Martha Kellogg Smith
description
Transcript of Martha Kellogg Smith
1
Information needs and uses of art museum visitors:
implications for descriptive vocabularies
Martha Kellogg SmithSchool of Library, Archival and Information Studies
University of British Columbia
Special Libraries Association 2008 ConferenceJune 16, 2008, Seattle, WA
22
“We’re curious, not connoisseurs.”
(comment of art museum visitor,
Winterthur Museum, Delaware)
33
Overview of talk today
Contemporary art museum audiences and their expectations
What we know about art museum visitors and their information needs and behaviors from visitor studies
Non-specialists’ levels of artwork interpretation and information use
Implications for art vocabularies in museum information resources
44
Art museum audiences: expectations of art museums and their information 21st century learners, leisure and lifelong learners of
great diversity (IMLS, 1999)
High expectations for descriptive and interpretive information about art objects Educational role of art museums as “authorized
knowers” (Lisus and Ericson, 1999)
High expectations for information access Raised in part by Web-based and gallery-based
technologies
55
Art museum visitor studies: empirical evidence and theoretical constructs Relevant information on: how novice artwork viewers
express themselves and non-specialist artwork interpretation and information use
Culled from a qualitative meta-analysis of art museum visitor studies (Smith, 2006): a picture of the visual observation and verbal description skills of non-specialist art viewers
66
Subject access to artworks and vocabularies of description Desired artwork information:
depicted characters, persons, events, locations, and objects symbolism and abstract themes, stories and narratives media and techniques original creation contexts and functions of these works overall significance of the works prefer this kind of information in brief synopses or overviews of
artworks (most often to be found in object wall labels)
Evidence that art viewers want subject access(Frost et al. 2000, Gordon 1996, Hourihane 1996)
Practice of art object and image subject indexing in art museums is still very limited (White 2002, Gilchrest 2003)
77
Evidence from artwork tagging projects
Visual elements landscape, winter landscape countryside, outdoors snow, snowfall moon, moonlight, moonrise night sky, clouds open fields, meadow stream, creek foothills, horizons trees, evergreens, forest, grass nighttime, evening winter, Christmastime
Henry Farrer (American, 1843–1903)
Winter Scene in Moonlight , 1869 Watercolor and gouache on white wove paper11 7/8 x 15 1/8 in.Accession no. 1999.19
88
Evidence from artwork tagging projects
Moods and themes
cold, darkness, silence, solitude
desolation, isolation,
bleakness, melancholy, lonely, empty, stark
beauty in nature
peaceful wilderness, peace, inner peace
Henry Farrer
Winter Scene in Moonlight , 1869
99
Evidence from artwork tagging projects Curatorial description
prosaic terrain
precise technique
Pre-Raphaelite ideals
primitivism
autodidact
chill nocturnal setting
subtle asymmetry of composition
anticipates tenor of Surrealists landscapes
Henry Farrer
Winter Scene in Moonlight , 1869
1010
Visual observation and verbal description skills of beginning, non-specialist art viewers Describe and list the visual elements of what they see
Note subject matter of depicted objects, figures, events, and
locations Prefer realistic works over more abstract works (most accessible
based on everyday visual experience) Rely first on their own emotions, memories, associations, and
values in assessing works Lack a large vocabulary of art terms and concepts and have an
undeveloped sense of critical analysis
1111
Non-specialists say they need: context and explanations of specialized terms Viewers transition from a “reactive stance” to growing awareness of
comparisons to be made beyond their own personal experience and the need to refer to museum-provided contextual information
Seek brief synopses of artworks that include information on depicted stories and characters, symbolism and abstract themes, media and techniques, and the original creation contexts and functions of these works and
encounter difficulties with unfamiliar art historical and foreign language vocabulary terms
12
Non-specialists and specialized vocabulary Encounter unfamiliar art history terminology and terms
from foreign languages and cultures (e.g., kast, krater, polychrome) and confusing historic geographic references (Netherlandish, Neopolitan)
