Meeting Notice Budget Committee Justice Assistance Grant ...

Meeting Notice

Budget Committee Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Planning Meeting

Tuesday, May 9, 2006 From 9 a.m. – 12 p.m.

& Wednesday, May 24, 2006

From 9 a.m. – 12 p.m.

120 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 1016 Chicago, Illinois

Agenda – Day Two - May 24, 2006 < Call to Order & Roll Call 1. Recap of Day One Meeting & Purpose of Meeting 2. Research & Analysis Unit Needs Survey Results 3. Discussion – Matching Funds and Grant Performance Periods 4. JAG Priorities 5. Wrap-up < Adjourn

This meeting will be accessible to persons with disabilities in compliance with Executive Order #5 and pertinent State and Federal laws upon anticipated attendance. Persons with disabilities planning to attend and needing special accommodations should contact by telephone or letter Mr. Hank Anthony, Associate Director, Office of Administrative Services, Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, 120 South Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60606-3997 (telephone 312/793-8550). TDD services are available at 312-793-4170.

ILLINOIS CRIMINAL JUSTICE

INFORMATION AUTHORITY

120 South Riverside Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60606-3997

Phone: (312) 793-8550 Fax: (312) 793-8422 TDD: (312) 793-4170

http://www.icjia.state.il.us

Budget Committee

_______________________________ _______________________________

Eugene E. Murphy, Jr. Chair

Hon. Richard A. Devine Vice Chair

David P. Bradford

Barbara L. Engel

Thomas J. Jurkanin

Hon. Lisa Madigan

Larry G. Trent

_______________________________ _______________________________

Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority

Sheldon Sorosky Chair

Hon. Richard A. Devine

Vice Chair

Lori G. Levin Executive Director

MEMORANDUM

TO: Authority Members FROM: Lori G. Levin, Executive Director DATE: May 17, 2006 RE: Informational Materials The following items are being provided for informational purposes pursuant to discussions held at the May 9, 2006 Budget Committee / Justice Assistance Grants planning meeting:

1. Justice Assistance Grants Matching Funds and Period of Project Support memo 2. Anti-Drug Abuse Act Past Priorities and Program Examples 3. The National Criminal Justice Association Survey of State Administering

Agencies - Justice Assistance Grants Match Requirements 4. Illinois Coverage by Metropolitan Enforcement Groups and Task Forces for State

Fiscal Year 2006 5. Federal Fiscal Year 2003 and 2004 Attachment A’s for the Anti-Drug Abuse Act

and the Local Law Enforcement Block Grants programs 6. Crime and Criminal Justice Trends – PowerPoint presentation delivered by the

Authority’s Research and Analysis Department at the May 9, 2006 Budget Committee / Justice Assistance Grants planning meeting

MEMORANDUM

TO: Authority Members FROM: Lori G. Levin, Executive Director DATE: May 17, 2006 RE: Justice Assistance Grants (JAG) Matching Funds & Period of Project Support In keeping with the Bureau of Justice Assistance’s policy to 1) promote the leveraging of state, local, and private resources and 2) to emphasize the need for early sustainment planning by grant recipients, staff recommends maintaining the original matching fund requirements as set forth under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act (ADAA) program, which JAG effectively replaces. Those matching fund requirements are as follows:

At least 25 percent of the cost of a program or project funded with a formula grant must be paid in cash with nonfederal funds. These “match” funds must be in addition to funds that would otherwise be made available by the recipient. Match funds are generally provided on a project-by-project basis, although BJA may approve a statewide match option.

Requiring matching funds would serve two purposes. First, matching funds would promote greater accountability among grant recipients, as they would have a vested stake in the effectiveness of the grant-funded program. Secondly, matching funds would allow the federal award to the Authority to be stretched further and be distributed among more recipients than if grant-funded programs relied entirely on JAG funds to cover their costs. Staff also recommends continuing the policy, as required under the ADAA program, that projects in the aggregate may be funded for a maximum of 4 years (48 months). Programs previously funded under ADAA would be eligible to begin new four-year funding periods. Grants awarded to state and local governments to participate in multi-jurisdictional drug or gang task forces and victim assistance programs are excluded from this restriction.

MEMORANDUM TO: Authority Members FROM: Eugene E. Murphy, Jr., Budget Committee Chair DATE: April 24, 2006 RE: Anti-Drug Abuse Act (ADAA) Past Priorities and Program Examples Past Priorities

At the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Criminal Justice Planning Assembly in 2000, several current and/or future resource gaps and needs in the areas of drugs and violent crime; juvenile crime; offender services; victims of violent crime; community capacity building; information systems and technology were identified. These resource gaps lead to the establishment of seven priorities, which are consistent with and build on the National Drug Control Strategy (NDCS), as well as the JAG purpose areas. These priorities have been used in the establishment of funding priorities in our ADAA applications for the past several years, and for the FFY05 and 06 JAG applications. Once this committee has established new priorities, those JAG application priorities will be revised to reflect any changes. Examples of programs falling within each priority area have been provided. Priority 1: Support prevention programs that help youth recognize risks associated

with violent crime and drug use and target youth to reduce their use of violence, illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco products. (NDCS priority #1 & JAG purpose area #3 - Prevention and Education Programs). Program Example: Juvenile Probation Program, the Cook County Probation Program developed a community-based team of clinicians, specially trained in the application of Multi-Systemic Therapy, to serve minors returning from court-ordered residential treatment programs. Team members attended a four-day training. Multidisciplinary team meetings continue to be held which include the courts, DCFS, the Multi-Systemic team, probation officers, and family, so that all aspects of the youths’ lives are considered.

ADAA Past Priorities Page 2

Priority 2: Support programs statewide that target prevention and early intervention for juveniles, with particular emphasis on the principals of balanced and restorative justice. (NDCS priority #1 & JAG purpose area #3 - Prevention and Education Programs).

Program Example: Juvenile Probation Centers Program has established a system of supervision and programming within the juvenile criminal justice system for a collaborative initiative, which seeks to address truancy and other at-risk behaviors, develop life-skills, build healthy family interaction and involvement, and provide after school and summer activities and services—all toward the goal of delinquency intervention and prevention.

Priority 3: Support programs that enhance treatment effectiveness, quality, and

services so that those who need treatment can receive it. (NDCS priority #2 & JAG purpose area #5 - Drug Treatment Programs).

Program Example: Jail-based Mental Health Services, the primary goal of Jail Data Link Project is to deploy the technological and clinical services in three (3) geographically diverse jail settings according to the Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health regional map for Illinois. The county adult detention facilities in each of the locations have a high enough number of jail admissions and provide geographic uniqueness to serve as pilot expansion sites. They also have established relationships with DHS funded mental providers who can provide community-based resources for detainees with mental illness that are identified through Data Link.

Priority 4: Support research that identifies what works in drug treatment and the

prevention of drug use, violent crime, and their consequences. (NDCS priority #’s 1 & 2, and JAG purpose area #3 - Prevention and Education Programs & #5 - Drug Treatment Programs).

Program Example: The Drug and Violent Crime Control Strategy Impact Program has the goal of improving the effectiveness of drug and violent crime control efforts in Illinois by providing policy and decision makers with better information on the nature and extent of the problem, as well as information about the types of programs or factors contributing to the success of crime control initiatives. It supports a central clearinghouse function for drug and violent crime related data and information, funds formal evaluations of drug and violent crime control efforts, and initiates other research in support of Illinois criminal justice planning and program development. Funding has supported evaluation projects conducted by the Authority and external evaluators.

Priority 5: Support programs that promote the efficiency and effectiveness of the

criminal justice system. (NDCS priority #3, and JAG purpose area #2 -


Prosecution and Court Programs & #4 - Corrections and Community Corrections Programs.)

Program Example: The Community-based Transitional Services for Female Offenders Program strategy is to provide support services on an individualized basis, rather than funding a pre-packaged or general program. Gender-responsive case management services were made available to eligible women in the program. Services will provide a continuum of programming from pre-release services in the facility through post-release programming in the community linking women to available service networks and community-based programs.

