MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

20
Structured Finance and the recent turmoil J. Ericsson

description

This presentation was made as part of a panel discussion organized for the McGIll MBA programme in November 2008

Transcript of MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Page 1: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Structured Finance and the recent turmoil

J. Ericsson

Page 2: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Primer on Structured Credit

  Credit default swaps.   Collateralized debt obligations.

Page 3: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 4: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 5: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Intuition

  Buying a corporate bond and insuring the default risk (CDS) is the same as buying a government bond to start with.

  Buying a treasury and selling insurance (CDS) is equivalent to buying a corporate bond synthetically.

  AIG was a big seller of various forms of default insurance.

  Lehman was an important counterparty to CDS contracts (300 vs. 6 $B)

5

Page 6: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 7: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name 7

Basic CDO structure

Individual CDS Contracts / credits

... are pooled ... ... and tranched

Page 8: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

– who were the CDO tranche buyers? – how does one sell an equity tranche to a

pension fund? – problems – leverage and transparency

combined with a brand new market barely understood by many participants.

Page 9: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 10: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

A not very virtuous loop of

–  low rates > –  increasing RE prices > –  new categories of homebuyers accepting

harsher terms > –  Institutions securitizing lower quality loans and

creating “safer” securities (and some riskier equity tranches) >

–  Buy side financial institutions funding investments in these securities by borrowing short term at lower yields (cf riding the yield curve).

Page 11: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 12: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 13: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 14: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 15: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 16: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

Page 17: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

FED REACTION – liquidity vs solvency

  crisis mainly viewed as a market liquidity problem between late summer 2007 and 2008

  central bank significantly extended its balance sheet to address the liquidity problem and the seizure of money markets.

  This led to perverse incentives -- “problem collateral” found its way to central banks.

Page 18: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

•  Take over of Fannie and Freddie and the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and the near failure of others have demonstrated that the problem is one of solvency as well as illiquidity.

Page 19: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name

– Now that the crisis is viewed more as a solvency problem , FED is approaching the problem by seeking to “nationalize” problem assets and hold them until the housing prices stabilize.

– This raises questions about incentives: a) recapitalization requirements, b) equity stake for tax payers etc...

Page 20: MBA Panel on the crisis, Montreal November 2008

Course Number © Leaders Name