Market Briefing. Malaysia. 27th January
Transcript of Market Briefing. Malaysia. 27th January
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY INMALAYSIA’S NUCLEAR MARKET
by:Muhamad B. Lebai Juri, PhD
Director General, Malaysian Nuclear Agency43000 Kajang, Malaysia
UKTI Jan 2014
Overview of nuclear science and technology inMalaysia
Nuclear 3S Infrastructure
Strengthening Human Capital Development
Nuclear supply chains
Public acceptance
Conclusion
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE ANDTECHNOLOGY IN MALAYSIA
NATIONAL KEY ECONOMIC AREAS
Military(WEAPON)
Civilian(PEACEFUL USE)
Power(Electricity Generation)
Non-Power(Various Applications)
Industry Medical Agriculture Manufacturing Environment
Industry Medical Agriculture Manufacturing Environment
NUCLEAR
Nuclear ReactorTech.
Thorium Fuel Cycle Nuclear Waste
Management
Nuclear ReactorTech.
Thorium Fuel Cycle Nuclear Waste
Management
RESEARCH REACTOR
(1)
Irradiation facility researchmaterials and isotope
production using neutronsource
GAMMA IRRADIATOR
(4)
Irradiation plantindustrial and medical
products using gamma-rays
E-BEAM
(7)
Irradiation plant usingelectron beam
MAJOR NUCLEAR INFRASTRUCTURESIN MALAYSIA
SECONDARY STANDARD DOSIMETRYLABORATORY (SSDL)
(1)
Calibration of radiationmeasuring instruments and
dosimeters
LATEX VULCANIZATION IRRADIATOR
(1)
Research & Production of IrradiatedVulcanised Rubber Latex
MAJOR NUCLEAR INFRASTRUCTURESIN MALAYSIA
RADIOCHEMISTRY ANDENVIRONMENTLABORATORY
(1)Environmentalradioactivity
measurements
NON DESTRUCTIVE TESTLABORATORY
(1)
Diagnosing defects ofcomponets and system
reliability
RADIOACTIVE WASTEMANAGEMENT CENTER
(1)
Compliance to AtomicEnergy Licensing Act
1984
MAJOR NUCLEAR INFRASTRUCTURESIN MALAYSIA
GAMMA GREEN HOUSE
(1)
Mutation breeding research
RADIOISOTOPE LABORATORY/CYCLOTRON
(4)
Production of radioisotopes,radiopharmaceuticals (3) &
radiopharmaceuticals kits (1)
MAJOR NUCLEAR INFRASTRUCTURESIN MALAYSIA
RevenueNuklear Malaysia 1988-2013
0.330.83
1.71 1.77
2.95
3.96
2.733.48
5.01 5.035.72
7.19
8.30
9.179.78
15.21
9.92
12.7212.62
10.73
12.5011.98
15.18
13.78
12.43 12.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
RM(M
iliio
n)
Year
Licensees for medical and non-medical sectors Distribution of radiation workers in various sectors
Non-Medical Sector•Irradiation facilities
(Sterilization)•Gauges•Industrial radiography•Oil and Gas•Mineral processing•Research and Education•Sales
MEDICAL 55%
NDT 2%
INDUSTRIAL43%
APPLICATION OF RADIATION SOURCES
• X-ray machine ( 62%)• Radioactive source (38%)
DISTRIBUTION OF X-RAY MACHINE &RADIOACTIVE SOURCES
Contribution of NA toward the GDP (2012)
• GDP increment of 0.024% (RM 138.64 million) in 2006 to0.032% (RM 236.62 million) in 2008.
• Increment of GDP per capita from RM 5.31 in 2006 toRM 8.76 in 2008.
