Mart Grisel | Policy Lab Luxembourg 2014
-
Upload
european-urban-knowledge-network -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
580 -
download
0
Transcript of Mart Grisel | Policy Lab Luxembourg 2014
EUKN EGTC Policy Lab Sustainable Neighborhood Ranking Systems
Luxembourg June 30, 2014
www.eukn.eu 1
What makes a sustainable neighborhood?
2
What makes a sustainable neighborhood?
Priorities of sustainability can vary widely from place to place
3
Highlighted urban development systems
4
LEED for Neighborhood Development •United States; Certified by Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI) •Piloted in 2007; Launched in 2010; Most recent version 2013 •12 prerequisites; 5 themes; 44 criteria •Most extensively used urban development scale system
Green Star for Communities •Australia; Certified by Green Star •Launched as pilot in 2012 •0 prerequisites; 5 themes; 37 criteria
Casbee for Urban Development •Japan; Certified by Institute for Built Environment & Energy Conservation (IBEC) •Launched in 2006; Most recent version 2007 •0 prerequisites; 6 themes; 31 criteria; 82 sub-criteria
BREEAM for Communities •United Kingdom; Certified by Building Research Establishment (BRE) •Launched in 2008; Most recent version 2012 •12 prerequisites; 5 themes; 40 criteria
DGNB for Urban Districts •Germany; Certified by DGNB •Launched in 2011; Most recent version 2012 •6 prerequisites; 5 themes; 14 sub-themes; 45 criteria
HQE for Urban Planning and Development •France; Certified by Certivea •Launched in 2011; Most recent version 2013 •Primarily a Project Management system; no certification scheme
5
Commonalities in Neighborhood Ranking Systems
Organisational structure • Comes out of a building level certification • Ratings are ranked through some sort of point system • Independent/Organisational review • Application costs associated with various phases of certification • Location-specific in most cases • Common considerations (themes & criteria)
Common themes • Transportation and mobility • Community life/neighborhood dynamics • Impact on the natural environment • Economic development (some) • Use of innovation (some) • Governance(some) • Design (some)
6
0
50
100
150
200
250
HQE-A LEED BREEAM AQUA DGNB Green StarCasbee
CertifiedPre-certifiedRegisteredPilot
LEED: 238 registered, 146 certified
7
Certifications levels
8
General Comparisons
While LEED ND is the oldest system, they were all launched within the past 10 years. Order of maturity: LEED, HQE, BREEAM, DGNB, Casbee, Green Star (pilot stage)
LEED, DGNB, Casbee focus on projects starting in the design phase; HQE is the only system beginning at project conception (certification of preliminary phases)
LEED, BREEAM and DGNB offer intermediate phases for pre-certification (in recognition of being on the right track, and marketing purposes)
LEED is only system to allow retroactive certification (up to 3 years after completion)
HQE and Green Star are only systems without prerequisites Green Star and Casbee are the only certifications that expire on 5
year cycles, with an option to renew
9
Key Assessment Comparisons
• The schemes "with criteria" have on average 5 themes/40 criteria. Common themes: Economy - Governance - Environment/Health - Technical/Infrastructure/Transportation/Mobility - Process/Design
• HQE and Casbee have no prerequisites: the most "inclusive" systems
• LEED and BREEAM are the schemes which have the most "filters" (12 prerequisites)
• BREEAM and Green Star offer an optional "bonus" category specifically for "Innovation"
• LEED also has an "Innovation" category and is the only one to offer a "Regional Priority" theme
• Casbee is the most technical system, and heavily based on criteria specific to Japan’s urban context
• LEED, BREEAM and Casbee are the only ones with a system for weighting, depending on the priority themes for projects
• LEED, BREEAM and Green Star offer accreditation for professionals. The LEED and Green Star schemes offer extra points when an accredited professional is present.
10
LEED for Neighborhood Development
Localisation "intelligente" et réseaux 28 R R R R R R 1 Prérequis
Modèle de quartier et conception 41 R R R 1 Critère
Infrastructures et bâtiments verts 31 R R R R
Innovation et processus de conception 6
Propriétés régionales 4
Thèmes pts Nombre de critères
Number of criteria according to themes, to the number of points and to the prerequisites
Smart links and localisation
Neighbourhood model and design
Green infrastructure and buildings
Innovation and the design process
Regional properties
Themes
R R R R R
R R R
R R R R
R
11
LEED-ND in practice
Northwest Gardens, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA
Mixed income multi-family housings, a gridded street network, communitiy gardens, energy efficiency.
