

● BIM Validation HVAC

● Intersection Between Architectural Components

● Intersection Between Structural Components

● Model Revision comparison

● Structural Versus Architectural Models

● Reinforcing Bar

● Intersection Between HVAC Elements

● Architectural Components versus HVAC

● Structural Components versus HVAC

3. The ratio of the number of errors to the total number of elements of the consolidated model in

percent is calculated. On the basis of this ratio, a final score is made;

4. The result of an automated quality check of the consolidated object digital information model:

a. up to 15% of the total number of errors detected - 10 points;

b. from 15 to 50% - 5 points;

c. more than 50% - 0 points.

28

*** In accordance with Section 2 of this Methodology, the Interconnection or associativity of data

between models is checked by the Expert Jury by the method of introducing changes in one model

and controlling the result of these changes in another.

**** Criteria for evaluation of resource and technology model efficiency of the construction facility

are published by the Expert Jury for the Finalists on the day of issue of the task for the Final Stage of

the Championship.

29

Annex No. 4

Timing schedule of the nomination

Item

No.

Event Date, 2020

1 The beginning of the Championship.

“Homework” Stage

December 11, 2020

2 Registration of Participant Organizations and

Participants that meet the qualification criteria*

till December 11, 2020

3 The Organizer publishes the task for the

“Homework” Stage for the Participant

Organizations

December 14, 2020

4 The Participant Organization sends the work result

by means of the Official Nomination resource**

within 60 calendar days from the

date of publication of the Task

(clause 3), but no later than

February 15, 2021

5 The Expert Jury checks the results*** within 30 calendar days from the

date of receipt of the result of

work from the Participating

Organization, but no later than

March 15, 2021

6 The Expert Jury will forward the results of the

assessment of works on the "Homework" stage to

the Organizer

March 19, 2021

7 The final stage of the Championship - competition

days

April 2021

* The deadline for accepting applications can be increased by the Organizer.

** The deadline for completing homework is no more than 60 (sixty) calendar days from the date of

registration, but no later than April 02, 2021.

*** The assessment of the work performed at the "Homework" stage is carried out by the Expert Jury

no later than April 16, 2021.

METHODS AT THE WORLD CONSTRUCTION CHAMPIONSHIP …

Documents

Transcript of METHODS AT THE WORLD CONSTRUCTION CHAMPIONSHIP …