NUCLEAR SAFETY, SECURITY andSAFEGUARD INFRASTRUCTURE
• 1968 Radioactive Substances Act
• 1984 Atomic Energy Licensing Act
• 20_ _ New Atomic Energy Licensing Bill (under
purview of Ministry of Science, Technology and
Innovation, MOSTI)
NUCLEAR SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE
CONTROLSRadioactive Material
Nuclear MaterialIrradiating Apparatus
Prescribed Substance
Regulatory BodyAtomic Energy Licensing
Board &Department of AELB
Licensing Authority forMedical Purposes
Director General ofHealth
Atomic EnergyLicensing Act 1984
(Act 304)
MALAYSIAN LEGALINFRASTRUCTURE
ENFORCEMENT
Act304
Regulations
LicenseConditions
To provide for the regulation andcontrol of atomic energy;For matters connected therewith orrelated thereto
•Licensing Regulations•BSS Regulations•Transport Regulations•Appeal Regulations, etc.
Section 17, Act 304
LEGAL INFRASTRUCTURE
• Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN)Membership since 1967
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Membershipsince 1969
• Regional Cooperative Agreement (RCA), signed 1975• International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and
Fuel Cycles (INPRO) Membership since 2012• Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA) 20??
INTERNATIONAL MEMBERSHIP
• Non-Proliferation Treaty - 1968• Safeguards Agreement -1972• 1986 IAEA Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear
Accident - 1987• 1986 IAEA Convention on Assistance in the Case of a
Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency - 1987• South East Asia Nuclear Weapon Free Zone (SEANWFZ),
signed -1995 & Ratified - 1996• Comprehensive Nuclear Test – Ban Treaty (CTBT), signed
-1998 & ratified - 2008• Additional Protocol - 2005
INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS RELATED TO 3SSIGNED BY MALAYSIA
• As a signatory to NPT & a member state of the IAEA,
Malaysia reaffirms its commitment to non-proliferation as well
as to implementation of its obligations under the NPT
Safeguards Agreement.
• Malaysia support robust practices on Nuclear security
including export control system.
• Dec 2012, Malaysia/AELB was officially recognized by IAEA
as a Security Support Centre.
NUCLEAR SECURITY
Some Initiatives in theImplementation of 3S
• Global Threat Reduction Initiative, GTRI(US)
• RN42 (CTBTO)
22
GTRI, Nuclear Malaysia
Equipments installed:• High security lock• Motion sensor• CCTV dome• Electric lock• Security grating• Exit button• Glass break sensor• Siren and strobe• Radiation detector
Sinagama
Alarm Keypad
High Security LockSpecial Film WindowMotion SensorGlass Break Sensor
SUMMARYWire mesh
Gamma Green House
Source Security Grating
Underground fibre optic ground sensor
CCTV, Security Grating
27
4 set of gamma and neutrondetectors
28
Radionuclide MonitoringStation, RN 42 (CTBTO)
Tanah Rata, Cameron Highland
AIRSAMPLER
AIR
Masuk
Out
Filter
DECAYMBER
Compressed Filter
GAMMADETECTOR
Compressed Filter
IDC
VSATANTENNA
COMPUTER &ELECTRONICS
24 hrs
24 hrs
24 hrs
1
2
3
LOCAL COLLABORATION TO ENHANCE NUCLEARSAFETY AND TECHNOLOGY
MultilateralCooperation
R&DInstitutions
Universities Ministries
Private Sector(Industries)
GovernmentAgencies
RegionalCooperation
BilateralCooperation
NGO: MARS, MNSMARPA, NDT Soc
INT. COLLABORATION TO ENHANCE NUCLEARSAFETY AND TECHNOLOGY
NonProliferation
Treaty(since1968)
IAEA –ContractResearchProjects
(12)
Forum forNuclear
CooperationAgreement
(FNCA)(7)
InternationalProject -
InnovativeNuclear
Reactors & FuelCycles (INPRO)
(1)
Others(such as EU,ASEANTOM)
IAEA-Regional
CooperationAgreements
(9)
IAEA-Technical
Cooperation Projects
(6)
CTBT
NUCLEAR POWER DEVELOPMENT
Malaysia Energy Mix
Fuel Sources % (components of the mix)
Gas 50%
Coal 40%
Hydro 8%
Renewal Sources (e.g. Biomass, Solar etc) 2%
Nuclear none
29 Aug. 2008: 2009 Budget in Parliament to explore nuclear energy& formulate new National Energy Policy
10 Sept. 2008: Decision to draft National Nuclear Policy
26 June 2009: Nuclear energy adopted as one of fuel optionsfor electricity supply post-2020, especially for the Peninsula;
10 June 2010:New National Energy Policy incorporated in Tenth Malaysia Planwith nuclear energy as longer term option for the Peninsula.
