Maritim Project

download Maritim Project

of 34

Transcript of Maritim Project

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    1/34

    IMPACT OF OUTSOURCING ON ORGANIZATIONAL

    PERFORMANCE

    A CASE STUDY OF MATER HOSPITAL, NAIROBI.

    BY

    KIPTOO MARITIM BERNARD

    REG. NO: BBM/2609/11

    RESEARCH PROPOSAL SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL

    FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF

    THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

    OF THE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND

    ECONOMICS

    MOI UNIVERSITY

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    2/34

    DECEMBER, 2011

    DECLARATION

    I declare that this is my original work and to the best of my knowledge, has not been submitted to

    any other institution or University for the purpose of examination.

    Signature .. Date_

    KIPTOO MARITIM BERNARD (BBM/2609/11)

    The project proposal has been submitted for examination with approval as University supervisor.

    Signature .. Date_

    WELDON NGENO

    LECTURER

    MOI UNIVERSITY

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    3/34

    DEDICATION

    This work is dedicated to all organizations which perceive outsourcing as one of their strategies

    that will lead to improvement in the organizational performance. I hope this research will inspire

    the Government, planners, Outsourcers and implementers of outsourcing to facilitate the dream of

    Kenya becoming an outsourcing hub by the year 2030

    ABSTRACT

    The aim of this paper is to assess the effects of outsourcing on performance of organizations.

    Outsourcing is a strategic use of outside resources to perform activities that are usually handled by

    internal staff and resources. By using a well managed outsourcing agreement, can gain in

    markets that would otherwise have been uneconomical. This study was designed to explore the

    impact outsourcing has on organizational performance. The results show that organizations

    benefits from outsourcing strategies if they identify their outsourcers wisely.

    The target population for the study was 60 employees. The questions tried to find out the extent to which

    outsourcing led to financial performance improvement, the impact did outsourcing revenue cycle

    functions have on the hospital employees, extent has outsourcing improved patient service and

    satisfaction and extent has outsourcing benefited the wider community.

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    4/34

    The instruments for data collection were questionnaires and interview schedule. The questionnaire was

    administered to the employees. This was a useful tool that enabled the researcher to receive responses on

    same questions from many respondents. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize data into

    frequencies and percentages. The data findings revealed that outsourcing has an impact on the

    performance of organizations.

    Table of Contents

    1.1 Back ground to the problem...........................................................................................................1

    1.2 Mater hospital.................................................................................................................................2

    1.3 Statement of the problem................................................................................................................3

    1.4 Research Questions.........................................................................................................................4

    1.5 Significance of the Study................................................................................................................5

    1.6 Scope...............................................................................................................................................6

    2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................2

    2.2 Determinants of outsourcing..........................................................................................................3

    2.3 Types of outsourcing......................................................................................................................4

    2.3.1 Total Outsourcing........................................................................................................................5

    2.3.2 Multiple suppliers outsourcing....................................................................................................6

    2.3.3 Joint venture/strategic alliance outsourcing................................................................................2

    2.3.4 In sourcing...................................................................................................................................3

    2.3 Theories of outsourcing..................................................................................................................4

    2.3.1 Transaction cost theory................................................................................................................5

    2.3.2 The Agency Theory.....................................................................................................................6

    2.3.3 Resource-based theory.................................................................................................................1

    2.3.4 Resource-dependent theory.........................................................................................................2

    2.3.5 Game theory.................................................................................................................................3

    3.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................4

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    5/34

    3.1 Research Design.............................................................................................................................5

    3.2 Target Population............................................................................................................................6

    3.3 Description of the Sample and Sampling Procedures....................................................................1

    3.4 Description of Data Collection Procedures....................................................................................2

    3.4.1 Questionnaire..............................................................................................................................3

    3.5 Description of Data Analysis Procedures......................................................................................4

    4.1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................5

    4.2 Presentation of finding....................................................................................................................6

    4.2.1 Respondents Background Information......................................................................................1

    4.2.2. Opinion of employees on the decision to outsource..................................................................2

    4.2.3 The extent to which outsourcing has lead to improved financial performance..........................3

    4.2.4 The impact outsourcing revenue cycle functions had on the hospital employees......................4

    4.2.5 Employees comment on the reaction of the staff union on the outsourcing decision................5

    4.2.6 The extent to which outsourcing has improved patient service and satisfaction.......................6

    4.2.7 Comments on the overall perception of the patients towards the service delivery

    of the hospital...............................................................................................................................1

    4.3 The extent to which outsourcing has benefited the wider community..........................................4

    4.3.1 How does the community in general perceive the Hospitals decision to outsource?.................5

    5.0 Summary, conclusions and recommendation.................................................................................6

    5.1 Summary.........................................................................................................................................6

    5.2 Conclusions.....................................................................................................................................6

    5.3 Recommendations...........................................................................................................................6

    5.4 Suggestions for Further Studies......................................................................................................6

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    6/34

    Table of Figures and tables

    Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of value from outsourcing.....................................................6

    Table 1: Distribution of the target population......................................................................................6

    Table 2: The sampling matrix ..............................................................................................................6

    Table 3: Employees Gender ................................................................................................................6

    Table 4: Service in years.......................................................................................................................6Table 5: Management level..................................................................................................................6

    Table 6: Department of the respondent ...............................................................................................6

    Table 7: presents a summary of what employees felt were the reason towards outsourcing ...... ...6

    Table 8: Effects of outsourcing on performance.................................................................................6

    Table 9: Impact of Outsourcing to employees.....................................................................................6

    Table 10: Impact of Outsourcing to patients........................................................................................6

    References ...........................................................................................................................................6

    Appendices ...........................................................................................................................................6

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    7/34

    CHAPTER ONE

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 Back ground to the problem

    In todays world of ever increasing competition, organizations are forced to look for new ways to

    generate value. The world has embraced the phenomenon of outsourcing and companies have

    adopted its principles to help them expand into other markets (Bender, 1999). Strategic

    management of outsourcing is perhaps the most powerful tool in management, and outsourcing of

    innovation is its frontier (Quinn, 2000)

    Outsourcing is getting into an agreement with other Companies or persons to do a specific job or

    function (Ella Venus, 2009). It is an arrangement in which one company provides services for

    another company that could also be or usually have been provided in-house. Outsourcing is a trend

    that is becoming more common in information technology and other industries for services that

    have usually been regarded as intrinsic to managing a business.

