MATISSE - Rencontre projet Fizeau Nov. 2010
description
Transcript of MATISSE - Rencontre projet Fizeau Nov. 2010
MATISSE - Rencontre projet Fizeau Nov. 2010
Schedule
Dec2010
PD
R
June2011
OF
DR
Dec2011
FD
R
Mar2013
N C
old
Op
tics
Apr2013
N C
ryo
stat
Jun2013
Inte
gra
tio
n N
Co
ld
Op
tics
, Cry
ost
at,
Det
ecto
r
Apr2014
Jul2013
L C
ryo
stat
Aug2013
L C
old
Op
tics
Nov2013
Inte
gra
tio
n L
Co
ld
Op
tics
, Cry
ost
at,
Det
ecto
r
Fin
al in
teg
rati
on
N
ban
d a
t O
CA
Fin
al in
teg
rati
on
N
ban
d a
t O
CA
Sep2014
Mar2015
Tes
t P
lan
, PA
E
Contribution de Caroline Daire pour la gestion
Total FTEs pour OCA : 48.8 sur 124.5.
From January 2010 to June
From January 2010 to June
Matisse September 2010 Slide 6
reimager
photometricchannels
anamorphic optics
Interferometricchannels
photometricslider
wheelscamera
detector
shutter
coldstop
slit
reimager
From January 2010 to now
Matisse June 2010 Slide 7
reimager
photometricchannels
anamorphic optics
Interferometric channels
photometricslider
wheels
camera
detectorshutter
Cold Optics & Cryostats
Warm Optics
BEAM COMPRESSOR UNIT2100x2400
MATISSE WARM OPTICS
680
U=52050V=-32025
UV
U=49800V=-32275
680
V=-28945FOCAL LAB WALL
CRANE ACCESS V=-30050
SWD-1-I / V=-33495
SWD-2-I / V=-33735
SWD-3-I / V=-33975
SWD-4-I / V=-34215
MATISSE FEEDING OPTICS
V=-35675FOCAL LAB WALL
SWITCHYARD2100x2100U=52050
V=-35325
LEONARDO
PRIMA-12100x2100
PRIMA-22190x2300
U=44800V=-32725
U=44800V=-35325
GRAVITY
1500x5690HARDWARE VOLUME
640
U=47540V=-35315
500
550
870
U=51130V=-34575
900x1800
2000x1500
1200x2400U=49910V=-35325
RE
FE
RE
NC
E T
AR
GE
T
640
SCP#35700x440
760
250
750x1105
MATISSE L BAND
CRYOSTAT
MATISSE N BAND
CRYOSTAT
750x1105
650 500
660
U=49700V=-30730
U=51125V=-30730
175
675
360
680
IP1-
L U
=50
215
IP3-
L U
=50
135
IP5-
L U
=50
055
IP7-
L U
=49
975
IP1-
N U
=51
640
IP3-
N U
=51
560
IP5-
N U
=51
480
IP7-
N U
=51
400
IP7 = ex-SWD-1-I / V=-33495
IP5 = ex-SWD-2-I / V=-33735
IP3 = ex-SWD-3-I / V=-33975
IP1 = ex-SWD-4-I / V=-34215
IP7
IP5
IP3
IP1
U=
5098
7.5
U=
5076
2.5
U=
5053
7.5
U=
5031
2.5
U
VWarm optics
Table
L band Cryostat
N band Cryostat
ESO feeding optics
100 100
Young Stellar Objects
From Circumstellar.org catalogue
Young Stellar Objects
N band : 4-7 sources >=18-20Jy, observable with ATs38 sources >=1Jy, observable with UTs
L band : 18 sources >=2Jy, observable with ATs53 sources >=0.1Jy, observable with UTs
By an increase of the sensitivity to the coherent flux by a factor of 5 :
N band AT : 20 sources instead of 2-4N band UT : 70 sources instead of 38L band AT : 40 sources instead of 18L band UT : 61 sources instead of 53
Young Stellar Objects
N band : 4-7 sources >=18-20Jy, observable with ATs38 sources >=1Jy, observable with UTs
L band : 18 sources >=2Jy, observable with ATs53 sources >=0.1Jy, observable with UTs
By an increase of the sensitivity to the coherent flux by a factor of 5 :
N band AT : 20 sources instead of 2-4N band UT : 70 sources instead of 38L band AT : 40 sources instead of 18L band UT : 61 sources instead of 53
Several Scenarios studied for different disk structures and dust contents
Scenario 1. Flared disk, inner radius of 3 AU. Herbig source. The disk inclination is 45°. Scenario similar to the one used during Phase A for reconstructing an image.
