Marriage and Civil Partnerships
-
Upload
ekaterina-k-vasileva -
Category
Documents
-
view
319 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Marriage and Civil Partnerships
![Page 1: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
30 SEPT 2015Dr Sara Ramshaw
FORMATION OF MARRIAGE / CIVIL
PARTNERSHIPS
![Page 2: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Aims of LectureFORMALISED RELATIONSHIPS
• Formalised versus unformalised relationships
• What is marriage?• How are marriages formed?• How are civil partnerships formed?• Same sex marriage• Further debates/issues
![Page 3: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
•What is marriage?
![Page 4: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• ‘I conceive that marriage, as understood in Christendom,
may ... be defined as the voluntary union for life of one man and one woman, to the
exclusion of all others.’
(Lord Penzance in Hyde v Hyde [1866] LR I P & D 130)
![Page 5: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Is this definition still accurate?• Consider: No longer for life –
prevalence of divorceChristian conception of marriage (to beget children) no longer dominates
Only between a man and a woman? – possibility of same sex marriage
![Page 6: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Marriage:
OR
?
![Page 7: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Marriage:
OR
?
Thorpe LJ in Bellinger v Bellinger [2001] described marriage as:
‘…a contract for which the parties elect but which is regulated by the state, both in its formation and in its termination by divorce, because it affects status upon which depend a variety of entitlements, benefits and obligation.’
![Page 8: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Creation of a valid marriage
![Page 9: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
(1)Capacity
Re E (An Alleged Patient); Sheffield City Council v E and S [2005] 1FLR 965
Test for capacity is whether person is able to understand the nature of the marriage contract, and whether s/he is mentally
capable of understanding the duties and responsibilities normally attached to
marriage (Mumby J).
![Page 10: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Capacity
M v B, A and S (By the Official Solicitor) [2006] 1 FLR 11
High Court can invoke its ‘inherent jurisdiction’ to protect vulnerable adults.
![Page 11: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
(2) Marriage must not fall foul of various grounds in section 11 of the Matrimonial
Causes Act (MCA) 1973 – otherwise regarded as void (see Week 3 lecture) .
![Page 12: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Religious v
Civil Marriage
![Page 13: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Where?
![Page 14: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
(1)Preliminary formalities
For all non-Anglican marriages (including civil marriages), parties must first obtain a superintendent registrar’s certificate giving them approval to marry. Various requirements need to be satisfied before this can be
granted as laid down in the Marriage Act 1949.
Church of England marriages can only be solemnised after the publication of banns, that is, an announcement of the intended marriage
made by the vicar or rector on 3 successive Sundays in the parish church of each of the parties.
![Page 15: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
(2)Ceremony
Civil ceremonies can take place at a register office or ‘approved premises’ once approval of the superintendent registrar is obtained.
‘Approved premises’ are premises approved by the local authority for the purposes of conducting civil marriages, and include premises such
as hotels, stately homes, castles, etc.
A civil ceremony may be followed by a religious ceremony, but it is the civil ceremony that creates the marriage. At the ceremony, the parties must declare that there are no lawful impediments to the marriage and
must exchange vows. At least 2 witnesses are required.
Religious marriages are celebrated according to the rites of the particular religion and in the
presence of at least 2 witnesses.
Failure to comply with the formalities required for creating a valid marriage will usually mean
that the marriage is void.
![Page 17: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Civil Partnership Act 2004
![Page 18: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
In 2001, the Netherlands became the first country to legalise same-sex marriage
Followed by Belgium, Canada, South Africa, Spain and US State of Massachusetts
UK followed the example in other jurisdictions by introducing a civil registration system for same-sex couples
![Page 19: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Grainne Close: ‘This is for all the people who went before us ...’
Shannon Sickles : ‘... and all the people who would like to come after us’
![Page 20: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
‘…people felt proud that Northern Ireland was in the media for something positive, after years and years of negative media coverage all over the world.’ (Sickles and Close)
![Page 21: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Effect of CPA 2004 Give same-sex couples the opportunity
to formalise their relationship in law and acquire marital-like rights and duties by civil registration
Also, extended every piece of legislation which conferred rights on 'those living together as husband and wife' to include 'those living together as civil partners'
![Page 22: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
SIMILARITIES
The same property rights as married opposite-sex couplesThe same exemption as married couples on inheritance tax, social security and pension benefitsThe ability to get parental responsibility for a partner’s children Responsibility for reasonable maintenance of one’s partner and their childrenTenancy rightsFull life insurance recognitionNext-of-kin rights in hospitalsA formal process for dissolving partnerships akin to divorceEtc.
![Page 23: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
A civil partnership is formed when the couple register their partnership in accordance with the Act
The civil partnership document must be signed by the parties, two witnesses and a registrar
It is a binding relationship – terminating only on death, dissolution or annulment
![Page 24: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
DIFFERENCES
•Non-consummation and adultery•Formalities at start, i.e., signing of register, not religious vows (but in February 2011, ban on civil partnerships in places of worship lifted)
![Page 25: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Despite similarities, civil partnership is NOT a marriage
![Page 26: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Is this discriminatory?
![Page 27: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2006Wilkinson v Kitzinger
▪Court rejected claim that denying marriage to same-sex couples is discriminatory▪Why?