    Outsourcing decisions involve decision making on the boundary of a firm (Barney, 1999).

    According to the Transaction Cost Theory, the boundary of a firm is decided by the cost

    effectiveness of the activity (Coase, 1937; Williamson, 1981).

    Africas outsourcing industry is very young but continues to grow slowly and gradually begins to

    attract global attention and consideration in key research papers, publications and business

    meetings. In Kenya, Business Process Outsourcing is one of the six pillars of economic growth in

    the 2030 vision. In 2007, the ICT Board was established with the mandate of making Kenya the

    preferred destination for outsourcing in Africa, and a top-10 global ICT hub.

    1.2 Mater hospital

    The Mater Hospital Nairobi first opened its doors in 1962 as a 60 bed unit. Gradually over the

    years the Hospital grew significant additions being a maternity extension in 1970, the

    paramedical building in 1987, a consultants clinic and family life centre in 1988, additional

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    8/34

    operating theatres, Accident and Emergency and ICU block in1994, a separate chapel in 1997, and

    a School of Nursing in 2004.

    Today the Hospital has 137 beds, a 9 bedded ICU/HDU, a Renal Dialysis Unit, four operating

    theatres, a Cardiac Unit, a 24-hour A & E service, a School of Nursing and numerous outpatient

    services including a very busy Comprehensive Care Clinic (CCC) for HIV/ AIDS clients.

    1.3 Statement of the problem

    The recent reports in the media of Moi referral hospitals (second largest referral hospital in

    Kenya) ICU and theatre have been closed due to cash crisis (Daily nation of October 18 th 2011)

    and KNH operations at the largest referral in east and central Africa (standard News paper of 30th

    October 2011) were paralyzed by strike of its 4,000 staff demanding commuter allowance. Perhaps

    the solutions to this problems experienced by the two largest referrals hospital in Kenya is

    outsourcing. This has prompted me access the impact outsourcing decisions has on the

    performance of the hospital.

    The practice of charging external service providers with the task of performing in-house activities,

    has attracted growing interest in recent years as managers consider whether it is in their best

    interest to perform activities in-house or externally (Maltz and Ellram 2000)

    Research on outsourcing has concentrated on particular support services, notably facilities

    management, logistics and IT provision. Some conclude that true costs and benefits are difficult to

    assess. Some evaluations of outsourcing, favorable (Sharpe, 1997) and unfavorable (Stein, 1997),

    are founded on ideology and management fashion (Hendry, 1995; Alexander and Young,

    1996).

    1.4 Objectives of the study1.4.1 General objectives

    Successful implementation of an outsourcing strategy has been credited with helping to cut costs

    (Bowersox 1990; Greer, Youngblood and Gray 1999), increase capacity, improve capacity,

    improve quality (Lau and Hurley 1997, Kotabe, Murray and Javulagi 1998), increase profitability

    and productivity (Casale 1996; Sinderman 1995), improve financial performance (Crane, 1999),

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    9/34

    lower innovation costs and risks (Quinn, 2000) and improve organizational competitiveness (Lever

    1997; Steensma and Corley 2000; Sharpe 1997).

    1.4.2Specific objectives

    Specifically the study sought to;

    2 To establish the extent to which outsourcing affects costs in mater hospital

    3 To determine the relationship between quality and outsourcing in mater hospital.

    1.5 Research Questions

    The following research questions guided this study:-

    1 To what extent has outsourcing led to financial performance improvement on the Hospital?

    2 To what extent has outsourcing improved patient service and satisfaction?

    3 To what extent has outsourcing benefited the wider community?

    1.6Significance/ Important of the study of the Study

    The study would have different implications to different stakeholders. The main stakeholders to

    benefit from the study include: Hospital Management, Patients, government and Academicians

    The study would enable the Hospital Management by providing an insight on the effects of

    Business process outsourcing and its significance to the hospital; it will also be useful to the

    patients in that the outcome will provide the way forward on the provision of medical facilities

    which could not be currently available in the hospital.

    The government will be able to spearhead the government in policymaking regarding regulatory

    requirements of the Kenyan outsourcing firms and the study will form a basis upon which further

    studies on business process of outsourcing strategies and its effects in an organization can be

    carried out.

    1.7 Scope

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    10/34

    The scope of this study was limited to the assessment of the effects of outsourcing to the Mater

    hospital. The study covered the organization entirely for effective results.

    1.8 Limitation of the study

    The numerous security guards in the hospital made collection of the data to be amajor hindrance. Access to the hospital was very difficult and even after accessing ,

    most managers tried to shift the responsibility of completing questionnaires to other

    employees.

    To overcome the problem I established link with some employees of the hospital

    which I used to contact management.

    CHAPTER TWO

    2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

    2.1 Introduction

    Outsourcing has increasingly become a vital tool for the implementation of business strategy in

    many organizations. Competition continues to increase and organizations are being continuously

    forced to find ways to improve business performance and to obtain competitive advantage.