Priority 6: Support efforts to implement an integrated justice system in Illinois that

includes all components of the criminal justice system and includes every jurisdiction within the state. (NDCS priority #3, and JAG purpose area #4 - Corrections and Community Corrections Programs & #6 - Planning, Evaluation, and Technology Improvement Programs.)

Program Example: The Criminal History Record Improvement program through which the Illinois State Police operates and maintains an Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS), which is the biometric identification component of the Illinois Criminal History Record Information system as a whole. The term eAFIS (enhanced Automated Fingerprint Identification System) is a conceptual construct that describes and represents the next generation of enhancement for the Illinois State Police AFIS. eAFIS is a marriage of enhanced platform and functionality.

Priority 7: Support efforts with law enforcement, prosecution, and probation to

combat, disrupt, and test drug users. (NDCS priority #3, and JAG purpose area #1 - Law Enforcement Programs & #2 - Prosecution and Court Programs.)

Program Example: Multi-jurisdictional narcotics units operate to improve the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of drug law enforcement, thereby making communities safer, and ensuring a greater degree of safety for undercover officers. Multi-jurisdictional units focus on the identification and apprehension of drug traffickers and on eliminating drug trafficking networks, and work together with law enforcement agencies at the local, state and federal level. Currently, there are a total of 20 multi-jurisdictional narcotic units, comprised of ten MEGs and 10 task forces funded by the Authority. Program Example: Multi-jurisdictional drug prosecution units provide prosecutorial support to local metropolitan enforcement groups (MEGs) and drug task forces to develop legally sound drug cases, prosecute drug offenders, and conduct forfeiture proceedings. Programs in eight county state’s attorney’s offices, and the Office of the State’s


Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor receive funding for drug prosecution attorneys to support MEGs and task forces. Program Example: Local Law Enforcement Officer Safety Initiatives have provided funding for local law enforcement agencies for basic law enforcement equipment to enhance officer safety and improve operational effectiveness. These grant programs funded the acquisition of law enforcement vehicles, radios, MDC/in-car computers, and in-car video systems for local law enforcement agencies in Illinois.

National Criminal Justice AssociationSurvey of

State Administering AgenciesMay 2006

State Percentage Comments Time Period CommentsAL 50% no limitAS 0% Congressional Act no limitAZ 25% will increase to 40% no limitCA 0% no limitCO 0% grantees report all sources of financial

support; agencies that receive direct award from BJA report amount of funds devoted to a particular project

4 years MJTF excepted

DE 10% no limit Advisory board determines limitFL 0% no limitGA 25% in kind or cash no limitHI 20% no limitIA 25% 4 years Advisory Board and Commission can

approve waiver

ID 0% JAG grants - 3 yrs; MJTF - 5 yrs; tech grants - no limits

KS 25% year 1; 30% year 2; 50% year 3; 75% year 4+

no limit few projects are funded more than 1 year

KY 25% no limit competitive application process annuallyLA 25% 4 yearsMI 25% year 1; 40%

year 2; 50% year 3; 60% year 4

MJDTF always have 50% match 3 years

MN Ask match from drug and gang task forces; no hard match requirement for other grants

no limit

MO 25% JAG/Byrne; 10% JAG/LLEBG

2 years Commission can approve waiver

MP 0% 1 year extend if need arises provided master grant is still in effect, normally 3 years

MS 25% 4 years MJTF and victim assistance exceptedNC 25% grantee can request waiver 3 years some exceptions on case by case basis

JAG Match Requirements Project Period

5/22/2006 page 1

National Criminal Justice AssociationSurvey of

State Administering AgenciesMay 2006

State Percentage Comments Time Period CommentsNH 0% 4 years MJTF exceptedNJ 50% MJTF grants;

25% all other grants4 years

NM 25% considering elimination of match requirement

yes MJTF, Victim/Witness Coordinator grants excepted; other exceptions can be approved

NV 0% 4 years MJTF, Victim/Witness Coordinator grants excepted

NY 10% considering increasing match each project year

3 years MJTF excepted

OH 25% on JAG; 10% on JAG pass through

Jurisdictions, organizations can request waiver

2 years

OK 25% cash or in-kind no limitPA 25% year 1; 50%

year 2; 75% year 3makes occasional exceptions no limit

PR 0% no limitSC 25% Also, 25% match on P&A 4 years MJTF exceptedTN 25% no limit usually adhere to 4 year limitVA 25% no limitWA 25% 4 years MJTF exceptedWI 0% 4 years MJTF exceptedWY No grants, reimburse personnel costs of

deputies and officers assigned to task forces

no limit

JAG Match Requirements Project Period

5/22/2006 page 2

* Shaded areas indicate at least one local law enforcement agency within the county participates in a MEG or Task Force

LegendNo Coverage

BATF

CIEG

DUMEG

ECITF

MANS

KAMEG

LCMEG

MEGSI

MCNEG

NCNTF

QCMEG

SCIDTF

SEIDTF

SIDTF

SIEG

SLANT

TF6

Z3LTF

VMEG

WCITF

Rural Counties

Illinois Coverage* by MEGs and Task Forces,

SFY 2006

PIKE

LEE

WILL

COOK

MCLEAN

LASALLE

OGLE

ADAMS

KNOX

HENRY

IROQUOIS

FULTON

BUREAU

SHELBY

WAYNE

LIVINGSTON

KANE

CHAMPAIGNLOGAN

EDGAR

LAKE

VERMILION

HANCOCK

MACOUPIN

CLAY

PEORIA

FAYETTE

FORD

MADISON

DEKALB

SANGAMON

MACON

MASON

WHITE

CLARK

COLES

PIATT

ST. CLAIR

MARION

CHRISTIAN

MERCER

CASS

KANKAKEE

JACKSON

WHITESIDE

GREENE

MORGAN

TAZEWELL

JASPER

PERRY

POPEUNION

BOND

MCHENRY

WARREN

CLINTON

RANDOLPH

JO DAVIESS

SALINE

DEWITT

JEFFERSON

MONTGOMERY

CARROLL

GRUNDY

JERSEY

WOODFORD

MCDONOUGH

MONROE

FRANKLIN

WINNEBAGO

DOUGLAS

STEPHENSON

HAMILTON

WASHINGTON

EFFINGHAM

SCHUYLER

STARK

DUPAGE

BROWN

CRAWFORD

BOONE

MARSHALL

WILLIAMSON

MENARD

JOHNSON

RICHLAND

SCOTT

KENDALL

ROCK ISLAND

GALLATIN

LAWRENCE

MOULTRIE

HENDERSON

CALHOUN

MASSAC

WABASH

CUMBERLAND

PULASKI

HARDIN

EDWARDS

ALEXANDER

PUTNAM

ADAA FFY03March 22, 2006

Program Title: Expanding Multi-Jurisdictional Narcotic Units

Project Title: Expanding Multi-Jurisdictional Narcotic Units403000 Blackhawk Area Task Force $84,141 F $28,047 L403001 Central IL Enforcement Group $167,787 F $55,929 L403002 DuPage County MEG $182,031 F $60,677 L403202 DuPage County MEG (Expansion) - 21 months $69,477 F $23,159 L403003 East Central IL Task Force $123,963 F $41,321 L403203 East Central IL Task Force (Expansion) - 21 months $2,750 F $917 L403004 Joliet MANS $174,555 F $58,185 L403005 Kankakee MEG $188,413 F $62,804 L403006 Lake County MEG $339,011 F $113,004 L403206 Lake County MEG (Expansion) - 21 months $76,500 F $25,500 L403007 Southern IL Drug Task Force $251,551 F $83,850 L403207 Southern Il Drug Task Force (Expansion) - 21 months $145,135 F $48,378 L403008 Multi-County MEG $88,974 F $29,658 L403208 Multi-County MEG (Expansion) - 21 months $93,471 F $31,157 L403009 North Central Narcotic Task Force $174,540 F $58,180 L403209 North Central Narcotic Task Force (Expansion) - 21 months $75,180 F $25,060 L403010 Quad-Cities MEG $39,869 F $13,290 L403210 Quad-Cities MEG (Expansion) - 21 months $253,187 F $84,396 L403011 SLANT Task Force $148,874 F $49,625 L403012 South Central Illinois Drug Task Force $102,341 F $34,114 L403212 South Central Illinois Drug Task Force (Expansion) - 21 months $133,091 F $44,364 L403013 Southeastern Illinois Drug Task Force $167,503 F $55,834 L403213 Southeastern Illinois Drug Task Force (Expansion) - 25 months $81,618 F $27,206 L403014 Metropolitan Enforcement Group of Southwestern Ill. $584,497 F $194,832 L403015 Southern Illinois Enforcement Group $178,122 F $59,374 L403017 Zone 3 / LaSalle Task Force $73,292 F $24,431 L403217 Zone 3 / LaSalle Task Force (Expansion) 24 months $102,754 F $34,251 L403018 Vermilion County MEG $179,476 F $59,825 L403218 Vermilion County MEG (Expansion) - 21 months $57,603 F $19,201 L403019 West Central IL Task Force $165,362 F $55,121 L403219 West Central IL Task Force (Expansion) - 21 months $110,597 F $36,866 L403020 Zone 6 Task Force $80,132 F $26,711 L403220 Zone 6 Task Force (Expansion) - 21 monhts $75,521 F $25,174 L