16 July 2010:Cabinet Decision take cognisance National NuclearPolicy
25 Oct. 2010:Economic Transformation Program (ETP) launched with
nuclear power deployment included
10 Dec. 2010: Decision to establish NEPIO
7 Jan. 2011: Incorporation of MNPC as NEPIO
Project Development
Final Site Selection
Site Permit
Pre-Operational BaselineRadiological Data Gathering
Regulatory & Quality Assurance Training & Implementation & Technological Support Organisation (TSO) DevelopmentContinuous Stakeholder Involvement, Public Information Programme & Long-Term Supporting Human Capital & Industrial Development & Technology Acquisition
Programme & Legislative Development
YR1
Detailed SiteInvestigations,
EIA/RIA/SIAwith input fromNPP vendor on
plant design
Finish Pre-FS(PFS)
Start FeasibilityStudy (FS)& Bid Specificationsincluding basic& detailed design& site investigation
Finish FS
CompleteRegulations
ContractAward
Govt. PolicyDecision onNuclear Project& Plant Type
NPP VendorProcurement
of Components
Start Site Excavation
Desk-top SiteSurvey & Ranking
First Concrete Pouring
40-month Construction Period
Nuclear Fuel Loading
BidEvaluation
Infrastructure Assessment & Planning& Project Management, Bid Evaluation& Safety Assessment Training
Financial Planning & Closure
Sign/Accede/Ratify International Instruments& National Legislative Development
Finish DetailedPlan
Bid Specifications& Issue Requestfor Proposals (RFP)
Site GradingSet ReactorPressure Vessel
Initial Power Supply ColdHydrostatictest
PreliminarySafety AnalysisReport (PSAR)for Site Permit
Construction Permit
Final Safety Analysis Report(FSAR) for Operating Licence
Operator Training
OperatingLicence
Point ofNo Return
YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 YR7 YR8 YR9 YR10 YR11 YR12
Commissioning8-month
Source: Nuclear Malaysia; Malaysia NKEA OGE Laboratory 37
DETAILED TIMELINE ON NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT
Nuclear Power in Malaysia
• Government policy• Human Capital• Industry’s capability/capacity• Public Acceptance
An update on National Energy Policy
• Currently under development by Economic Planning Unit
(EPU), under the Prime Minister Department
• The report expected to be available early 2014
• National new energy policy timeframe is until 2050
– Nuclear is considered as one of the options for electricity
generation – but STILL NO CLEAR DECISION
STRENGHTENING HUMANCAPITAL DEVELOPEMENT
FRAMEWORK FOR NUCLEAR HRD PROGRAM FORMALAYSIA
Nuclear HRD Program(All must work in tandem)
Government
• Nuclear Policy and Promotion• Planning of Nuclear Power• Nuclear Regulation and Control
Regulatory Authority
• Licensing and Inspection• Evaluation and analysis of
Nuclear Safety
Industries
• Construction, design & A/E• Manufacturing of component
and Equipment
Society & Associations
• Malaysian Nuclear Society• MSNT, MARPA• MARS
Utilities/Operator
• Operation & Maintenance of NPP• In-house Training for NPP Personnel
• Education in Nuclear Eng• Education in Nuclear S&T• B.Sc, MSc PhD Degree• Vocational Education Level
Education Institutions
• Development, Acquisition,Dissemination of Nuclear PowerTechnology
• Nuclear Manpower Training
Nuclear R&D Institutes
41
42
Lower Secondary (3 years)
Primary (6 years)
World of Employment/ Entrepreneurship
Post-graduates
Degree
Polytechnic/CollegeCommunityDiploma
CertificateSixthForm –HigherSchoolCertificate
Matriculation
SecondaryAcademicSchools
TechnicalSchools
VocationalSchools
School Certificate (11 years of education)
Universities & HigherEducationInstitutions
Skills TrainingCenter
Skills Certificate
Technical &VocationalInstitutions
VocationalQualifications