    Increasingly, organizations are looking beyond the traditional boundaries of the firm to obtain

    performance improvement. The growing prevalence of outsourcing service providers is shaping the

    development of competitive strategies as well. The Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)

    phenomenon has grown as organizations have been transferring responsibility for entire functions

    such as human resource management, finance and information services to service providers

    sometimes referred to as unbundling (Hagel and Singer, 1999).

    Most firms often operate with limited resources and capabilities. The firms must learn to make the

    most with the limited resources and capabilities (Hamel and Prahalad, 1989). Outsourcing provides

    a way for the managers to grow their firms by obtaining the needed resources from external

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    11/34

    suppliers and/or partners (Quinn, 2000; McIvor, 2005). Instead of doing everything internally,

    firms may opt to source the needed goods and/or services from outside.

    The aims are usually concerned with better cost control, which assumes that in-house costs are

    known precisely beforehand, although that is not always the case. In some cases the outsourcing is

    concerned more with gaining access to technical expertise which may not be available in the

    outsourcing organization. There may be an emphasis on time saving for some organizations (cost

    control in terms of staff time costs). Increasingly, perhaps, many outsourcing relationships are

    becoming partnerships as outsourcing becomes an accepted way of conducting business, and

    relationships between those involved develop over time (Grover, Teng, & Cheon, 1998).

    2.2 Determinants of outsourcing

    Outsourcing and its productivity effects may be obtained by looking directly at the determinants of

    outsourcing.

    i. Wages

    (Girma and Grg, 2004), who estimated the productivity effect of outsourcing in the chemical,

    engineering, and electronic manufacturing industries in the United Kingdom, estimated the

    determinants of outsourcing. Focusing on plant characteristics, they found that high wages were

    positively related to outsourcing. As they argue, this could suggest that cost-savings are important

    in the firms decision to outsource. It could also indicate, however, a specialization process by skill

    intensive plants in which they are outsourcing their relatively low-skill intensive processes.

    ii. Asset Specificity

    In transaction cost theory, assets are durable resources that include sites, physical assets, and

    human assets (Williamson, 1985). Asset specificity refers to the degree to which such resources are

    specialized to an exchange. In this way, asset specificity can be viewed as an exchange attribute as

    well as a resource property, one that explains the resources potential for affecting transaction

    costs.

    Transaction cost theory asserts that asset specificity is important in conjunction with bounded

    rationality, opportunism, and uncertainty. When asset specificity increases, under these conditions

    the redeploy ability of the assets decreases, and the contracting hazards (notably, the hazard of

    opportunism) as well as the bilateral dependency (notably, the risk of hold-up) between the parties

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    12/34

    involved in an exchange, increase (Williamson, 1985). Consequently, the likelihood of hierarchical

    forms of transaction governance increases (Williamson, 1991).

    Asset specificity can not only cause hold-ups, with their associated monitoring and contract

    enforcement costs, but it also affects the transaction costs engendered by other exchange attributes,

    such as uncertainty and frequency (Williamson 1975, 1985; David and Han 2004).

    Indeed, Williamson asserts (Williamson, 1999) that much of the explanatory power of the

    transaction cost perspective turns on transaction-specific assets. A precise understanding of the

    concept of asset specificity is important in order to assess its role in a firms decision on how to

    govern an activity (Carter and Hodgson, 2006).

    iii. Firms specificity

    Although firm specificity is often meant to denote resource among firms, so far researchers have

    not agreed on a formal definition of the term. Different researchers emphasize different aspects,

    such as the specificity of resources with respect to fields of application (Collis and Montgomery,

    1997), specificity with respect to a firms needs (Chi, 1994)

    A firms resources could still be firm-specific, even if the firm was not endowed with them, in the

    sense that their potential to generate value would be greater for that firm than for another. Firm

    specificity of activity-enabling resources is also often associated with the difficulties involved in

    imitating and substituting this resource bundle (Rumelt, 1984), as well as with the value-enhancing

    linkages (complementarities) among these resources and the firms overall resource position

    (Conner, 1991).

    Firm-specificity is one of the resource properties that define strategic assets (Amit and

    Schoemaker, 1993).The greater a resources specificity to a firm, the greater its rent potential to

    that firm, given favorable conditions of demand, public policy and competitor action. Firm-specific

    resources are often associated with increased efficiency (Jacobides, 2004)

    2.3 Types of outsourcing

    Outsourcing is an important decision that has implications far beyond the improved financial

    results most organizations hope to gain. Only hospitals that understand the real financial and

    human costs and benefits can determine when it adds value. This can help a Hospital in determine

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    13/34

    the levels of outsourcing it can accommodate in its services. There are basically four types of

    outsourcing (Currie & Willcocks, 1998)

    2.3.1 Total Outsourcing

    Total outsourcing involves developing a partnership with a single supplier, with IT perceived as a

    service or support function. The aim is usually to reduce IT costs, or eliminate a problem IT

    function, but the outsourcing organization retains strategic control.

    2.3.2 Multiple suppliers outsourcing

    Multiple suppliers out sourcing is less concerned with partnerships as the aim is to foster

    innovation and create competition between suppliers, although it is recognized that suppliers will

    form alliances among themselves for bidding purposes.

    2.3.3Joint venture/strategic alliance outsourcing

    Joint venture/strategic alliance outsourcing is more concerned with development of new

    knowledge for the client, and there is more emphasis on shared risks and rewards. Sometimes

    various organizations will foster the creation of a supplier company to which they will outsource

    work, but still have more control than they would do in a multiple supplier or total outsourcing

    arrangement.

    2.3.4 In sourcing

    In sourcing, or keeping the IT department and services in-house, occurs when organizations view

    IT as core to their business, or when they mistrust possible suppliers. A more recent type of

    outsourcing is the ASP (application service provider) model, where organizations purchase

    software use on an as and when basis (Kern, Kreijger, & Willcocks, 2002).