The Shipyard/Candlestick Point, San Francisco, CA, USA
Housing, retail, commercial, cultural, leisure and educational uses.
12
BREEAM Communities
Prerequisite
Criteria applicable in Phase 1
Criteria applicable in Phase 2
Criteria applicable in Phase 3
R Gouvernance 8 R R
R Pré-requisEconomie locale 5 R
Critère applicable en Phase 1Bien-être social 25 R
Critère applicable en Phase 2Conditions environnementales 17 R R
Critère applicable en Phase 3Ressources et Energie 31 R R R
Usages des sols et écologie 18 R R
Transports et mobilité 15 R
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Thèmes pts Nombre de critères
Développement économique
Governance
Local economy
Social well-being
Environmental conditions
Resources and Energy
Land use and ecology
Transportation and mobility
Themes
8
5
25
17
31
18
15
pts
Economic
Development
R
R
R
R R
R
R R R
R R
R
Phase 1: Selection of the development
principle
Interim certification
Phase 2: Drawing the site plan
Phase 3: Detailed design
Final certification
1
2
3
1
2
13
Number of criteria
BREEAM Communities in practice
Masthusen, Malmö, Sweden
Multifunctional hub, active routes, public spaces.
Sheffield Housing Corporation, United Kingdom
3 sites with 2,300 new homes for sale and rent on 60 hectares of land over the next 15 years
14
DGNB Urban Quarters
R R R
R 1 Prérequis
1 CritèreR
Sous-thème
RTEC20
RPRO10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14Thèmes pts
25
10
25
12
18
Qualité envrionnementale
Qualité économique
Qualité sociale et fonctionnelle
Qualité technique
Qualité du processus
Nombre de critères
ENV10 ENV20
ECO10 ECO20
SCO10 SCO20 SCO30 SCO40
TEC10 TEC30
PRO20 PRO30
Environmental quality
Economic quality
Social and functional quality
Technical quality
Process quality
Themes
25
10
25
12
18
pts Number of criteria
R
R
R
R
R
ENV10 ENV20
ECO10 ECO20
SCO10 SCO20 SCO30 SCO40
TEC10 TEC20 TEC30
PRO10 PRO20 PRO30
R R
15
DGNB Urban Quarters in practice
Le Quartier Central, Dusseldorf, Germany
Urban mix of housing, jobs, shopping and leisure.
Nordhavn, Denmark
Sustainable energy supply, low-energy building, public transport and cycling.
16
HQE Urban Planning and Development
Launch
Initial analysis
Selection of objectives
Project design
Implementation
• Setting up the multi-disciplinary team • Initial diagnostic and summary • Analysis of the regulatory framework and
regional policies • Overview of the preliminary participation • Reasoning for the relevance of the project
• Sustainable development objectives charter
• Schedule, Site plan, Schedule for actions, Design selection
• Integration plan • Justification for the sustainable
development objectives
• Requirements for buildings, public and private spaces and facilities: regulatory, contractual or informational documents
• Worksite management plan • Buyer and user awareness
1
3
4
5
2
Overview - Capitalisation 6
• Setting up a sponsorship structure • Formalisation of the planner-local
government joint involvement • Participation specifications
• Project sheet • Overview • Measurement of performance
before the work starts (unless
waived): Phases 1 to 4:
4
Application/ admissibility study/ proposal/contract
Initial auditon site
Yearly follow-up audits on site
Final audit
Transmission of the Operational Tracking
Dossier/nursing
Transmission of the Operational Tracking
Dossier/nursing
Transmission of the Operational Tracking
Dossier/nursing
1
2
3
End of phase 2 to 4 (unless waived)
Phase 6
Stages in the certification process SPM phases Primary deliverables at each phase
Phases 4 and 5
17
CASBEE Urban Development
1 Sous-critère
1 Critère
2.6
Contribution à la communauté locale3.2
Infrastructures sociales
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18Thèmes
QUD1.1 QUD1.2 QUD1.3 QUD1.4 QUD1.5
LRUD3.1 LRUD3.2 LRUD3.3 LRUD3.4
LRUD1.6
LRUD2.1 LRUD2.2 LRUD2.3 LRUD2.4 LRUD2.5 LRUD2.6
QUD2.5
