Measuring Business Impact National Fund for Workforce Solutions June 11, 2013.
-
Upload
lambert-patrick -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Measuring Business Impact National Fund for Workforce Solutions June 11, 2013.
Measuring Business ImpactNational Fund for Workforce Solutions
June 11, 2013
2
Starter Questions
What kind of evaluations are you doing?
What does business value mean in your work?
3
Starting Place
What sort of business value are you trying to achieve?
What are the mechanisms (programs and services) that target those outcomes for your business partners?
4
Evaluation Process
Map logic model
Derive research questions
Create data plan and timeline
Frame implementation plan and timeline
Develop the mechanics – collection tools, databases, data portals, websites, data user agreements
Coach the organizations involved
Implement
5
Business Value – Three Ways to Do It
Benchmarking
Employer self report
Econometric case study
Benchmarking
Example: Massachusetts Building Essential Skills through Training (BEST) Met Employer Expectations
Was Valuable to the Companies
Employers Valued Participation with Other Companies
Was Valuable to Employees
Value of Career Ladder Efforts
Return on Investment
Improved Profitability
Cost Reductions
Participation in Future Rounds of BEST
Future Participation in Workforce Development
• Pros: Easy to complete and provides basic feedback about value• Cons: No detail; hard to do continuous improvement with this data
alone
Employer Self-Report
Example: Workforce Strategies Initiative, Business Value Assessment Tool Sets up comparisons on key factors, Program Participants vs. Non-Participants
Attempts to monetize many factors, but not all
Employers Report
Remember that these are just examples
Example: MAGNET (Manufacturing Growth Network), Impact Survey Series of yes/ no questions on key factors
Each question is followed by a blank that asks employers to estimate a dollar value for the factor
• Pros: Can be used for continuous improvements such as curriculum improvements, recruiting/ screening improvements, employer services improvements
• Cons: Harder to fill out, requires employers time and data
Econometric Case Study
Example: Health Careers Collaborative of Greater Cincinnati, ROI 2011 Estimates costs/ benefits for key factors
Comparison analysis of program participants vs. similar non-participants
Attempts to mitigate threats to validity
Small number of employers provide deep data on several hundred program participants and a comparison
• Pros: Produces hard numbers estimating business value. Can be used for sales, fundraising, and policy advocacy.
• Cons: Takes time to get to scale. Someone has to provide the data.
Recommendations
Decide on a few (3-5) key metrics that the employer value work can be built around
Develop a benchmarking tool immediately and roll it out
Develop an employer-self report tool immediately and set expectations for completing it with new employers. Roll out in the 12-18 month timeframe
Econometric case study only makes sense if there are a smaller number of employers who hire a larger number of people. Need at least 100 people, prefer more.
Benefits Discussion
What are the benefits of being in a partnership as opposed to doing this on your own?
What workforce problem(s) will this (or could this) solve for you?
What business value does this (or could this) provide to you?
Return-On-Investment
Value
Employers
Individuals
Institutions
Public
• Can be viewed from several perspectives
• Implies items that can be monetized
12
Good Resources
Aspen Institute’s Workforce Strategies Initiative http://www.aspenwsi.org/resource/bva-toolkit/Moving
towards solutions
Commonwealth Corporation’s Measuring Business Impact: A Workforce Development Practitioner’s Guide http://www.commcorp.org/resources/detail.cfm?ID=899
New Growth Group’s Greater Cincinnati Health Careers Collaborative: Return-On-Investment Report http://www.healthcareerscollaborative.com/resources/
articles-publications/