    2.3.5 Theories of outsourcing

    The increasing use of outsourcing arrangements, as well as the unfamiliar complexity of

    outsourcing suggests the need to know more of how to effectively utilize this strategy.

    Consequently, more information is needed to understand successful outsourcing and the problems

    encountered in outsourcing activities and its impact on the overall organizational performance.

    The capabilities of a firm must include control over or access to complementary assets and

    activities that would enable them to innovate, and to profit from the innovations (Nelson, 1991).

    The ability to control and make the most of critical capabilities whether or not they reside within

    the firm is more important than the ownership of the capabilities (Gottfredson, Puryear and

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    14/34

    Phillips, 2005). Outsourcing provides strategic options for the firms to address the challenges of

    operating and growing given the limitations of their resources and capabilities (Gottfredson 2005).

    2.3.5.1 The Agency Theory

    Agency cost theory expands on one aspect of TCT, as it deals with the different perspectives of

    risk that client and supplier have, and differentiates between outcome-based contracts, and

    behavior-based contracts. If the client distrusts the supplier then the extent of monitoring required

    will be greater for the client, than it would be if the client could wholly trust the supplier to deliver.

    The client has two main choices: a contract which stipulates payment by results (an outcome-based

    contract), or a contract that states the supplier should do certain things at stipulated times, or spend

    a certain amount of time on certain functions. If one cannot trust a supplier to deliver a product

    some months down the line, then it might pay to ensure that it looks as if they are doing something.

    On the supplier side, a behavior-based contract at least allows them to claim that they did spend x

    hours on this task, even if the outcome could not be achieved as originally intended.

    Agency cost theory helps to distinguish the most productive and fairest method of minimizing risks

    for both client and supplier. Agency theory addresses relationships in which one party (the

    principal) delegates work to another (the agent) who performs the work according to a mutually

    agreed contract. Both parties are self-interested with incongruent goals. This leads to two

    problems: 1) ex-ante, before signing the contract: the problem of adverse selection and 2) ex-post,

    after signing the contract: the problem of moral hazard.

    Adverse selection arises pre-contractually because the agent possesses private or hidden

    information about the real quality of his service and the principal is unable to find out that

    information. This leads to information asymmetry and puts the principal in a disadvantaged

    position since the principal is faced with a pool of bidders with often insufficient qualifications.

    The principal cannot easily distinguish the bad cars or lemons from the good ones (Akerlof,

    1970).

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    15/34

    2.4 Conceptual frame work

    Although outsourcing may prove beneficial in specific situations, hospitals need to consider the

    true costs of outsourcing, which include the opportunity cost of outside contractors continually

    tapping into the hospitals revenue stream rather than having the additional revenue flow back to

    the hospital.

    Before outsourcing revenue cycle functions, hospitals need to determine why they have not yet

    accomplished their performance improvement objectives.

    Does the organization lack access to qualified personnel?

    Are internal processes, tools, and technology insufficient to handle revenue cycle activities

    efficiently and effectively?

    Is there insufficient capital to invest in needed resources?

    What attempts have been made to address these issues?

    What were the outcomes of these efforts?

    Once the answers to these questions are clear, the unique capabilities, skills, and resources an

    outsourcer must be able to provide to overcome existing barriers to success can be identified.

    Hospitals should work closely with potential outside contractors to document and verify their skills

    and capabilities and ensure they can demonstrate a consistent, long-term track record of success.

    Hospitals may hope to achieve several objectives through outsourcing; financial performance

    improvement is usually the chief among them. Increased employee performance, greater job

    satisfaction, and improved workforce morale resulting from better training, more efficient work

    processes, or enhanced technology that an outsourcer may provide are other common objectives.

    Some hospitals hope that outsourcing revenue cycle activities will improve patient service or

    satisfaction by reducing waiting times to receive care or expediting claims processing and

    payment. Still others anticipate benefits to the broader community by boosting the margin

    available to help fulfill the hospitals mission. Accomplishing all of these objectives, rather than

    just one or two, should be the goal of any revenue cycle improvement effort.

    To truly understand the real financial benefits and costs of outsourcing, hospitals need to carefully

    evaluate the ways they expect outsourcing to drive financial performance improvement. Because

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    16/34

    the revenue cycle affects so many stakeholders (patients, employees, and the community), it is

    important not only to consider the objectives but also to evaluate the impact that outsourcing will

    have on all of these constituencies.

    Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of value from outsourcing

    CHAPTER THREE

    Outsourci

    ng

    Specialty Performance

    Service Quality

    Cost saving

    Improved satisfaction

    Savings on capital investments

    Adaptability to the environment

    Saving on Human resource

    Benefits to the wider community

    Service Quality

    Cost saving

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    17/34

    3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

    3.1 Introduction

    This chapter has research approach, designs, sample and sampling procedures, research

    instruments, administration of research instruments/data collection and analysis procedures.

    3.1 Research Design

    In assessing the effects of outsourcing to the organizational performance of the Mater Hospital, the

    researcher used descriptive research. This approach is appropriate to this study because the study

    involves fact finding and enquiries of different kind to describe the state of the affairs (effects of

    outsourcing) as they exist at the time of this study.

    3.2 Target Population

    In assessing the effects of outsourcing to the organizational performance of the Mater Hospital, the

    researcher targeted a population size of 602 people who included senior Management, paramedic

    staff, contracted staff, low come staff and senior management staff. The population of 602

    consisted of the total number of employees from the fivedepartments of The Mater Hospital and

    will be being distributed as follows:

    Table 1: Distribution of the target population

    DEPARTMENT POPULATION SIZE

    Subordinate 253

    Paramedic 211

    Contracted 72

    Low come 48

    Senior Management 18

    Total 602

    3.3 Description of the Sample and Sampling Procedures

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    18/34

    The selection of the actual sample size was done using Stratified Sampling. Simple Random

    Sampling was then used to get the figures. Stratified random sampling which is one method of

    Probability Sampling (Kombo and Tromp, 2006) was used to divide the staff population into

    homogeneous subgroups and then took simple random sample in each subgroup.

