Maududi and Qumaini

JI called the Qumaini as a Great Personality. They say Sd. Maududi is also Great personality. So how can be both Qumainy and Sd. Maududi be great personalities for a Muslim who follow Quran and Sunnah. Then there must be something common between these two personalities. (Qumainy and Maududi).

Yes, let us see some points and proof, then we will understand why JI wants to justify the Rafidas as Muslim to hide the fact that they(JI) are rafidies in the name of Islam. (See page 68 Ibadath Oru Samgra Padanam by KC)

This is "hakimiyathulla" Maududi cooked in his mind It was not known to mufassireen / fuqkahs before him. See Qumainy has also the same concept.

See Maududies and Seyyid Quthb books have helped for Iran revolutions. Prahodanam 1999 July 3 page 28

Nuri Tibiris, one of the most renowned Shi'ite scholars and mujtahids, wrote a book against the present Quran. The book is entitled: 'Faslul Khitab Fi Tahreefi-Kitabi Rabbil Arbaab' (The Final Verdict on the Distortion of the Book of the Lord of Lords)

Khomeini mentions this scholar with great respect in his Al-Hukumatul Islamiyah" (The Islamic State). In fact, Khomeini has actually used Nuri Tibiris's work entitled "Mustadrakul Wasail" to complete his theory of Wilayatul Faqih.

So Qumaini has also the same concept of Hakimiyath. KC in the above book mentions the Hakimiyyha Maududi envisaged has been implemented in Iran. Not yet implemented in Hiijaaz (aoodubilla)

There were instances of agreements and approvals from the Qumainy’s to accept / confirm Sd. Maududi during his life time. Did Qumainies agreed / approved any scholars of Sunnis OTHER THAN Sd.Maududi? (See the attached file: What Shias says about the ulama of Sunnath Jamath). If Shias said the Ulema of

Sunnath Jamath as murthad and Kafir at the same time agreed / approved only Sd.Maududi, what does it mean?. It means Sd. Maududi is an agent of Shias to propagate Shiaism among the Sunnath Jamath by wearing the gown of Sunnath Jamath. The same job JI has been doing by translating the books of Shias. Maududi was a close friend of Khomeini and was sympathetic to his course. In a book titled, 'Two brothers -Maududi and Khomeini' page 129, the following statement of Dr Ahmad Farouk Maududi (son of Abul-A'ala Maududi) was published in Roz Naame, Lahore - 29 September 1979,"Allama Khomeini had a very old and close relationship with Abba Jaan (father). Aayaatullah Khomeini translated his (fathers) books in Farsi and included it as a subject in Qum. Allama Khomeini met my father in 1963 during Hajj and my father's wish was to create a revolutionary in Pakistan similar to Iran. He was concerned about the success of the Iranian revolution till his last breath.'

See the book Minhaj Al Ambiya of Sh. Rabeeh page 157 the same friendship of Qumainy and Maududi we can read.

Sd. Maududi is the first person (outside the Shias) who called the Iran revolution as Islamic revolution. Sd.Maududi is the first person (from otherthan Shias) who called “Iran Revolution as Islamic Revolution” / supported / advise the world to support Qumainy’s Iran revolution. In the news paper of Ihwaanul Muslimoon Sd.Maududi said “thourathul Qumainy

thaurathul Islamia” Verily Iran Revolution as Islamic Revolution So every body has to support Qumainy..”

When Sd. Maududi died the news in the Official press of Qunany’s “Al Majlist-Shia” said in the front page after giving the photo of Maududi “ today the world is in sorrow due to the death of usthad Maududi”. When we say this JI can ask “Why to wonder for the news in the press of Shias about the death of such a great personality known all over the world like Maududi, the first recipient of King Faisal Award..” OK. No problem.. leave it.. But continue the news in Al Majlist-Shia continues as “Still… no problem we have the book from Usthad Maududi named “Al kilafath Wal Mulk” (What is the specialty of that book; where in there are instances of strong accusing and scolding against Aboobacker, Umar, Othman and Aysh and Muawiya(RAA)). press continued “so even if Usathad Maududi died.. the book “Al kilafath Wal Mulk will flourish here”.

I gave this book to read to a Pakistani friend; (I swear by Allah) after reading page 103-108; he told me "sorry I can not read this, because it will affect my love to wards Othman (R)."

So brother think.. If shia says that the book Kilaafath wal Mulk will flourish.. who is benefited with that book? Shias or Sunnath Jamath?. Sure Shias.. It is not possible for any body from Sunnath Jamath to write a book accusing / scolding Aboobacker, Umar, Othman and Aysh (RA). The same book has been translated in to Malayalam also in the name “Islamul Raajawaychayum”. Then the JI workers can asking. The JI scholars did not see this? What they say about this?. Yes at least the person who translated the book

in to Malayalam has seen this. But translation is made by omitting these accusing and scolding.

When Qumaini died Prabhodanam (24/06/1989) wrote "Qumainiyude viyogam Islamika lokathinu theera Nastam". Death of Qumaini an ever loss for Islamic world. The Qunainy who said Quran is corrupted, Jibril Mistaken, called Othman(R) and Yazid(R) as rascals, called Sahabas as Murthad, Kafir, called all Muslims are off-springs of prostitutes has dies, sure it is loss for JI but not for the Muslims who believe in Allah and Akhirath.

All the above evidences are convincing us that Maududi and JI has a close liaison with the Qumaines and Rafidies. See more shiaism with Maududi.

In the explanation of the verse 2:1 Maududi has rejected the opinion of 5 Sahabas (Abubacker, Omer, Othman, Ali and Ibn Masoud(RAA). See Ibn kathir Tafseer.

See Thafsser Ali Muhsin Khan

Now see what Maududi said about this

See one more example that Maududi has rejected the opinion of Ibn Abbas, Imam Buhaari, Imam Masai, Imam Thabri and Al Awfi.

Ibn kathir Tafseer. Verse 28:85

See Ali Muhsin Khan

See Amaani Maulawi