Martha Nussbaum on the political role of philosophy and the "capabilities approach"
-
Upload
christina-hendricks -
Category
Education
-
view
288 -
download
0
Transcript of Martha Nussbaum on the political role of philosophy and the "capabilities approach"
Martha NussbaumThe political role of philosophy and the “capabilities approach”
PHIL 102, UBCChristina HendricksSummer 2015
Except images licensed otherwise, this presentation is licensed CC BY 4.0
Nussbaum on the political role of
philosophy/philosophers
“Four Paradigms of Philosophical Politics” (2000)
Four ancient models for this role
Louvre, Socrates sculpture, by Cherry X on Wikimedia Commons
licensed CC BY-SA 3.0
Socrates
Plato
Aristotle
Imaginary portrait of Epictetus on 1751 Latin version of his Enchiridion (Wikimedia Commons, public domain)
Stoics
What she takes from Socrates
• What sort of role did Socrates play in the political realm, would you say?oWhat might its political value be?
• What might philosophers today do that is similar, and how?oWhat might be the political value of
such activity?
Problem with Socrates’ role
Didn’t engage in political discussions in public forums, but should have (470-471)
Pnyx, Athens, Panorama, by Nikthestunned on Wikimedia Commons, licensed CC BY-SA 3.0
Philosophers in the public forum
What philosophers can do to contribute to public debates on social/political issues• pp. 478, 479
• “Philosophy in the Public Interest” interview (optional reading)“The philosopher clarifies basic theoretical ideas and sets out conceptions of justice …, so that people can see clearly the arguments for and against them, and can compare them to their own considered judgments about justice” (41)
What she takes from Stoics
• What sort of social/political role might a Stoic take on?
• Nussbaum on what is socially/politically useful from Stoicso “therapeutic treatment” of problematic
emotions (480, 483-484)o Cosmopolitanism, and treating all humans as
equal (482-483)o Focus on the value of virtue over other things
(481)
Problem they all have
Ancient Greek & Roman philosophers did not respect pluralism of different ways of life & views of what is most good/important (486)
How can philosophers respect pluralism?
• Provide arguments that could be understood, considered, possibly accepted by many, regardless of their other philosophical or religious views (487)oQuote on pp. 487-488
• Can teach skills that are important for “democratic citizenship” (488), such as Socratic self-examination (487)
Why look back so far?
Why turn to ancient Greece & Rome for models of the political role of philosophy?
Maybe: rhetorically suggesting that philosophy should be more focused on making people’s lives better, as the ancients saw it
ForoRomano1, by Carla Tavares on Wikimedia Commons, licensed CC BY-SA 3.0
Example of Nussbaum’s political role as a
philosopherThe “capabilities approach” to measuring
and improving quality of life
(Amartya Sen also uses a similar approach)
Vasanti
Starts Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (2011) with the story of Vasanti
India 2011-07-18 at 07-24-24, Flickr photo by José Antonio Morcillo, licensed CC-BY
Other approaches to considering quality of
life“Capabilities and Social Justice” article (2002)
What do you think might be good ways to determine people’s quality of life around the world?How might we measure quality of life?
Resource-based approaches
E.g., GNP, GDP (126-127)
Problems:
• Need to focus also on distribution
• Too narrow a measure of quality of life
Preference-based approaches
Are people’s desires, preferences satisfied? (127-128)
Problem: Can reinforce inequalities (how?)
Human rights approach
Are people’s human rights being upheld? (128-129)• What do you think of when you hear
“human rights”?• Problems
oHard to determine what human rights are/what they’re grounded on
oOften focused on “negative” duties of non-interference
oOften focused on public rather than private life
Basics of this approach
Asks: what are people “actually able to do and to be?” (129)
There are certain capabilities that are required to live a human life, to live well as a human (130)
Suggested list of ten central capabilities
See password-protected readings page (under “weekly schedule”): http://blogs.ubc.ca/phil102
Life
Bodily health
Emotions
Affiliation
Play
Other species
Bodily integrity
Practical reason
Senses, imagination, thought
Control over environment:
political & material
Connect to Vasanti’s story
Definitions
Combined capabilities (132): • Internal abilities, “internal states of readiness
to act” (132), and • Social opportunities & freedoms to express
those internal abilities
Functioning: “active realization of one or more capabilities” (Creating Capabilities book, p. 25)• Why it’s important to require just that
capabilities are developed, not that people put them into practice (functioning) (132)
Capabilities and utilitarianism
• Differences between this and how a utilitarian would approach improving quality of life?
• Problems w/utilitarian approach, acc. to NussbaumoNot sure these apply to Singer’s
arguments, though
Your thoughts
• LC: what do you think of this list of capabilities?
• Groups: o Does this list capture what is required to live
well as a human? Anything missing? Anything there that is not required?
o Any comments on the capabilities approach generally?
http://is.gd/PHIL102Nussbaum