Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study
description
Transcript of Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study
![Page 1: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study
December 11, 2012
Sharon Lynn Kagan, Ed.D. Catherine Scott-Little, Ph.D.
Jeanne L. Reid, Ed.D.
![Page 2: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation Overview
Part I: Background and Purpose of the Study Part II: Methods Part III: Major Findings So Far Part IV: Recommendations
![Page 3: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Part I:Background and Purpose of
the Study
![Page 4: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background for the Study
Massachusetts is engaged in an ambitious effort to improve the quality of its early childhood services.
Central to these efforts is a focus on creating the highest quality early learning and development standards for young children.
The standards articulate multi-domain expectations for children’s growth and support continuity in early education from birth through kindergarten.
![Page 5: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background for the Study
This vision requires standards that are:– Aligned with each other, so that they express cohesive
expectations for early development;– Aligned with other milestone documents, such as the
Common Core and Head Start Child Development Early Learning Framework (HSCDELF); and,
– Aligned with the assessments used in early childhood programs throughout the state.
This is hard to do!
![Page 6: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Purpose of the Study Therefore, the Department commissioned an
alignment study. When complete, the 18-month study will
present detailed analyses of:– Alignment of the Massachusetts toddler,
preschool, and kindergarten standards;– Alignment of the preschool standards and the
HSCDELF; and,– Alignment of the standards with three assessment
instruments used in the state.
![Page 7: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Work Completed So Far
So far, we have completed the first two parts of the study:– An analysis of the content of the infant/toddler,
preschool, and kindergarten standards, and,– An analysis of the alignment of the older toddler,
preschool, and kindergarten standards, and the preschool standards with the HSCDELF.
![Page 8: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Part II:Methods
![Page 9: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Focus for Today’s Presentation
Today we will focus on three of Massachusetts’ questions:– How does the content of the older toddler standards
compare to the the preschool standards?– How does the content of the preschool standards
compare to the the kindergarten standards?– How does the content of the preschool standards
compare to the HSCDELF?
![Page 10: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Terms We Use: Horizontal Alignment
Horizontal alignment refers to the consistency of standards and assessments within a given age cohort (e.g., Preschool and the HSCDELF).
Standards
4-year-olds
Curricula Assessment
![Page 11: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Terms We Use: Vertical Alignment
Vertical alignment refers to the consistency of standards between age cohorts (e.g., Toddlers vs. Pre-K).
Standards
Pre-K
K
ToddlersAssesments
![Page 12: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Documents We Used
The Early Learning Guidelines for Infants and Toddlers (May 2011) – older toddlers (22 to 33 months)
The Guidelines for Preschool Learning Experiences (April 2003) in all domains except English Language Arts and Mathematics
The Kindergarten Learning Experiences (April 2008) in all domains except English Language Arts and Mathematics
The Curriculum Framework for English Language Arts and Literacy (March 2011): Standards for Pre-K and Kindergarten
The Curriculum Framework for Mathematics (March 2011): Standards for Pre-K and Kindergarten
![Page 13: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Alignment Analyses To analyze alignment, we created a construct template:
– Provides an objective and thorough metric for collecting data. – Enables us to compare items across age levels and documents, and even
different types of documents.– Brings a new level of consistency and precision to the analysis.
The construct template organizes all the content from the standards into five domains:– Physical Development and Motor Skills– Social and Emotional Development– Approaches Toward Play and Learning– Language and Communication Development– Cognitive Development and General Knowledge
![Page 14: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Alignment Analyses
We looked at both match and quality:– Match looks at how well indicators are aligned.– Quality looks at whether indicators are age-appropriate and complete.– Can have well matched indicators, but they may not be high quality.
We analyzed alignment on three parameters:– Balance– Coverage/Depth – Difficulty
![Page 15: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Parameters: BALANCE The percentage of all indicators devoted to each
domain.– Do the documents exhibit the same balance across the
five domains? – Does one document emphasize some domains
more/less than another document? – Do the documents cover the different domains
sufficiently?
![Page 16: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Parameters: BALANCE
Document A
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12.7% 14.8% 15.3% 20.2% 37.0%
Balance Analysis: Document A
Physical Development and Motor Skills
Social and Emotional De-velopment
Approaches Toward Play and Learning
Language and Communica-tion Development
Cognitive Development and General Knowledge
![Page 17: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The Parameters: COVERAGE/DEPTH The percentage of indicators within the domain
focused on each construct.– To what extent do the documents address individual
constructs? – Do the documents emphasize constructs to the same
degree? – Do the documents cover the constructs with sufficient
thoroughness? – Are there constructs absent from one or both documents
that should be considered for inclusion?