Ages 7 to 12
Ages 13 to 15
UniversityColleges
POLYTECHNICS
Community Colleges
AgeSchooling
Years
26 21
25 20
24+ 19
24 18
23 17
22 16
21 15
20 14
19 13
18 12
17 11
16 10
MALAYSIA EDUCATIONAL PATHWAYS
42Source: MOHE
UniversitiTenagaNasional (UNITEN)
UniversitiTunHussienOnn Malaysia
UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia
INSANIAH UniversityCollege
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Universiti Utara Malaysia
AIMST University
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Universiti Terbuka Wawasan
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
INTI International University College
Nilai International University College
Univerisiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Universiti Malaysia Kelantan
Universiti Darul Iman Malaysia
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Universiti Malaysia PahangElective subject-Nuclear Technology
Master Programme-Nuclear Engineering
Bachelor Programme-Nuclear Engineering
UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia
Bachelor Programme: Nuclear ScienceElective subject: Nuclear Law
LIST OF UNIVERSITIES WITHNUCLEAR RELATED EDUCATION
HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
Higher Education Institutions In Malaysia (May 2011)
Types of Institution Total
Public Universities 20
Polytechnics 27
Community Colleges 70
Private Universities/University Colleges 52
Private Colleges 403
Total 572
Source: MOHE
44
Level ofstudy
2008 2009 2010 2015(projection)
PhD 12,240 14,600 17,700 21,500
M.Sc 36,000 45,000 49,500 60,400
B.Sc 270,000 272,000 275,000 334,000
Total 318,240 331,600 341,700 415,900
• To facilitate the development of nuclear relatededucation, research and training program in Malaysia
• Establish collaboration platform between MalaysianNuclear Agency and local educational institutes
• Sharing of resources and expertise
• Sharing of facilities from Malaysian Nuclear Agency andlocal educational institutes
Moving Forward: NUCLEAR CONSORTIUM INEDUCATION, RESEARCH AND TRAINING
▪ Transformation of existing education policy▪ Employment prospect (job scheme,
incentive, etc)▪ Amendment of foreign workers policy▪ Attracting and retaining foreign and local
talent• Inadequate nuclear education programs
(coordination, programs, etc).• Limited funding and quota for training
▪ Establish Multi-lateral and bi-lateralcooperation
▪ Attract expatriate personnel who havework in nuclear sector abroad
▪ Engage experienced consultants▪ Formulation of National Nuclear Policy
and National Energy Policy▪ Develop and improve HRD
infrastructure e.g. National NuclearTraining Centre
▪ Establish National HRD Roadmap
▪ Improving Human Resource Management(HRM) and support system
▪ Inadequate personnel▪ Conflict of interest (R&D vs. TSO)▪ Clarification of roles of TSO in NPP▪ Improving Employment system▪ Funding & Coordination (cross ministry)▪ Limited funding, quota and time for
trainings
▪ Fast-tracking nuclear related educationfor TSO personnel
▪ Deployment plan for TSO personnel▪ Aptitude and attitude test▪ Continuous capacity building program▪ Examples: Nuclear Malaysia,
Universities, Industries
Challenges Possible / Current Approaches
Nationallevel
KEY HR CHALLENGES IN NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT
46
TechnicalSupportOrganisation
▪ Willingness of vendors to offer HRDpackage solely
▪ Personnel’s keenness to convertinto NP personnel
▪ Transformation of remunerationpackage
▪ Inadequate competent andexperienced personnel
▪ Collaboration with vendors in HRD▪ Convert conventional power plant
engineers to be competent in NP O&M,commissioning, etc.