QUD3.1 QUD3.3 QUD3.4
LRUD1.1 LRUD1.2 LRUD1.3 LRUD1.4 LRUD1.5
Nombre de critères
QUD2.1 QUD2.2 QUD2.3 QUD2.4Fonction de services pour l'espace
désigné
Envrionnement naturel
Impact envrionnemental sur le microclimat, les façades et le paysage
Gestion de l'envrionnement local
Natural environment
Functionality of services for the designated space
Contribution to the community
Environmental impact on the micro climate, on building façades and on the landscape
Social infrastructure
Management of the local environment
Number of criteria
QUD1.1 QUD1.2 QUD1.3 QUD1.4 QUD1.5
QUD2.1 QUD2.2 QUD2.3 QUD2.4 QUD2.5 2.6
QUD3.1 QUD3.3 QUD4.4 3.2
LRUD1.1 LRUD1.2 LRUD1.3 LRUD1.4 LRUD1.5 LRUD1.6
LRUD2.1 LRUD2.2 LRUD2.3 LRUD2.4 LRUD2.5 LRUD2.6
LRUD3.1 LRUD3.2 LRUD3.3 LRUD3.4
18
Casbee Urban Development in practice
Laketown “Miwa no Mori”
Energy efficient houses surrouned by ecosystems for indigenous species.
Harumi Triton Square
Environment friendly community with clear zoning and energy saving systems.
19
Green Star Communities
Gouvernance 211 Critère
Conception 11
Habitabilité 23
Prospérité économique 19
Environnement 26
Innovation 101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Thèmes pts Nombre de critères
Governance
Design
Liveability
Economic prosperity
Environment
Innovation
Themes Number of criteria
20
Green Star Communities in practice Paramatta Square, Paramatta, Australia
The Loop District, Canberra, Australia
21
Vibrant, connected and liveable city. Socially, economically and environmentally sustainable community.
APPENDIX SLIDES
22
LEED for Neighborhood Development •http://www.usgbc.org/articles/getting-know-leed-neighborhood-development
Green Star for Communities •http://www.gbca.org.au/green-star/green-star-communities/
Casbee for Urban Development •http://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/index.htm
BREEAM for Communities •http://www.breeam.org/page.jsp?id=372
DGNB for Urban Districts •http://www.dgnb-system.de/en/schemes/scheme-overview/neubau_stadtquartiere.php
HQE for Urban Planning and Development •http://www.behqe.com/
Technical manuals, detailed research, background information, and all presentations from this workshop can be found after
this conference on EUKN’s website: http://www.eukn.org/Policy_Labs
23
24
Comparison of the certified phases in the different certification procedures
CERTIVEA AQUA LEED BREEAM DGNB Green Star CASBEE
France Brazil United States Great Britain Germany Australia Japan
Certification process
Phase 1: Launch Phase 1: Launch
Phase 2: Initial analysis Phase 2: Initial analysis
Phase 3: Selecting the objectives
Phase 3: Selecting the objectives
Phase 4: Project design Phase 4: Project design
Phase 5: Implementation Phase 5: Implementation
Phase 6: Overview-Capitalisation
Phase 6: Overview-Capitalisation
Usage phase
Phase 1: Selection of the development principle
Phase 2: Drawing the site plan
Phase 3: Detailed design
HQE-A certification
HQE-A certification
HQE-A certification
HQE-A certification
HQE-A certification
AQUA-BL programming certification
AQUA-BL design certification
AQUA-BL certification
Stage 1: Plan approved subject to conditions
Stage 2: Pre-certified plan
Stage 3: LEED-ND Certification
Time limit of 3 years after completion
Intermediate certificate
Final certificate
Phase 1: Pre-certification Valid for 3 years
Phase 2: Infrastructure Certification
Valid for 5 years
Phase 3: DGNB-UD certification
SLL: Review of the prerequisites (optional)
AQUA-BL Certification Optional
No clearly indicated process
Submission of the documents required for the assessment
Simple assessment on the
points grid
Green Star for Communities
certification must be obtained 3 years after registration
Certification renewed every 5
years
No clearly indicated process
Assessment on the analysis and points grid
Casbee UD certification is
valid for 5 years