Visitors do learn vocabulary at the museum as they read labels or go on tours, and they practice “text echo”
Visitors do question museum information at times when they encounter specialized art concepts or terminology which seem to obscure information rather than provide answers
1313
Conceptual framework of art interpretation and information use Level I Description: describing, listing, enumerating, and
naming objects and their parts, telling stories, making associations, using emotions (uses visual information)
Level II Analysis and Identification: classifying and contextualizing artworks by styles, dates, functions, origins, conventional themes, etc. (uses contextual information)
Level III Integration: evaluating, explaining, and synthesizing the many strands of visual, personal, comparative, and contextual information (uses interpretive information)
1414
Erwin Panofsky’s iconographic theory and art object/image indexing Panofsky’s Level I pre-iconographic interpretation:
natural subject matter, that is, depicted “everyday” generic people, objects, events, and simple emotional states (a dog, a child, a train, a foot race)
Panofsky’s Level II iconographic interpretation: named or specific people, objects, places, or events; conventional themes and stories in art (Lassie, Shirley Temple, the Orient Express, the Boston Marathon)
Panofsky’s Level III iconological interpretation: deeper meanings that these depictions, themes, and stories have in the contexts of artworks’ creation and cultures (faithfulness, innocence, mystery, endurance)
1515
Pre-iconographic
Iconographic Iconological
human female Athena Promachos
[Attic Greek, Black-figure]
competition
horse, hunt, pond
Shah Jahan
[Mughal]
virility, power
still life, flowers, butterfly
Vanitas
[Baroque]
beauty, death, soul, transience, Resurrection
1616
Conclusions and research directions Need to address difficulties with unfamiliar art historical
and foreign language vocabulary terms encountered particularly at the analysis and identification (iconographic) Level II , e.g., Athena Promachos, Shah Jahan, Attic Greek, Black-figure, Vanitas, Mughal, Baroque
Results of user-supplied keywording can be leveraged to
create bridges among the interpretive and vocabulary levels though which non-specialists progress
Use the consistency and clear definitions of controlled vocabularies for Level II (and some Level I) concepts as the backbone of museum resources for non-specialist viewers
1717
Pictures and ReferencesPICTURES Mrs. Si-a-gut, Coiled Cedar Root Basket, Cowlitz/Nisqually, 1899, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, acc. no. 3.2000/1. Dorothea Lange, Human Erosion in California (Migrant Mother), Nipomo, Californina, 1936, J Paul Getty Museum,
Los Angeles, CA. Enamel Plaque, Germany, Rhine Valley, Cologne, ca. 1170, The Cleveland Museum of Art, acc. no. 1953.274. Vasily Kandinsky, Composition IV, 1911, Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfallen, Dusseldorf , Germany. Henry Farrer, Winter Scene in Moonlight, 1869, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, NY, acc. no. 1999.19.
REFERENCES Frost, C. O., Taylor, B., Noakes, A., Markel, S., Torres, D., and Drabenstott, K. M. (2000). Browse and search
patterns in a digital image database. Information Retrieval, 1, 287-313. Gilchrest, A. (2003). Factors affecting controlled vocabulary usage in art museum information systems. Art
Documentation, 22(1), 13-20. Gordon, C. (1996). Patterns of user queries in an ICONCLASS database. Visual Resources, 12(2), 177-186. Hourihane, C. (1996). The Van Eyck Project, information exchange, and European art libraries. VRA Bulletin,
23(2), 57-60. The Metropolitan Museum of Art (2005). Image cataloguing test. December 7, 2004. Available at:
http://www.steve.museum/reference/MMAImageCatalogingTest12-7-04.pdf Panofsky, E. (1955). Iconography and iconology: An introduction to the study of Renaissance art. In Erwin
Panofsky, Meaning in the Visual Arts (pp. 26-54). New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor. Seren, T., Donohue, D., and Underwood, L. A. (2001). Integrated art documentation: The Guggenheim
perspective. Art Documentation, 20(1), 31-35. Smith, M. K. (2006). Art information use and needs of non-specialists: Evidence in art museum visitor studies.
PhD dissertation. University of Washington. White, L. (2002). Interpretation and representation: The who, why, what, and how of subject access in museums.
Art Documentation, 21(1), 21-22.