▪ Recruitment of experienced oil and gaspersonnel under deployment planbetween companies
▪ Offer higher incentives and remuneration▪ Licensed and certified NPP personnel by
2021▪ Aptitude and attitude test
Challenges Possible / Current Approaches
KEY HR CHALLENGES IN NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT
47
OperatingOrganisation
RegulatoryBody
▪ Amendment of existing nuclear act▪ Inadequate number and experienced
personnel▪ Remuneration scheme▪ Nuclear law education▪ Limited quota for training
• Continuous capacity building in nuclearlegislation
• Engagement of external assessors andtransfer of expertise to local regulators
▪ Aptitude and attitude test• Examples: AELB, Energy Commission
EducationInstitute
▪ No nuclear power related educationprogram in higher learning institutions
▪ Lack of competent and experiencedlecturers in nuclear education
▪ Future prospect for nuclear educatedstudents are still not clear
▪ Lack of promotion for nuclear education▪ Inadequate nuclear research and
experimental facilities▪ Need to produce nuclear craftsmen and
technician
Industry
ChallengesPossible / Current Approaches
• Uncertain roles and participation ofindustry in NPP
▪ Inadequate integration between nationaland education institutes
▪ Coordination between industries▪ Deployment of competent industry’s
workforce into nuclear power program▪ Nuclear safety culture
▪ Non-power nuclear application industry isquite establish
▪ Attract industry key players to participatein NPP
▪ Capacity building▪ Possible deployment of key personnel in
industry to participate in NPP
KEY HR CHALLENGES IN NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT
48
▪ Introduce nuclear engineering courses aselective in engineering courses atundergraduate level (for familiarization toengineering students)
▪ Introduce nuclear engineering courses atMaster level (to produce nuclear engineer)
▪ Establish consortium of universities▪ Establish network with international renowned
universities and research institutions▪ Joint education programs with other
organizations (JICA, JAEA, KAIST, KINS, etc)▪ Fellowship, training course and internship▪ Formal courses of overseas study
NUCLEAR SUPPLY CHAIN –POTENTIAL AREAS
1)The choice of reactor design & typeeg Pressurized Water Reactor - PWR, VVER,
AP1000 , EPR etcBoiling Water Reactor – BWR, ABWR etc
2) Consortium structures establishedReactor Vendors ( Westinghouse, AREVA, KEPCO,Toshiba etc ) & their chosen/selected nuclear suppliers ( local and/orinternational companies ) to support the construction of the nuclear powerreactor and plant.
NUCLEAR SUPPLY CHAIN IN CONSIDERATION
3 a) Availability and/or lead times of critical components andserviceseg Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) , Steam Generators,
pipework and valves, and main Engineering, Procurement andConstruction (EPC) contractor , plant management capacities, etc
- which could lead to delays in a national nuclear new build,and/or to cost escalation.
b) It would be strategic and imperative to review and identify/determinewhat would the countries and companies need to develop orproduce components , which currently (or in future) cannot beobtained from overseas suppliers without long delays, whichcould ultimately threaten both the:• security and• affordability of energy supplies
NUCLEAR SUPPLY CHAIN IN CONSIDERATION
4. Many capable companies exist in Malaysian industry but they lack nuclearexperience, where specifications are often different from usual industrystandards
Thus local companies must be introduced to and updatedregarding Codes ,Standards and Accreditation by InternationalOrganizations including the ASME, USA etc
a) In striving to enter the nuclear industry sectorb) to ensure public safetyc) facilitation of international business acceptance andd) enhance export opportunities
5. WNA – Economy of scale in supply chain and transfer technology, aminimum number of new builds should not be less than 10 power plants.
