MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

download MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

of 46

Transcript of MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    1/46

    1-1

    Operations Management

    MB 202Production and Operations Management

    1 of Unit 2

    Location & Capacity Planning, ProductionPlanning & Control, Work Study

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 1 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    William J. Stevenson

    8th edition

    Gurdeepak Singh

    GJIMTMohali

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    2/46

    1-2

    OperationsOperations

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 2 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    LocationLocation StrategiesStrategies

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    3/46

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    4/46

    1-4

    OutlineOutline -- ContinuedContinued

    METHODS OF EVALUATING LOCATION ALTERNATIVES

    The Factor-Rating Method Locational Break-Even Analysis

    Center-of-Gravity Method

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 4 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    SERVICE LOCATION STRATEGY

    How Hotel Chains Select Sites

    The Telemarketing Industry

    Geographic Information Systems

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    5/46

    1-5

    Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

    When you complete this, you should be able to :

    Identify or Define: Objective of location strategy International location issues Clustering Geographic Information Systems

    Describe or ex lain:

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 5 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Three methods of solving the location problem

    Factor-rating method

    Locational breakeven analysis

    Center -of-gravity method

    Describe the factors affecting location decisions

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    6/46

    1-6

    Federal ExpressFederal Express

    Stresses hub concept

    Advantages: enables service to more locations with fewer aircraft

    enables matching of aircraft flights with package loads

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 6 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    re uces m s an ng an e ay n trans t ecause t ere s totacontrol of packages from pickup to delivery

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    7/46

    1-7

    Objective of Location StrategyObjective of Location Strategy

    Maximize the benefit of location

    to the firm

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 7 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    8/46

    1-8

    Industrial Location DecisionsIndustrial Location Decisions

    Costfocus

    Revenue varies littlebetween locations

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 8 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    oca on s a ma orcost factor Affects shipping &

    production costs (e.g., labor) Costs vary greatly between

    locations

    1995 Corel Corp.

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    9/46

    1-9

    Service Location DecisionsService Location Decisions

    Revenue focus Costs vary little between market areas

    Location is a major

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 9 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    eve ue ac o Affects amount of

    customer contact

    Affects volume of

    business

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    10/46

    1-10

    In GeneralIn General -- Location DecisionsLocation Decisions

    Long-term decisions

    Difficult to reverse

    Affect fixed & variable costs

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 10 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Transportation cost As much as 25% of product price

    Other costs: Taxes, wages, rent etc.

    Objective:Maximize benefit of location to firm

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    11/46

    1-11

    Location Decision SequenceLocation Decision Sequence

    Country Region/Community

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 11 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    1995CorelCorp.

    1995 Corel Corp.

    1995CorelCorp.

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    12/46

    1-12

    Factors Affecting CountryFactors Affecting Country

    Government rules, attitudes, politicalrisk, incentives

    Culture & economy

    Market location

    Labor availability, attitudes,

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 12 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Availability of supplies,communications, energy

    Exchange rates and currency risks

    1995 Corel Corp.

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    13/46

    1-13

    Region Location DecisionsRegion Location Decisions

    Corporate desires

    Attractiveness of region (culture,

    taxes, climate, etc.) Labor, availability, costs, attitudes

    towards unions

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 13 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Costs and availability of utilities Environmental regulations of state

    and town

    Government incentives

    Proximity to raw materials &customers

    Land/construction costs 1995 Corel Corp.

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    14/46

    1-14

    Factors Affecting SiteFactors Affecting Site

    Site size and cost

    Air, rail, highway,and waterway

    s stems

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 14 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Zoning restrictions

    Nearness of

    services/supplies

    needed Environmental

    impact issues

    1995 Corel Corp.

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    15/46

    1-15

    Location Decision ExampleLocation Decision Example

    BMW decided tobuild its firstmajor

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 15 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    manufacturingplant outsideGermany in

    Spartanburg,South Carolina.

