Measuring the Properties of Rossby Waves from Space Peter Challenor, Paolo Cipollini & the...
-
Upload
roland-wells -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
3
Transcript of Measuring the Properties of Rossby Waves from Space Peter Challenor, Paolo Cipollini & the...
Measuring the Properties of Rossby Waves from Space
Peter Challenor, Paolo Cipollini
& the Laboratory for Satellite Oceanography
Southampton Oceanography Centre, U.K.
Outline
• Observations of planetary waves with satellite altimetry– Speed estimation techniques– Observed propagation speed vs theoretical speed
• Observations of planetary waves in other datasets– SST– Ocean Colour
• Possible mechanisms
• Looking for the single wave events
Some relevant properties of Planetary waves
• Amplitude of surface manifestation: 1-20cm• Propagation speeds: a few cm s-1
– They take months or years to cross the oceans– Speeds depends on latitude: faster for waves
closer to the equator – Speed is an important issue as it sets the
‘response time’ of the oceans to perturbations and climatic anomalies
Sea surface height anomaly from Topex/Poseidon altimeter; 10 day cycles
North Atlantic, 34°N
“Classic” techniques to study RWs
• Fourier Transform of longitude/time plots (Tokmakian and Challenor, 1993)– Peaks correspond to single sinusoidal
components of the propagating signal
• Radon Transform (2D-RT): projected sum of the diagram at an angle theta (Chelton and Schlax, 1996)– Then we look for the value of thetawhich
maximises the energy of the RT - good objective estimate of propagation speed.
Schematic of the 2-D Radon Transform
Global speed results by Fu and Chelton (2001)after Chelton & Schlax (1996)
Ratio to standard theory
Ratio to extended theory
Going 3-D…..
• We want to detect and study the possible deviations of RW propagation from pure Westward
• Need to add a N-S dimension (latitude)• The dataset is then a full 3-D cuboid (long x lat x
time)• We have developed a 3-D extension of the Radon
Transform (3D-RT) and implemented it with MATLAB and FORTRAN
The 3-D cuboid of data
The 3-D Radon TransformChallenor et al., JAOT, 2001
Example of 3D-RT analysis
Rossby waves in other datasets
• SST (both IR and microwave)– A signature could be expected as SST and SSH
have some degree of correlation
• Ocean colour ??
Rossby waves detected in the SST anomaly field
Ref: Hill et al, JGR, 2000
Speeds fromT/P SSH
Speeds fromATSR SST
Ref: Hill et al, JGR, 2000
Ratio to standard theory
Ratio to extended theory
Why do we see Rossby waves in Ocean colour?
Two main hypotheses:
1. Horizontal displacement
2. Vertical processes
Note: phase difference between SSH and OC will depend on the time the tracer (chl) anomaly takes to go back to equilibrium (relaxation time)
This can be modelled (Killworth & Blundell)….
Observed Chl v SSHphase
Pure H advection Chl v SSHphase
= 60 d
MODEL
DATA
1st conclusion: horizontal advection is important
• But does it explain all the signal we see in the colour field?– Need to focus on those regions where
observations and predictions do not match well..
– …and on those regions where the meridional gradient of chl is weak
Possible vertical mechanisms• Real pumping effect (vertical advection of nutrients into
the euphotic zone! ) - ‘rototiller effect’– This can be modelled and computed but it is
currently a puzzle - modelled signal is small but at the equator and phase does not seem to match the observations
– However modelling of this effect suffers from very poor nutrients climatology!
• Vertical advection of phytoplankton• Shoaling of DCM and its ‘erosion’ into the mixed layer
(suggested by Kawamiya and Oschlies, 2001)
Need further investigations…..• … vertical mechanisms could still be playing a
significant role in some places - and they would
phase-shift the SSH/SST/OC relationship
• They would also be very important for the biology
• Let’s see an example in the Indian Ocean…
A different methodological approach…..
• Techniques like FFTs, RTs and Crosscorrelations on
satellite data have yielded ‘mean’ properties.
• We want to look at the single wave events. Identify
them and study how their characteristics change as
they propagate across the ocean basins
• This can be done with a model-fitting approach -
Gaussian ‘crests’ and ‘troughs’
Four parameters each:• Amplitude• horizontal scale• Slope of track• intercept of track
Gaussian model fitting
• First of all, we split the longitude/time plots into ‘narrow’ partially overlapping sub-windows
Gaussian model fitting
• First of all, we split the longitude/time plots into ‘narrow’ partially overlapping sub-windows
Results: a table of wave parameters for each sub-windowResults: a table of wave parameters for each sub-window
In any sub-window, we fit and remove the In any sub-window, we fit and remove the strongest Gaussian, then we fit and remove the strongest Gaussian, then we fit and remove the next strongest, etc.next strongest, etc.
Finally, we “compact” the results, reconstructing Finally, we “compact” the results, reconstructing the trajectories of the single events.the trajectories of the single events.
Some pre-processing
• filter out annual cycle and any non-Westward signals
• taper both the longitude/time plot and the fitting function with a Hanning window in longitude– increases ‘localization’ of information– improves amplitude retrieval
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressorare needed to see this picture.
+ 0.2 m
0
- 0.2m
Original sub-window
Fitted elementarywaves Residuals
34NOriginal data (filtered + tapered)
Fitted elementary waves
Joining waveslabel all waves in Emost
sub-window as ‘new’
Move 1 subw to the W
min(fc)< ?
couple (wave, wave to the E) compute COSTFUNCTION (fc)
(it’s a matrix whose elements depend on squared errors on amp., slope, intercept, width)
- Join the two waves- write off row and column in fc
yes
label all remaining waves as ‘new’ no
Move 1 subw to the Wetc…
34N
waveNA34_0097
MARThe story of a single wave…
Planetary wave forecast strategy
• Find ‘most similar wave’ (to the one to be propagated) in parameter space
• Propagate wave in accordance to behaviour of ‘most similar wave’
Example of hindcast
Std deviation of reference data
RMS error with simple ‘persistence’ of wave properties
RMSE - hindcast 2
RMSE - hindcast 1
Next….• increase number of parameters in the model• more comparisons with theory and other PW
estimating techniques• global ocean; look at interannual variability• extend to 3-D• Build forecast based on statistical distributions of
parameters in parameters’ space • Invert to get information on the ‘state’ of the
ocean