Program Title: Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Prosecution Program

Project Title: Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Prosecution Program403021 DuPage County State's Attorney's Office $195,519 F $65,173 L403022 Kane County State's Attorney's Office $179,959 F $59,986 L403023 Lake County State's Attorney's Office $256,072 F $85,357 L403024 McHenry County State's Attorney's Office $104,242 F $34,747 L403025 Office of the State's Attorneys' Appellate Prosecutor $548,801 F $182,934 L403026 St. Clair County State's Attorney's Office $132,191 F $44,064 L403027 Will County State's Attorney's Office $165,660 F $55,220 L

Project Title: Complex Drug Prosecutions403089 Cook County State's Attorney's Office $1,274,992 F $424,997 L

ANTI-DRUG ABUSEACT

FFY03 PLAN

ATTACHMENT A

Multi-Jurisdictional Task ForcesADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(2)

1


Program Title: Community Violence Prevention

Project Title: CeaseFire403160 Illinois Violence Prevention Authority $600,000 F $200,000 S

Project Title: Crimes Against Seniors Program403161 Illinois State Police $213,113 F $71,038 S

Program Title: Specialized Training

Project Title: Law Enforcement Training403085 Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board $0 F $0 S

Project Title: Judicial Training403100 Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts $25,000 F $8,333 S

Project Title: Sex Offender Management Training403117 Illinois Department of Corrections $60,000 F $20,000 S

Project Title: Meth Training403131 Illinois Attorney General's Office $18,250 F $6,083 S

Project Title: Meth Summit403132 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority $3,200 F $1,067 S

Program Title: Risk Assessment

Project Title: Improve Juvenile Risk Assessment403101 Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts - 8 months $0 F $0 S

Program Title: Local Law Enforcement Officer Safety

Project Title: Local Law Enforcement Officer Safety403800 Chicago Police Department $150,000 F $50,000 L

Project Title: Local Law Enforcement Officer Safety403801… TBD $498,851 F $166,284 L

Program Title: Specialized Prosecution Initiatives

Project Title: Systemic Sentencing Issues Appeals Project403188 Office of the State's Attorney's Appellate Prosecutor - 24 months $710,700 F $236,900 S

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(7)(A)Improving Operational Effectiveness

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(4)Community Crime Prevention

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(8)Drug and Violent Offender Prosecution

2


Program Title: Specialized Defense Initiatives

Project Title: Defense Services403102 Office of the State Appellate Defender - 9 months $142,000 F $47,333 S403028 Office of the Macon County Public Defender $101,250 F $33,750 L403029 Office of the Winnebago County Public Defender - 24 months $106,500 F $35,500 L403030 Office of the Kankakee County Public Defender - 24 monhts $97,000 F $32,333 L403032 Office of the Champaign County Public Defender - 24 months $89,614 F $29,871 L403033 Office of the Will County Public Defender $35,250 F $11,750 L403084 Office of the Lake County Public Defender $62,250 F $20,750 L

Project Title: Systemic Sentencing Issues Appeals Project403106 Office of the State Appellate Defender $236,900 F $78,967 S

Program Title: Specialized Defense Training

Project Title: Statewide Public Defender Training403103 Office of the State Appellate Defender - 9 months $30,000 F $10,000 S

Program Title: Correctional Initiatives

Project Title: Community-Based Residential Treatment for Adults403092 Illinois Department of Corrections - 10 months $402,344 F $134,115 S

Project Title: Young Offender Re-entry Program403093 Illinois Department of Corrections - 9 months $528,680 F $176,227 S

Project Title: Community-based Transitional Services for Female Offenders403105 Illinois Department of Corrections - 18 months $333,333 F $111,111 S

Program Title: Specialized Corrections Tranining

403047 Project Title: Corrections Hostage/Crisis TrainingIllinios Department of Corrections $0 F $0 S

Program Title: Vocational Training Facility Development

Project Title: Pere Marquette Vocational Facility Development403619 Illinois Department of Corrections $0 F $0 S

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(10)Operational Effectiveness of the Court

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(11)Post Conviction Correctional Resources

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(12)Inmate Skills Development

3


Program Title: Information Systems

Project Title: Gang Information Exchange Database403096 Chicago Police Department - 24 months $1,339,000 F $446,333 L

Project Title: Videotaped Confessions and Eyewitness ID Training403041 Illinois State Police $333,868 F $111,289 S

Project Title: Integrated Justice InitiativesTBD $280,363 F $93,454 S

Program Title: Criminal History Records Improvement

Project Title: Audit Plan403051 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority $225,000 F $75,000 S

Project Title: ISP eAFIS Upgrade403777 Illinois State Police $88,325 F $29,442 S

Project Title: ISP Mobile Data Computer Systems403778 Illinois State Police $17,951 F $5,984 S

Project Title: LiveScan403400 Chicago Police Department $629,222 F $209,741 L

Program Title: Innovative Jail-based Initiatives

Project Title: Jail-based Mental Health Services403251 Illinois Department of Human Services $375,000 F $125,000 L

Program Title: Evaluation

Project Title: Drug Strategy Impact Evaluation403058 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority $1,265,000 F $421,667 S

Program Title: Probation Initiatives

Project Title: Juvenile Probation Programs403078 Cook County Juvenile Probation - 6 months $0 F $0 L403081 Rock Island County Probation - 14 months $54,075 F $18,025 L403127 DeKalb County Juvenile Probation $9,000 F $3,000 L

Project Title: Juvenile Reporting Centers403070 Tazewell County Probation Department - 12 months $70,000 F $23,333 L403071 First Judicial Circuit $105,000 F $35,000 L

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(15)(B)Information Systems

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(16)Innovative Programs

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(19)Evaluation Programs

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(20)Alternatives to Detention

4


Project Title: Innovative Probation Initiatives403150 Will County - 24 months $140,000 F $46,667 L403151 Christian County - 4th Judicial Circuit $179,145 F $59,715 L403152 Tazewell County - 10th Judicial Circuit - 24 months $206,000 F $68,667 L403153 Lee County - 24 months $103,310 F $34,437 L403154 Kane Couty - 24 months $100,000 F $33,333 L403155 Ford County - 24 months $92,400 F $30,800 L

Project Title: Community-based Transitional Services for Female Offenders403107 Lake County $25,069 F $8,356 L403109 Madison County $0 F $0 L403110 Cook County Social Services $78,899 F $26,300 L403111 Cook County Adult Probation $64,812 F $21,604 L

Program Title: Educational Programs

Project Title: Child Lures Prevention School Program403250 Illinois State Police $106,878 F $35,626 S

403998 Unallocated

Undesignated Local CHRI $0 F $0 LUndesignated State CHRI $0 F $0 SUndesignated Local $0 F $0 LUndesignated State $0 F $0 S