    Simple random sampling was then used taking 10% to ensure that the sample was representative in

    proportion to their number in population. This is because for descriptive studies 10% of the

    population is adequate for sampling (Gay, 1996). Simple random sampling ensured that each

    individual employee had an equal chance of being selected and therefore avoided biases.

    Below is tabulation of how the sample was derived.

    Table 2: The sampling matrix

    DEPARTMENT POPULATION SIZE SAMPLE SIZE

    Subordinate 253 25

    Paramedic 211 21

    Contracted 72 7

    Low come 48 5

    Senior Management 18 2

    Total 602 60

    Using the organizational chart and list of staff members, the population was first stratified

    according to departments and then determined the size of each department. Using proportionate

    method, the researcher established the size of the subject of each department and by use of

    purposive sampling method, picked subjects for each department. This sampling process enabled

    the researcher to deal with the subject critical to the study.

    3.4 Description of Data Collection Procedures

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    19/34

    The study used primary data and secondary data. Primary data refers to the information a

    researcher obtains from the field from the subjects in the sample while the secondary data refers to

    information a researcher obtains from books, reports and other publications which had been

    collected for other purposes (Kothari, 2003). These sources assisted the researcher in comparing

    the two types of data for reliability.

    According to (Mugenda and Mugenda ,2003) qualitative methods provide in depth explanations

    while quantitative methods provide the hard data needed to meet required objectives.

    3.4.1 Questionnaire

    A questionnaire with structured and unstructured questions was used to collect data. According to

    (Kothari ,2003), structured questions (closed ended) refer to questions which are accompanied by a

    list of possible alternative answers from which respondents select the answer that best describes

    their situation. Closed ended questions are easier to analyze and administer because of specific

    alternative answers, however they are difficult to construct and responses are limited. Questions

    were therefore standardized to ensure all respondents reply to same questions in a defined manner.

    Open ended questions refer to questions which give respondents complete freedom of response.

    They permit greater response though can encourage irrelevant response (Kothari, 2003). They were

    used in some specific areas that require explanations. The questionnaires were delivered by hand to

    each subject by the researcher who then instructed the subject on how to complete the

    questionnaire and also make clarifications on issues that required to be clarified.

    3.5Description of Data Analysis Procedures

    (Kerlinger, 1973) describes data analysis as categorizing, ordering, manipulating and summarizing

    data to obtain answers to research questions. He stresses that the purpose of analysis is to reduce

    data to intelligible and interpretable form in order to study and test the relations of research

    problems. The data obtained will be analyzed using data management software, Statistical Package

    for Social Sciences (SPSS) for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data.

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    20/34

    All questionnaires were adequately checked and verified for reliability. The information was

    codified, entered into a spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS by the researcher. Exploratory

    analysis was first performed to ensure that the output were free from errors. The data was then

    analyzed using qualitative and quantitative techniques. This involves creating descriptive statistics

    namely percentages, and measures of central tendency. The data was then presented using tables

    and cross tabulations. Scalar types of questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics to

    establish the level of perception to various attributes provided.

    CHAPTER FOUR

    4.0 PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF THE FINDINGS

    4.1. Introduction

    This chapter presents the research findings from employees of The Mater Hospital. The study

    sought to find out the effects of outsourcing to organizational performance. Questionnaires were

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    21/34

    administered to 60 employees in different departments. Only 53 employees returned the

    questionnaires.

    The findings are hereby presented in descriptive statistics. These findings are presented in five

    sections. The first section gives background information of the respondents and the rest four are in

    line with the four research questions. The main sections shall be as follows:

    1) Respondents Background Information

    2) The extent to which outsourcing has lead to improved financial performance

    3) The extent to which outsourcing has improved patient service and satisfaction

    4) The extent to which outsourcing has benefited the wider community

    4.2 Presentation of finding

    4.2.1 Respondents Background Information

    Table 3: Employees Gender

    Gender Frequency %

    Male 29 54.7

    Female 24 45.3

    53 100

    Out of the 60 questioners which were administered, a total of 53 employees participated in the

    study among which 24 were female and 29 male. This was 88.3% of the sample size that had been

    selected.

    Table 4: Service in years

    Service in Year Frequency %

    0 - 5 22 41.5

    6 - 10 17 32.1

    11 -15 9 17

    Over 15 5 9.4

    Total 53 100

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    22/34

    Of the total employees who participated 41.5% has served the Hospital for less than five years,

    32.1% for six to ten years, 11% for eleven to fifteen years and 9.45 has served the Hospital for

    over 15 years. These results indicate that very few employees stay in the Hospital for long.

    Effective communication among the management and the employees could reduce the rate of staff

    turnover. The management needs to rebuild trust with the employees this can be achieved through

    support by the top management and providing incentives to employees who meet their expectations

    (Jones, 1997; foster, 1999)

    Table 5: Management level

    Level in Management Frequency %

    Management Level 2 3.77

    Supervisory level 23 43.4

    Subordinated staff 28 52.83

    Total 53 100

    52.83% of the employees who participated were subordinate staff, 43.4% were supervisory staff

    and 3.77% were in the management level.

    The subordinate staffs being the main participants in the exercise were the most affected in the

    outsourcing decision of the hospital this was due to the fear that their jobs were at stake and risked

    losing them to the outsourced company.

