Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration First results from STAR experiment at...
-
Upload
robert-webster -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration First results from STAR experiment at...
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Masashi Kanetafor the STAR collaboration
First results from STAR experiment at RHIC
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
The STAR collaboration
~ 400 collaborators 34 institutions 7 countries
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
STAR InstitutionsU.S. Labs:
Argonne, Berkeley, and
Brookhaven National Labs
U.S. Universities:
Arkansas, UC Berkeley,
UC Davis, UCLA,
Carnegie Mellon, Creighton,
Indiana, Johns Hopkins,
Kent State, MIT, MSU,
CCNY, Ohio State,
Penn State, Purdue, Rice,
UT Austin, Washington,
Wayne State, Yale
Brazil :
Universidade de Sao Paol
England:
University of Birmingham
France:
Institut de Recherches Subatomiques Strasbourg, SUBATECH – Nantes
Germany:
Max Planck Institute – Munich, University of Frankfurt
Poland:
Warsaw University Warsaw University of Technology
Russia:
MEPHI – Moscow, LPP/LHE JINR – Dubna, IHEP – Protvino
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
STAR DetectorYear1 Ready for next run Next year(2002) or later
ZDC
Silicon Vertex Tracker
Central Trigger Barrel
FTPCs
Barrel EMC (install over next 4 years)
Vertex Position Detectors
Endcap EMC (half in 2003)
Magnet
Coils
TPC Endcap & MWPC
ZDC
RICH
yr.1 SVT ladder
+ TOF patch
Silicon Strip Detector
Time Projection Chamber
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Au+Au, sNN=130 GeV
Central EventFrom real-time Level 3 display.
~2000 tracks in 200msec
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Particle identification
K
p
e
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Focus onHadrons
Measured : h, ±, K±, K0s, K*0, K*0, p, p, d, 3He, 3He,
t,In future : 0, , +’, , J/ and more
Freeze-out conditions of low momentum hadrons by:
Spectra/Ratios• Thermal/Chemical Freeze-out
Particle correlations• Size parameters, Phase space density
Event anisotropy• v2
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Spectra
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Spectra
Low pT spectra
h, , K, p Thermal freeze-out
High pT spectra
hhard process
Particle ratios, yield (dN/dy, dN/d)p/p, , , K/K, K/, p/, K*0/h
Stopping Chemical freeze-out
d/p Coalescence
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
h- multiplicity
6% systematic error shown on 3 points only
Preliminary
5% Central
ZD
C p
ulse
hei
ght
CTB pulse height
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
h- centrality dependence
5%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
h- centrality dependence (cont.)
15% Increase in <pT> from 80% sample to top 5% central
NA49UA1
STAR, Preliminary
STAR, Preliminary
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
h- pT distribution
STAR Preliminary
Statistical errors negligibleErrors on points: systematic error on STAR dataGray bars: cumulative error including UA1 scalingHard: Binary collisions TAA = 26 ± 2 mb-1
Soft: Wounded nucleon
STAR Preliminary
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Particle Identification
dE/dxe, , K, p
Kink, V0, Mixed eventKaon to muon decay, etc.Resonances
Kd
e
p
“kinks”:
K +
Vo
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Typical e+e pairfrom
e+
e+
e+
e+
e-
e-
e-e-
invariant mass [GeV]
STAR Preliminary
and0
The e+e pair from conversion is measured
Large acceptance pT = 50 MeV/c to ~4 GeV/c, ||<1.8
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
K+K-
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Identified particle spectra
Inverse slope:56540(sta.)50(sys.) MeV
Inverse slope:19015(sta.)20(sys.) MeV
-
K-p
Inverse slope:30015(sta.)30(sys.) MeV
central collisions
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Inverse slope vs. centrality
K- (kink)
P e r i p h e r a l C e n t r a l
STAR Preliminary Indicate increased radial flow in central collisions at RHIC
Event fraction [%]
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Kink K
Kaon from muon decay
K
Inverse slope:2675(sta.)10(sys.) MeV
Inverse slope:2725(sta.)10(sys.) MeV
K-K+
|y|<0.5Event fraction = top 7%
STAR Preliminary STAR Preliminary
|y|<0.5Event fraction = top 7%
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
“Kink” Rapidity Distribution
Mid-y K+ dN/dy = 35 ±3(stat.)±5(sys.)
Mid-y K- dN/dy = 30±2.5(stat.)±4(sys.)
