Materials and Components for ITER - INDUCIENCIA
Transcript of Materials and Components for ITER - INDUCIENCIA
1
Stefan WikmanMaterials and Manufacturing
Materials and Components Qualification for ITER
Materials & Fabrication
Component development → materials and joints development
Mechanical Testing & Thermal Fatigue Testing
Crack Propagation of Tungsten CFC tensile tests CFC Un‐irradiated CFC Irradiated
The work is aimed at Definition of Design Criteria Definition of Acceptance Criteria Qualification According to Codes & Standards Irradiation Campaigns at ITER Relevant doses Assessment of the Effect of Corrosion in the Heat Transfer Systems
WHAT DO WE DO AND WHY?
S. Wikman 2014
S. Wikman
Reactor Main Components (with Demanding Functional Requirements)
Vacuum Vessel In-Vessel systems and Heat Transfer Systems
The JET reactor in action (Culham, UK)
2014
ITERMagnets
• Thermal-hydraulics• Thermo-mechanics• Electro-magnetic loads• Neutron Irradiation• Corrosion and Water Chemistry• Fatigue, Creep• Joining methods• Cryogenic (4K) properties• Non destructive examination• Reproducibility• Metrology and Tolerances• Electronics• Ultra Low Vacuum• Etc etc etc …
Detailed analysis of everything
Tokamak
S. Wikman
Fusion reaction in a power plantThis animation combines reactions from the energy generation process and the breeding of tritium (renewal of fuel).
Magnetic confinementWithout a magnetic field, charged particles move randomly similar to motion of gases. As soon as a magnetic field is switched on, nuclei and electrons of the plasma spiral around the magnetic field lines.
Neutrons from the fusion reaction will still move freely.
Materials are exposed to a very high neutron flux and radiation heat.
Materials Qualification Unique thermal and neutron loads
Several Challenges with the Design of Plasma Facing ComponentsFirst barrier must let neutrons pass through to be absorbed by the coolant water to avoid surface melting.
2014
Stainless Steel 316L Irradiation Effects
S. Wikman 2014
Yield stress at higher temperature irradiation
Typical behavior of metals, irradiation hardening and increased strength in the beginning, but brittle with higher doses. And saturation effect.
S. Wikman 2014
Irradiation softening vs irradiation hardening ‐> find matching bolt materials!!Temperature & dose dependent evolutionLow temperatures speeds up irradiation hardeningIrradiation results in dissolution of precipitates thus lowering the strength (stress relaxation will also occur if the bolts are fastened with pre‐tension)
Material & Joining QualificationChallenges: some bolt materials show opposite behaviour
Irradiation hardening of CuCrZr
Irradiation hardening of CuCrZr after irradiation and testing at 150°C
S Wikman 2014
Material & Joining Qualification
Saturation of the irradiation hardening effect as increase yield load versus dose
Three‐point bend tests at 150°C were performed on notched bars of CuCrZr to show the effect of irradiation hardening and saturation of CuCrZr.The irradiation hardening is saturated at ~0.1 dpa.
PSI
PSI
S. Wikman
Qualification and assessment of materials influenced by neutron irradiation
HFR (High Flux Reactor)Netherlands
2014
Neutron irradiation tend to damage the lattice structure of crystalline materials Increasing dislocations results in increased strength and hardness, but less energy is needed for failure as toughness and ductility decrease. Neutron bombardment of steels also results in swelling (volume increase) and radiation-induced creep.
Typical material structure (un‐irradiated)
Irradiated
Irradiation causes helium production inside the microstructure eventually forming “He-bubbles (white spots)
Cross-sectional SEM Fracture surface
Effect of He migration to grain boundaries
Nuclear Grade MaterialsTypically clean, low impurity powders with restricted compositionLow Co, NB…
S Wikman 2014
Material & Joining QualificationChallenges Re-welding
He accumulated due to the relatively high n‐ and α‐cross section. He is insoluble in metals generating bubbles, pores and eventually initiation of cracks.
No. 1 Issue: Cracking in the HAZ or its vicinity (irradiation hardening + He accumulation especially in grain boundaries). Due to elevated temperature during welding the release of stresses is increased and gets uncontrolled with helium. Energy input must be minimized when performing re‐welding. Thus, a need for qualification under relevant conditions.
5 appm He, multi grain boundary cracking.‐ Single grain boundary cracks are evidence for He‐bubbles
Present challenges Qualify a welding procedure of re‐welding pipes after years of operation.
