Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.
-
Upload
maurice-hilary-flowers -
Category
Documents
-
view
251 -
download
2
Transcript of Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.
![Page 1: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Measuring the Benefits of
Environmental Protection
![Page 2: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Market benefits
Nonmarket benefits
Nonmarket benefits are determined by inferring how much people would be willing to pay or accept for these benefits if a market for them did exist
![Page 3: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Use, Option, and Existence Value
The nonmarket benefits of environmental protection: Use: value in useOption: a resource has option value if the
future benefits are uncertain and resource depletion is irreversible
Existence: obtaining value from the existence of a species
Total Value = Use + Option + Existence
![Page 4: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Measuring Benefits: Consumer Surplus The benefit measure for pollution
reduction is the increase in consumer surplus due to such a reduction
Consumer surplus is the difference between what one is willing to pay and what one actually has to pay for a service or a project
![Page 5: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Consumer Surplus from Preservation
![Page 6: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Measuring Benefits: WTP and WTA There are two ways to determine
surplus: Willingness-to-pay (WTP) for improved
qualityWillingness-to-accept (WTA) compensation
in exchange for degraded quality In theory, because income differences
are small, WTA should be only a bit higher than WTP
![Page 7: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Problems with WTA and WTP WTA values are typically 2 to 7 times as
high as WTP valuesThis difference persists even in tests
specifically designed to control for inflated WTA figures
![Page 8: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Problems with WTA and WTP
![Page 9: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Explaining WTP/WTA Disparities:1. Prospect theory: people may adopt the
status quo as their reference point and demand higher compensation to allow environmental degradation than they are willing to pay to make improvements
If prospect theory is correct, it would reshape our marginal benefit curve for pollution reduction
![Page 10: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Prospect Theory and Marginal Benefits of Cleanup
![Page 11: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Explaining WTP/WTA Disparities: Substitution
2. The degree of substitutability between environmental quality and other consumption goods
Do environmental goods really have no good substitutes?
![Page 12: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
WTP/WTA Disparities: Which to Use?
The standard practice is to use WTP because WTA estimates may be less reliable
But if we think of common property as belonging to “the people” then WTA may be the best measurement
With either WTA or WTP, the use of consumer surplus as our benefit measure automatically leads to higher benefits for clean-up in wealthier communities.
![Page 13: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Risk: Assessment and Perception
Step 1 in measuring the benefits of pollution reduction: assess the risks
Information on health risks come from two sources:Epidemiological: studying past cases of
human exposure Animal studies from laboratories
![Page 14: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Risk Comparisons: peanut butter?!
![Page 15: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Risk: PCBs Epidemiological studies have shown that
PCBs cause developmental abnormalities such as low birth weights and less developed cognitive and motor weights; there is also limited evidence of a link between exposure to PCBs and certain cancers
In animal studies PCBs have been found to generate cancers
These studies have led the EPA to label PCBs as “probable human carcinogens”
![Page 16: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Making Predictions
Translating information from high-dose animal studies to low dose human exposure often generates a much higher estimated risk of cancer in humans than other models
Because of this researchers often adopt a “conservative” modeling stance
![Page 17: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Perceived Risk
Individuals may perceive risk differently than the actual risk for a few reasons:Voluntary vs involuntary riskLack of knowledgeDistrust of ExpertsPeople are risk averse
![Page 18: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Risk Aversion An individual is risk averse if they prefer a
“sure thing” to a gamble with a higher expected payoff:
E.g.. If I prefer $50 for sure versus a 50% chance for $110, I am risk averse.
Risk aversion implies that people will dislike exposure to catastrophic events occuring w/ low probability more than unpleasant events occurring w/ high probability– even if they have the same average cost.
![Page 19: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Why is nuclear waste at the bottom?
![Page 20: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Measuring Benefits: Contingent Valuation
Contingent valuation (CV Analysis):Survey methods used by economists to
determine the benefits of environmental protection; the survey responses are “contingent” upon the questions asked
Basically, ask people their WTP and/or WTA
![Page 21: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The CV Method of Measuring Consumer Surplus
![Page 22: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Sources of Error in CVs
Hypothetical BiasHypothetical questions hypothetical responses
Free-ridingMay lead understatement of true WTP
Strategic BiasPeople might inflate their WTP to achieve greater
clean-up if they believe they will not have to pay their WTP
Embedding BiasAnswers are strongly affected by the context provided
about the issue at stake: MAIN PROBLEM!
![Page 23: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
CV: useful or useless?
