Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.
-
Upload
avis-phillips -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.
![Page 1: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power
Kimberly Pendell
![Page 2: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Validity
Validity implies that the measurement reliably measures what it intends to measure.
Validity relates to the magnitude of bias.
![Page 3: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Bias
Bias is the systematic tendency to produce an outcome that differs from the underlying truth.
![Page 4: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Some different types of bias
Selection bias Interviewer bias Recall bias Detection bias Verification bias Publication bias
![Page 5: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Bias and Research Designs
Ex. research design
Ex. of potential bias
Ex. of potential solution
RCT Selection bias Randomization
Case-control study
Recall biasBlind subjects to research hypothesis
Meta-analysis Publication biasLook for unpublished data
![Page 6: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Confounds
A confound is a variable that is distributed differently in the study group and the control group and that affects the outcome being assessed. (Riegelman, 2005)
Confounding variables can appear through bias or random chance.
![Page 7: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Probability
Probability is the quantitative estimate of the likelihood of condition existing (as in a diagnosis) or of subsequent events (such as in a treatment study). (Guyatt, Rennie, 2002)
![Page 8: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
P-value
P-value is the probability of an outcome occurring by chance. The p-value establishes statistical significance.
In medical research the standard p-value is p<.05
![Page 9: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Power
Power is the ability of a research study to demonstrate statistical significance.
Researchers determine the size of study population needed for a set amount of power before beginning their study.
If the study has statistically significant results, the study has enough power.
In medical research the standard for power is 80%.
![Page 10: Medical Research: Validity, Bias, Confounds, Probability, P-value, and Power Kimberly Pendell.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f4f5503460f94c70b72/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Readings:
Guyatt, G., Rennie, D. (Eds.). (2002). Users’ guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based practice. USA: American Medical Association.
Katzer, J., Cook, K.H., Crouch, W.W. (1998). Evaluating information: a guide for users of social science research. Massachusetts: McGraw Hill.
Riegelman, R.K. (2005). Studying a study & testing a test: how to read the medical evidence. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.