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
mT distribution from Hydro model
Cylindrical source
Flow profile included
u t r z er ( , , ) (cosh , sinh , )= =
β= −tanh 1r ( )β βr s r R= /
R
βs
Ref. : E.Schnedermann et al, PR C48 (1993) 2462
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Thermal(Kinetic) freeze-out
Thermal freeze-out at RHICTemperature is similar at SPSLarger radial flow than at SPS
STAR (sNN=130 GeV)
c
T fo
60.0
MeV95
>=<
=
β
Hydrodynamical model: E. Schnedermann et al.PRC48(1993)2462
mT-mass [GeV/c2]
mass [GeV/c2]
Inve
rse
slop
e pa
ram
eter
[G
eV/c
2 ]
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Ratios
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
p/p ratioMinimum bias dataSystematic errors<10% for bothNo or weak pT and rapidity dependence
rapidity
STAR submittedSTAR submitted
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
and
~0.84 /event, ~ 0.61/event
V0Mixed event
Higher statistics than V0 method (~10 times/event)
Invariant mass [GeV] Invariant mass [GeV]
Top 15% central event
Minimum Bias (150K event)
0<p<2GeV/c
STAR submitted
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
/ ratio
No significant pT dependence in the ratio
The mean ratio = 0.72±0.04
From 200 K Central trigger Au+Au Events (top ~15% multiplicity.)
Systematic errors are under evaluation
|y|<0.5
ra
tio
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
K+/K ratiora
tio
pT [GeV/c]
STAR Preliminary
|y|<0.5Event fraction = top 7%
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
+ and -
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Centrality dependence of ratios
An effect of anti-baryon absorption in central collisions?
(nch/nmax)
/ Preliminary
Preliminary
P e r i p h e r a l C e n t r a l
p/p submitted to PRL pT 0.6-0.8 GeV/c |y|<0.3
Only statistic errors are shown Systematic errors p/p : 10%
and : under evaluation
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Centrality dependence of ratios (cont.)
K+/K ratio seems to be independent of centrality in each measurement
STAR preliminary
dE/dx KinksSTAR preliminarypT < 0.35 GeV/c
# primary trackdN/d
K+/K
rat
io
K+/K
rat
io
P e r i p h e r a l C e n t r a l P e r i p h e r a l C e n t r a l
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
K/ and p/ ratios
K-/- , p/-
enhanced by ~2 in central vs. peripheral collisions
p/K ~ constant
In central collisions:
K-/- 15%
p/- 8%
P e r i p h e r a l C e n t r a l
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
K*0K++-
Central events (top 14%)
primary tracks: K+-
K* signalmK*0 = 0.8930.003 [GeV]
K*0 = 0.058 0.015 [GeV] (stat. error only)
PDG mK*0 = 0.89610.00026 [GeV] K*0 = 0.05070.0006 [GeV]
Background estimate: 20%
Breit-Wigner
)4/)((2 220 +−
MmA
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
K*0K-++
Central events (top 14%)
primary tracks: K-+
K* signalmK*0 = 0.8960.004 [GeV]
K*0 = 0.063 0.011[GeV] (stat. error only)
PDG mK*0 = 0.89610.00026 [GeV] K*0 = 0.05070.0006 [GeV]
Background estimate: 18%
Breit-Wigner
)4/)((2 220 +−
MmA
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
K*0
The first measurement of K*0 in heavy ion collisionsK
*0/h
K*0/h
(K*0 +K*0)/2 / h
Centrality h/hmax
K*0/hSTAR preliminary
Only statistical errors are shownSystematic error ~ 25%
|y|<0.50.2<pT<2.0 GeV/c
pp (s=63GeV) : K*0/
e+e (s=91GeV) : K*0/
h : ||<0.5 pT>0.1 GeV/c
P e r i p h e r a l C e n t r a l
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Summary of ratios
Anti-particle/particle ratio is flat as a function of pT
Anti-baryon/baryon ratio is larger than at SPS, but not baryon free at mid-rapidity at RHIC
(stat.) (sys.) (Event fraction)
p/p = 0.60 0.02 0.06 (top6%)
/(M.B. trig.) = 0.70 0.02 (top8%)
/(central trig.) = 0.72 0.04 (top15%)
- = 0.82 0.08 (top15%)
K+/K-(kink) = 1.17 0.07 (top15%)
K+/K-(dE/dx) = 1.14 0.01 0.06 (top6%)
K-/- = 0.15 0.02 (top6%)
p/- = 0.080 0.008 (top6%)
K*0/h- = 0.060 0.006 0.015 (top15%)
K*0h- = 0.058 0.006 0.015 (top15%)
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
sq sq +=
Chemical freeze-out model
Comparable particle ratios to experimental data
q: 1 for u and d, -1 for u and d q: lightquark chemical potential
s: 1 for s, -1 for s s: strangeness chemical potential
Particle densityof each particle
Decay all resonances
g : spi-isospin freedom
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Chemical freeze-out
Baryonic Potential B [MeV]
Chem
ical Tem