    The individuals in the subordinate level were expected to manage the outsourcing relationship and

    therefore required to have a complete understanding of the business goal, specific performance

    criteria and their individual roles. This can be achieved through training and communication and

    can help reduce resistance or resentment (Foster 1999)

    Table 6: Department of the respondent

    Department Frequency %

    Subordinate 23 43.4

    Paramedic 18 33.96

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    23/34

    Contracted 6 11.32

    Low come 4 7.55

    Senior Management 2 3.77

    Total 53 100

    Part of the employees who returned their questionnaire 43.4%, 33.96 %, 11.32%, 7.55% and

    3.77% were in the Subordinate, Paramedic, Contracted, Low come and Senior Management

    departments respectively.

    The research was carried out in all departments of the Hospital to ensure that opinion was obtained

    from all levels because the decision of the Hospital to outsource affected all the employees

    irrespective of the department in which they were placed.4.2.2. Opinion of employees on the decision to outsource

    This sections findings shall be responding to the employees opinion on the driving force to the

    decision to outsource. The first question in the questionnaire sought to find out employees overall

    opinion towards the reasons of outsourcing as concerned cost savings, employee morale and skills,

    insufficient capital resources, focus on core competences and improved delivery and reliability

    Table 7: presents a summary of what employees felt were the reason towards outsourcing

    Selected possible areas that led to outsourcing decision

    Strongly

    agree

    Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

    disagree

    % % % % % %

    Financial performance was the driving force that lead

    to Outsourcing

    11.32 73.58 9.43 3.77 1.89 100

    Hospital outsourced in order to increase employee

    performance

    7.55 58.49 3.77 18.87 11.32 100

    Improving patient service / satisfaction was a driving

    force to the outsourcing decision

    32.08 49.06 7.55 9.43 1.89 100

    Lack of qualified personnel to handle the outsourced

    services led to the outsourcing decision

    15.09 54.72 0.00 13.21 16.98 100

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    24/34

    Insufficient capital to invest in the needed resources

    was the cause of the outsourcing decision

    58.49 35.85 5.66 0.00 0.00 100

    Insufficient internal processes, tools and technology

    led to the outsourcing of revenue cycle activities

    67.92 24.53 1.89 3.77 1.89 100

    Hospital outsourced in order to focus on its core

    activities

    73.58 22.64 3.77 0.00 0.00 100

    Hospital outsourced in order to make capital funds

    available for more profitable operations

    45.28 39.62 5.66 1.89 7.55 100

    Hospital outsourced in order to improve delivery and

    reliability of its services

    7.55 79.25 3.77 9.43 0.00 100

    N = 58

    Opinion on Financial performance as the driving force

    11.32% of those studied strongly agreed with the reasons behind the outsourcing decision, while as

    73.58% agreed that indeed financial performance was the driving force towards the outsourcing

    decision. This resulted to 84.9% of the employees were positive that financial performance was the

    driving force towards outsourcing.

    The finding complement previous studies (Bowersox ,1999 ; Crane, 1999; and Quinn, 2000) and

    proves that outsourcing is undertaken for purposes that have a large impact on the organizations

    bottom line.

    Opinion on outsourcing in order to increase employee performance

    7.55% of those studied strongly agreed with the reasons behind the outsourcing decision, while as

    58.49% agreed that the hospital outsourced in order to improve employee performance. This

    resulted to 66.04% of the employees being positive though they felt they need to be more involved

    than the position stands currently.

    The effects of outsourcing on the employees morale and performance though 66.04% agreed to

    the decision to outsource the Hospital need to inform the employees in every step of the

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    25/34

    outsourcing decision and make them feel they have participated in the decisions to ensure they

    perform well.

    Other reasons that contributed to the outsourcing decision

    From the employees studied it was clear that they felt that there existed other reasons which led to

    the hospitals decision to outsource. These reasons were stipulated in the questioner as what the

    participants felt were the other reason why the decision to outsource were undertaken.

    1. Reduction of the number of staff in the payroll

    2. Reduction in insurance costs

    3. The possibility of obtaining cheaper labor from the market

    4.2.3 The extent to which outsourcing has lead to improved financial performance

    Table 8: Effects of outsourcing on performance

    Effects of outsourcing on performance

    % % % %

    Outsourcing opportunity match the organizational business needs 66.04 22.64 11.32 100

    Outsourcing led to the Hospital reducing costs 81.13 15.10 3.77 100

    Out sourcing led to improved cash flow in the organization 77.36 0.00 22.64 100

    N = 53

    From the employees studied 66.04% felt that the outsourcing opportunity matched the

    organizational business needs, 22.64% felt otherwise while as 11.32% were not sure. The

    employees studied, 81.13% felt that the outsourcing has led to reduction of costs by the hospital,

    15.1% felt that there was no saving in cost as a result of the outsourcing decision and 3.77% were

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    26/34

    not sure on whether there has been a cost reduction experienced by the hospital, and 22.64% were

    not sure of any increased cash flow from the organization. From those studied it was evidence that

    the Hospital conducts performance evaluation of the outsourced services on quarterly basis.

    4.2.4 The impact outsourcing revenue cycle functions had on the hospital employees

    Table 9: Impact of Outsourcing to employees

    Effects of outsourcing on Employees

    Yes No Not

    sure

    % % % %

    Did outsourcing result to additional new skills from employees of

    the outsourced Company

    79.25 20.75 0 100

    Did outsourcing bring about organizational change in practice and

    culture

    88.68 9.43 1.89 100

    Did outsourcing boost the employees morale 54.72 16.98 28.30 100

    Outsourcing enhanced the relationship between employees and the

    management

    37.74 52.83 9.43 100

    Are employees more efficient as a result of outsourcing 71.70 18.87 9.43 100

    Has out sourcing led to high staff turnover 24.53 69.81 22.64 100

    N = 53

    79.25% of the respondents agreed that the outsourcing by the Hospital has facilitate its employees

    in acquiring new skills, 88.68% felt that the organizational culture and practice has changed as a

    result of the outsourcing decision and 52.83% felt that the decision led to reduced relationship

    among the employees and the management.