    1995 Corel Corp.

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    16/46

    1-16

    Country Decision FactorsCountry Decision Factors

    Market location

    U.S. is worlds largestluxury car market

    Growing (baby boomers)

    Other Lower shipping cost($2,500/car less)

    New plant & equipmentwould increase productivity

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 16 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Lower manufacturing laborcosts $17/hr. (U.S.) vs. $27

    (Germany)

    Higher labor productivity 11 holidays (U.S.) vs.

    31 (Germany)

    , -

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    17/46

    1-17 Region/Community DecisionRegion/Community DecisionFactorsFactors

    Labor Lower wages in South Carolina (SC)

    Government incentives

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 17 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    m on n s a e oca ax rea s

    Free-trade zone from airport to plant No duties on imported components or on exported cars

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    18/46

    1-18

    TIPIf you do not understandsomething,

    ask me!

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 18 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    19/46

    1-19

    CSF in Location AnalysisCSF in Location Analysis

    Critical Success Factors Country1

    Country

    2

    Country

    3

    Country

    4Technology

    Rate of technology change

    Innovations in process design

    3

    55

    3

    2

    11

    5Level of education

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 19 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Number of skilled workersNational education rate

    54

    41

    31

    42

    Political and Legal Aspects

    Stability of governmentProduct liability laws

    Export restrictions

    54

    4

    53

    3

    23

    3

    55

    1

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    20/46

    1-20

    CSF in Location AnalysisCSF in Location Analysis -- ContinuedContinued

    Critical Success Factors Country1

    Country2

    Country3

    Country4Social and Cultural Aspects

    Similarity in language

    Work ethic

    5

    4

    1

    2

    5

    3

    4

    1

    Economic factors

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 20 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Total Rating Points 50 43 35 48

    Tax rates

    Inflation

    Availability of raw materials

    Interest rates

    3

    3

    2

    3

    3

    5

    4

    4

    2

    5

    3

    2

    5

    5

    5

    5

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    21/46

    1-21

    Global Competitiveness of CountriesGlobal Competitiveness of Countries

    Finland... United States ...

    Netherlands... Germany... Canada .

    12

    34

    11

    2001 Ranking

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 21 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    ....

    Brazil .. .. Russia .. Ecuador ..... Bangladesh ... Honduras .. Bolivia.....

    35

    58

    72737475

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    22/46

    1-22

    Ranking CorruptionRanking Corruption

    Rank Score

    1 Finland 9.9

    2 Denmark 9.53 New Zealand 9.4

    4 Singapore 9.2

    A score of 10represents

    corruption free

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 22 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    srae . .(Tied)

    .

    21 Japan 7.1

    57 China 3.5

    79 Russia 2.390 Nigeria 1.0

    91 Bangladesh 0.4

    1 23

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    23/46

    1-23Organizations That Need To BeOrganizations That Need To Be

    Close to MarketsClose to Markets

    Government agencies Police & fire departments Post Office

    Retail Sales and Service

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 23 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Fast food restaurants, supermarkets, gas stations Drug stores, shopping malls

    Bakeries

    Services Doctors, lawyers, accountants, barbers

    Banks, auto repair, motels

    1 24

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    24/46

    1-24

    Location Evaluation MethodsLocation Evaluation Methods

    Factor-rating method

    Locational break-even analysis

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 24 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Center of gravitymethod

    Transportation model

    1995 Corel Corp.

    1 25

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    25/46

    1-25

    FactorFactor--Rating MethodRating Method

    Most widely used location technique

    Useful for service & industrial locations

    Rates locations using factors

    Tangible (quantitative) factors

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 25 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Example: Short-run & long-run costs

    Intangible (qualitative) factors

    Example: Education quality, labor skills

    1 26

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    26/46

    1-26

    Factors Affecting Location SelectionFactors Affecting Location Selection

    Labor costs (including wages, unionization,

    productivity) Labor availability (including attitudes, age,

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 26 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    ,

    Proximity to raw materials and suppliers

    Proximity to markets

    Government fiscal policies (includingincentives, taxes, unemploymentcompensation)