403999 Administration

Administration Funds $1,248,647 F $416,216 S

TOTAL $19,209,953

ADAA PURPOSE 99Administration Funds

ADAA PURPOSE UNALLOCATEDUnallocated Funds

ADAA PURPOSE 501 (b)(28)Child Abuse Prevention

5


Program Title: Expanding Multi-Jurisdictional Narcotic Units

Project Title: Expanding Multi-Jurisdictional Narcotic Units404000 Blackhawk Area Task Force $130,432 F $43,477 L404001 Central IL Enforcement Group $259,759 F $86,586 L404002 DuPage County MEG $272,986 F $90,995 L404003 East Central IL Task Force $200,810 F $66,937 L404004 Joliet MANS $261,775 F $87,258 L404005 Kankakee MEG $282,557 F $94,186 L404006 Lake County MEG $508,404 F $169,468 L404007 Southern IL Drug Task Force $377,528 F $125,843 L404008 Multi-County MEG $133,431 F $44,477 L404009 North Central Narcotic Task Force $261,822 F $87,274 L404010 Quad-Cities MEG $59,790 F $19,930 L404011 SLANT Task Force $224,942 F $74,981 L404012 South Central Illinois Drug Task Force $159,460 F $53,153 L404013 Southeastern Illinois Drug Task Force $251,198 F $83,733 L404213 Southeastern Illinois Drug Task Force $3,401 F $1,134 L404014 Metropolitan Enforcement Group of Southwestern Ill. $876,551 F $292,184 L404015 Southern Illinois Enforcement Group $267,124 F $89,041 L404017 Zone 3 / LaSalle Task Force $109,913 F $36,638 L404018 Vermilion County MEG $269,155 F $89,718 L404019 West Central IL Task Force $250,048 F $83,349 L404020 Zone 6 Task Force $120,171 F $40,057 L404217 Zone 3 / LaSalle Task Force (Expansion) $51,377 F $17,126 L404212 South Central Illinois Drug Task Force (Expansion) - 15 months $95,065 F $31,688 L

Program Title: Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Prosecution Program

Project Title: Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Prosecution Program404021 DuPage County State's Attorney's Office $293,214 F $97,738 L404022 Kane County State's Attorney's Office $269,878 F $89,959 L404023 Lake County State's Attorney's Office $384,023 F $128,008 L404024 McHenry County State's Attorney's Office $104,242 F $34,747 L404124 McHenry County State's Attorney's Office $69,495 F $23,165 L404025 Office of the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor $550,607 F $183,536 S404125 Office of the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor $298,062 F $99,354 S404026 St. Clair County State's Attorney's Office $202,461 F $67,487 L404027 Will County State's Attorney's Office $248,435 F $82,812 L

Project Title: Complex Drug Prosecutions404089 Cook County State's Attorney's Office $1,467,630 F $489,210 L404189 Cook County State's Attorney's Office $1,070,147 F $356,716 L

ANTI-DRUG ABUSEACT

FFY04 PLAN

ATTACHMENT A

Multi-Jurisdictional Task ForcesADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(2)

1


ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(4)Community Crime Prevention

Program Title: Community Violence Prevention

Project Title: Crimes Against Seniors404160 Illinois State Police $213,113 F $71,038 S

Program Title: Specialized Training

Project Title: Judicial Training404100 Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts $40,000 F $13,333 S

Project Title: Forensic Unit Training and Equipment404042 Harwood Heights (West Suburban Major Violent Crimes Task Force) $30,000 F $10,000 L

Program Title: Risk Assessment

404101 Project Title: Improve Juvenile Risk AssessmentAdministrative Office of the Illinois Courts - 15 months $193,125 F $64,375 S

Program Title: Specialized Prosecution Initiatives

Project Title: DNA Unit404129 Cook County State's Attorney's Office $700,000 F $233,333 S

Project Title: Systemic Sentencing Issues Appeals Project404188 Office of the State's Attorney's Appellate Prosecutor $355,350 F $118,450 S

Program Title: Specialized Defense Initiatives

Project Title: Defense Services404028 Office of the Macon County Public Defender $101,250 F $33,750 L404033 Office of the Will County Public Defender $35,250 F $11,750 L404084 Office of the Lake County Public Defender $62,250 F $20,750 L

Project Title: Systemic Sentencing Issues Appeals Project404106 Office of the State Appellate Defender - 24 months $473,800 F $157,933 S

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(7)(A)Improving Operational Effectiveness

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(8)Drug and Violent Offender Prosecution

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(10)Operational Effectiveness of the Courts

2


Program Title: Information Systems

Project Title: Audit Plan404051 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority $42,253 F $14,084 S

Project Title: Gang Information Exchange Database404096 Chicago Police Department $0 F $0 L

Project Title: Integrated Justice InitiativesTBD $219,637 F $73,212 S

Program Title: Criminal History Records Improvement

Project Title: ISP Mobile Data Computer Systems404778 Illinois State Police $249,041 F $83,014 S

Program Title: Evaluation

Project Title: Drug Strategy Impact Evaluation404058 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority $1,265,000 F $421,667 S

Program Title: Probation Initiatives

Project Title: Juvenile Reporting Centers404071 First Judicial Circuit $105,000 F $35,000 L

Project Title: Innovative Probation Initiatives404150 Will County $70,000 F $23,333 L404151 Christian County - 4th Judicial Circuit - 24 months $358,290 F $119,430 L404152 Tazewell County - 10th Judicial Circuit $103,000 F $34,333 L404153 Lee County $51,655 F $17,218 L404154 Kane Couty $50,000 F $16,667 L404155 Ford County $46,200 F $15,400 L

Project Title: Community-based Transitional Services for Female Offenders404107 Lake County - 21 months $43,871 F $14,624 L404110 Cook County Social Services - 24 months $339,456 F $113,152 L404111 Cook County Adult Probation - 24 months $410,406 F $136,802 L

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(15)(B)Information Systems

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(19)Evaluation Programs

ADAA PURPOSE 501(b)(20)Alternatives to Detention

3


404998 Unallocated

Undesignated Local CHRI $629,222 F $209,741 LUndesignated State CHRI $0 F $0 SUndesignated Local $0 F $0 LUndesignated State $1,005,534 F $335,178 S

404999 Administration

Administration Funds $1,222,041 F $407,347 S

TOTAL $18,800,637

ADAA PURPOSE 99Administration Funds

ADAA PURPOSE UNALLOCATEDUnallocated Funds

4

LLEBG FFY03February 10, 2005

LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENTBLOCK GRANTS PROGRAMFFY03ATTACHMENT ARevised 2/24/05, 7/7/05

Federal MatchGrant ID Law Enforcement Agency County Amount Amount803000 Bureau County Sheriff’s Department Bureau $20,000 $2,222803001 Coles County Sheriff’s Department Coles $20,000 $2,222803002 Iroquois Sheriff’s Department Iroquois $16,650 $1,850803003 Kendall County Sheriff’s Department Kendall $20,000 $2,222

Total Amount $76,650 $8,517

Federal MatchGrant ID Law Enforcement Agency County Amount Amount803004 Bourbonnais Police Department Kankakee $20,000 $2,222803005 Breese Police Department Clinton $20,000 $2,222803006 Buffalo Police Department Sangamon $11,644 $1,294803007 Buncombe Police Department Johnson $18,000 $2,000803008 Carlyle Police Department Clinton $15,651 $1,739803009 Carrier Mills Police Department Saline $12,236 $1,360803010 Carroll County Sheriff’s Department Carroll $17,964 $1,996803011 Cherry Valley Police Department Winnebago $8,334 $926803012 Cumberland County Sheriff’s Department Cumberland $18,000 $2,000803013 DuQuoin Police Department Perry $17,569 $1,952803014 Dupo Police Department St. Clair $18,160 $2,018803015 Dwight Police Department Livingston $20,000 $2,222803016 Effingham Police Department Effingham $9,315 $1,035803017 Elkhart Police Department Logan $16,484 $1,832803018 Evergreen Park Police Department Cook $19,910 $2,212803019 Farmington Police Department Fulton $0 $0803020 Fillmore Police Department Montgomery $0 $0803021 Forreston Police Department Ogle $16,946 $1,883803022 Gorham Police Department Jackson $18,270 $2,030803023 Hampshire Police Department Kane $17,550 $1,950803024 Irving Police Department Montgomery $10,350 $1,150803025 Itasca Police Department DuPage $18,000 $2,000803026 Jersey County Sheriff’s Department Jersey $20,000 $2,222803027 Johnston City Police Department Williamson $17,779 $1,975803028 Justice Police Department Cook $20,000 $2,222

