Chapters 31 and 32 Fungi and Eumetozoans Chris Lysuik Kyle Kurihara Geoff Whitener etc.usf.edu.
Medicaid Managed Care 101: A Framework for Cost-Conscious, Quality Care Joan Alker Tricia Brooks...
-
Upload
lindsay-chambers -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Medicaid Managed Care 101: A Framework for Cost-Conscious, Quality Care Joan Alker Tricia Brooks...
Medicaid Managed Care 101:A Framework for Cost-Conscious, Quality
Care
Joan Alker Tricia Brooks
Sarah SomersKelly WhitenerRuth Kennedy
CCF Annual Conference 2015
Today
What we’ll talk about….• Consumer Information• Enrollment • Disenrollment• Plan choice• Types of managed care• Benefits and EPSDT• Network adequacy• Consumer protections• Quality• The State perspective
What we’ll defer to MC 201….• Payment methodologies• Actuarial soundness• Rate setting• Contract requirements
Approaching Our Work on Managed Care
What do children and
their families need?
How do we make sure that kids
and families are well served?
What do they need to
know?
Share of Medicaid Enrollees in Managed Care• Historically children
and low income families
• Recent shifting of duals and disabled to achieve better cost controls and care coordination for high need, high cost populations
• All expansion adults0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0.03
0.14
0.294
0.5758
0.63
0.7170.7422
Voluntary vs. Mandatory
6
Voluntary enrollment can be offered to anyone
in Medicaid
Non-exempt groups can be mandated to
enroll in managed care
Waiver is required to enroll exempt
populations
Low voluntary enrollment can result in inadequate numbers of enrollees • Particularly true for high risk, high cost populations• Issues can sometimes be addressed through well-
designed payment arrangements• States more often move toward mandatory coverage
Populations
7
State Plan Amendment
• Children• Parents• Non-disabled
Adults
Need 1915(b) Waiver to Mandate Exempt Groups:
• Children with special health care needs or disabilities
• Children receiving foster care or adoption assistance
• American Indians• Dual eligibles (poor elderly
eligible for Medicare)
ChoiceVoluntary
• Choice of FFS or voluntary enrollment in a managed care plan
Mandatory
• Risk-based managed care plans– Choice of plans
• Exception for rural areas where choice of primary care provider is required
• Other protections also exist
• Primary care case management– Choice of providers
9
Plan Selection vs. Auto-Assignment
• Goal for states is as to enroll as quickly as possible• Some states require that enrollees select a plan
upfront when applying• Others wait until after eligibility has been determined• All must have auto-assignment (default enrollment)
process for those who do not choose• Number of plans to choose from varies by state and
region
10
Auto-Assignment (Default Enrollment)• Must preserve existing provider arrangements or
relationships with providers that have traditionally served Medicaid
• If not possible, must distribute “equitably” among plans
NPRM would codify additional criteria to
use in default enrollment,
including quality
• In practice, states assign based on a variety of factors (e.g., proximity to providers, enrollment of family members, and performance based measures)
11
Other Enrollment Issues
• No current enrollment provisions relating to voluntary managed care- Many states enroll directly and offer opt-out
NPRM addresses both
• No minimum period of time allowed for plan selection– Varies, by state, from a number
of days to months– sometimes longer for disabled
populations
12
Enrollment Brokers
• States often contract with external enrollment brokers to provide choice counseling and conduct enrollment activities (438.810(a))
• Must be independent from the managed care entities and free from conflict of interests
• Mixed evidence of the effectiveness of enrollment brokers
NPRM requires choice counseling and
establishes broader requirement for
beneficiary support system
13
Disenrollment
Requested by Plan• May not disenroll based on
utilization, change in health status, special needs
• Contract should specify reasons plans may use for requesting disenrollment
Requested by the Enrollee• First 90 days • At least once every 12
months, with 60 day notice• At any time for cause• May require enrollee to seek
redress through grievance system before disenrolling
• Effective no later than the first of the second month following the month of the request
14