Scenario 2 = scenario 1 with a disk inner radius of 4 AU
Scenario 3 = scenario 1 with a disk inclination of 35°
Scenario 4 = scenario 1 with a maximum grain size three times larger.
Scenario 5 = scenario 1 where the dust grains are made up also with 10% of crystalline olivine + Forsterite material. Images for several wavelengths are computed.
Scenario 6 = scenario 5, the same case as previously where the dust grains are made up also with a percentage of crystalline material but now the olivine composed grains are distributed for R <= 6 AU.
Scenario 7 : a puffed inner region as an alternative to Scenario 1.
Scenario 8 : a case with the presence of water ice grains (to be compared with scenario 1), disk without ice grains).
7 nights, 4 telescopes, N band
Case 1: 10 % error on V, 0.1 rad on the closure phases.Case 2: 2-3% error on V, 0.01 rad on the closure phases.
7 nights, 4 telescopes, N band
Case 1: 10 % error on V, 0.1 rad on the closure phases.Case 2: 2-3% error on V, 0.01 rad on the closure phases.
…
Improvement of VLTI sensitivity and accuracy.
Sensitivities with MATISSE will be improved by :- the use of an external Fringe Tracking, On and Off Axis,- the continuation of the effort made to reduce the fast OPD jitters/ vibrations.
Accuracies with MATISSE will be improved by :- the use of an external Fringe Tracking,- the effort made to reduce the fast OPD jitters/ vibrations,- the pupil lateral motion monitoring,- the use of OPD jitter residuals, tip-tilt residual, pupil lateral motion information
when analysing the data.
High limiting magnitude : Urgent need to develop and test « exotic » modes : H-K blind + N fringe-tracking MR blind recording New ideas for coherencing
High dynamic range : Urgent need to open the AMBER BCD
Vers une ANR 2011
Formation et Evolution des Systèmes Planétaires
2 Axes afin d’apporter de nouveau résultats dans le domaines :
a) R&D codes Astrophysiques (différent types poussière, région puffed-up, …)
b) R&D Traitement du signal (cas objet faible en régime ‘fond thermique’)
Projets : MIDI, AMBER (déjà utilisables), SPHERE (à court terme), …,
MATISSE & SPICA dont on a intérêt à préparer au mieux les programmes
Date de soumission : 10 (?) Janvier 2011, ANR sur 4 ans nous conduisant à l’intégration finale et aux tests de MATISSE.
Imaginé demandé : 2 post-doc, 2 Thèses, 50-100 k€ MATISSE & SPICA
Interface avec recherche et/ou ANR : corps mineurs, simulation dynamique, reconstruction d’image
B. Lopez1, P. Antonelli1, S. Wolf2, W. Jaffe3, R. Petrov1, S. Lagarde1, P. Berio1, R. Navarro4, U. Graser2, U. Beckman4, G. Weigelt5 , F. Vakili1, T. Henning2, J.C. Augereau9, C. Bailet1, J. Behrend5, N. Berruyer1, Y. Bresson1, O. Chesneau1, J.M. Clausse1, C. Connot5, K. Demyk6, W.C. Danchi7, M. Dugué1, E. Elswijk4, S. Flament1, H. Hanenburg4, K.H. Hofmann5, M. Heininger5, R. t. Horst4, J. Hron14, R. Matthar3, J. Kragt4, G. Kroes8, W. Laun2, Ch. Leinert2, H. Linz2, A. Matter1, Ph. Mathias1, K. Meisenheimer2, J.L. Menut1, F. Millour5, U. Neumann2, E. Nussbaum5, A. Niedzielski10, M. Mellein2, L. Mosoni8, S. Ottogalli1, J. Olofsson9, Y. Rabbia1, T. Ratzka2, S. Robbe-Dubois1, A. Roussel1, F. Rigal4, D. Schertl4, F.-X. Schmider1, B. Stecklum11, E. Thiebaut12, M. Vannier1, L. Venema4, K. Wagner2, L.B.F.M. Waters13.
1- Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Nice, France, 2- Max Planck Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg, Germany, 3- Leiden Observatory, the Netherlands, 4- ASTRON-NOVA, Dwingeloo, the Netherlands, 5- Max Planck Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany,6- CETP, Toulouse, France,7- NASA Goddard Flight Center, Baltimore, USA,8- Konkoly Observatory Budapest, Hungary,9- Observatoire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France,10- Torun Center for Astronomy, Torun, Poland,11- Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Germany, 12- Observatoire de Lyon, France,13- Astronomical Institute Amsterdam, the Netherlands,14- Vienna University Austria.
With the support of ESO in the frame of the second generation VLTI instruments : A. Richichi (ESO Instrument Scientist of MATISSE), F. Gonté (ESO VLTI System Engineer as MATISSE contact), G. Finger, J.L. Lizon, I. Derek, I. Percheron, G. Ruppretch, P. Haguenhauer, P. Gitton, S. Morel, …
Participants and Institutes
Fundings
Comparison of the Potential of MATISSE Phase-Referenced Imaging with Closure-Phase Imaging
Model Image,diam. 90 mas
Building block reconstruction with Phase References
Building block reconstruction with Closure Phases
30 Jy 20 Jy 12 Jy 8 Jy 6 Jy 4 Jy
Simulated uv coverage, 4 ATs, 3 configurations
Comparison of the Potential of MATISSE Phase-Referenced Imaging with Closure-Phase Imaging
Model Images
Building block reconstruction with Phase References
Building block reconstruction with Closure Phases
60 mas 90 mas 120 mas 150 mas 180 mas 210 mas
MATISSE
Successor of MIDI:Imaging capability in the entire mid-IR
Successor of AMBER:Extension down to 2.8 m + General use of closure phases
Complement to ALMA + ELT
Ground Precursor of space mission to characterize Earth like planets
Wavelength range 6-18m
Multi-AperTure Mid-Infrared SpectroScopic Experiment
Towards the Imaging in the mid-IR domain
Towards the Opening of New Spectral Windows
3 4 5L M N Q
Present MIDI Instrument
Towards the Opening of New Spectral Windows
3 4 5L M N Q
MATISSE Instrument
Science Programs and their key Issues
Science Programs and their key Issues
Mineralogy of Proto-Planetary Disks Grain Evolution towards Planetesimals
“The building blocks of planets within the terrestrial region of protoplanetary disks”
van Boekel et al. 2004, Nature, 432, 479
No
rma
lize
d f
lux
Science Programs and their key Issues
???????
MATISSE Characteristics
Number of beams : four, two and three also possible.
Spectral coverage : L, M, N, possible also simultaneously. Optimized for L and N.
Spectral resolution : low : 20 <R<40 in L&M at 3.5 mm; 20<R<40 in N at 10.5 mm. Medium : 350<R<550 in L&M at 3.5 mm; 150<R<250 in N at 10.5 mm. High : 800<R<1000 in L at 3.5 mm
The simultaneous coverage of the L&M bands in low and medium resolutions, and the full coverage of the L band in high spectral resolution require an external fringe tracker.
MATISSE will measure: coherent flux, visibilities, closure phases and differential phases. Differential visibilities can also be derived.
2 main modes
High sensitivity Mode (High Sens) :- 2T, 3T or 4T- With dedicated sequence of photometry: the photometry is evaluated by two
means,• In the Fourier domain, by the low frequency peak,• Using dedicated long sequences of photometric recording.
- Without photometry => Phase Oriented Mode
Simultaneous Photometry Mode (Si Phot) :- 2T, 3T or 4T- Photometric channels are used, individual photometry is estimated frame by frame for
bright targets, or binned relatively to the chopping frequency.
MATISSE Observing Modes
Specifications on sensitivity on the coherent flux
With the current VLTI infrastructure (within 300 ms and 50ms) :
Specifications on sensitivity on the coherent flux
With the current VLTI infrastructure (within 300 ms and 50ms) :
For information assuming a Fringe Tracking
With 10 minutes of total observing time