Populations of 25,000 or More (4 proposals)

Populations of Less Than 25,000 (56 proposals)

1


803029 Kildeer Police Department Lake $18,000 $2,000803030 London Mills Police Department Fulton $15,133 $1,681803031 Manito Police Department Mason $19,841 $2,205803032 Mansfield Police Department Piatt $11,250 $1,250803033 Metamora Police Department Woodford $0 $0803034 Minonk Police Department Woodford $11,000 $1,222803035 Morton Grove Police Department Cook $17,755 $1,973803036 Mt. Morris Police Department Ogle $16,958 $1,884803037 Nauvoo Police Department Hancock $12,535 $1,393803038 New Lenox Police Department Will $18,581 $2,065803039 New Windsor Police Department Mercer $19,800 $2,200803040 Norridge Police Department Cook $15,782 $1,754803041 Norris City Police Department White $20,000 $2,222803042 Orion Police Department Henry $6,120 $680803043 Piatt County Sheriff’s Department Piatt $17,914 $1,990803044 Plymouth Police Department Hancock $20,000 $2,222803045 Raleigh Police Department Saline $7,650 $850803046 Richmond Police Department McHenry $9,685 $1,076803047 River Forest Police Department Cook $14,612 $1,624803048 River Grove Police Department Cook $13,221 $1,469803049 Stone Park Police Department Cook $13,079 $1,453803050 Strasburg Police Department Shelby $17,160 $1,907803051 Tilden Police Department Randolph $20,000 $2,222803052 Vienna Police Department Johnson $19,800 $2,200803053 Viola Police Department Mercer $17,100 $1,900803054 Warsaw Police Department Hancock $19,987 $2,221803055 Waterman Police Department Dekalb $19,101 $2,122803056 West Dundee Police Department Kane $14,598 $1,622803057 West Frankfort Police Department Franklin $13,455 $1,495803058 Westmont Police Department DuPage $15,944 $1,772803059 Woodhull Police Department Henry $19,800 $2,200803060 Cave-in-Rock Police Department Hardin $7,899 $878803061 Crete Police Department Will $9,477 $1,053803062 Dunfermlin Police Department Fulton $18,000 $2,000803063 Toledo Police Department Cumberland $4,275 $475803064 Shelbyville Police Department Shelby $4,668 $519

Total Amount $902,342 $100,260

Unallocated $89

Total Amount $979,081

3% Administrative Funds $30,281

Total Authority Administered $1,009,362 $108,777

2


LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENTBLOCK GRANTS PROGRAMFFY04ATTACHMENT ARevised 4/21/2005, 7/13/05

Federal MatchGrant ID Law Enforcement Agency County Amount Amount

804015 Grundy County Sheriff's Department Grundy $16,018 $1,780804033 Round Lake Beach Police Department Lake $17,550 $1,950804023 Northbrook Police Department Cook $17,982 $1,998

$51,550 $5,728

Federal MatchGrant ID Law Enforcement Agency County Amount Amount

804000 Ashland Police Department Cass $17,995 $1,999804001 Beckemeyer Police Department Clinton $20,000 $2,222804002 Bethany Police Department Moultrie $5,963 $663804003 Buda Police Department Bureau $19,710 $2,190804004 Carroll County Sheriff's Department Carroll $17,964 $1,996804005 Cedar Point Police Department LaSalle $15,489 $1,721804006 Centralia Police Department Marion/Clinton $17,374 $1,930804007 Cherry Police Department Bureau $9,454 $1,050804008 Cowden Police Department Shelby $20,000 $2,222804009 Crawford County Sheriff's Department Crawford $20,000 $2,222804010 Elkville Police Department Jackson $18,900 $2,100804011 Fairmont City Police Department St. Clair $17,786 $1,976804012 Fulton Police Department Whiteside $9,074 $1,008804013 Germantown Police Department Clinton $20,000 $2,222804014 Greenville Police Department Bond $8,100 $900804016 Hinsdale Police Department DuPage $18,000 $2,000804017 Hometown Police Department Cook $19,102 $2,122804018 Colchester Police Department Pulaski $20,000 $2,222804019 LaSalle Police Department LaSalle $19,980 $2,220804020 Malta Police Department DeKalb $19,980 $2,220804021 Metamora Police Department Woodford $19,143 $2,127804022 North Pekin Police Department Tazewell $20,000 $2,222804024 Northfield Police Department Cook $18,522 $2,058804025 Oakbrook Terrace Police Department DuPage $20,000 $2,222804026 Oblong Police Department Crawford $15,113 $1,679804027 Old Shawneetown Police Department Gallatin $17,964 $1,996804028 Peotone Police Department Will $20,000 $2,222804029 Peru Police Department LaSalle $20,000 $2,222804030 Pleasant Hill Police Department Pike $10,322 $1,147

Populations of 25,000 or More (3 proposals)

Populations of Less Than 25,000 (41 proposals)

TOTAL


804031 Potomac Police Department Vermilion $20,000 $2,222804032 Prairie Grove Police Department McHenry $19,840 $2,204804034 St. Francisville Police Department Lawrence $19,800 $2,200804035 Summerfield Police Department St. Clair $8,182 $909804036 Taylorville Police Department Christian $20,000 $2,222804037 Toledo Police Department Cumberland $7,742 $860804038 Tower Lakes Police Department Lake $18,000 $2,000804039 Waverly Police Department Morgan $13,152 $1,461804040 Western Springs Police Department Cook $19,715 $2,191804041 Windsor Police Department Shelby $5,438 $604804042 Witt Police Department Montgomery $14,574 $1,619804043 Yates City Police Department Knox $8,262 $918804044 Zion Police Department Lake $19,611 $2,179

Unallocated $805 $89$691,056 $76,784$22,967 $2,551

$765,573 $85,0633% Administrative

TOTAL AUTHORITY ADMINISTERED

TOTAL

JAG Planning Committee, 2006 1

Crime and Criminal Justice Trends

Presented to the Justice Assistance Grant Planning Committee, May 9, 2006


Trends in Statewide Index Offense Rates• Crime continues a 13-year

decline in Illinois;

• Although Cook County accounts for 42% of the statewide population, in 2004, it continued to account for the majority (54%) of reported crime in the state.

0500

1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,5005,000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

Rat

e pe

r 10

0,00

0 po

pula

tion

Total Violent Property


Trends in Violent and Property Index Offense Rates, 1999-2004

Legend

No Significant Change

Notable Decrease

Notable Increase

Violent

Property


Trends in Statewide Index Arrest Rates• Similar to reported crime,

arrests by law enforcement has continued a gradual decline in Illinois;

• In 2004, Cook County accounted for the majority (51%) of reported statewide arrests.

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

Rat

e pe

r 10

0,00

0 po

pula

tion

Total Violent Property


Trends in Violent and Property Index Arrest Rates, 1999-2004

Violent Property

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


Trends in Illinois Elder Abuse and Neglect Rates

• While overall Index crime has been on the decline in Illinois, reported cases of elder abuse/neglect have increased 17% statewide between 1999 and 2004, from 7,157 to 8,359 cases (while more than doubling since 1993);

• Nearly half of the alleged abusers were children of the elder victim.

050

100150200250300350400450

Ra

te p

er 1

00

,00

0 p

op

ula

tio

n

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Year


Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase

• Between 1999 and 2004, of those 14 counties, rural and urban counties accounted for half that experienced increases and decreases;

• Rural and urban counties had rates 38% and 43% higher than the statewide rate of 426 cases per 100,000 population.

• The rural county rate of 588 cases per 100,000 population was second only to the rate of 611 cases per 100,000 population in the urban counties.

