Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

download Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

of 33

Transcript of Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    1/33

    Methodology of Motor Predictive Monitoring.

    This presentation covers the methodology of Motor Predictive Monitoring, the

    background to motor failure and the Instruments available to achieve correct analysis for

    both on line (live) and off line motors.Whitelegg are UK and Ireland agents for Baker Inc (anSKF Company)

    On-Line or Dynamic Testing

    (Explorer Monitoring)

    Explorer

    Off-Line or Static Testing

    (Advanced Winding Analyzer)

    AWA

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    2/33

    Cost savings

    Reduced unscheduled downtime through MPM

    (Motor Predictive Monitoring)

    Indicates root cause analysis

    Save s of energy costs

    VFD: Analysis

    Motor Quality Assurance

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    3/33

    Electrical Motor Management

    Programme

    The Question is not if a Motor will fail electrically,

    it is

    (1) Dielectric Strength of a new motor is very high

    (2) All Motor will see normal ageing

    Thermal

    Chemical Mechanical

    (3)T-T Dielectric Strength falls below

    level of switching surges

    Arcing occurs when motor starts up

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    4/33

    (4) Insulation begins to deteriorate much faster

    (5) T-T Dielectric Strength drops below operating voltage

    The short fuses

    (6) Transform action causes high induced current - high heat 16-20

    time full load amps

    (7) Rapid Failure (Typically Minutes)

    80% of electrical motor failures start as turn-to-turn fault

    Most will fail to ground but the root cause will be turn toturn failure

    General Electric Paper

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    5/33

    Turn insulation is the weakest insulation in the motor

    Chemical deposits breakdown the insulationMovement from start up rubs the turns together causing

    wear source: D.E. Crawford\General Electric

    The Surge Test is the only method available to find weak

    insulation between the turns. Thus allowing the operatorto be predictive.

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    6/33

    Field Testing Can Find-

    Weak insulation (PPM, QA, TS)

    Turn-To-Turn

    Phase-To-Phase

    Coil-To-Coil

    In-Shop Testing (Rotor Removed)

    Can find-

    Weak insulation turn to turn, phase to phase, coil to coil (QA, TS, PPM)

    Reversed coils (QA)

    Turn-To-Turn shorts (QA,)

    Unbalanced turn count (QA)

    Different size copper wire (QA)

    Shorted laminations (QA)

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    7/33

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    8/33

    Scope

    This insulation maintenance guide is applicable to industrial air-cooled rotating electric machines ratedfrom 5 hp to 10 000 hp. The procedures detailed herein may also be useful for other types of machines.

    7.4 Interturn Insulation Tests

    Film insulation usually provides high dielectric strength but, in many cases, the interturn insulation onmotor coils is porous in nature. Fibrous insulation effectively provides a physical separation of the turns ofthe order of 0.010 to 0.025 in (0.250.635 mm) for motors, and the electric strength between the turns isessentially provided by the insulating value of the gas (air, hydrogen, etc.) contained between thesebers. Micaceous insulations are commonly used in high-voltage machines.

    To provide a useful service in checking the adequacy of the insulation between turns, the test levelselected must be greater than the minimum sparking potential of the air at the minimum permissiblespacing. The test potential will often, therefore, be several times normal operating volts per turn. A test ofabout 500 V rms per turn is considered average for a new machine, while for maintenance tests potentialsof one-half to two-thirds of the new coil turn test, eight to ten t imes normal operating volts per turn, areusually considered adequate to provide insurance from the possibilities of marginal insulation andcontains allowance for switching transients and for surges likely to be encountered in service.

    The normal operating volts per turn are often up to about 30 V for motors, while turbine and water-wheelgenerators are substantially above that value. The test methods used include forms of surge comparisontests. A steep-front surge is applied to all or part of a winding, or by induction to individual coils within awinding. The resultant waveforms are viewed on an oscilloscope screen and interpretation of the patternsor amplitudes permits detection of short-circuited turns. The surge comparison test applied directly to thewinding terminals is limited, in the case of windings consisting of many coils in series, by the magnitude ofthe voltage that can be applied to the ground insulation without exceeding its specified test voltage. Thislimitation can be overcome by placing a surge coil in the bore over the coil to be tested and by applyingdirectly into it a voltage appropriate to the induced volts per turn required in the stator coil. For additional

    information on procedures and requirements for interturn insulation tests, see IEEE Std 522-1992 [10].See [B14] for detailed information on surge comparison testing.

    d) The 2300 V and 4000 V designs shall use vacuum-pressure-

    impregnated form windings, capable of withstanding a voltage surge

    of 3.5 per unit at a rise time of 0.1 s to 0.2 s and of 5 per unit at a

    rise time of 1.2 s or longer. (One per unit equals 0.8165 V L -L .)The

    test method and instrumentation used shall be per IEEE Std 522-

    1992. When specified by the purchaser, this requirement shall also

    apply to form windings supplied for voltages 575 V and below on

    motors rated above 150 kW (200 hp).