Cause for Disenrollment• Enrollee moves out of service area• Plan does not cover service based on moral or
religious objections • Enrollee needs related services to be performed at
same time that are not available• Others, including but not limited to, poor quality, lack
of access to covered services or qualified providers
15
Consumer Education
• Health insurance literacy • Low-income uninsured may
have little or no experience with managed care
• May be transitioning from FFS to MC
Benefits
NetworkDrugs
Enrollment
Accessing Services
Getting Help
Appeals
16
Notices and Written Information
• All notices and informational or instructional materials must:- Be in an easily understood language and format- Be available in prevalent languages and alternative formats
needed by those with special needs (e.g. limited vision, limited reading proficiency)
- Inform enrollees and potential enrollees of the availability and how to access alternative formats
• Provided upon eligibility determination in time to support plan selection
17
Language Support
• States must…• Identify prevalent languages spoken by a significant
number or percentage of enrollees and potential enrollees• State and plans must…• provide written information in all prevalent languages• provide oral interpretation for all non-English languages• must inform enrollees and potential enrollees of
availability and how to access language supports
18
State Responsibilities
• Mechanism to help enrollees and potential enrollees understand managed care
• Must ensure that managed care plans fulfill their responsibilities
• Information must include:– Basic features of
managed care– Which groups are…
• Able to enroll voluntarily• Excluded from enrollment• Required to enroll
– Disenrollment rights
19
NPRM has new and very detailed information
requirements
MC Plan Responsibilities
• Mechanism to help enrollees and potential enrollees understand plan requirements and benefits
• Information must include:– Benefits and how to
access– Cost-sharing– Service area– Provider information– Restrictions on choice of
provider– When services of covered
out of network– Grievances and appeals
20
Marketing Restrictions
• Distribution of materials must be approved by state in consultation with Medical Care Advisory Committee
• Must distribute to everyone in service area• Can’t sell other products• Info must not be fraudulent, misleading or confusing• Cold-calling is prohibited
21
Other Beneficiary Protections
• Access to emergency services without prior authorization
• Defines emergency medical conditions, services, and out-of-network access
• No restrictions on patient-provider communications
• Liability for payment• Anti-discrimination
22
Roll Out of New MC Implementation
• No Standards but….- Must be adequate time for system development- Sufficient resources to ensure smooth transition- Phased-in approach may work best
23
TYPES OF MANAGED CARE ENTITIESBENEFITS AND EPSDT NETWORK ADEQUACY AND ACCESS STANDARDS
24
Sarah Somers
Medicaid Managed Care Entities
• MCO – Managed Care Organization• PIHP, PAHP – Prepaid Health Plan
- (Inpatient or Ambulatory)• PCCM – Primary Care Case Management
- “Managed’ fee for service• PACE – Program of all-inclusive care for the elderly
26
NPRM Adds New Definitions
• PCCM Entity – Primary care case management entity
• NEMT PAHP – Non-Emergency Transportation Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plan
27
Benefits
• Basic requirement: - States must ensure that all services covered under
Medicaid state plan are “available and accessible”
28
Adequacy of Services/Networks
• MCOs/PHPs must:- Make covered services available to the same extent they
are available to other beneficiaries - Assure that they have adequate capacity to serve
expected enrollment, including services and providers • PCCM contracts must provide for
arrangements/referrals to sufficient numbers of providers to ensure prompt service delivery
29
Services for Enrollees with Special Health Care Needs
• States must:- Identify such persons* to plans- Assess individual needs (using appropriate health
care professionals)- Allow direct access to specialists
• Require plans to produce a treatment plan (optional)- Developed by provider with enrollee input- Approved by plan
*as defined by the state
30
Network Adequacy
• No specific federal standards- Contracts- State law
• Example: Virginia Contract (pp. 39, 245)• Example: California Regulations (28 Cal. Code.