Trends in Elder Abuse and Neglect Rates, 1999-2004


VictimizationComparison of national urban, suburban, and rural

trends and Midwest trends of violent crime victimization rates, 1993-2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Year

Vict

imiz

atio

n ra

te p

er 1

,000

pop

ulat

ion

12

or o

lder

Total U.S. Urban Suburban Rural MidwestSource: National Crime Victimization Survey


VictimizationComparison of national urban, suburban, and rural

trends and Midwest trends of property crime victimization rates, 1993-2004

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Year

Vict

imiz

atio

n ra

te p

er 1

,000

pop

ulat

ion

12

or o

lder

Total U.S. Urban Suburban Rural MidwestSource: National Crime Victimization Survey


Trends in Illinois Drug Arrest Rates• Despite dropping 2%

between 1999 and 2004, Illinois’ drug arrest rate (880 per 100,000 population) was 57% higher than the national rate (564 per 100,000 population);

• In 2004, Cook County accounted for the majority (63%) of reported statewide drug arrests.

0100200300400500600700800900

1,000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Total Cannabis Controlled Substances


Trends in Illinois Drug Arrest Rates• Between 1999 and 2004, 30

of the 39 counties that experienced notable increases in their drug arrest rates were rural;

• Rural counties had the highest drug arrest rate (660 arrests per 100,000 population) second only to Cook County (1,325 arrests per 100,000 population).

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


Trends in Illinois Drug Seizure Rates• Between 1994 and 2005, the

rate of total drugs seized in Illinois increased 34%, but decreased 23% from 2000-2005;

• In 2005, Cook County accounted for the largest proportion (43%) of drugs seized statewide, despite experiencing a decrease of 42% in its seizure rate;

• Between 2000 and 2005 in Cook County, the rate of heroin seizures increased 47 percent but increased 81 percent in Chicago.

05,000

10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,00050,000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Year

Rat

e per

100

,000

pop

ulat

ion


Trends in Illinois Drug Seizure Rates

• Between 2000 and 2005, 41 of the 58 counties that experienced notable increases in their drug seizure rates were rural;

• Rural counties had the highest drug seizure rate second only to Cook County.

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


Methamphetamine Trends


0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Calendar Year

Num

ber

Crime LabSubmissions in grams(Divided by 10)Crime Lab Cases

Labs (Multipled by 5)

IDOC Commitments(Multiplied by 10)*

TreatmentAdmissions*

MJTF Meth Arrests

Measures of Methamphetamine Activity in Illinois


Proportion of Meth Submissions (Cases) to ISP Crime Labs, by Region

• Between 2000 and 2005, the number of methamphetamine cases submitted to ISP crime labs more than doubled statewide as well across Illinois’ urban, collar, and rural regions.

• The number of methamphetamine submissions increased nearly five-fold in Cook County. As a result, the proportion of statewide methamphetamine submissions accounted for by Cook County increased from 5 to 13 percent.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Cook Urban Collar Rural


Proportion of Meth Seizures (in Grams) to ISP Crime Labs, by Region

• Between 2000 and 2005, the quantity of methamphetamine seized and submitted to ISP crime labs nearly quadrupled statewide.;

• More notable is the quantity methamphetamine seized increased nearly nine-fold in Illinois’ more urban counties. As a result, since 2000, the proportion of statewide methamphetamine seized in Cook County increased from 19 to 45 percent.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005



Proportion of Meth Treatment Admissions, by Region

• Between 2000 and 2005, the number of treatment admissions for methamphetamine abuse increased more than six-fold statewide, from 740 to 5,252;

• While methamphetamine distribution and trafficking indicators reflect increased meth activity in Cook County, the majority of individuals seeking treatment for methamphetamine abuse continue to be from rural counties, increasing from 70-76% between 2000 and 2005.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005



Distribution of Controlled Substances Act Treatment Admissions, by Region, 2005

0.1%5.2%

9.6%

48.8%

1.0%

0.2%30.5%

64.9%58.0%

80.8%

33.7%57.5%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Cook 1998 Cook 2005 Other Urban1998

Other Urban2005

Rural 1998 Rural 2005

State Fiscal Year

Per

cen

t of

Tre

atm

ent

Ad

mis

sion

s fr

om R

egio

n

Heroin Meth Cocaine Other


Proportion of IDOC Commitments Accounted for by Meth, by Region

• Between 2000 and 2005, the number of individuals committed to the Illinois Department of Corrections for serious meth-related offenses increased more than ten-fold, from 38 to 454;

• The number of meth-related commitments from urban counties outside Cook County increased nearly 16-fold, from nine to 156. As a result, the proportion accounted for by Illinois’ urban counties increased from 26 to 35 percent.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005



Proportion of Meth Lab Seizures, by Region• Between 2000 and 2005, the

number of meth labs seized in Illinois more than doubled, from 487 to 1,189;

• While the number of meth labs seized in rural counties nearly doubled, meth labs seized in urban counties outside Cook County increased nearly six-fold, from 59 to 393. As a result, the proportion of statewide meth lab seizures accounted for by Illinois’ urban counties increased from 13 to 35 percent.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005



Trends in Meth Lab Seizures in Illinois• Between 2000 and 2005, 15 of the

23 counties experiencing a notable increase in their methamphetamine lab seizure rate were rural;

• Despite the fact that meth manufacturing has spread into more diverse regions of the state, the problem has not diminished in the predominantly rural regions of southern Illinois, where it is noted here that the problem continues to worsen.

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


MEG and Task Force Drug Arrests, by Drug Type

• Between 2000 and 2005, the number of drug arrests made by Illinois’ MEGs and Task Forces decreased 9 percent, from 3,855 to 3,489;

• Meth has had a profound impact on drug enforcement activities of many MEGs and Task Forces. Between 2000 and 2004, the number of arrests decreased across all drug types examined, except methamphetamine.

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Year

Num

ber

of D

rug

Arr

ests

Total Meth Cocaine Cannabis Other


Arrests by Illinois’ MEGs and Task Forces, by Drug Type

0

525

1,050

1,574

2,099

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

Calendar Year

Nu

mb

er

of

Arr

est

s

Marijuana Cocaine Methamphetamine MRT-Meth

Meth Arrestsaccounted for 24 percent of all drug arrests made by MEG/TFs in 2005, comparedto 34 percent in 2004


Arrests by Mostly-Rural MEGs and Task Forces, by Drug Type

0

100200

300400

500

600700

800

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

Calendar Year

Nu

mb

er

of

Arr

est

s

Marijuana Cocaine Methamphetamine


Proportion of Arrests by Illinois’ MEGs and Task Forces, by Drug Type

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

Mos

tly U

rban

Mix

ed U

rban

/Rur

alM

ostly

Rur

al

Mos

tly U

rban

Mix

ed U

rban

/Rur

alM

ostly

Rur

al

Pe

rce

nt

of

Arr

ests

Marijuana Cocaine Methamphetamine Other

Meth Arrestsaccounted for 52% of all drug arrests made by Mostly Rural MEG/TFs in 2005, down from 58% in 2004

1999 2005


Arrests by Individual Mostly-Rural MEGs and Task Forces, by Drug Type, 2005

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

EC

ITF

SC

IDT

F

SE

IDT

F

SIE

G

Z3

/LT

F

VE

ME

G

WC

ITF

Pe

rce

nt

of

Arr

est

s

Marijuana Cocaine Methamphetamine


MEG and Task Force Meth Arrests, by Unit Type

• The number of meth arrests made by all MEGs and Task Forces increased significantly between 2000 and 2004, from 593 to 1,264;

• However, between 2004 and 2005, there was a steep decrease in the number of meth arrests (863).

0100200300400500600700

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Year

Num

ber

of a

rres

ts

Mostly Urban Mixed Urban/Rural Mostly Rural


Illinois State Police Meth Response Team (MRT) Activities, by Zone, 2005*

• MRT implemented in May 2005. During that time, the team made 446 meth arrests and seized 469 meth labs;

• When combined with MEG/TF meth arrests, there were 1,309 ISP meth arrests in 2005, an increase of 4% from 2004.