S. Wikman 2014
Carbon Fibre Reinforced Carbon
CFC a plasma Facing MaterialExposed to neutron irradiationExposed to high heat fluxRequires high thermal conductivity and strength
Background to decision to not use CFC in ITER
CFC un‐irradiated CFC Irradiated
NB31Pabs = 1.63 GW/m2
CFC is a good example with visible irradiation effects
CFC un‐irradiated CFC irradiated
Decision by ITER to scrap CFC development and go for 100% Tungsten
Tungsten needs optimization for high heat loads to replace CFC
2013S. Wikman
Laser Sintered Surfaces (oriented structure)
Hot Rolled W typically cracks along grain boundaries after thermal shocks.Laser/EB Textured W has a potential for crack mitigation
Aim: Avoid this as much as possible
S. Wikman
Encapsulation of cooling pipesembedded in 316L powder andHIP:ed
Loading of HIP
Background Prototype Manufacturing – ITER BlanketsStarted 20 years ago and still not finalized
HIP:ed prototype
2014
Early prototype (Sweden 1995)Manufacturing conditions still being assessed
2014
Complex coolant water geometry for the internal circuits
S. Wikman
First Wall Panels are attached to Shield Blanket Modules
Shield Blanket Module Ongoing workOperational life time assessment
Over the years the plasma operationwas optimized changing boundaryconditions and design
Be tiles
CuCrZr SS pipesSS drilledstructure
Very complex and lengthy manufacturing
Water flow
CuC1
Inner Waterbox
2014S. Wikman
Several Diffusion Bonding steps (HIP)
Qualification of PM-HIP 316L(N)-IG for the FWPs
15
• Completed a study and fabrication of mock-ups on powder metallurgy 316L(N)-IG and CuCrZr-IG
• The strength of powder 316 was superior to forged 316• Characterization of powder CuCrZr is comencing• Irradiation campaign under preparation
Figure:
Specimen:
Magnification
Etching:Description
Figure:
Specimen:
Magnification
Etching:
Description
Figure:
Specimen:
Magnification
Etching:
Description
Solid/powder boundary
Powder
Solid
500 (A4 print)
11255-40
40 % NaOH, electrolytic
11255-40
500 (A4 print)
40 % NaOH, electrolytic
11255-40
120 (A4 print)
40 % NaOH, electrolyticPowder 316L(N)-IG
Forged 316L(N)-IG Powder 316L(N)-IG
Powder CuCrZr-IG
S. Wikman
New Materials DevelopmentComplex component “printing”
2014S. Wikman
Demonstration that Additive Manufacturing can be utilized for fusion components and to improve thermo hydraulic conditions.
Laser sintered corner
ITER Test Blanket Modules (where new fuel is produced from neutrons)
Very complex assembly using conventional manufacturing techniques!
S. Wikman 2014
Movie 3
Only to manufacture one cooled wall structure is time consuming
EUROFER and ODS Steels shall operate at 650 °C -> creep important!
Additive manufacturing has a potential here!
2014
Corrosion mitigation is a major design criteria for operational life time• 37 water reactions due to radiolysis
• Activated Corrosion Products from coolant water interfaces and impurity accumulation in crevices is an issue due to the complex geometries
A fusion reactor as ITER provides unique cyclic water chemistry
Assessment of Water Coolant Interfaces under ITER Operational Conditions
Electrochemical potential is following the plasma
Extensive work in progress to assess CuCrZr at coolant water interfaces
The water chemistry determines the operational life time of a reactorThe Coolant Water is Influenced by Irradiation
S. Wikman
2014
Operational Life Time of a Component
Assessment of corrosion data by StudsvikITER operational conditions (long exposure times)
Crevice corrosion under applied load
Crevice corrosion
(15-18 months)
S. Wikman
2014
Erosion corrosion assessment of CuCrZr and CuCrZr/316L(N)-IG joints
Samples had to be replaced after first trial at 250 °C (too high T and after 180 h the water was green)
Repeated for 110 °C and 150 °C and specimens taken out and measured and weighedafter 180 h, 1180h, 2180 h and 4180 h
S. Wikman
2014S. Wikman
2014S. Wikman
Life time assessment
2014
Up to 150 °C the erosion is acceptableOxidizing conditions are mainly relevant for last few years of ITER operationITER IO decision was taken to lower inlet water Temp from 110 °C to 70 °C
250°C is not a high temperature for PFC’s and CuCrZr not suitable for higher temperatures (be careful with design)!