    The Hospital management needs to step in and re build trust among the workers, reevaluate those

    jobs and provide incentives to employees to make them understand that they are part of the process

    and make them know they have a share on the improved bottom line of the Hospital. This will

    enable them perform better.

    4.2.5 Employees comment on the reaction of the staff union on the outsourcing decision

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    27/34

    Employees studies concluded that the staff union participated in the decision to outsource thereby

    ensuring that they were not victimized and that no one was sent home so as to create room for

    employees of the outsourced company. They however felt that they need to be involved more in

    those decisions which affect them directly.

    4.2.6 The extent to which outsourcing has improved patient service and satisfaction

    Table 10: Impact of Outsourcing to patients

    Selected possible areas that led to outsourcing

    decision

    Strongly

    agree

    Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

    Disagree

    % % % % % %

    Patients are more satisfied by the services offered by

    the Hospital than before

    69.81 9.43 5.66 3.77 11.32 100

    Are there fewer patients complain as a result of

    outsourcing

    77.36 13.21 9.43 0.00 0.00 100

    As a result of the satisfaction derived employees

    would prefer seeking medical attention from the

    hospital

    60.38 28.30 0.00 9.43 1.89 100

    Patients always refer other patients to the Hospital

    since they get more satisfied

    92.46 3.77 3.77 0.00 0.00 100

    N = 53

    77.36% of the responded agreed that there were fewer patients complains, 92.46% said that

    patients are more satisfied and refer other patients to the Hospital to receive services and 11.32%

    disagreed that patients were more satisfied with the services that were offered by the hospital.

    The results indicate that the decision to outsource has a greet impact in the way services are

    provided

    4.2.7 Comments on the overall perception of the patients towards the service delivery of the

    hospital

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    28/34

    In this question employees commented that they have been receiving commendation from patients

    they serve and also relatives of those patients on their service in this they felt that the patients were

    satisfied with the services delivered by the Hospital in general.

    4.3 The extent to which outsourcing has benefited the wider community

    4.3.1 How does the community in general perceive the Hospitals decision to outsource?

    Employees studied commented that the community with the Hospital has fully benefited from the

    outsourcing decision this was clearly expressed in cases where the community is contacted for

    provision of care for the terminally ill patients especially those suffering from HIV & AIDS who

    needs assurance and love during their last days and with the use of services from the community it

    gives such patients comfort and the feeling of belongingness from the company they get from

    those taking care of the yet the people are hired from the community and as a result jobs are

    created.

    CHAPTER FIVE

    5.0 Summary, conclusions and recommendation

    5.1 Summary

    This research paper purposed to find out the effects of outsourcing to organizational performance

    in The Mater Hospital. From the study it was quite evidence that outsourcing led to improved

    performance to organizations depending on how the outsourcing is structured and the

    competencies of the firm from which outsourcing has been contracted from.

    It was indeed evident that the decision to outsource can lead to competitive advantages for

    businesses and for outsourcing to be successful the decision needs to be an informed one. Good,

    hard, detailed information in the hands of strong management can help avoid a costly step, one that

    is not easily reversed. Ultimately, for outsourcing in any form to be successful, quick responsetimes to strategic opportunities and threats are essential. Effective management of the outsourcing

    relationships is an organizational imperative.

    The top reasons for undertaking outsourcing projects identified by the survey results were to

    reduce costs, improve quality, improve delivery and reliability, gain access to materials only

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    29/34

    available abroad, establish a presence in foreign market, use resources not available internally,

    reduce the overall amount of specialized skills and knowledge needed for operations, make capital

    funds available for more profitable operations, and focus on core competencies of the corporation.

    These findings complement previous studies (Bowersox 1990; Crane 1999; and Quinn 2000) and

    suggest that outsourcing is undertaken for purposes that have a large impact on the organizations

    bottom line, although more tangential purposes such as strategy, profitability, and competitive

    advantage may have been the rationale for the more direct reasons.

    This study was guided by the following research questions:

    1 To what extent has outsourcing led to financial performance improvement?

    2 What impact did outsourcing revenue cycle functions have on the hospital employees?

    3 To what extent has outsourcing improved patient service and satisfaction?

    4 To what extent has outsourcing benefited the wider community?

    The study employed descriptive research. It targeted all employees of the Mater Hospital. The

    researched used Stratified Sampling and Simple Random Sampling to select a sample of 60. Only

    53 employees returned the filled in questionnaire. To obtain information from the respondents the

    researcher used questionnaires. Data were collected by the researcher and summarized into

    frequencies, percentages and narrative reports.

    5.2 Conclusions

    Based on the findings, the following are the conclusions:

    1) Based on the researchers knowledge of outsourcing, the respondents showed that The Mater

    Hospital outsourcing decision was well informed, and has led to a significance change on how the

    Hospital operates.

    2) The respondents possessed concepts; perspectives and conviction that they need to be moreinvolved in the outsourcing decisions by the Hospital to ensure that they have all information to

    enable them monitor the operations of the outsourced company.

    3) The researcher clearly deduced from the responses that respondents knew that outsourcing has a

    great impact to the Hospital performance and delivery of its services.

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    30/34

    4) The Employees expressed their willingness to improve their relationship with the management

    if they were more involved in decision making in those areas which touched on them and were

    critical.

    5.3 Recommendations

    Based on the findings the researcher made the following recommendations:

    1) The Mater Hospital should establish a department or centre to coordinate employees and to

    collect their views on the operations of the Hospital.