*MRT began operations in May 2005

Zone 7

Zone 6

Zone 5

Zone 4

Zone 3

Zone 2

Zone 1

Zone

469 labs446 arrests

136 / 72

128 / 188

67 / 25

9 / 19

86 / 127

43 / 15

PIKE

LEE

WILL

COOK

MCLEAN

LASALLE

OGLE

ADAMS

KNOX

HENRY

IROQUOIS

FULTON

BUREAU

SHELBY

WAYNE

LIVINGSTON

KANE

CHAMPAIGNLOGAN

EDGAR

LAKE

VERMILION

HANCOCK

MACOUPIN

CLAY

PEORIA

FAYETTE

FORD

MADISON

DEKALB

SANGAMON

MACON

MASON

WHITE

CLARK

COLES

PIATT

ST. CLAIR

MARION

CHRISTIAN

MERCER

CASS

KANKAKEE

JACKSON

WHITESIDE

GREENE

MORGAN

TAZEWELL

JASPER

PERRY

POPEUNION

BOND

MCHENRY

WARREN

CLINTON

RANDOLPH

JO DAVIESS

SALINE

DEWITT

JEFFERSON

MONTGOMERY

CARROLL

GRUNDY

JERSEY

WOODFORD

MCDONOUGH

MONROE

FRANKLIN

WINNEBAGO

DOUGLAS

STEPHENSON

HAMILTON

WASHINGTON

EFFINGHAM

SCHUYLER

STARK

DUPAGE

BROWN

CRAWFORD

BOONE

MARSHALL

WILLIAMSON

MENARD

JOHNSON

RICHLAND

SCOTT

KENDALL

ROCK ISLAND

GALLATIN

LAWRENCE

MOULTRIE

HENDERSON

CALHOUN

MASSAC

WABASH

CUMBERLAND

PULASKI

HARDIN

EDWARDS

ALEXANDER

PUTNAM

#labs / # arrests


Proportion of MEG and Task Force Drug Arrests, by Unit and Drug Type, 2004-2005

35%

48%

11%7%

Mostly Urban 2004

22%

30%

41%

6%

Mixed Urban/Rural 2004

21%

17%58%

4%

Mostly Rural 2004

28%

31%

35%

6%

All Units 2004

38%

46%

10%7%

Mostly Urban 2005

30%

38%

24%

8%

Mixed Urban/Rural 2005

19%

23%53%

5%

Mostly Rural 2005

31%

25%

38%

7%

All Units 2005

Cannabis Cocaine Meth Other


Trends in Illinois Felony Filing Rates

• Between 1999 and 2004, the statewide rate of felony cases filed in criminal court increased 7 percent, from to 692 to 742 felony cases filed per 100,000 population;

• In 2004, Cook County accounted for 42 percent of felony cases filed in criminal court in Illinois.

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

Rat

e pe

r 10

0,00

0 po

pula

tion


Trends in Illinois Felony Filing Rates

• Between 1999 and 2004, 30 of the 39 counties that experienced notable increases in their felony filing rates were rural;

• Rural counties experienced the largest rate increase (25%) and their rate of 909 filings per 100,000 population was second only to the urban rate of 933 filings per 100,000 population .

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


Trends in Illinois Felony Sentences to Probation Rates

• Between 1999 and 2004, the statewide rate of felony sentences to probation decreased 1 percent, from to 242 to 238 sentences per 100,000 population;

• In 2004, Cook County accounted for 47 percent of felony cases sentenced to probation in Illinois.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

Rat

e pe

r 10

0,00

0 po

pula

tion


Trends in Illinois Felony Sentences to Probation Rates

• Between 1999 and 2004, 14 of the 19 counties that experienced notable increases in their felony probation sentence rates were rural;

• Rural counties experienced the largest rate increase (17%) and their rate of 267 felony probation sentences per 100,000 population was second only to the urban rate of 298 probation sentences per 100,000 population .

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


Trends in Illinois Felony Sentences to Prison Rates

• Between 1999 and 2004, the statewide rate of felony cases sentenced to prison increased 7 percent, from to 222 to 237 prison sentences per 100,000 population;

• In 2004, Cook County accounted for 56 percent of all felons sentenced to prison in Illinois.

050

100150200250300350400

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

Rat

e pe

r 10

0,00

0 po

pula

tion


Trends in Illinois Felony Sentences to Prison Rates

• Between 1999 and 2004, 24 of the 35 counties that experienced notable increases in their felony prison sentence rates were rural;

• Rural counties experienced the largest rate increase (68%) and their rate of 243 prison sentences per 100,000 population was second only to Cook County’s rate of 314 prison sentences per 100,000 population .

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


Prison Admission Rates for Drug Offenses

0

50

100

150

200

250

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

State Fiscal Year

Rat

e fo

r C

oo

k C

ou

nty

per

1

00

,00

0 R

esid

ents

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Rat

e fo

r O

ther

U

rban

/Ru

ral

Co

un

ties

per

1

00

,00

0 R

esid

ents

Cook Rest of Illinois Rural

Onset of meth activity in rural regions

Substantial changes tometh. laws in Illinois


Trends in New Court Commitment Rates to IDOC

• Between SFYs 2000 and 2005, the statewide rate of new court commitments to prison increased 16 percent;

• In SFY2005, Cook County accounted for 54 percent of all adult commitments to prison in Illinois.

• Drug crimes accounted for the largest proportion (41%), property (30%), violent (26%).

0

50

100

150

200

250

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

State Fiscal year

Rat

e p

er 1

00,0

00 p

opu

lati

on


Trends in New Court Commitment Rates to IDOC

• Between SFYs 2000 and 2005, 26 of the 37 counties that experienced notable increases in their prison commitment rates were rural;

• Rural counties experienced the greatest increase across all commitment types, increasing 3-times the state rate for Total, Violent, and Property, crimes but more than 6 times the statewide drug rate.

Legend


Notable Decrease

Notable Increase


Robert W. BauerSenior Research Analyst

Manager, Criminal Justice Information Clearinghouse

[email protected]

JAG Planning, May 2006 1

Results from the 2005 Criminal Justice System Needs

Assessment

Presented to theJustice Assistance Grant

Planning Committee


Criminal Justice Needs Assessment

A replication of a needs assessment done by ICJIA in the early 1990’s

Captures data on the needs of CJS professionals regionally and statewide


The regions

PIKE

LEE

WILL

COOK

MCLEAN

LASALLE

OGLE

ADAMS

KNOX

HENRY

IROQUOIS

FULTON

BUREAU

SHELBY

WAYNE

LIVINGSTON

KANE

CHAMPAIGNLOGAN

EDGAR

LAKE

VERMILION

HANCOCK

MACOUPIN

CLAY

PEORIA

FAYETTE

FORD

MADISON

DEKALB

SANGAMON

MACON

MASON

WHITE

CLARK

COLES

PIATT

ST. CLAIR

MARION

CHRISTIAN

MERCER

CASS

KANKAKEE

JACKSON

WHITESIDE

GREENE

MORGAN

TAZEWELL

JASPER

PERRY

POPEUNION

BOND

MCHENRY

WARREN

CLINTON

RANDOLPH

JO DAVIESS

SALINE

DEWITT

JEFFERSON

MONTGOMERY

CARROLL

GRUNDY

JERSEY

WOODFORD

MCDONOUGH

MONROE

FRANKLIN

WINNEBAGO

DOUGLAS

STEPHENSON

HAMILTON

WASHINGTON

EFFINGHAM

SCHUYLER

STARK

DUPAGE

BROWN

CRAWFORD

BOONE

MARSHALL

WILLIAMSON

MENARD

JOHNSON

RICHLAND

SCOTT

KENDALL

ROCK ISLAND

GALLATIN

LAWRENCE

MOULTRIE

HENDERSON

CALHOUN

MASSAC

WABASH

CUMBERLAND

PULASKI

HARDIN

EDWARDS

ALEXANDER

PUTNAM

Legend

Other Urban Counties

Rural Counties

Cook/Collar Counties


Who were surveyed?Police Chiefs (n=334)State’s Attorneys (n=47)Public Defenders (n=42)Chief Judges (n=5)Probation (n=61)Circuit Court Clerks (n=51)Detention Center Administrators (n=11)Victim Service Administrators (n=58)


