Methamphetamine, Behavior and Brain Imaging - UCLA Integrated ...
-
Upload
brucelee55 -
Category
Documents
-
view
552 -
download
0
Transcript of Methamphetamine, Behavior and Brain Imaging - UCLA Integrated ...
Methamphetamine, Behaviorand Brain Imaging
Edythe D. London, Ph.D.David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
AMPHETAMINESIncluding Methamphetamine
• MOST COMMONLY USED ILLICIT DRUG AFTER CANNABIS
• >35 million regular users (WHO, 1997)
• 9.4 million Americans have used (DEA, 1999)
•No longer restricted to the Southwest
• Use steeply increased and expanded geographically
What do we know about methamphetamine?
•Meth, crystal, speed•CNS stimulant
•Injected, smoked, snorted, ingested orally
• Amphetamine derivative (prescribed 1950s, 1960s for
obesity, depression)• Prolonged , high level use
produces dependence.
What are the effects of methamphetamine?
• Cardiac arrhythmias• Stomach cramps
Effects on the brain:• stroke
• shaking• anxiety
• insomnia• paranoia
• hallucinations
What are the goals of brain imaging?
Figure out how drugs act.
Characterize addiction.
What’s wrong in the brain? What circuits?
Advance treatment.Provide a rational basis to design medicines or
cognitive-behavioral therapies.
Methamphetamine users have emotional and cognitive deficits.
.Where is the problem in the brain?
Focus on cortical-limbic circuits.
The orbitofrontal and cingulate cortices participate in emotional experiences and
cognitive processing.
R.J. Dolan, 2002
The anterior cingulate and insular cortices participate in emotional experiences.
The amygdala links perception with emotion and memory.
Affective State Varies Over Time
Drug-Taking
Dependence
Cessationof Drug Use
craving, negative affectco-morbid psychiatric
conditions
Relapse
Withdrawal
Positiv
e Affe
ct
Methamphetamine users have Methamphetamine users have cognitive deficits in early abstinence.cognitive deficits in early abstinence.
•working memory
•learning
•abstract thinking
• logic
113 (3.4) **124 (3.4) Words Remembered
19.5 (1.8) *24.0 (1.3)Discrimination Learning (# correct)
20.5 (3.0)
Controls (n = 23)
35.3 (3.8) **
MA (n = 21)
Learning Selective Reminding
Reminders (#)
Cognitive DeficitsCognitive Deficits
significant from control, *p<.05; **p <.01
63.1 (2.2) 54 (2.3) **Digit symbol (# correct)Working Memory
HypothesesHypotheses
Methamphetamine abusers in early abstinencehave affective deficits as well.
These deficits reflect dysfunction in specific brain regions.
Depression Scores in Abstinent Depression Scores in Abstinent Methamphetamine UsersMethamphetamine Users
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5
Weeks of MA AbstinenceWeeks of MA Abstinence
BD
I Sco
re
control control
Methamphetamine craving drops Methamphetamine craving drops dramatically over 3 weeks.dramatically over 3 weeks.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
1 2 3 4 5
Weeks of MA Abstinence
VA
S S
core
• MA and control groups
• Urine drug screens to show MA use
• Abstinence maintained on a research ward
• PET scan and cognitive tests
• PET scan -- FDG/auditory CPT
MethodsMethods
Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is injected as a tracer for brain function.
[18F]-labeled 2-deoxyglucose (FDG) is used in neurology, cardiology and oncology to study glucose metabolism. In cardiology, [18F]-labeled FDG can be used to measure regional myocardial glucose metabolism. Although glucose is not the primary metabolic fuel of the myocardium, glucose utilization has been extensively studied as a metabolic marker in both diseased and normal myocardium. Because [18F]-labeled FDG measures glucose metabolism it is also useful for tumor localization and quantitation. FDG is potentially useful in differentiating benign from malignant forms of stimulated osteoblastic activity because of the high metabolic activity of many types of aggressive tumors.
[ Tracers TOC | Back to Doses ] Copyright © 1998 Crump Institute for Biogical Imaging. Web Curator
FDG is taken up by brain regionsin proportion to their activity.