Economists disagree about the reliability of CV analysis. Doing a ‘state of the art’ job can be very expensive○ Analyses of Exxon Valdez oil spill cost $3 million
Such ambitious efforts are relatively rareCVs provide the only available means for
estimating the existence value component of nonmarket benefits, so they are widely used
![Page 24: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Measuring Benefits:Travel Cost The travel-cost method measures the
amount of money that people expend to use the resource (parks, rivers, or beaches)
By relating differences in travel cost to differences in consumption, a demand curve for the resource can be derived and consumer surplus estimated
![Page 25: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Demand Curve Derived from Travel-Cost Data
![Page 26: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Demand Curve Derived from Travel-Cost Data Total Consumer Surplus
= Area A surplus + Area B surplus + Area C surplus
= 1,000 people * (d + e + f)
+ 1,000 people * [(d + e) – 6 * 25]
+ 1,000 people * (d – 50)
![Page 27: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Problems With theTravel Cost Method
People have different opportunity costs Some may have alternative recreational
opportunities that others do not The travel cost method has been extended to
address both of these issues
![Page 28: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Travel Cost and Beach Values The value of Florida Beaches (Bell and Leeworthy) Survey 826 tourists: days spent at the beach and
expenses incurred to use the beach, meals, travel and access fees, initial travel costs in and out of the state, length of stay, age, income, and other control data.
Hypothesis: holding all the other factors constant, lower beach expenses --> greater number of days at the beach.
Results: a 10% increase in “price” lead to a 1.5% decrease in time on the beach. Average CS per day of $38. Over 2 million tourists: $2.37 billion per year.
![Page 29: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Measuring Benefits:Hedonic Regression
Hedonic regression uses the change in price from related (complementary) goods to infer a WTP for a healthier environment
Confusing label! Hedonic=“pertaining to pleasure”
A hedonic regression estimates the pleasure or utility associated with an improved environment
![Page 30: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Hedonic Regression 1: Property Values and Pollution PCB contamination in New Bedford
(Mendehslon et al) Compare change in prices for houses sold
before and after contamination became public. Control for all other factors affecting home costs.
Houses closest to the contaminated area: price declines of $9,000; in area of secondary pollution, declines of $7,000. Total damages to home-owners: $36 million
![Page 31: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Hedonic Regression 2: The Value of Human Life
The most ethically charged aspect of benefit-cost analysis is its requirement that we put a monetary value on human life
Old approach, still used in court settlements: lifetime earnings. Retired or disabled person is “worth” $0.
Economic Approach: wage-risk studies.
![Page 32: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Hedonic Regression 2: The Value of Human Life Isolate the wage premium people are paid to
accept risk jobs--police officer, firefighter, coal miner
With this it is possible to estimate a WTA a reduction in the risk of death, and implicitly, the value of life
Holding all else equal, suppose we observe that police officers receive extra pay of $500/yr. If the excess risk of death is 1/10,000 per year then collectively, 10,000 officers trade one of their lives each year for $500*10,000=$5 million.
![Page 33: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Problems:
1. Accurate informationIndividuals might underestimate or
overestimate risk of death
2. Sample selection biasPeople accepting risky jobs are not likely
representative of the “average” person with preference toward risk-aversion
3. Involuntary nature of riskPeople may require more to accept risk
imposed upon them without their consent
![Page 34: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Value of a Life
The value obtained from a hedonic regression is not the value of a specific lifeWe would pay just about anything to save our
own life or that of a loved one!
Instead, this is the amount of money the average individual in a society requires to accept a higher risk of death
![Page 35: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Morally OK?
As with any measure of consumer surplus, this method will put a much larger value on life for folks from rich than from poor countries.
USA: $7 millionPakistan: $300,000
![Page 36: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Review of Measuring Benefits
1. Is consumer surplus a good measure of benefits, especially for valuing life?
2. Which measure should be used: WTP or WTA?
3. How reliable is the risk assessment? 4. How good are the benefit measures? 5. What discount rate is used to value
future benefits?
![Page 37: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
WTA and WTP Redux
![Page 38: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
WTA/WTP: Perfect Substitutes
![Page 39: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
WTA/WTP: Poor Substitutes
![Page 40: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Prospect Theory or Substitutability? One study using candy bars and risk of
salmonella from sandwiches, to determine peoples’ WTA and WTP. Provided support for the “no-good substitutes” explanation for the WTA/WTP discrepancy
Advocates of prospect theory argue people do not become as attached to a candy bar or sandwich as they do to a grove of trees in a local park
![Page 41: Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Protection.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56649f265503460f94c3da25/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Prospect Theory or Substitutability?
People are attached to the status quo because there are no good substitutes for environmental degradation from the status quo
In this sense, the two explanations converge