    1-27t ff ti ti S l tit ff ti ti S l ti

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    27/46

    1-27Factors Affecting Location SelectionFactors Affecting Location Selection --

    ContinuedContinued

    Environmental regulations

    Utilities (including gas, electric, water, andtheir costs)

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 27 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    e cos s nc u ng an , expans on, par ng,drainage)

    Transportation availability (including rail, air,

    water, and interstate roads)

    1-28F t Aff ti L ti S l tiF t Aff ti L ti S l ti

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    28/46

    1 28Factors Affecting Location SelectionFactors Affecting Location Selection --

    ContinuedContinued

    Quality-of-life issues in the community

    (including all levels of education, cost of living,health care, sports, cultural activities,

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 28 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    , , ,

    facilities)

    Foreign exchange Including rates and stability

    Quality of government (including stability,

    honesty, attitudes toward new business - whether

    overseas or local)

    1-29

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    29/46

    1 29

    Steps in Factor Rating MethodSteps in Factor Rating Method

    List relevant factors

    Assign importance weight to each factor (such as 0 1)

    Develop scale for each factor (such as 1 100)

    Score each location using factor scale

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 29 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    Mu t p y scores y we ghts or each actor & tota Select location with maximum total score

    1-30

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    30/46

    1 30

    Method of cost-volume analysis used for

    industrial locations Steps

    Determine fixed & variable costs for each

    LocationalLocational BreakBreak--Even AnalysisEven Analysis

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 30 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    location Plot total cost for each location (Cost on

    vertical axis, Annual Volume on horizontalaxis)

    Select location with lowest total cost forexpected production volume Must be above break-even

    1-31 LocationalLocational BreakBreak Even AnalysisEven Analysis

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    31/46

    LocationalLocational BreakBreak--Even AnalysisEven AnalysisExampleExample

    Youre an analyst for MICO. Youre considering a

    new manufacturing plant in Patiala, Ludhiana, orChandigarh. Fixed costs per year are $30k, $60k,& $110k respectively. Variable costs per case are

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 31 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    , , .

    $120. What is the best location for an expectedvolume of 2,000 cases per year?

    1995 Corel Corp.

    1-32Locational BreakLocational Break Even CrossoverEven Crossover

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    32/46

    Locational BreakLocational Break--Even CrossoverEven CrossoverChartChart

    100000

    150000

    200000

    ualCost

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 32 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    0

    50000

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

    Volume

    A

    nn

    Ludhianalowest cost

    Chandigarhlowest cost

    Patialalowest cost

    1-33

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    33/46

    Center of Gravity MethodCenter of Gravity Method

    Finds location ofsingle distribution center

    serving several destinations Used primarily for services

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 33 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    ons ers Location of existing destinations

    Example: Markets, retailers etc.

    Volume to be shipped Shipping distance (or cost)

    Shipping cost/unit/mile is constant

    1-34

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    34/46

    Center of Gravity Method StepsCenter of Gravity Method Steps

    Place existing locations on a coordinate grid

    Grid has arbitrary origin & scale

    Maintains relative distances

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 34 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    CalculateX& Ycoordinates for center ofgravity

    Gives location of distribution center

    Minimizes transportation cost

    1-35

    C t f G it M th d E tiC t f G it M th d E ti

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    35/46

    Center of Gravity Method EquationsCenter of Gravity Method Equations

    dix = x coordinate of

    location i

    =

    X Coordinate

    =

    i

    iiix

    xW

    Wd

    C

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 35 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    moved to or from location i

    diy = y coordinate of

    location i

    Y Coordinate

    =

    ii

    i

    iiy

    yW

    Wd

    C

    1-36Coordinate Locations of FourCoordinate Locations of Four QuainsQuains

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    36/46

    Coordinate Locations of FourCoordinate Locations of Four Quain sQuain sDepartment Stores and the Center of GravityDepartment Stores and the Center of Gravity

