Measurement Based Care: Enhancing quality of Pain …...IOC FOC IOC: 01 Aug 10 Slide 6 of 13 PI –...
Transcript of Measurement Based Care: Enhancing quality of Pain …...IOC FOC IOC: 01 Aug 10 Slide 6 of 13 PI –...
Measurement Based Care:Enhancing quality of Pain Care
Disclosures
• I am not opio-phobic• I am not opio-philic• I am not needle-phobic• I am not needle-philic• I am not CAM-phobic• I am not CAM-philic• ‘I just wanna know how my patients are doin’• Because I don’t measure outcome I believe my practice
is not medically, financially or ethically sustainable
John J. Bonica
Passing of the Mantle
UWMCUWMC
InpatientInpatient
OutpatientOutpatient
HMCHMC
InpatientInpatient
OutpatientOutpatient
SCHSCH
InpatientInpatient
OutpatientOutpatient
VAPSHCSVAPSHCS
InpatientInpatient
OutpatientOutpatient
SCCASCCA
OutpatientOutpatient
Doctors pour drugs, of which they know little,
for diseases of which they know less,
into patients - of which they know nothing.
Voltaire (1694-1778)
Unintentional Prescription Opioid Overdose Deaths Washington 1995-2009
* Tramadol only deaths included in 2009, but not in prior years.
Source: Washington State Department of Health, Death Certificates
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Num
ber o
f dea
ths
Prescription Opioid + alcohol or illicit drug
Prescription Opioid +/- Other Prescriptions
24
*490
Trends for Specific Opiates Washington 1995-2009
Source: Washington State Department of Health, Death Certificates
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
35019
95
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
Num
ber o
f dea
ths
Methadone
Oxycodone
Hydrocodone
Non-fatal Hospitalizations for Prescription Opiate Overdose, 1987-2009
Source: Washington State Department of Health, Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
# of
hos
pita
lizat
ions Rx Opioid Overdose Diagnosis
As Primary Diagnosis
Newborns with Drug WithdrawalWashington State, 1990-2009
0
1
2
3
4
5
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Rate
per
1,0
00 li
ve b
irth
s
Source: Washington State Department of Health, Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System
Treatment is not Always Mechanism Based
Health Care Costs of Chronic Pain in the US
Panic DisorderMultiple Sclerosis
HIV InfectionAnxiety
DementiaStroke
PregnancyDepression
CancerArthritis
GI DiseaseDiabetes
Respiratory DiseaseHypertension
Heart Disease
0 50 100 150 200Cost (billions)
Chronic Pain
Indirect Costs
Total Economic Burden =
$210 billion1
1National Research Council. Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001
CMS $ 2009
Practice Variation
Variations in Prescribing
Variations in Outcomes
Outcome Measures Approach*
1.Pain 2.Physical functioning 3.Emotional functioning 4.Participant ratings of improvement and
satisfaction with treatment 5.Symptoms and adverse events 6.Participant disposition
*IMMPACT’s 6 core domainsTurk et al. Pain 2003;106:337-45
Home Page
CPAIN - Patient Profiles
CPAIN - Outcomes Tracking
Benefits from Previous Medications
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100% Tried Medication
Medication Helpful
*Whole bar is % of patients who tried treatment in the past, red is those that are currently using the treatment, blue is % of
patients using the treatment who have benefited from it
Patient Outcomes: Clinic vs. National Average
0123456789
10
Baseline 3 months 6 months
Pain Intensity
0123456789
10
Baseline 3 months 6 months
Physical Function
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
Baseline 3 months 6 months
Anxiety
02468
101214161820
Baseline 3 months 6 months
Depression
ClinicNational Average
Patient Complexity: Clinic vs. National Average
I'm sure that there is a medical treatment and cure for my pain
I expect that my pain will get worse over time
When I do something that causes my pain to increase, it means that I am harming my body even more
Less Complex More Complex
Disabling Pain Beliefs
0%
25%
50%
StronglyDisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree
0%
25%
50%
StronglyDisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree
0%
25%
50%
StronglyDisagree
Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree
ClinicNational Average
Invasive vs. Non-Invasive Interventions
Non-InvasiveInterventions34% (N = 375)