    2) The Hospital needed to invite tenders for the services currently being outsourced to be assured

    that they are getting the best services at the lowest costs.

    5.4 Suggestions for Further Studies

    1) Similar research studies should be carried out in all organization to ensure that the true effects of

    outsourcing are experienced.

    2) A study need conducted to establish whether the outsourced companies are equipped with the

    right skills and competencies to tackle the assigned activities

    3) A study should be carried out to find out the extent to which the employees of the outsourced

    company are utilized to attain the desired objectives.

    4) A study should be carried out to establish the challenges that are facing the decision to

    outsource some activities which are usually seen as key to the organization.

    REFERENCES

    1. Quinn, B.J. 2000. Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management

    review 41 (14)

    2. (Ella Venus 2009

    3. Barney, J.B. 1999. How a firms capabilities affect boundery decisions. Sloan Management

    review, (40: 3)

    4. Coase R. H (1937). The nature of the form. Cited in: J Barney, W Ouchi (Eds). Organizational

    economics san Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1986

    5. Williamson, 1981).

    6. 2030 vision. In 2007

    7. Medical Device Daily February 28 2008).

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    31/34

    8. (Maltz and Ellram 2000;)

    9. (Lewis and Talalayevsky 2000)

    10. ( Mahnke, Overby, and Vang 2005).

    11. (Murphy and Poist 2000)

    12. ( Knemeyer, Corsi, and Murphy 2003).

    13.Sharpe, M. 1997. Outsourcing gains speed in outsourcing world. Journal of labour research

    (Fall): 535 - 549

    14.Bowers, D. J. 1990. The strategic benefits of logistics alliances. Harvard Business Review 68

    (4): 6 45.

    15.Greer, C. R., S. A. Youngblood and D. A. Gray. 1999. Human resource management

    outsourcing: The make or buy decision. Academy management Executive 13(3): 85 96.

    (Alexander and Young, 1996).

    QUESTIONNAIRE

    Dear Respondent: My name is Kiptoo Maritim Bernard, am a Bachelor of Business management

    Student at the Moi University, Nairobi Sattetlite Campus. Am conducting my Academic research,

    which is a partial fulfillment of the requirement of this course. The Mater Hospital has permitted

    me to conduct this research. I will treat your opinions confidentially. You honesty is both critical

    and paramount when you respond to the questionnaire.

    Please tick() as appropriate.

    Section A: Background Information

    1. Gender of Respondent

    2. Male Female

    3. How long have your worked for this organization (in terms of years)

    0-5 6-10 11-15 over 15

    4. Management level of respondent

    Management Level Supervisory Level Subordinate Staff

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    32/34

    5. Your department: _______________________________________

    6. Which services are currently being outsourced?

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    _________________________________________________________________________

    Section B: Effects of outsourcing

    6 In this statement kindly indicate your level of agreement

    1 Strongly agree 2 Agree 3 Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly disagree

    Factor 1 2 3 4 5

    Financial performance improvement in terms of cost reduction was the major

    reason why the outsourcing decision was taken

    The hospital outsourced in order to increase employee performance and ensure

    greater job satisfaction resulting from better training and more efficient work

    processes

    Improving patient service or satisfaction by reducing waiting times to receive

    care or expediting claims processing and payment was the driving force for

    outsourcing in the hospital

    The Hospital outsourced due to lack of access to qualified personnel to handle

    the outsourced services

    Insufficient capital in invest in the needed resources was a cause for

    outsourcing

    The hospital resulted into outsourcing since internal processes, tools and

    technology were insufficient to handle revenue cycles activities efficiently and

    effectively

    The Hospital outsourced in order to focus on it core competencies

    The Hospital outsourced in order to make capital funds available for more

    profitable operations

    The Hospital outsourced in order to improve delivery and reliability of its

    services

    7 What are the other reasons that contributed to the decision of outsourcing by the management

    oftheHospital:_________________________________________________________________

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    33/34

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    8 Does the outsourcing opportunity match the organizations business needs?

    Yes No Not Sure

    9 Has the outsourcing helped the Hospital to reduce and control costs?

    Yes No Not Sure

    10 Has the outsourcing led to improved cash flow of the organization?

    Yes No Not Sure

    11 How often do you carry out performance evaluation on the outsourced services?

    Weekly Monthly Quarterly

    Semi - Annually Annually Never

    12 Did outsourcing provide Hospital employees with additional benefits such as new skills from

    employees of the outsourced Companies?

    Yes No Not Sure

    13 Did outsourcing bring change in organizational practices and culture?

    Yes No Not Sure

    14 Did outsourcing boost the morale of the employees?

    Yes No Not Sure

    15 Did outsourcing enhance the relationships between the employees and the management?

    Yes No Not Sure

    16 Are the employees more efficient as a result of outsourcing?

    Yes No Not Sure

  • 8/2/2019 Maritim Project

    34/34

    17 Has outsourcing led to higher staff turnover?

    Yes No Not Sure

    18 Comment of the reaction of the staff union (if any) on the outsourcing decision:

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    _________________________________________________________________________

    19 In the following statements, please indicate the level of agreement as follows:

    1 Strongly agree 2 Agree 3 Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly disagree

    Factor 1 2 3 4 5

    Patients are now much more satisfied by the services offered by the

    Hospital the before

    There are fewer patient complaints as a result of outsourcing

    As a result of satisfaction derived from the outsourced services patients

    would always prefer seeking medical attention from the Hospital

    Patients always refer other patients to this Hospital since the get more

    satisfied

    20 Comment on the overall perception of the patients towards the service delivery of the Hospital:

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    21 How does the community in general perceive the Hospitals decision to outsource?

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________