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 36 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    1-37

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    37/46

    Transportation ModelTransportation Model

    Finds amount to be shipped from severalsources to several destinations

    Used primarily for industrial locations Type of linear programming model

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 37 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    ect ve: n m ze tota pro uct on& shipping costs

    Constraints

    Production capacity at source (factory) Demand requirement at destination

    1-38Worldwide Distribution of VolkswagensWorldwide Distribution of Volkswagens

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    38/46

    Worldwide Distribution of VolkswagensWorldwide Distribution of Volkswagens

    and Partsand Parts

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 38 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    1-39Components of Volume and RevenueComponents of Volume and Revenue

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    39/46

    Components of Volume and RevenueComponents of Volume and Revenuefor a Service Firmfor a Service Firm

    1. Purchasing power of customer drawing area

    2. Service and image compatibility with demographics of thecustomer drawing area

    3. Competition in the area

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 39 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    . Qua ty o the compet t on

    5. Uniqueness of the firms and competitors locations

    6. Physical qualities of facilities and neighboring businesses

    7. Operating policies of the firm8. Quality of management

    1-40

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    40/46

    TIPIf you do not understand

    something,

    ask me!

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 40 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    1-41Location StrategiesLocation Strategies Service vs.Service vs.

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    41/46

    Location StrategiesLocation Strategies Service vs.Service vs.IndustrialIndustrial

    Service/Retail/Professional

    Revenue Focus

    o Volume/revenueo Drawing area, purchasing powero Competition; advertising/pricing

    Goods-Producing LocationCost Focus

    Tangible costso Transportation cost of raw

    materials

    o Shipment cost of finished goods

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 41 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    o Parking/access; security/ lighting;appearance/image

    o Cost determinantso Rent

    o Management caliber

    o Operations policies (hours, wagerates)

    o Energy and utility cost; labor; raw

    material; taxes, etc.o Intangible and future costs

    o Attitude toward union

    o Quality of life

    o Education expenditures by stateo Quality of state and local

    government

    1-42Location StrategiesLocation Strategies

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    42/46

    oca o S a eg esoca o S a eg esService vs. IndustrialService vs. Industrial

    Service/Retail/ProfessionalTechniques

    o Regression models to determineimportance of various factors

    o Factor-rating method

    Goods Producing LocationTechniques

    o Linear Programming(Transportation method)

    o Factor-rating method

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 42 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    o ra c coun s

    o Demographic analysis of drawingarea

    o Purchasing power analysis of

    drawing areao Center of gravity method

    o Geographic information systems

    o Locational breakeven

    analysis

    o Crossover charts

    1-43Location StrategiesLocation Strategies

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    43/46

    ggService vs. IndustrialService vs. Industrial

    Service/Retail/ProfessionalAssumptions

    o Location is a major determinate ofrevenue

    o High customer-contact issues are

    Goods-Producing LocationAssumptions

    o Location is a majordeterminate of cost

    o Most major costs can be

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 43 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    cr t ca

    o Costs are relatively constant for a

    given area; therefore, the revenue

    function is critical

    identified explicitly for each

    site

    o Low customer contact allows

    focus on identifiable costs

    o Intangible costs can beevaluated

    1-44Telemarketing and InternetTelemarketing and Internet

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    44/46

    ggIndustriesIndustries

    Require neither face-to-face contact with

    customers (or employees) nor movement of

    material

    Presents a whole new perspective on the location

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 44 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    problem

    1-45

    Final ThoughtFinal Thought

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    45/46

    Final ThoughtFinal Thought

    The ideal location for

    many companies in thefuture will be a floating

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 45 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~

    go from port to port,from country to

    country wherevercostper unit is lowest.

    1995 Corel Corp.

    1-46

  • 7/31/2019 MB202 POM 1 of Unit 2 Gurdeepak Jan 2012

    46/46

    Facility & Capacity Planning, PPC and Work StudySlide 46 of Unit 2 MB-202 POM ~Gurdeepak 2011~