Invasive Interventions66% (N = 730)
p-value
Age (SD) 46 (14.5) 47 (14.1) 0.442
Gender (% Female) 64% (238) 63% (457) 0.778
Duration of Pain, months (SD) 77 (87.3) 102 (109.1) < 0.001a
Unable to work because of pain 31% (108) 45% (306) < 0.001b
a Effect Size based on Cohen’s d = 0.2b Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.8 (1.4, 2.4)
Demographic Characteristics
Non-InvasiveInterventions34% (N = 375)
Invasive Interventions66% (N = 730)
p-value
Pain Intensity (SD) 5.5 (2.2) 5.8 (2.1) 0.057
Type of PainNeuropathic onlySomatic onlyMixed
4% (15)27% (103)63% (238)
4% (29)25% (185)66% (481)
0.9820.4460.424
Positive for Emotional Distress on MHI-5
64% (174) 67% (337) 0.396
Pessimistic Outlook: Believes that pain will get worse
62% (227) 63% (449) 0.693
Believes that pain is the Number 1 problem in their life
79% (288) 86% (98) 0.004a
a Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.6 (1.2, 2.3)
Pain & Psychosocial Measures
Invasive vs. Non-Invasive Interventions
80%
59%61%
48%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Intervention Helpful Adverse Effects
% o
f Pat
ient
s in
Coh
ort (
N =
110
5)
Non-Invasive
Invasive
p < 0.001, O.R. = 2.5 (1.9, 3.4)
p = 0.001, O.R. = 1.5 (1.2, 2.0)
Perception of TreatmentInvasive vs. Non-Invasive Interventions
64%
38%
64%
45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Future Interest in Non-Invasive Interventions
Future Interest in InvasiveInterventions
% o
f Pat
ient
s in
Coh
ort (
N =
110
5)
Current Non-InvasiveInterventions
Current InvasiveInterventions
p = 0.995
p = 0.027, O.R. = 1.3 (1.0, 1.7)
Future Treatment Outlook
Invasive vs. Non-Invasive Interventions
Opioid vs. Non-Opioid Medication
Non-Opioid Medication
22% (N = 229)
Opioid Medication
78% (N = 793)
p-value
Age (SD) 46 (15.1) 47 (14.1) 0.164
Gender (% Female) 62% (141) 64% (505) 0.560
Duration of Pain, months (SD) 83 (103.1) 99 (103.3) 0.048
Unable to work because of pain 36% (78) 43% (320) 0.049
Demographic Characteristics
Non-Opioid Medication
22% (N = 229)
Opioid Medication78% (N = 793)
p-value
Pain Intensity (SD) 5.5 (2.3) 5.8 (2.0) 0.030a
Type of PainNeuropathic onlySomatic onlyMixed
5% (12)35% (80)
55% (125)
3% (28)23% (185)69% (549)
0.240< 0.001b
< 0.001c
Positive for Emotional Distress on MHI-5
63% (109) 67% (369) 0.352
Pessimistic Outlook: Believes that pain will get worse
58% (130) 65% (505) 0.045
Believes that pain is the Number 1 problem in their life
83% (187) 85% (655) 0.583
a Cohen’s d = 0.1b Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.8 (1.3, 2.5)c Odds Ratio (95% CI) = 1.9 (1.4, 2.5)
Pain & Psychosocial Measures
Opioid vs. Non-Opioid Medication
82%
28%
80%
57%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Medication Helpful Future Interest in MedicationTherapy
% o
f Pat
ient
s in
Coh
ort
( N =
102
2)
Non-Opioid MedicationOpioid Medication
p = 0.496
p < 0.001, O.R. = 3.4 (2.4, 4.6)
Opioid vs. Non-Opioid Medication
Unable to Work Because of Pain Non-Opioid Medication OpioidMedication
Unable to Work & Prior Non-Invasive Treatments
25% 34%
Unable to Work & Prior Invasive Treatments
43% 47%
Disability:
Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for chronic pain
CPAIN Data Comparison
IMS Claims DB
PracticeMgmt. CPAIN
Pharmacologic therapy ✔ ✔ ✔
Non-pharmacologic therapy ✔ ✔
Treatment effectiveness ✔ ✔
Treatment safety ✔ ✔
Misuse, abuse, diversion ✔ ✔
Patient characteristics ✔ ✔
Prescriber characteristics ✔ ✔
In summary: Concept
Collect patient reported outcomes (e.g., pain assessment, QoL, mood, function, opioid risk screening)
Link measurement instruments - patients – research data – clinical tools – clinicians
Easily retrievable and incorporated into real time reports
Data repository that is relatively easy to access (for research)
Codify Standard of care
• Education/guidelines• Access to specialty care• Prescription monitoring program• Statewide outcome tracking tool
Proficiency training
• LOES: 4+ hours in multidisciplinary pain center• Didactic: 2 hours
– Includes review of AMDG guideline for care model• At home CME: 3+ hours
– COPE (for opioid prescribing training)– AMA (overview)
• Continuing CMEs: – Project ECHO
• Evaluation• Reimbursed by payer?
Dubois, et al Pain Medicine Position Paper., Pain Medicine 10 (6), 2009: 972-1000.