Comparison of the schemes' contents
AQUA LEED BREEAM DGNB Green Star CASBEE
Themes addressed during certification
Most recent version
Nbr of themes
Nbr of criteria or sub-criteria
Nbr of prerequisites
Weighting
2013 2013 2011 2012 2012 2007 Draft - 2012
3 5 3 5 (+1) 5 6 6
17 44 17 40 45 82 37
none 12 none 12 6 none none
none none none none yes yes none
1
2
3
4
5
6
Integration of the neighbourhood
Integration of the neighbourhood
Smart links and localisation Governance Environmental
quality
Natural environment Governance
Environment and health
Environment and health
Neighbourhood model and design Economic
development Economic quality
Functionality of services for the
designated space
Design
Community life and neighbourhood
dynamics
Community life and neighbourhood
dynamics
Green infrastructure and buildings
Resources and Energy Social and functional
quality
Contribution to the community Liveability
Innovation and the design process Land use and ecology Technical quality
Environmental impact on the micro climate, on building
façades and on the landscape Economic prosperity
Regional properties Transportation and mobility
Process quality Social infrastructures Environment
Innovation (optional) Management of the local environment Innovation
25
HQE-A / AQUA-BL LEED-ND
Gouvernance (SMO)
Intégration et Cohérence du quartier 30% Localisation "intelligente" et réseaux 23%
Qualité environnementale et sanitaire 40% Modèle de quartier et conception 37%
Vie sociale et Dynamique économique 30% Infrastructures et bâtiments verts 28%
Innovation et processus de conception 6%
Propriétés régionales 4%
Casbee-UD
Envrionnement naturel 15%
20%
Contribution à la communauté locale 15%
16%
Infrastructures sociales 20%
Gestion de l'envrionnement local 14%
Green Star
Gouvernance 19%
Conception 10%
Habitabilité 21%
Prospérité économique 17%
Environnement 24%
Innovation 9%
DGNB-UD
Qualité envrionnementale 23%
Qualité économique 23%
Qualité sociale et fonctionnelle 23%
Qualité technique 22%
Qualité du processus 10%
BREEAM-C
Gouvernance 9%
Economie locale 15%
Bien-être social 17%
Conditions environnementales 11%
Ressources et Energie 22%
Usages des sols et écologie 13%
Transports et mobilité 13%
Fonction de services pour l'espace désigné
Impact envrionnemental sur le microclimat, les façades et le paysage
30%
25.5%
9%
23%
19%
15%
40%
37.3%
15%
23%
10%
20%
30%
28.1%
17%
23%
21%
15%
5.5%
11%
22%
17%
16%
3.6%
22%
10%
24%
20%
13%
9%
14%
13%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
HQE-A / AQUA-BL
LEED-ND
BREEAM-C
DGNB-UD
Green Star
Casbee
SPM
Casbee
Green Star
DGNB-UD
BREEAM-C
LEED-ND
HQE-A /AQUA-BL
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
HQE-A/AQUA-BL LEED-ND
BREEAM-C
DGNB-UD
Green Star
Casbee-UD
Governance (SPM)
Integration and Cohesion of the neighbourhood 30%
Environmental and health quality 40%
Community life and Economic dynamics 30%
Smart links and localisation 23%
Neighbourhood model and design 37%
Green infrastructure and buildings 28%
Innovation and the design process 6%
Regional properties 4%
Natural environment 15%
Functionality of services for the 20% designated space
Contribution to the community 15%
Environmental impact on the 16% micro climate, on building façades and on the landscape
Social infrastructures 20%
Management of the local environment 14%
Governance 19%
Design 10%
Liveability 21%
Economic prosperity 17%
Environment 24%
Innovation 9%
Environmental quality 23%
Economic quality 23%
Social and functional quality 23%
Technical quality 22%
Quality of the process 10%
Governance 9%
Local economy 15%
Social well-being 17%
Environmental conditions 11%
Resources and Energy 22%
Land use and ecology 13%
Transportation and mobility 13%
26
Comparison of the schemes' contents Note: the different elements compared below are an indication of "matching themes", and not matching contents