![Page 28: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Sir Mark Potter:
Preserving the heterosexual definition of marriage did
not make same-sex couples ‘inferior’, it just recognised
their ‘differences’ (para 121)
![Page 29: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
It affirms the status of formalised relationships
Modelled on marriage (assimilationist policy)
Do martial-like obligations suit same-sex relationships?
Avoids more fundamental critique of the assumed values and principles enshrined in marriage - a missed opportunity?
![Page 30: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Is it a symbolic victory for same-sex couples?
Registration will lead to greater social acceptance of same-sex relationships and thus, ultimately, cultural change (DTI, Women & Equality Unit, Civil Partnership: A Framework for the Legal Recognition of Same-sex Couples, June 2003, para. 1.5)
Do you agree?
![Page 31: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
What does CPA 2004 say about the direction of family law policy?
State preference for formalised relationships?
What about unmarried opposite-sex couples OR unregistered same-sex couples?
Diduck notes that the 'regulation of legal burdens and benefits to unmarried partners relative to their married counterparts has proceeded … on an ad hoc or piecemeal basis…'
![Page 32: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Carl Stychin, ‘Not (Quite) a Horse and Carriage: The Civil Partnership Act 2004’ (2006) 14 Feminist Legal Studies 79.
Carl Stychin, ‘“Las Vegas is not where we are”: Queer Readings of the Civil Partnership Act’ (2006) 25 Political Geography 899.
![Page 33: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013
(17 July 2013)
![Page 34: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
In October 2011, at a party conference in Manchester, Prime Minister David Cameron urged reluctant Tory MPs and members to support gay marriage.
![Page 36: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
‘And to anyone who has reservations, I say this: Yes, it’s about equality, but it’s also about something else: commitment. Conservatives believe in the ties that bind us; that society is stronger when we make vows to each other and support each other. … So I don’t support gay marriage in spite of being a Conservative. I support gay marriage because I am a Conservative.’ (David Cameron)
![Page 37: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Government’s Equality Office’s Equal civil marriage: a consultation (March 2012)
![Page 38: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
3 principles for change: 1. Remove the ban on same-sex
couples being able to marry through civil ceremony.
2. Make no changes to how religious organisations solemnise marriages.
Allow transsexual people to change their legal gender without having to legally end their existing marriage or civil partnership.
![Page 39: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act came into force on 13 March 2014.
Enables same sex couples to marry either by way of a civil ceremony or, provided the religious organisation concerned is in agreement, on religious premises.
The first same sex marriage took place on 29 March 2014.
![Page 40: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
DIFFERENCES
•Non-consummation and adultery (mirrors law on civil partnerships).•Legislation does not extend the common law presumption that a child born to a woman during marriage is the child of her husband.•Same-sex married couples given fewer pension inheritance rights (mirrors occupation pension rights of civil partnerships – only based on contributions since 2005). A legal challenge on this issue was heard by the C of A in late June 2015. For more information, see Briefing Paper, Pensions: civil partnerships and same-sex marriages, published 10 July 2015.
![Page 41: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
On 28 April 2015, the NI Assembly voted to reject legalising same sex marriage (despite overwhelming support for same sex marriage by majority of public).
Same sex marriages from other jurisdictions are treated as civil partnerships in NI.
![Page 42: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
‘In order for us to exercise our right to marry, we would have to leave NI. We’ve made a life for ourselves here in Belfast, and we should have the same rights afforded to us as other citizens and be able to make a choice about marriage for ourselves’
Sickles and Close
![Page 43: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
On 26 June 2015, Mr Justice Treacy ruled that Shannon Sickles and Grainne Close, along with Charles and Henry Flanagan-Kane, have the right to have the same sex marriage ban subjected to judicial review (probably November 2015).
![Page 44: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
FURTHER QUESTIONS/DEBATES
![Page 45: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Does marriage deserve the value placed on it and its
privileged legal position in UK society?
![Page 46: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Rosemary Auchmuty challenges the desire to seek access to marriage:
‘… formal equality claims are not always progressive. … [W]hether you see marriage as an oppressive bastion of male power, as the second-wave feminists did, or simply as outmoded and irrelevant, as many contemporaries do, the goal should surely be to get rid of it, or at least to let it die out of its own accord – not to try and share in its privileges, leaving the ineligible out in the cold.’
(Auchmuty 2008: 497)
![Page 47: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
ARGUMENTS FOR (SAME-SEX) MARRIAGE
![Page 48: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
ARGUMENTS FOR (SAME-SEX) MARRIAGE
![Page 49: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
ARGUMENTS FOR (SAME-SEX) MARRIAGE
![Page 50: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
ARGUMENTS AGAINST (SAME-SEX) MARRIAGE
![Page 51: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
ARGUMENTS AGAINST (SAME-SEX) MARRIAGE
![Page 52: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Should UK society be encouraging other kinds of formalised relationships?
![Page 53: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Heterosexual Civil Partnership
![Page 54: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Burden v United Kingdom (2008)
![Page 55: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Ferguson and Others v United Kingdom (2011)
![Page 56: Marriage and Civil Partnerships](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022061404/5695cffd1a28ab9b02907317/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
‘For some people, civil partnerships are marriage without the history of sexism and without the traditional
trappings of what a wedding is supposed to be. It is a simple, more
informal, modern form of relationship recognition.’
(Peter Tarchell, ‘Equal Love’ campaign)