NUCLEAR SUPPLY CHAIN IN CONSIDERATION
NPP Operator SPVNPP Operator SPV
Malaysian Industries
Malaysian Educational& Training Institutions
NationalRegulators
(AELB, ST, DOSH,DOE, MHLG)
ROLE OF NUCLEAR MALAYSIA AS A NUCLEAR POWERR&D and TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANISATION (TSO)
NPP Owner SPVNPP Owner SPV
TSO(Nuclear Malaysia)
NEPIO(MNPC)NEPIO(MNPC)
Planning &implementation
coordination
Technicalsupport
Regulate
NPP VendorSingle Turnkey
Contractor
supply
Vendor CountryTSO
Vendor CountryRegulators
Vendor CountryIndustries
Vendor CountryEducational
&Training Institutions
53
ROLE OF NUCLEAR MALAYSIA AS A NUCLEAR POWER R & D and TECHNICAL SUPPORTORGANISATION (TSO)
PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE SCENARIO INMALAYSIA
• The decision by government to explore nuclear option forelectricity generation attract mixed reaction from thepublic – pro and against;
• It is becoming increasingly challenging in Malaysia toimplement technologies because of the widespread publicopposition, influential non-government organizations(NGOs) and also strong sentiment from minority groups;
• Public records and news sources covering the reactions ofthese groups towards various beneficial projects requiresmore sophisticated PI/PA strategies to be employed
Asian Rare Earth (ARE) Processing Plant
300 MW EasternSabah Coal
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2013/06/08/oil-and-gas-rich-sabah-looking-at-coal-again/
Plant BrogaIncinerator Project
Fukushima Accidents
Lynas Advanced Material Plant (LAMP)
Lynas Advanced Material Plant (LAMP)
“For Malaysia andthe world’s most
advancedtechnology
companies, theplant is a gamble
that the processingcan be done safely
enough to makethe local
environmentalrisks worth the
promised globalrewards.”- The
New York Times
GENERAL CIVIL SOCIETY & PUBLIC STAKEHOLDERS
civic society, mass media, non-governmental organisations (NGO’s),religious, women & other civic organisations, teacher training colleges,
university & school students, general public.
STATE & LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS AROUND NUCLEAR PLANT SITES
local government, community leaders, village heads,local associations, such as farmers & fishermen associations, schools, etc.
Biggest Challenge of Public Acceptanceat National & Local Levels in Malaysia
PUBLIC INFORMATION & ACCEPTANCE TARGETS: 70% public acceptance by end 2012
Why nuclear?Why not solar?Is it safe?What about the waste?Isn’t it too expensive?Where to get the fuel?Nuclear accidents?Public radiation exposure?Environmental impacts? Yes,but not in my backyard!
Why build in this district?Is it safe for the people?
Why build in this State?Won’t we lose the next election?Is it safe? What benefit to the State?
Why build here?Is it safe for us?Accident effect?Won’t our food, fish,vegetable supplybe contaminated?Our children?Our river, our beach?
STATE GOVERNMENTS
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES
NATIONAL PUBLIC OPINION
NIMBY, BANANA!*LOCAL POPULATION
*NIMBY*BANANA
= Not in My Backyard= Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything
Public Opinion Survey
The use of nuclear energy as one of theways to provide electricity in Malaysia.
0 10 20 30 40 50
Strongly Favor
Somewhat Favor
Strongly Oppose
Somewhat Oppose
Don't Know
No answer/respond
Opinion on the role of nuclearenergyin Malaysia
5232.7
11.2
4.1
very important
Somewhat important
not too important
not an important at all
79.6 % favor of the use of nuclear energy toprovide electricity (42.9 % strongly favor and
36.7% somewhat favor).
52.0 % think that the role of nuclear energy inMalaysia is very important.
Pre-Fukushima
Post-FukushimaSurvey in 2012 (MSc Student)• 47.1% Support NPP• 29% Disagree• 16.5% Malaysia Not ready• 7.4% Neutral
PublicParticipation;Define overallapproach and
strategy/policies.
Obtain localsupport at
recommendedsite(s).
Educate broaderMalaysian
population onnuclear powerdeployment in
Malaysia’s energymix.
DevelopMalaysian public
participationinfrastructure.
~ 10 – 15 years
63
Strategy: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT GOALSOVER 10 – 15 YEARS
1. The current nuclear industry in Malaysia is concentrated innon-power applications
2. The nuclear industry has progressed in Malaysia andpositively contributed to socio-economic development of thecountry
3. Realization of nuclear power program in the future will offersignificant prospect for Malaysian industry as well as access toadvanced technology and business opportunities
4. Continuous improvement in terms of infrastructure, resourcesand capability is continent to uplift local nuclear industry
THANK YOU