![Page 18: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Parameters: COVERAGE/DEPTH
Health
Nutrition
Physical fitness
Knowledge for participation in physical education
Physical state regulation
Self care
Development of the senses
Orientation to stimuli
Sensory integration
Spatial awareness
Gross motor skills
Fine motor skills
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
28%
4%
8%
0%
4%
4%
4%
8%
4%
4%
12%
20%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
0.0%
13.3%
6.7%
0.0%
6.7%
26.7%
6.7%
Coverage/Depth Analysis: Document B and Document C: Physical Development and Motor Skills
Document CDocument B
Percentage of Indicators within the Domain
Con
stru
cts
![Page 19: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Parameters: DIFFICULTY
Comparing the level of cognitive demand in pairs of indicators across documents.– Do the levels of difficulty of indicators in the documents
match? – Do the documents represent a cohesive progression of
difficulty over time?
![Page 20: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Parameters: DIFFICULTY
9.1%
31.8%
27.3%
31.8%
Difficulty: Document D and Document E: The Arts
Document E more difficult than Document D (-)
Equal difficulty (=)
Document D more difficult than Document E (+)
Document D much more difficult than Document E (++)
Indicator Pairs (n=22) Unpaired IndicatorsDocument D: 0Document E: 5
(n=7)
(n=7)
(n=6)
(n=2)
![Page 21: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Summary of the Alignment Study
We developed a construct template as a means to bring comparability and consistency to the data.
We used three parameters (Balance, Coverage/Depth, and Difficulty) to answer the questions that were asked by the Department.
This allowed for multiple complex analyses as a basis for answering the Department’s questions.
![Page 22: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Part III: Major Findings So Far
![Page 23: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Major Findings #1
Massachusetts has a solid set of standards that address the birth-through-five age continuum.
The Department has made a good effort to align its standards across a broad age spectrum and with seminal documents, particularly the Common Core.
![Page 24: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Major Findings #2
Balance The toddler standards are quite balanced across the five
domains in the construct template. The preschool and kindergarten standards place more
emphasis on Cognitive Development, particularly the subject areas, and less attention on Social-Emotional Development and Approaches Toward Play and Learning.
The tension between an academic and holistic orientation-- not unique to Massachusetts--is thus evident in the toddler, preschool, and kindergarten standards.
![Page 25: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Major Findings #2
MA Toddlers
MA Preschool
MA Kindergarten
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
22.6%
16.3%
8.7%
21.0%
2.6%
1.7%
13% 20.2%
28.8%
38.4%
23.4%
52.3%
51.2%
Balance Analysis: MA Toddlers, MA Preschool, and MA Kindergarten
Physical Development and Motor SkillsSocial and Emotional De-velopmentApproaches Toward Play and LearningLanguage and Communica-tion DevelopmentCognitive Development and General Knowledge
Percentage of All Indicators
![Page 26: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Major Findings #3
Balance
The HSCDELF and preschool standards align well on Language and Communication.
The preschool standards place a somewhat greater emphasis on Physical Development and a much greater emphasis on Cognitive Development than the HSCDELF.
The HSCDELF places a much greater emphasis on Social-Emotional Development and Approaches Toward Play and Learning than the preschool standards.
![Page 27: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Major Findings #3
MA Preschool
HSCDELF
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%
16.3%
12.8%
2.6%
12.1%
28.8%
31.5%
52.3%
36.2%7.4%
Balance Analysis: MA Preschool and the HSCDELF
Physical Development and Motor SkillsSocial and Emotional De-velopmentApproaches Toward Play and LearningLanguage and Communica-tion DevelopmentCognitive Development and General Knowledge
Percentage of All Indicators
![Page 28: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Major Findings #4
Coverage/Depth
The coverage of specific constructs was generally good in the toddler standards, with only a few missing constructs, such as nutrition and vocabulary.
There were more constructs missing in the preschool and kindergarten documents, with several missing constructs related to physical fitness, social-emotional development, approaches toward play and learning, and the cognitive processes.
![Page 29: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Major Findings #4
Cause and effect
Reasoning
Conjecture, hypothesizing and guessing
Perspective taking
Representation
Reflection on thought processes
Planning and intentionality
Adaptability of thought processes
-20% 0% 20% 40% 60%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
Coverage/Depth Analysis in the Cognitive Processes: MA Toddlers and MA Preschool
MA PreschoolMA Toddlers
Percentage of Indicators within the Domain
Cons
truc
ts
![Page 30: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Major Findings #5Coverage/Depth
Alignment between the HSCDELF and Massachusetts preschool standards is pretty good in some areas, such as physical development.
