MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE [email protected]

30
www.tie.n et A Repair Kit for Grading 15 Fixes for Broken Grades By Ken O’Connor October 5, 2012 Wagner School District MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE [email protected] et

description

A Repair Kit for Grading 15 Fixes for Broken Grades By Ken O’Connor October 5, 2012 Wagner School District. MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE [email protected]. Norms Revisited. Listen with engagement Honor each other’s thinking, comments, and private think time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE [email protected]

Page 1: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

A Repair Kit for Grading15 Fixes for Broken Grades

By Ken O’Connor

October 5, 2012Wagner School District

MaryLou McGirrLearning Specialist

[email protected]

Page 2: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Norms Revisited• Listen with engagement• Honor each other’s thinking, comments, and

private think time• Everyone has a voice during group activities• Participation is expected• Limit side conversation• Take care of your needs• Turn cell phones off or vibrate

Page 3: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

1. When you were a student, what motived you?

2. How has that changed over the year(s)?

Page 4: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

They were here!Lucy Atwood; [email protected]

Karen Taylor: [email protected]

Page 5: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

OutcomesDuring our time together participants will:

• Increase understanding of developing quality assessment tasks and questions.

• Develop and evaluate questions and tasks that provide students with the appropriate rigor to be successful on quarterly and CCSS assessments.

Page 6: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

OutcomesDuring our time together participants will:

• Increase understanding of how grading fits into classroom assessment.

• Determine which of the 15 Fixes, when implemented, will cause achievement for all students.

• Develop standard-based grading and reporting practices.

Page 7: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What do these terms mean?• Marks and scores - formative

– The number (or letter) “score” given to any students test or performance – individual basis

– 7/10– 4, 3, 2, 1

• Grades - summative– The number (or letter) reported at the end of a period of time as a summary

statement of student performance– A, B, C, D, F– 91, 78, 61, 57, 42– 4, 3, 2, 1– Basic, Proficient, Exemplary

Page 8: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What are your current grading thoughts and practices?

• Appendix A Rubric - Make or highlight the words and phrases in the rubric that reflect your current practice.

• Appendix B Survey – Complete the survey.

• Put both documents aside for later use.

Page 9: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What are your questions?

• Write down the questions you have about any aspect of grading.

• Put the questions aside and we will come back to this later.

Page 10: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What is the Essential Question?

• How confident are you that the grades students get in your school are:– Accurate - decisions– Consistent – same ideas– Meaningful – defines achievement– Supportive of learning – culture of learning, not points

– If grades do not meet these 4 conditions of quality they are “broken”.

Page 11: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What are our believes and practices around fairness?

• Patterson said, “Fair does mean equal; yet, when it comes to grading, we insist that it does.”

• Fairness is about equal opportunities, not uniformity.

• If students are different, treating them the same isn’t fair.

Page 12: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What are the reasons we do standards-based grading and reporting?

1. Mandate – clear focus on CIAGR to create a system

2. Supports learning a clear understanding of the standards allows us

to communicate to and support students3. Improves communication

specific information4. Consistency/Fairness

comes from agreed upon procedures

Page 13: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Reasons: SMARTER BALANCED Tasks

• Tasks will be presented as:• selected response, • short constructed response,• extended constructed response, • technology enhanced, and • performance tasks

Page 14: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What are the purposes for grading?

1. The primary purpose is to communicate with students and parents about students achievement. 2. Providing teachers with information for instructional purposes.3. Select, identify or group students.4. Provide incentives to learn.5. Evaluate the effectiveness of instructional programs.

– Guskey, Thomas R.

Page 15: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What are the key ideas to think about?

1. Grading is not essential for learning.2. Grading is complicated.3. Grading is subjective/emotional.4. Grading is inescapable.5. There is not much “pure” research on grading

practices.6. No single best grading practice; emerging consensus

about best practice. (Fixes)7. Faulty grading damages students and teachers.

Page 16: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Form trios• Middle School• High School

• English• Math• Science• Social Studies/Sped• Business, Art, Dakota

Language• Music, Ag, FACS• Spanish, JAG

Page 17: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What do we know about the 15 Fixes?Process:

Task: To learn about the assigned Fix, work with one or two colleagues to choose a method to best teach about the Fix, and finally teach everyone here so informed decisions can be made.

Do not advocate for or against – simply teach us!

Please create a physical document that can be posted so advocates have information to reference. (chart paper)

Page 18: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What do we know about the 15 Fixes?Process:

1. Form 15 Expert Pairs or Trios. 2. Read the assigned Fix silently.3. As you are reading refer to the Teach US

worksheet for elements to include in your lesson.

Page 19: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Here are the elements to include in your lesson/presentation at a minimum:

1. Grades are broken when ……..2. The Fix is ……..3. What are the reasons FOR or BENEFITS of

implementing the Fix?4. How would implementing this Fix support student

achievement?5. What might get in the way of implementing the Fix?6. How should students be involved?7. What stories support the Fix (vignettes)?8. What examples help clarify the Fix?9. Does there need to be a policy or a policy change to

implement this Fix?

Page 20: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Stretch, think and share

Page 21: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Teach us!

Page 22: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

How do we sum it up?

• To evaluate or judge is to reach:

“a sensible conclusion that is consistent with both evidence and common sense”

Robert Linn, CRESST

Page 23: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Which Fixes apply to conditions of quality?

• Consistent Fix 8• Accurate Fixes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 9,

10, 11, 12, 14• Meaningful Fix 7• Supportive of learning Fixes 13, 14 15

Page 24: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

How do we sum it up?

• Grades should come from: A Body of +evidence

Performance + Standards

Fixes

For example: professional judgment

NOTjust number crunching

Page 25: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What are you thinking now?• Look at the Appendix Rubric for Grading

Practices and the Appendix B Survey.• Self-assess your grading practices now in the

same manner you did when we began this afternoon.

• What has changed on each instrument?• What does that mean for your classroom

practice?• What will be different?

Page 26: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

How might you answer your initial questions?

• What new questions have arisen?• How do your new questions and

responses to old questions compare with the other people in your group?

Page 27: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Prioritizing Process

We will follow the steps; we won’t go back. Listen to the rules first:

1. Which Fix do you want the group to consider for evaluation?

Just tell us, advocate later.2. What clarification do you need about any of

the Fixes? 3. Each person may advocate for one Fix. Keep it

positive…. “I advocate for this Fix because….”

Page 28: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Prioritizing Process

4. You will vote using the Rule of Thirds. The number of Fixes divided by three plus

one.

5. You get _____ votes. You can only vote for a Fix once.

6. Vote.

Page 29: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

Next steps

• All grade levels collaborate to choose Fixes to implement.

• Prepare an action plan to get started.– Start with a goal.

Page 30: MaryLou McGirr Learning Specialist TIE mmcgirr@tie.net

www.tie.net

What do you do before we meet January 18?

• Have conversations with colleagues about the Fixes which received the most votes.

• How would implementing these fixes in Wagner School District affect our students’ achievement?

• What steps would I have to take in order to implement these Fixes?