Repeated experiments are ongoing with reducing water chemistry (without active plasma) to complete the assessment of operational life time.
S. Wikman
No region with large grain sizes
40mm
Problems with CuCrZr for “solid” trial phase
40mm
Regions with large grain sizes
Chaotic grain growth observed with batch to batch differences
Large grains give significantly lower mechanical properties
Main reason:The necessary HIP temperature at 1040°C to obtain CuCrZr/316L(N)-IG jointscritical temperature for CuCrZrfollowed by 980°C + the cooling rate (hard to tell what the plant actually achieves as that is “in-house knowledge”)
2014S. Wikman
CuCrZr composition:99% Cu0.7% Cr 0.3% Zr
Tensile tests after heat treatment (1040°C + 980°C + WQ + 580°C)The tensile properties are higher than ITER requirements, but too high scattering associated with the maximal elongation.
These properties strongly depend on the cooling rate.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Engineering strain (%)
Engi
neer
ing
stre
ss (M
Pa)
M2-1 M2-2
M6-1 M6-2
M9-1 M9-2
M9-3 M9-4
D12-HIP-1 D12-HIP-2
M14-1 M14-2
R0,2 = 175MPa (ITER)
Rm = 280MPa (ITER)
Strain rate = 1 10-4s-1, 20°C
Examples CuCrZr “solid” trial phase
2014S. Wikman
Tensile tests after HIP: Scatter and mechanical properties under control
CuCrZr “powder” trials
Results at RT
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Engineering strain (%)
Engi
neer
ing
stre
ss F
/S0
(MPa
)
11-10111-10011-07111-072
Powder heat treated under H2
ITER R0,2 20°C
ITER Rm 20°C
Powder without treatment
Strain rate = 10-4s-1
Powder Metallurgy superior for CuCrZr to mitigate chaotic grain growth
2014S. Wikman
S. Wikman
316LN Large piece manufactured via Powder Metallurgy
2011-2012 Prototype – Toroidal Field Coil Radial PlatePowder HIP approach was one candidate for the tender
TF and PF Conductors:• Qualification of mechanical properties of materials and welds at cryogenic temperatures 4K
2014
Carpenter Powder Products, SwedenBodycote HIP, SwedenMetso, FinlandSIMIC, Italy
Irradiation needs
S. Wikman 2014
• Reference testing of the materials performed via Framework contract with Tecnalia Spain
Irradiation Conditions Material DPA DPAXM19 0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.3 dpa 250 ○CXM19/316L(N)‐IG joint 0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.3 dpa 250 ○CSS660 0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.3 dpa 250 ○CNiAl Bronze 0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.3 dpa 250 ○CInconel 718 0.05 dpa 250 ○C 0.3 dpa 250 ○CCuCrZr/316L(N)‐IG Joint (HIPed and Explosion Bonded joints)
0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.7 dpa 250 ○C
316L(N)‐IG jointsPowder HIP to solid plate
0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.7 dpa 250 ○C
CuCrZrPowder HIP
0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.7 dpa 250 ○C
316L(N)‐IGPowder HIP
0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.7 dpa 250 ○C
316L(N)‐IG jointsPowder HIP to CuCrZr powder HIP
0.1 dpa 250 ○C 0.7 dpa 250 ○C
In-pile creep relaxation testingMaterials Pre-stress 0.1 DPA 0.3 DPA References
Un‐irradiatedXM-19 σ/YS → 30 % 3 3 2
σ/YS → 50 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 70 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 90 % 3 3 2
Alloy 660 σ/YS → 30 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 50 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 70 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 90 % 3 3 2
NiAl-Bronze σ/YS → 30 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 50 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 70 % 3 3 2σ/YS → 90 % 3 3 2
Total No. Specimens 36 36 24
Hot Cell LaboratoryTensile tests at 250 ºC + RT;Fatigue tests 250 ºC + RT;Fracture tests 250 ºC + RT;Charpy tests at RT;Visual inspection of fractured surfaces presented as pictures.
Similar for TMB materialsSuch as EUROFER but at ~500C to 650°Cand up to 3 dpa
Weldability of irradiated 316L pipes
S. Wikman 29
Non Destructive TestingJoining (TIG, EB, Laser welding, diffusion bonding)Technical Support
Upcoming work on materials assessment
Framework Contract 2014/2015
http://www.fusionforenergy.europa.eu/careers/workingasexpert.aspx
Follow us on:www.f4e.europa.eu
www.twitter.com/fusionforenergy
www.youtube.com/fusionforenergy