It is visualized in the brain by PET scans.
PET Scanning A Nuclear Medicine procedure
Detectors linked to a computer system reconstruct an image.
PET scans with FDG show normal whole brain metabolism in early
abstinence from methamphetamine.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
CM
Rg
lc (
mg
/10
0g
/min
)C
MR
glc
(m
g/1
00
g/m
in)
Control Control MAMA
Brain activity varies with age in methamphetamine users –
not in control subjects.
789
1011121314
20 30 40 50AGE (years)
Metabolic rate(mg/100 g/min)
MA reduces reserve – less compensation for aging.
Sig
nal In
ten
sit
y
Sig
nal In
ten
sit
y
(Wh
ite M
att
er)
(Wh
ite M
att
er)
Age (years)Age (years)
1010
55
00
-- 55
-- 1010
--1515
-- 20202020 3030 4040 5050
White matter (MRI scans) varies with White matter (MRI scans) varies with age in methamphetamine users. age in methamphetamine users.
Cortical white matter increases until the mid-30s in healthy people – not in methamphetamine users.
Regional brain activity is abnormal in methamphetamine abusers
during early abstinence.Anterior Cingulate
PosteriorCingulate
VentralStriatum/
2.5
1.5
1
2
3
3.5
0.5
Control> MA
t-values
MA >Control
5
3
1
2
4
Amygdala
Orbitofrontal Dysfunction in Methamphetamine Abusers
t-values
2.5
1.5
1
2
3
3.5
0.5
Control> MA
MA >Control
5
3
1
2
4
Depressive Symptoms in MA AbusersPositive Covariance with Activity
of Anterior Cingulate and Amygdala
5
3
1
2
4
67
t-values
ACCAmygdala
Anxiety in MA Abusers Negative Covariance with Cortical ActivityPositive Covariance with Amygdala Activity
Amygdala5
3
2
4
6
7
1
t-values
5
3
1
2
4
Negative Positive Covariance
Loss of Cortical Inhibition of the Amygdala
2.5
1.5
1
2
33.5
0.5
Control> MA
t-values
MA >Control
5
3
1
2
4
Cues exaggerated responses
anxiety, craving
ACC
AmygdalaOFC
Infralimbic Cortex Role in Recall of Extinction
Infralimbic neurons signal extinction memory
Habit. + Cond. Extinction Extinction
Habit. Cond. Extinction Extinction
Day 1 Day 2
Seconds after tone onset
% F
ree
zin
g t
o
ton
e
Sham
vmPFC
Lesion
20
10
0
20
10
0
20
10
021-1 0 -1-1 0 01 12 2
vmPFC lesions block recall of extinction Day 1 Day 2
80
60
40
20
0S
pik
es
IL
IL
Adapted from GJ Quirk and DR Gehlert, 2003
Orbitofrontal dysfunction shows recovery with continued
abstinence.t-values
2.5
1.5
1
2
3
3.5
0.5
Control> MA
MA >Control
5
3
1
2
4
Some cognitive functions improve with continued abstinence.
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52C
orre
ct r
espo
nses
/45
sec
Controls
METH, 1-7 days abstinent
METH, 3 mo abstinent
N = 22
*
Conclusions
Cortical dysfunction in methamphetamine dependence
involves regions associated with negative affect:
Orbitofrontal, Cingulate, Insular
Negative affect (depression, anxiety)-- Has direct effects on drug taking
-- Has indirect effects through influencing executive cognitive functions.
Can imaging help to develop effective treatments?
Treatment and Sobriety
Drug Use Behavior
Responsible Behavioral
Choice
Knowledge of affected circuitry can• Identify targets for medications.
• Identify brain systems amenable to behavioral therapy- a moving target.
Walter Ling Richard Rawson
Sara Simon Steven Berman
Roger Woods Mark Mandelkern
John Matochik Bradley Voytek
Aaron Lichtman Varughese Kurian
Ann Shinn Jennifer Bramen
Jennifer Learn
Collaborating InvestigatorsCollaborating Investigators