Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

18
Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation

Transcript of Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Page 1: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation

Page 2: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Meet the Chair

• Francis Kwakwa, MA• Assistant Director, Data

Management, Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

Page 3: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Meet the Staff

• Valerie SmothersDeputy Director, MedBiquitous

• Jody PoetAdministrative Manager, MedBiquitous

Page 4: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

1.0 Working group participants• Craig Bowen, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University• Jennifer Comerford, Radiological Society of North

America• David Cook, M.D., Mayo Clinic• Nancy Davis, Ph.D., Chair, American Academy of

Family Physicians • Bill Deluise, John Wiley and Sons• Ray Everngam, CTSNet• Michael Fordis, MD, Baylor College of Medicine• Nancy Gathany, Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention• Peter Greene, M.D., MedBiquitous• Cyndi Grimes, Medscape• Stuart Gilman, M.D., Department of Veterans Affairs• Monica Hanks, American Association of Critical-Care

Nurses• Sean Hayes, AXDEV• Linda Casebeer, Outcomes Inc.• Edward Kennedy, Accreditation Council of Continuing

Medical Education• Jack Kues, PhD, University of Cincinnati

• Tao Le, M.D., Johns Hopkins University• Jim Leist, Alliance for Continuing Medical Education• Rachel Makleff, American Thoracic Society• Ross Martin, MD, Bearing Point • Tarun Mathur, Medsn• Jackie Mayhew, Pfizer • Suzanne Murray, Ph.D., AXDEV• Kevin O’Hara, Healthstream• Veronica O’Quinn, METI• Mellie Pouwels, Radiological Society of North America• Andrew Rabin, CECity• Mike Saxton, Pfizer• Hilary Schmidt, Sanofi Aventis• Donna Schoonover, Department of Veterans Affairs• Valerie Smothers, MedBiquitous• Jing Tian, M.D., Ph,D, University of Maryland• Scott Weber, Med-IQ• Tim Willett, M.D., CRI Critical Care Education Network• Andrea Young, Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention

Page 5: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

http://bit.ly/erlarems

Page 6: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Goals

• Revise the MEMS technical specification to support ER/LA Opioid REMS educational outcomes data for the health professions.

• Provide assistance to the accrediting bodies and the RPC in implementing the MEMS technical specifications.

Page 7: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

What is MEMS?• A standard format for CE outcomes data• Allow educators to bring outcomes data

together across systems• Current Scope of MEMS 1.0

– Report description – Activity description – Participant survey data – Knowledge assessment data – Participation metrics, including credits awarded

http://bit.ly/memsfull

Page 8: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

MEMS Example

Online

Joint

Journal

In person

Evaluation data:Online activities

Evaluation data:Jointly sponsored

activities

Evaluation data:Journal-based

CE Evaluation data:In person activities

<xml><xml> <xml>

<xml>

Program Evaluation DashboardParticipation

Page 9: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

MEMS 2.0 Example

CE provider CE provider

CE provider

Accreditor

CE provider CE provider

CE provider

Accreditor

REMS Educational Outcomes Data

<xml> <xml>

<xml>

Page 10: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.
Page 11: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.
Page 12: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.
Page 13: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

What if we can’t do XML?

• That’s OK!• Use Excel templates aligned with the standard• Same field names• Same values

Page 14: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Working Group preparesdraft standard and presentsit to Standards Committee

for comment

Working Group resolvesconflict and revises draft

standard if necessary

Working Group resolvesconflict, incorporates

changes, and produces ormodifies official draft

standard

ANSI approvesstandard?

Executive Director forwardscandidate standard to ANSI

using BSR9 form

StandardsCommitteeapprovesstandard? No

Standards Committeeevaluates official draft

standard

Yes

Yes

Executive Directorpublishes standard

Executive Director submitsBSR-8 form to initiate public

review and comment

Working Group resolvesconflict and incorporates

changes if necessary

Standards Committeereviews draft standard and

provides comments toWorking Group

Executive Committeedetermines next steps based

on ANSI commentsNo

Standards Committee Chairpresents draft standard to

Executive Director

Development Process

Page 15: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Funding

• The REMS Program Companies (www.ER-LA-opioidREMS.com) is providing financial support for this work so that it may proceed in an accelerated fashion.

• How accelerated?

Twice a month, schedule forthcoming.

Page 16: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Communications

• Wiki: http://groups.medbiq.org/medbiq/display/MWG/Home

• Mailing list: [email protected]

(use reply all to send a note to the entire list)

Page 17: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Timeline

Page 18: Medical Education Metrics 2.0 (MEMS 2.0) Orientation.

Next steps

• Gather ideas on how the standard could be used.

• Collect requirements to support ER/LA Opioid REMS CE evaluation.

• If there are additional requirements, they can be presented as well.