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    9/33

    Winding Resistance (PPM, QA, TS)

    Meg-ohm test (PPM, TS)PI (polarization test) (PPM, QA)

    Step Voltage Test (PPM, QA, TS)

    Surge Test (PPM, QA, TS)

    Balance between phases (PPM, QA, TS)

    # of Turns per phase (QA)

    Diameter copper (QA)

    High resistance connections (PPM, TS, QA)

    Turn-To-Turn shorts (TS, QA, PPM)

    Turn-To-Turn Opens (TS, QA,)

    Trending

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    10/33

    Meg-Ohm-Meter

    It Can:

    Determine if the motor has failed to ground. (TS)

    Dirty motor (Surface leakage) (PPM)

    Trending (PPM)

    Meg-Ohm-Meter

    It Can Not

    Determine if a motor is good

    Determine a Turn-to-Turn Fault

    Determine a Open Phase

    Determine a Phase-to-Phase Fault

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    11/33

    Can find-

    Deteriorated ground wall insulation (PPM, QA)

    Dry-rotted, hard, brittle ground wall insulation (PPM, QA)

    Moisture and Contamination

    Can find-

    Weak Ground wall insulation (PPM, QA, TS)

    Cable insulation (PPM, QA, TS)

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    12/33

    Low Voltage Tests Show all good

    Low Voltage Tests Show all good

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    13/33

    Surge test is the only test capable of finding weak

    insulation turn to turn

    Phase 1 & 2 are good

    Phase 3 shows weak insulation TurnTurn at about 1,000 volts.

    This is not a TurnTurn Short

    If it was the winding resistance would be unbalanced and it is not

    No other technology can find this fault

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    14/33

    480 Volt

    60 Hp1760 RPM

    Low voltage Tests show good

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    15/33

    White wave form shows the frequency shift when the

    weak insulation occurred

    1490 volts is where the weak insulation occurred on this

    phase

    Motor

    7200 volt

    1000 Hp

    3600 RPM Motor

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    16/33

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    17/33

    Results after the J-Box was cleaned

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    18/33

    Only by elevating the voltage above operating voltage did

    we see a problem

    Voltage spikes could track and cause a failure

    4160 Volt Motor

    300 HP

    1770 speedTested 4 identical motors at a power plant

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    19/33

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    20/33

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    21/33

    Last step at 8,960 Volts shows unstable ground wall

    insulation

    The step test allows the operator to see and trend the

    current leakage

    Dynamic Motor Monitoring

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    22/33

    Standard Connection

    Install PPE

    Open cabinet Connect CTs and Voltage Clips

    Less Than 600 V connect to bottom of starter

    Greater Then 600 Volts Connect into Secondary PTs and CTs

    Time for connection 4 Min

    Testing Time

    1 Sample 1560 Seconds

    Depends on rates and acquisition time

    See next slide

    Standard Connection

    Install PPE

    Open cabinet

    Connect CTs and Voltage Clips

    Less Than 600 V connect to bottom of starter

    Greater Then 600 Volts Connect into Secondary PTs and CTs

    Time for connection 4 Min

    Testing Time

    1 Sample 1560 Seconds

    Depends on rates and acquisition time

    See next slide

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    23/33

    Motor

    MCC

    LoadBreaker

    Step one: Running motor

    Step two: STOP motor

    Step three: Connect MPM

    Step four: Run and test

    Step five: STOP motor

    Step six: Disconnect MPM

    Exp

    Motor

    CTs

    Breaker

    PTs

    EP

    Explorer

    First EnergyRC Pump

    1 of 700+ EPs at one customer

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    24/33

    PQ Capabilities

    Voltage and Current level, unbalance distortions

    Kvars, KVA, KWs, Power factor, Crest factor, Harmonic bar chart ect.

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    25/33

    Eff. s.f.

