Mars Atmospheric Evolution : What Can Dynamical Models Tell Us?

18
Mar 22, 2022 1 Mars Atmospheric Evolution : What Can Dynamical Models Tell Us? Stephen W. Bougher Jared M. Bell (University of Michigan) Jane L. Fox (Wright State University)

description

Mars Atmospheric Evolution : What Can Dynamical Models Tell Us?. Stephen W. Bougher Jared M. Bell (University of Michigan). Jane L. Fox (Wright State University). Martian Atmospheric Regions and Escape Processes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Mars Atmospheric Evolution : What Can Dynamical Models Tell Us?

  • Mars Atmospheric Evolution :What Can Dynamical Models Tell Us? Stephen W. BougherJared M. Bell (University of Michigan) Jane L. Fox (Wright State University)

  • Martian Atmospheric Regions and Escape Processes

  • Summary of Mars Volatile Escape MechanismsThermal (Jeans) escape : e.g. HNon-thermal escape:Photochemical escape : DR of O2+, N2+, CO+ forming energetic (hot) neutrals (O, N, C ).(2) Pick-up ion escape : ions produced in the corona and exosphere are dragged along by solar B-field lines to partially escape in the SW (O+, H+, C+).(3) Ionospheric outflows: planetary ions are accelerated by the SW convection E-field and partially lost (e.g. O2+).(4) Ion sputtering : a portion of pick-up ions re-impact the neutral atmosphere with enough energy to eject neutral atmospheric particles (e.g. CO2, N2, CO, O, N, C...).

  • Requirements for Evolution Models of Mars Volatile EscapeModel for the early solar EUV fluxes (Ayres, 1997). ~3 x EUV at ~2.5 GYA.Model for the history of the solar wind properties (Newkirk, 1981; Wood et al., 2002).Models for the ancient upper atmosphere neutral densities and temperatures (Zhang et al., 1993; Bougher and Fox, 1996; this work).An assumed history of the planetary magnetic field; Mars turn-off ~3.7 GYA (Acuna et al., 1998).

  • Interaction of Key Models : Volatile Escape

  • MTGCM Input Parameters, Fields, and DomainDomain : ~70-300 km; 33-levels; 5x5 resolutionMajor Fields and Species : T, U, V, W, CO2, CO, O, N2Minor Species : O2, He, Ar, N(4S)Ions (PCE) : CO2+, O2+, O+, NO+, CO+, N2+ (
  • MGCM-MTGCM Simulation: Coupling ConfigurationSeparate but coupled NASA Ames MGCM (0-90 km) and NCAR/Michigan MTGCM (70-300 km) codes, linked across an interface at 1.32-microbars on 5x5 grid.

    Fields passed upward at interface (T, U, V, Z) on 2-min time-step intervals. No downward coupling enabled.

    MGCM-MTGCM captures upward propagating migrating and non-migrating tidal oscillations, as well as in-situ driven solar EUV-UV migrating tides.

  • Current vs. Ancient Model Inputs and Parameters

    Both : Ls = 270 (perihelion, S. Summer, TES dust)

    Current (today): --F10.7-cm= 130 solar EUV/FUV fluxes --1.0 solar IR fluxes.

    Ancient (2.5 GYA) : --F10.7-cm = 390 solar EUV/FUV fluxes (Ayres, 1997) --0.79 current solar IR fluxes (Gough, 1981).

  • Thermal StructureExobase Altitude :~215 km (C)~250 km (A)

  • Heat BalancesSolid = condDash = adiaD.Dash = heat3D.Dash = CO2Dotted = adv

  • Heat Balances

  • Neutral CompositionSolid = CO23D-Dash = OD-Dash = N2Dash = CODotted = Ar

  • Neutral Composition

  • O/CO2 Ratios (Current vs. Ancient)At 135 km:O/CO2 = 1.75% (C)O/CO2 = 3.75% (A)

  • Electron DensitiesIonospheric peak :1.94 x 105 cm-3 (C)2.90 x 105 cm-3 (A)

  • Current : T+(U,V) at Exobase

  • Ancient : T+(U,V) at Exobase

  • Summary and ConclusionsEnhanced solar EUV-UV fluxes drive a warmer (290 to 430 K) ancient Mars dayside exobase, faster global winds, and a lower thermosphere more abundant in O (1.75 to 3.75% near 135 km). Dayside (upwelling) winds have a significant impact upon adiabatic cooling, strongly regulating dayside temperatures. Advection of O is enhanced.A strong dayside thermostat also results from enhanced CO2 cooling, due to more abundant atomic-O. Similar to present day Venus.Exobase rises (on average) from ~195 to 230 km. Enhanced O and CO2 densities at these heights.