Massachusetts Pharmacists Association · Web viewSystematic Reviews: Systematically driven,...

1
Please do not adjust margins Pharmacy Journal of New England ARTICLE Title A. N. Authorname, a A. N. Authorname b and A. N. Authorname c Abstract text goes here. The abstract should be a single paragraph that summarises the content of the arcle. The abstract should be a single paragraph (50–250 words). It should set out briefly and clearly the main objecves and results of the work; it should give the reader a clear idea of what has been achieved. Like your tle, make sure you use recognisable, searchable terms and keywords. The main text of the arcle should appear here with headings as appropriate. Introducon An introducon should 'set the scene' of the work. It should clearly explain both the nature of the problem under invesgaon and its background. It should start off general and then focus in to the specific research queson you are invesgang. Ensure you include all relevant references. Key Points For manuscripts in the Research, Reviews, Advances in Pharmacy Pracce, Experience, and Commentary secons, authors are required to prepare key points in a bulleted format that describe the arcle's relevance and contribuon to the literature. These are presented under two separate headings: Background and Findings. Two or three key points under each of these headings should provide the context for the arcle (what is already known on the topic, other relevant background) and what the manuscript findings adds to exisng knowledge on the topic. Arcle Text Research: Hypothesis-driven and generalizable studies with sufficient power to show stascal significance that are based on scienfic method and scholarly invesgaons Advances in Pharmacy Pracce: Innovaons or other related advances in pharmacy pracce; should describe in sufficient detail how to develop and evaluate the innovave pracce in such a way that it could be replicated Systemac Reviews: Systemacally driven, comprehensive, and reproducible summaries of current research in primary pharmacy and biomedical literature on clinical, administrave, legal, humanisc, or economic topics; may be evaluated quantavely (e.g., meta-analysis) or qualitavely based on objecve criteria Commentary: Informed (supported by referenced citaons) personal opinions about events, trends, and/or developments in pharmacy or health care Conclusions The conclusions secon should come in this secon at the end of the arcle, before the acknowledgements. This is for interpretaon of the key points and to highlight the novelty and significance of the work. The conclusions should not summarize informaon already present in the arcle or abstract. Plans for relevant future work can also be included. Acknowledgements The acknowledgements come at the end of an arcle aſter the conclusions and before the notes and references. Notes and references ‡ Footnotes relang to the main text should appear here. These might include comments relevant to but not central to the maer under discussion, limited experimental and spectral data, and crystallographic data. § §§ etc. 1 Citaons should appear here in the format A. Name, B. Name and C. Name, Journal Title, 2000, 35, 3523; A. Name, B. Name and C. Name, Journal Title, 2000, 35, 3523. 2

Transcript of Massachusetts Pharmacists Association · Web viewSystematic Reviews: Systematically driven,...

Page 1: Massachusetts Pharmacists Association · Web viewSystematic Reviews: Systematically driven, comprehensive, and reproducible summaries of current research in primary pharmacy and biomedical

Please do not adjust margins

Pharmacy Journal of New England

ARTICLE

Title

A. N. Authorname,a A. N. Authornameb and A. N. Authornamec

Abstract text goes here. The abstract should be a single paragraph that summarises the content of the article. The abstract should be a single paragraph (50–250 words). It should set out briefly and clearly the main objectives and results of the work; it should give the reader a clear idea of what has been achieved. Like your title, make sure you use recognisable, searchable terms and keywords.

The main text of the article should appear here with headings as appropriate.

IntroductionAn introduction should 'set the scene' of the work. It should clearly explain both the nature of the problem under investigation and its background. It should start off general and then focus in to the specific research question you are investigating. Ensure you include all relevant references.

Key PointsFor manuscripts in the Research, Reviews, Advances in Pharmacy Practice, Experience, and Commentary sections, authors are required to prepare key points in a bulleted format that describe the article's relevance and contribution to the literature. These are presented under two separate headings: Background and Findings. Two or three key points under each of these headings should provide the context for the article (what is already known on the topic, other relevant background) and what the manuscript findings adds to existing knowledge on the topic.

Article TextResearch: Hypothesis-driven and generalizable studies with sufficient power to show statistical significance that are based on scientific method and scholarly investigations

Advances in Pharmacy Practice: Innovations or other related advances in pharmacy practice; should describe in sufficient detail how to develop and evaluate the innovative practice in such a way that it could be replicated

Systematic Reviews: Systematically driven, comprehensive, and reproducible summaries of current research in primary pharmacy and biomedical literature on clinical, administrative, legal, humanistic, or economic topics; may be evaluated quantitatively (e.g., meta-analysis) or qualitatively based on objective criteria

Commentary: Informed (supported by referenced citations) personal opinions about events, trends, and/or developments in pharmacy or health care

ConclusionsThe conclusions section should come in this section at the end of the article, before the acknowledgements. This is for interpretation of the key points and to highlight the novelty and significance of the work. The conclusions should not summarize information already present in the article or abstract. Plans for relevant future work can also be included.

AcknowledgementsThe acknowledgements come at the end of an article after the conclusions and before the notes and references.

Notes and references‡ Footnotes relating to the main text should appear here. These might include comments relevant to but not central to the matter under discussion, limited experimental and spectral data, and crystallographic data.

§§§etc.1 Citations should appear here in the format A. Name, B.

Name and C. Name, Journal Title, 2000, 35, 3523; A. Name, B. Name and C. Name, Journal Title, 2000, 35, 3523.

2 …