    % NEMA derating

    % Load

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    26/33

    Temperature (C)

    Full Load 1.15 SF 1.25 SF49 64 77

    56 75 91

    75 102 128

    64 80 94

    69 89 106

    Horsepower10

    20

    50

    100

    200

    * Courtesy U S Motors

    Operating RMS values

    Voltage Level 658.2 V 99.7%

    Current Level 378.4 A 91.4%

    Load Level 312.6 kW 78.1%

    Voltage Unbalance 3.66%

    Voltage Distortion 9.80%

    NEMA derating % 0.6

    Eff. s.f. 1.28

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    27/33

    Importance

    Poor power quality causes increase heat

    For every ten degrees rise in temperature the life of the motor is reducedin half.

    Fan 1 hp 1740 rpm

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    28/33

    Great tool for Separating electrical and mechanical

    issues (solve disputes between mechanics and

    electricians) Reason the load is what causes more or less torque from the motor

    If a torque signature looks out of the ordinary the problem

    is most likely in the load

    4160V submersible pump

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    29/33

    Diagnose mechanical issues from

    the MCC

    Bearing Outer Race

    Inner Race

    Cage fr.

    Fan Unbalance

    Ect.

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    30/33

    Set up short medium and long

    range trip settings

    Set up Soft Starts

    Diagnose Pump and Fan issues

    Worn impellers

    Binding pumps

    Power Issues

    Rotor Issues

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    31/33

    IEEE 522

    IEC 34-15NEMA MG1

    NFPA 70B

    EASA

    Power Quality

    Poorly performing Transformers

    Short, medium, long, range trip settings

    Connection issues (Junction Box, In motor)

    Lead Line Insulation deterioration

    Turn-Turn, Phase-Phase, Coil-Coil insulationweakness

    Ground Wall Insulation

    Weakness

    Dirt

    Moisture

    Dry Rotted, Brittle

    Cracks

    Motor Circuit

    TurnTurn Shorts, Opens

    Reversed Coils

    Phase Unbalanced (turn count)

    Phase Unbalanced (wire size)

    Rotor

    Cracked Bars

    Poor Welds

    Broken Bars Eccentricity (Dynamic, Static)

    Loading Issues

    Over load

    Process

    Mechanical

    Bearing faults

    Miss Alignment Fan Unbalances

    Belt frequencies

    Worn Impellers

    Gear Mesh Frequencies

    VFD

    Power Quality

    Shorted IGBTs

    Feed Back loop

    Process Information

    Tuning / Set up

    Soft Start

    Tuning / Set up

    Trouble shooting

    Ect.

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    32/33

    Power Quality

    Poorly performing Transformers

    Short, medium, long, range trip settings

    Connection issues (Junction Box, In motor)Lead Line Insulation deterioration

    Turn-Turn, Phase-Phase, Coil-Coil insulationweakness

    Ground Wall Insulation

    Weakness

    Dirt

    Moisture

    Dry Rotted, Brittle

    Cracks

    Motor Circuit

    TurnTurn Shorts, Opens

    Reversed Coils

    Phase Unbalanced (turn count)

    Phase Unbalanced (wire size)

    Rotor

    Cracked Bars

    Poor Welds

    Broken Bars

    Eccentricity (Dynamic, Static)

    Loading Issues

    Over load

    Process

    Mechanical Bearing faults

    Miss Alignment

    Fan Unbalances

    Belt frequencies

    Worn Impellers

    Gear Mesh Frequencies

    VFD

    Power Quality

    Shorted IGBTs

    Feed Back loop

    Process Information

    Tuning / Set up

    Soft Start

    Tuning / Set up

    Trouble shooting

    Ect.

  • 7/29/2019 Methodology of motor predictive monitoring

    33/33

    Explorer (On-Line) testing provides information about the

    power condition, the load and the motor.

    AWA (Off-Line) testing measures the integrity of the

    motors insulation system and motor circuit

    Together they present a picture of the motors health and

    provide information required to accurately diagnose and

    predict imminent failures. Increasing motor quality

    assurance and trouble shooting capabilities will be

    realised with the utilisation of the AWA and Explorer

    Questions?

    For further information, please visit www.whitelegg.com

    Or contact

    Whitelegg Machines Ltd, 19 Crompton Way, Manor Royal, Crawley, West Sussex RH10 9QR,

    UK Tel: +44 (0) 1293 526 230 | Fax: +44 (0) 1293 538 910 | Email: [email protected]

    http://www.whitelegg.com/http://www.whitelegg.com/http://www.whitelegg.com/http://www.whitelegg.com/