Regs.1300.67.2)
31
Early and Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT)
• Required for beneficiaries under age 21• Outreach and informing• “Screens” (check ups)• Treatment• Assistance with accessing services
Great Resource
35
Policy Reasons for EPSDT
Low-income children are more likely to have:
Vision, hearing and speech problems Untreated tooth decay Elevated lead blood levels Sickle cell disease Behavioral Health problems Anemia Asthma Transportation barriers And more . . .
36
EPSDT Requirements: Mandatory Screenings
Medical ScreensHealth and
developmental historyUnclothed physical
exam Immunizations Lab tests, including lead
blood testsHealth education
Other ScreensVision, including
eyeglassesHearing, including
hearing aidsDental, including relief
of pain, restoration of teeth and maintenance of dental health
37
EPSDT Requirements: Treatment
• All services that could be covered under state Medicaid plan (mandatory and optional)
• All Medicaid-covered services necessary to “correct or ameliorate physical and mental illnesses and conditions,” even if the service is not covered under the state plan
• CMS Guidance: no hard limits on hours/visits
38
EPSDT Requirements: Outreach and Informing
• Effective and aggressive- Oral and written- Translated- Targeted (e.g. pregnant teens, non-users)
• Transportation and appointment assistance (prior to screen due date)
• Coordination with other entities
39
EPSDT: Issues in Managed Care
• Non-coverage of services- Carve outs, failure of state to ensure services are
provided• Limits on number of visits/hours• Prior authorization for screens, delaying
services• Stricter medical necessity definition than state
uses
40
Medicaid Due Process: Legal Authority
• Constitution• Medicaid statute• Federal regulations• State law• Contracts (MC)
43
What triggers right to hearing?
• Denial of application for benefits/failure to act with reasonable promptness
• Agency has taken an action erroneously• Reduction, suspension, termination of service• PASRR, transfer or discharge from NF
44
Right to Appeal, cont’d
• “Action” of MCO:- Denying, reducing, terminating or otherwise
limiting services or denying payment for services- Failing to timely provide services- Denying request for disenrollment or exemption- “otherwise adversely affecting the individual”
45
Notice• Must include:
- Action taken- Reasons for action- Right to file appeal- Right file state hearing request- Expedited resolution- Continued benefits
46
Continued Benefits
• Must continue pending final hearing decision if hearing is requested w/in 10 days of action- When MCO appeal taken and beneficiary loses,
must again request services continue pending fair hearing decision
- Beneficiary can be required to pay for benefits if he ultimately loses
• ISSUE – no continued benefits beyond authorization period
48
Quality Assessment and Improvement Strategy
• Current regulations focus quality measurement and improvement strategies on MCO’s and PIHP’s.
NPRM expands quality requirements to all
delivery systems, including FFS and all types of MC
entities
50
Each State Contracting with an MCO or PIHP must….
• Have a written strategy for assessing and improving quality
• Obtain public input • Ensure plan compliance• Review effectiveness and update the strategy • Submit strategy to CMS, as well as updates and
reports on implementation and effectiveness
51
Required Elements of Quality Strategy• Assess the quality and appropriateness of care to
everyone, and to those with special health needs• Identify and provide to plans at enrollment, the race,
ethnicity, and primary language of each enrollee • Monitor and evaluate plan compliance• Incorporate national performance measures if
applicable• Arrange for annual independent external quality review
(EQR)• Ensures adoption and dissemination of practice
guidelines
52
MC Entity Must Conduct Performance Improvement Projects
• Use objective measurements• Assess clinical and nonclinical areas• Implement system interventions to improve care• Evaluate effectiveness• Submit state or CMS specified performance
measurement data• Identify both underutilization and overutilization of
services• Assess quality and appropriateness of care for enrollees
with SHCN
53
External Quality Review (EQR)• Applies to MCO, PHIP, HIO• EQR organization must meet federal standards• Analyzes and evaluates aggregated information on
quality, timeliness, and access to health care services