The HSCDELF covers a broader array of constructs that address social and emotional development, approaches toward play and learning, and the cognitive processes.
The HSCDELF devotes a large portion of indicators to English language acquisition; the preschool standards do not.
In Mathematics, neither the HSCDELF nor the preschool standards covers data and mathematics processes.
![Page 31: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Major Findings #5
Emotional expression
Self-confidence
Self-concept
Emotional regulation
Behavioral regulation
Moral/character development
Relationships with familiar adults
Relationships with peers
Social skills with adults
Social skills with peers
Recognition of others’ feelings
-20% 0% 20% 40% 60%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
25%
25%
11.1%
16.7%
5.6%
5.6%
11 .1%
0.0%
11 .1%
5.6%
5.6%
16.7%
11 .1%
Coverage/Depth Analysis in Social and Emotional Development: MA Preschool and the HSCDELF
HSCDELFMA Preschool
Percentage of Indicators within the Domain
Con
stru
cts
![Page 32: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Major Findings #6Difficulty
The progression of difficulty from toddler to preschool was particularly strong, and the progression from preschool to K was good.
There were some examples of equal difficulty between the preschool and kindergarten standards, and some in which kindergarten was much more difficult.
Alignment with the HSDCELF was mixed; in some areas, the HSCDELF was more difficult, while in others, the preschool standards were more difficult.
![Page 33: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Major Findings #6
4.3%
29.8%
53.2%
12.8%
Difficulty: MA Preschool and MA Kindergarten: English Language Arts and Literacy
MA Preschool more difficult than MA Kindergarten (-)
Equal difficulty (=)
MA Kindergarten more difficult than MA Preschool (+)
MA Kindergarten much more dif-ficult than MA Preschool (++)
Unpaired IndicatorsMA Preschool: 3
MA Kindergarten: 19
Indicator Pairs (n=47)
(n=2)
(n=14)
(n=25)
(n=6)
![Page 34: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Summary In the Massachusetts standards, we found many
examples of good alignment across the age levels, but fewer between the preschool standards and HSCDELF.
The progression of difficulty between the preschool and kindergarten standards was somewhat inconsistent.
Some areas that were under-addressed in the preschool and kindergarten standards:– Social and Emotional Development– Approaches Toward Play and Learning– English Language Acquisition– The Cognitive Processes
![Page 35: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Part IV: Recommendations
![Page 36: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Next Steps Massachusetts has developed a solid set of standards
to address birth through age five, and made a great effort to align the standards with the Common Core for kindergarten.
This analysis has yielded recommendations regarding revisions that would further strengthen the Massachusetts standards, and we suggest that the Department consider revising the standards with those recommendations in mind.
![Page 37: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Solomon’s Dilemma
Our two national documents, the HSCDELF and Common Core, are not very well aligned.
This poses a problem, not only for Massachusetts, but for the entire early childhood field.
Both documents are important and valuable to children and the field of early education.
![Page 38: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Recommendations We recommend creating a robust set of standards that does
not ignore either of the national documents, but aligns with them as appropriate within the context of Massachusetts.
Specifically, we suggest adding indicators to the preschool and kindergarten standards to fully address Social and Emotional Development, Approaches Toward Play and Learning, the Cognitive Processes, and English Language Acquisition.
It would also be worth “tweaking” some of the indicators to make the progression of difficulty between the preschool and kindergarten standards more consistent.
![Page 39: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The Goal
The revisions would help to:– Improve the alignment of the Massachusetts toddler,
preschool and kindergarten standards, and to improve alignment of the preschools standards with the HSCDELF.
– Improve the quality of the documents and ease the tension between a holistic and academic orientation across the age spectrum.
![Page 40: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Where to Begin?
We recommend the Department begin by revising the preschool standards.
Consider using the HSCDELF as a metric (albeit an imperfect one) to improve the quality of the preschool standards, and then revise the toddler and kindergarten standards as needed to improve alignment and quality.
![Page 41: Massachusetts Department of Early Care and Education Alignment Study](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816385550346895dd46d56/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Massachusetts as a Leader Resolving the challenges inherent in Solomon’s dilemma
is not only germane to Massachusetts, but to all the states.
By trying to address this challenge, the Massachusetts standards could become the base for common standards that could be voluntarily adopted by other states.
This would again position Massachusetts at the forefront of early childhood education.
In any case, Massachusetts starts with a solid set of standards for early childhood learning. Bravo, Massachusetts!