Survey TopicsWorkload IssuesStaffing IssuesTraining IssuesServices and Program NeedsInformation System NeedsPerceptions of CrimeCollaborations with Other CJ Agencies


Crime problems that are getting worse in rural counties in Illinois

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Illicit drug use Identity theft Illicit drug dealing Juvenile crime Violence (general)

Getting worse Staying the same Getting better

Response Percentage


Crime problems that are getting worse in urban counties in Illinois

010

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Identity theft Illicit drug/alcoholuse

Illicit drug dealing Juvenile crime Domestic violence


Response Percentage


Crime problems that are getting worse in Cook and Collar counties in Illinois

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Gangs Illicit drug/alcoholuse

Domestic violence Drug dealing School Violence


Response Percentage


Police Chief Sample

• 77 – Cook / Collar

• 162 – Other Urban

• 90 – Rural

• 5 - Missing


Police ChiefsWorkload demands

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Property theftcases

Domesticviolence cases

Juvenile cases Neighborhoodproblems

False alarms

Statewide Cook/Collar Other Urban Rural

Response Percentage


Police ChiefsResponses to drug problems that need

improvement

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Info. System forintelligence

Directed patrol Neighborhoodwatch

Crime analysisunit

Nuisanceabatement


Response Percentage


Police ChiefsStaffing needs

0102030405060708090

100

Patrol officers Bi-lingual officers Communitypolice/service

officers

Detectives Swornsupervisors


Response Percentage


Police ChiefsStaff Training Needs

0102030405060708090

100

Identity theft Report writing Druginvestigations

Languagetranslation

TerrorismHomeland

security


Response Percentage


Police ChiefsField operations activity needs

0102030405060708090

100

Strategies toreduce drug

problems

Strategies toreduce juvenile

crime

Strategies toreduce DV

Problem solvingprocesses

Communityprograms to

reduce fear ofcrime


Response Percentage


Police ChiefsInvestigative activity needs

0102030405060708090

100

Identity theft Preliminaryfollow-up

investigations

Informantdevelopment

Interviewingtechniques

Drug crimeinvestigations


Response Percentage


State’s Attorney Sample



• 29 – Rural

• 1 – Missing


State’s AttorneysWorkload demands

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DUI cases DomesticViolence cases

Drug possessioncases

Theft cases Drug sales cases


Response Percentage


State’s AttorneysStaffing needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Attorneys Investigators Clerical


Response Percentage


State’s AttorneysStaff Training Needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DNA evidence Child witnesses Identity theft Asset forfeiture Complex drugconspiracy


Response Percentage


State’s AttorneysDiversion / sentencing alternative needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Mental HealthTreatment

Educationalvocational

Drug treatment Sex offendertreatment

Alcohol treatment


Response Percentage


Public Defender Sample



• 23 – Rural

• 0 - Missing


Public DefendersWorkload demands

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Drug possessioncases

Drug sales cases Domesticviolence cases

Juvenile cases DUI cases


Response Percentage


Public DefendersStaffing needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Attorneys Investigators Clerical


Response Percentage


Public DefendersStaff training needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DNA evidence Newly hiredattorneys

Stressmanagement

Trial practice skillsStatutory updates


Response Percentage


Public DefendersDiversion / sentencing alternative needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Educational /Vocational

Drug treatment Mental healthtreatment

Sex offendertreatment

Pre-trial diversion


Response Percentage


JudgesWorkload demands

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DV cases DUI cases Drug possession cases Drug sales cases

Statewide

Response Percentage


JudgesStaffing needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Security personnel Number of translators/ interpreters

Number of publicdefenders

Number of pre-sentence investigators

Statewide

Response Percentage


JudgesCourt security needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Space for inmateholding

Secure area forconsultation

Metal detection atcourtroom

Comprehensivesecurity plan

Statewide

Response Percentage


JudgesStaff training needs

0

1020

3040

5060

7080

90100

Dealing with treatmentagencies

Language translation Management skills

Statewide

Response Percentage


JudgesDiversion / sentencing alternative needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

BARJ Pre-trial divesion Mental healthtreatment

Day reporting centers

Statewide

Response Percentage


Probation Sample



• 24 – Rural

• 3 – Missing


ProbationWorkload demands

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Sex offendersupervision

Electronicmonitoring

Home detentionw/EM

Pre-trialsupervision

Home detentionw/o EM


Response Percentage


ProbationStaffing needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Field officers Treatment staff Front linesupervisors

Clerical Investigators


Response Percentage


ProbationStaff training needs

0102030405060708090

100

Cognitivebehavioral

programming

Programevaluation

Evaluation andoutcomemeasures

Working withvictims

Informationsystems


Response Percentage


ProbationContracted services needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Vocationaleducation

Job readiness Employmentreferral services

Housing referralservices

Sex offendertreatment


Response Percentage


ProbationProbation programs needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Vocational workprogram

Restorativejustice

Mental Healthtreatment

Drug treatment Sex offendertreatment


Response Percentage


Clerks Sample



• 36 – Rural

• 1 – Missing


ClerksWorkload Demands

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Criminal Traffic Small claims Civil Child support


Response Percentage


ClerksStaff training needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Managementskills

Dispositionreporting

Case recordsmanagement

Languagetranslation

Case schedulingtechniques


Response Percentage


Detention Center Sample



• 3 – Rural


Detention CentersDetention alternative needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Day reporting centers Community/residentialtreatment

BARJ programs


Response Percentage


DetentionStaff needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Mental healthprofessionals

Programpersonnel

Supervisorypersonnel

Detention officers Educationalpersonnel


Response Percentage


DetentionStaff training needs

0102030405060708090

100

Languagetranslation

Handlingmentally illoffenders

Handling sexoffenders

Handling specialneeds offenders

BARJ


Response Percentage


Detention CentersContracted service needs

0102030405060708090

100

Vocational Substance abusetreatment

Pre-releaseservices

Mental health /specializedcounseling

Education


Response Percentage


Detention CentersProgram needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Parenting skills Sex offendertreatment

Special programsfor females

BARJ MentalHealth/Counseling


Response Percentage


Victim Service Providers Sample



• 14 – Rural

• 3 – Missing


Victim Service ProvidersWorkload demands

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Child sexual abuse Child physicalabuse

Domestic violence Sexual assault Elder abuse


Response Percentage


Victim Service ProvidersService demands

0102030405060708090

100

Information andreferrals

Criminal justiceadvocacy

Personaladvocacy

Casemanagement /coordination

Follow up contact


Response Percentage


Victim Service ProvidersStaff needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Volunteers Paid counselors Outreach / public awarenessworkers


Response Percentage


Victim Service ProvidersStaff training needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Specialpopulations

Culturalsensitivity

Institutionalchange advocacy

Programevaluation

Working withState's Attorneys


Response Percentage


Is your information system linked to other criminal justice information systems?

0

20

40

60

80

100

PoliceChiefs

State'sAttorneys

PublicDefenders

Judges Probation Clerks Detentioncenters

Victimservice

providers

Yes No

Response Percentage


Summary

• Workload demands

– Domestic violence was ranked in the top 5 workload contributors by Judges, Public Defenders, Police Chiefs, State’s Attorneys, and Victim Service providers

– Drug and DUI cases were ranked in the top 5 of workload contributors by Judges, Public Defenders, and State’s Attorneys


Summary (cont.)

• Programs and Services

– Judges, Public Defenders, State’s Attorneys, Probation, and Detention Centers all ranked mental health treatment in their top 5 of programs and services that needed improvement.

– Public Defenders, State’s Attorneys, Probation, and Detention Centers all ranked educational, vocational, and sex offender treatment in their top 5 programs and services that needed improvement.


Next Steps

• Final report on the needs assessment project is due this month.

• Research and Analysis staff will continue to analyze the data and publish subsequent work that digs deeper into the data.

Meeting Notice Budget Committee Justice Assistance Grant ...

Documents

Transcript of Meeting Notice Budget Committee Justice Assistance Grant ...