• Reports must be submitted to CMS but vary across states in organization and level of detail due to differing interpretation of the regulations
54
http://www.healthlaw.org/issues/medicaid/managed-care/EQR-Overview06162014pdf#.VQ7JvBDF_2w
EQR?Validates performance measures and improvement programs :
Mandatory EQR Activities
- Evaluate quality, timeliness, and access to care
- Assess plan’s strengths and weaknesses, and recommend quality improvement project
- Appraise how well each plan responded to previous QI recommendations
Optional EQR Activities
- Validate encounter level data- Administer or validate
consumer or provider surveys- Calculate state-required
performance measures- Conduct detailed PIP reviews- Conduct focused, one-time
studies
55
NPRM adds network adequacy validation to
mandatory activities
Common Issues Across EQR Reports • Data collection methods vary• No federally required measures; states can pick and
choose but tend to use most common• Challenging to compare across states or plans• MCO’s come and go, so difficult to form a picture of
system performance• Comprehensiveness of the reporting to CMS is
improving
56
NPRM lays foundation for alignment and more consistent
reporting on quality
CHIP Managed Care Rules
• The Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) applied several Medicaid managed care provisions to CHIP at section 2103(f)(3) of the Social Security Act:- Section 1932(a)(4): Process for enrollment and termination and
change of enrollment- Section 1932(a)(5): Provision of information- Section 1932(b): Beneficiary protections- Section 1932(c): Quality assurance standards- Section 1932(d): Protections against fraud and abuse- Section 1932(e): Sanction for noncompliance
58
CHIP Managed Care Rules
• CMS provided initial guidance on these rules in two State Health Official (SHO) letters- SHO#09-008 offered guidance on implementing the new
requirements generally, including submitting CHIP managed care contracts to CMS for review for the first time
- SHO#09-013 offered additional guidance on the quality provisions in particular
- Both letters indicated more information was forthcoming, and it arrived on June 1 this year, proposing managed care regulations in CHIP for the first time!
59
How is CHIP managed care different?
Contracts & Rates• Contracts are typically not
reviewed by CMS, and they do not have to be approved prior to implementation
• Capitation rates are not reviewed by CMS and they do not have to meet actuarial soundness requirements
Beneficiary Enrollment• There is no requirement
for beneficiaries to have a choice of plans at enrollment, but must have another option if they choose to disenroll from the managed care plan
• Beneficiaries can be required to pay premiums prior to enrollment
60
Resources• CMS “Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Report,” July 2011
http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Data-and-Systems/Downloads/2011-Medicaid-MC-Enrollment-Report.pdf
• CMS Medicaid Managed Care Web Pages http://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/by-topics/delivery-systems/managed-care/managed-care-site.html
• MACPAC “The Evolution of Managed Care in Medicaid,” June 2011 http://www.mhpa.org/_upload/MACPAC_June2011_web.pdf
• Kaiser Family Foundation “A Profile of Medicaid Managed Care Programs in 2010: Findings from a 50-State Survey” http://kff.org/medicaid/report/a-profile-of-medicaid-managed-care-programs-in-2010-findings-from-a-50-state-survey/
• Kaiser Family Foundation “Medicaid Managed Care Tracker” http://kff.org/data-collection/medicaid-managed-care-market-tracker/
NHeLP Resources• “A Guide to Oversight, Transparency, and Accountability in
Medicaid Managed Care” http://www.healthlaw.org/publications/browse-all-publications/managed-care-toolkit-march-2015#.VaMGs5NViko
• “Survey of Medicaid Managed Care Contracts: EPSDT Vision and Hearing Services” http://www.healthlaw.org/publications/search-publications/managed-care-survey-EPSDT
• Model Provisions: #1 Grievances and Appeals; #2 Enrollment and Disenrollment; #3 Network Adequacy; #4 Accessibility & Language Access; #5 Reproductive Health http://www.healthlaw.org/publications/search-publications
• Network Adequacy in Medicaid Managed Care: Recommendations for Advocates http://www.healthlaw.org/publications/search-publications/network-adequacy-in-medicaid-managed-care#.VaMJdJNViko
64
Contact
65
Sarah [email protected] www.healthlaw.org
Joan [email protected]
Tricia [email protected]
Kelly [email protected]