Materi Ke-3 Anumgeotek 2015
-
Upload
julian-wiciardo -
Category
Documents
-
view
6 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Materi Ke-3 Anumgeotek 2015
SLOPE STABILITY
By :
Yulinda Sari, ST. M.Eng.
Assessment of Slope Stability
Simple methods
e.g Infinite slope, linear failure plane, circular plane, wedge failure plane
Use of Charts e.g Taylor’chart
Assessment of Slope Stability
Slices methods e.g. ordinary, bishop, janbu,
morgenstein & price
Introduction to computer programs e.g. Slope/w, Stabl etc.
METHODS OF ANALYSIS
After defining the shape and location of the failure surface, the limit equilibrium methods can be applied for slope stability analysis by imposing several assumptions i.e:
(1)The failure occurs in two-dimension,
(2) Rigid block movement taking place on the failure surface itself, and
(3) Uniform shear stress is mobilized over the whole length of the failure surface
In general, there are two methods of limit equilibrium analysis i.e.:
1.Linear methods which is relatively simple, and
2.The Non-linear methods or Method of Slices
In limit equilibrium method, the shear strength at the time of failure is f compared to the
stress mobilized at that plane m.
Then the factor of safety is :
SIMPLE METHODS Infinite Slope Analysis
FORMULA
SIMPLE METHODS Finite Slope with Linear Failure plane
FORMULA
SIMPLE METHODS
Finite Slope with Circular Failure plane
Slope in Homogeneous Cohesive soil (= 0 Analysis)
FORMULA
USE OF CHARTS
There are many charts available for evaluating the factor of safety of a slope, each based on various assumptions and specific use. The most popular one is the Taylor’s stability number which will be discussed in the following. Other charts include the Janbu stability charts for slope in cohesive soils, Morgenstein graphs for rapid drawdown in dam, the Bischop and Morgenstain charts for effective stress analysis, and many others.
Taylor’s chart (Figure 5.8) can be used to evaluate the stability of slope in a homogeneous cohesive soil with a hard stratum at depth of ndH
from the surface of the slope. The factor of safety can be calculated as:
Where Ns is the Taylor’s stability number obtained from the chart.
METHOD OF SLICES
FORMULA As shown in the Figure, the forces acting on slice i are:
1.The total weight of the slice, W = bhi
2.The total normal force on the base: the effective normal force N’ = ’li and the boundary water force U = li. where
is the pore water pressure at the center of the base and l is the length of the base3.The shear force on the base, T = m li4.The total normal forces on the sides, Ei and Ei-1
5.The shear forces on the sides, Xi and Xi-1
6.Any external forces working on the slope must be included in the analysis.
FORMULA
Bischop (Routine) Method
Bischop assumed that the resultant of vertical inter-slice forces (Xi –Xi-1) is equal to zero, but the sum of the horizontal inter-slice force (Ei-Ei-1) is not zero. Then T is not equal to the soil resistance at the base of the slices
CONTOH SOAL
PENYELESAIAN CONTOH SOAL
PENYELESAIAN CONTOH SOAL
COMPUTER PROGRAM
GEO-SLOPE
● SLOPE/W for slope stability analysis
● SEEP/W for finite element seepage analysis
● CTRAN/W for finite element contaminant transport analysis
● SIGMA/W for finite element stress and deformation analysis
● TEMP/W for finite element geothermal analysis
● QUAKE/W for finite element dynamic stress and deformation analysis
GEO-SLOPE provides the following suite of geotechnical and geo-environmental engineering software products :
SLOPE/W
SLOPE/W is a software product that uses limit equilibrium theory to compute the factor of safety of earth and rock slopes.
The comprehensive formulation of SLOPE/W makes it possible to easily analyze both simple and complex slope stability problems using a variety of methods to calculate the factor of safety.
SLOPE/W has application in the analysis and design for geotechnical, civil, and mining engineering projects.
SLOPE/W is a 32-bit, graphical software product that operates under Microsoft Windows.
The common "look and feel" of Windows applications makes it easy to learn how to use SLOPE/W, especially if you are already familiar with the Windows environment.
SLOPE/W
C A S E
LANDSLIDE ANALYSIS AT OUTSIDE DUMPING AREA AIR LAYA COAL MINING SITE, TANJUNG ENIM
The Incident on November 27th, 2002
Landslide Consequences : No Sacrifice / victim Fall down of 1 electrical tower PLN Damaged MCP (KPL 701) & Dikes Destroyed Agriculture Land
LANDSLIDE SITUATION
Landslide Occured = November 27th, 2002Influenced area = 72 HaVolume of soils removed = 690.000 bcmMax. movement velocity = 72 cm/jam
Fall Down Tower
Eni
m ri
ver
Tensio
n Cra
ck
Damaged Mud Collection Pond (KPL 701)
DESCRIPTION OF SITE
Dumping Area = 650 HaLandslide Area = 72 HaBefore landslide : High Slope = 60 m Angle Slope= 15ºAfter landslide : High Slope = 48 mGeological Structure : - unsymetrical anticline - symetrical syncline - no faultDumping Soil : - sandy silt and sand/silty clay - very low cohesion, wet, and loose
GROUND INVESTIGATIONPOSITION OF BORE HOLES
Failure Area
DikeMud Collection Pond
Tower
Eni
m R
iver
Point of Failure Start (BH.SP08)
ANALYSIS OF SLOPE ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITYSTABILITY
NUMERICAL SIMULATION (SLOPE/W)NUMERICAL SIMULATION (SLOPE/W)
Before Failure
At Failure
SF = 2.43
SF = 0.495
LANDSLIDE MECHANISM
Moving Mass
Seepage
River
Run off
Weak Layer
CRACK
FAILURE OCCURED
FAILURE MECHANISM
Infiltration
Moving Mass
Seepage
River
Run off
Weak Layer
CRACK
STARTING FAILURE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION
Landslide Occurred because : :
Develop. of Tension Crack at the Fill Surface Develop. of Tension Crack at the Fill Surface
Soil Strength decrease (same with the Interface Soil Strength decrease (same with the Interface Layer)Layer)
The Prolonged and Heavy Rainfall The Prolonged and Heavy Rainfall It resulted in It resulted in
significant water ingress into the ground that significant water ingress into the ground that triggered triggered
the mass movementthe mass movement