pera
ture
Tch
[M
eV
]
0
200
250
150
100
50
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
AGS
SIS
LEP/
SppS
SPS
quarks-gluons
hadrons
RHIC
Experimental ratio
Mod
el p
redi
ctio
n of
rat
io
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
HBT
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Particle correlations (HBT)
Size parametersTransverse and longitudinal direction
Duration time• From Rout and Rside
Phase space density• Combination of radius parameter and yield
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
HBT
Pion HBTCentralityTransverse momentumThe HBT excitation function
Phase space densityEvent-by-Event HBTK0
s K0s,
pp, pp correlationsNon-identical particles
Many topics in STAR measurement
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
3D analysis
Information:
• source size
• duration time (for transparent sources)
)(
)2()1(
)2,1(
21
222222
1),( LongLongSideSideOutOut RqRqRq
mixedNrealN
pPpP
ppPeppC ++−+=== λ
Pratt-Bertsch Parameterization (measured in the LCMS frame; (p1+ p2)z=0)
βτ 22SideOut RRÄ −=
p1
qOut
p2
qSide
x
y p1+p2
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
3 Dimensional - - HBT
Top 12% central events
0.125<pT<0.225 [GeV/c]
|y|<0.5
1D Projections of the 3D Pratt-Bertsch Parameterization
21.012.007.7
16.009.047.5
23.011.086.5
03.001.050.0
±±=±±=±±=±±=
Long
Side
Out
RRR
λ
qSide,qLong<20MeV/c qOut,qLong<20MeV/c
Systematic error result from the pair cuts (merging) and Coulomb correction
C(q
out)
C(q
Sid
e)
qout [GeV/c] qSide [GeV/c]
C(q
Long
)
qLong [GeV/c]
qOut,qSide<20MeV/c
[fm]
[fm]
[fm]
Coulomb corrected with a 5 fm source
No Coulomb correction
(sta.) (sys.)
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Centrality dependence0.125 GeV/c < pT <0.225 GeV/c
tot: 32-72% 12-32% 0-12%
STAR Preliminary• ++, --, parameters similar
• λ`s don’t change with multiplicity• radii increase with multiplicity• roughly similar to AGS/SPS
Comparison with AGS/SPS • parameters roughly same • similar increase in ROut, RSide (geometric effect)
sys.error
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
mT dependence12 % most central events
0.125<pT<0.225 [GeV/c]
STAR Preliminary
0.225<pT<0.325 [GeV/c]0.325<pT<0.450 [GeV/c]
• ++, -- HBT parameters similarwith increasing mT
λ increases fewer resonances• radii decrease
position-momentum correlations
Comparison with AGS/SPS• parameters roughly similar to AGS/SPSWith increasing mT
• similar increase in λ• similar decrease of radii• stronger effect in ROut than at
AGS/SPS
2/)( 21TTT ppK +=
STAR
Preliminary
sys.error
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
The HBT excitation function
Compilation 3D -HBT parameters as a function of s
• ~10% Central Au+Au(Pb+Pb) events• y ~ 0 • kT 0.17 GeV/c
STAR PreliminaryNo significant jump
from SPS to RHICWe need energy scan between both energy
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
EventAnisotropy
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Event anisotropyThe pressure gradient generates collective motion (aka flow)
Central collisions• radial flow
Peripheral collisions
• radial flow and anisotropic flow
Momentum spaceAlmond shape overlap region in coordinate space
ε =⟨y2 −x2⟩⟨y2 +x2⟩
x
z
y
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Charged particle v2 versus centrality
PRL 86, (2001) 402
|| < 1.3
0.1 < pT < 2.0
Boxes show “initial spatial anisotropy” scaled by 0.19-0.25
nch = primary tracks in || < 0.75
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Excitation function
WA98
NA49
h-
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Charged and p+p, v2(pT) (M.B.)
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
A Hydro view of the world
Hydro calculations: Huovinen, Kolb and Heinz
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Charged particle anisotropy 0<pT<4.5 GeV/c
Only statistical errors
Systematic error 10% - 20% for pt = 2 – 4.5 GeV/c
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL
Conclusions
Net-baryon 0 at mid-rapidity! Anti-baryon/baryon ratios are toward 1, but still <1
Chemical Freeze-outTch ~ 200 GeV (150-200 MeV @ SPS,90-150 MeV @ AGS)
B ~ 50 MeV (200-270 MeV @ SPS,550-600 MeV @ AGS)
Large anisotropic flowHydro model can describe v2 an low pT (<2GeV/c)
Large v2 early thermalization
Thermal Freeze-outStrong space-momentum correlationsLarge radial flow ~ 0.6c (SPS/AGS <ß>= 0.4-0.5c)Tfo = 95-110 MeV (similar to SPS/AGS)