Pain Champion 1b
Codify Standard of care
• Education/guidelines• Access to specialty care• Prescription monitoring program• Statewide outcome tracking tool
Tele-health in Washington
Jefferson Hospital
Forks Hospital
Olympic Medical Ctr
Harrison Hospital
Grays Harbor Hospital
UW Mark Reed Hospital
Morton Hospital
Mason Hospital
Willapa Harbor HospitalOcean Beach Hospital
OMCC
Skagit Valley Hospital
United General Hospital
Snoqualmie Valley Hospitall
Island Hospital
Oroville
RepublicOmak
Brewster
Grand Coulee
Chelan
Walla Walla
Wenatchee, CWH Quincy
St. Joseph Hospital
Longview RSN & Pediatric Clinic
Naselle Juvenile Facility
Yakima Valley Farmworkers Clinic
Ione
Colville
ChewelahNewportInchelium
Keller Deer Park
Spokane
Davenport
OdessaEphrata
Moses Lake Colfax
Dayton
PullmanPomeroy
Othello
Dayton
Connell
Sunnyside
Goldendale
Ellensburg
Whidbey Gen’eral Hospital
Makah Tribe
Quinault Tribe
Quileute Tribe
Shoalwater Bay TribeChehalis Tribe
Nisqually Tribe
Squaxin Island TribeSkokomish Tribe
UW Telehealth Sites
Other Telehealth Network Sites
UW Pain/ Project ECHO
• Twice weekly tele-videoconference statewide:– Pain (projected start 1/2011)– Addiction (started 11/2010)
• Expert UW multidisciplinary consultant group meets with 30+ pre-scheduled providers– Polycom or similar system– Nurse coordinator/Outcomes followed & measured– Case presentation– Knowledge-networks
Pain Tracker
Measurement based care
Integrates with CPAIN®
Codify Standard of care
• Education/guidelines• Access to specialty care• Prescription monitoring program• Statewide outcome tracking tool
Emergency Department Information Exchange (EDIE) www.ediecareplan.com
Statewide ED Visit Network (EDIE)
14 hospitals pursuing EDIE implementation (yellow/green)
Registration Reveals Patient on Consistent Care Patient’s ED chart
flagged for doctor
Physician reviews ED care guidelines
Patient Discharged
medical screeningexam by ED physician
No controlledsubstances
ED case manager talks to patient prior to discharge
ED Visit Process
Usual Triage
The Process“Please
review Jane Doe”
24 hour referral line compiled and researched. Reviewed for appropriateness Program Coordinatorcalls PCP
Patient’s Primary Care Physician
PCPRecommendations
ED Care Guidelines CommitteeChaplin ED Nurse ED PhysiciansPsych Nurse Pharmacist Medical Director
ED Care Guidelines
ED Physician
11,146
4,959
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ED Visits to All Hospitalssince Consistent Care Started (4 years)
6187 Reduced ED Visits
-56% ReductionBefore
After
n=264 patients
Codify Standard of care
• Education/guidelines• Access to specialty care• Prescription monitoring program• Statewide outcome tracking tool
Measurement Based Care
Continue and work together
MHCS
Planning Timeline
Current Date
FOC: 01 Oct 12
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
IOC
FOC
IOC: 01 Aug 10
Slide 6 of 13
PI – Operationalize
• OPORD Published: NLT 30 Jul 10PII – Implementing
1
PIII – Assess
3
1
2 IOC, 1 Aug 10 “Quick Wins”
3 FOC, 01 Oct 12
Phase I begins, 01 May 101
Critical Points( CP)
Pain Management Campaign Plan
2
PIV – Revise Implementation
P V – Re-Assess
P VI – Sustain
Summary:
• System is fragmented
• Care is inconsistent
• Cost is unsustainable
The Model:1. Coordinated Care
– Use care managers– Pain tracker supports Medical Home
2. Collaborative Care– Standard of care & TelePain– Between patient, family & provider
3. Measurement-base Care– Tracking and providing aggregate reports (CPAIN)– Treatment based on data outcomes not output
4. Value based Care– Incentive alignment– Pay for things that have evidence that they work
78
PHASE IEstablish the Model
PHASE IIIntroduce the Model
PHASE IIIImplement the Model
Nationally
PHASE IVA
Develop & Sustain the Model
PHASE IVB
Integrate the Model into Long Term VA
Organizational Goals
Sustainable Pain Care
EffectiveCollaboration
PCP supported by Behavioral Health
Care Manager
Informed, Active Patient
Practice Support
MeasurementTelePain
Training
Codify Standard of Care:
• Education and Guidelines (AMDG)• Access to specialty care (TelePain)• Monitoring Program (PMP, EDIE)• Measurement-based care (CPAIN)
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble.
It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
Mark Twain