MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE ACTIONS STATISTICS INDIVIDUAL … · 2020-02-20 · MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE...
Transcript of MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE ACTIONS STATISTICS INDIVIDUAL … · 2020-02-20 · MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE...
MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE ACTIONS
STATISTICS
INDIVIDUAL FELLOWSHIPS
1Dernière mise à jour :
Février 2020
EFST
EFCAR/RI SE
European Fellowships
Standard
European Fellowships
CAR/RI
Society and Enterprise Panel
Held in EU Member States or Associated
Countries
Return and reintegration of
researchers in Europe or after a career break
based on a secondment to a
third country
GlobalFellowships
Only for non-academic
beneficiaries
GF
2
3
Applicants, Main List & Budget :Evolution from 2014 to 2019
1305
1163 1188
1348 1351
1475
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Main List
240,5
215 218,71
248,7
273
296,49
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Budget (million)
7409
83808829 8957
9676 9709
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Applicants
IF-EF-Standard
5
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
No of eligible proposals 5756 6667 7061 7065 7499 7602
Main list (No of projects) 1072 947 925 1029 930 997
Success rate 18,62% 14,20% 13,10% 14,56% 12,40% 13,11%
Above threshold (No of
projects)4728 5406 5814 5607 5939 5868
Reserve list 268 237 276 204 553 495
IF-EF-Standard Highest and lowest scores
6
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
PanelMain
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
CHE 136 98,2 89,6 120 98 90,8 124 100 91,8 149 98,6 91,4 132 98,6 92,8 139 99,4 92,4
ECO 26 97 86,6 23 97,8 89,8 25 98,6 90,6 25 100 89 18 97,6 89,4 23 100 91,6
ENG 128 100 88,6 112 100 90,6 109 100 91,8 122 100 91,4 108 100 93 124 100 92,4
ENV 137 99,2 90,4 115 99 91,2 120 100 92 128 99,2 92,2 116 100 92,4 111 100 93,4
LIF 286 99,6 90,6 255 100 92,4 233 99,2 92,2 251 99,6 93 222 99,2 93,6 231 100 92,6
MAT 29 98,6 90,2 22 98,6 91 21 97,2 91,6 23 100 91,6 24 98 92,6 23 99,6 91,2
PHY 126 97,8 90,4 115 98,6 91,2 102 98,4 91,2 113 98,8 90 106 98,6 90,8 119 100 91,4
SOC 204 100 92,8 185 100 92,2 191 100 92,8 218 100 91 204 100 92,6 227 100 93
Total 1072 947 925 1029 930 997
IF-EF-Career restart panel
7
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
No of eligible proposals 181 181 242 322 423 440
Main list (No of projects) 33 25 31 46 76 89
Success rate 18,23% 13,81% 12,80% 14,29% 17,97% 20,23%
Above threshold (No of
projects)124 150 177 209 307 314
Reserve list 8 8 9 13 43 35
IF-EF-CAR Highest and lowest scores
8
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
PanelMain
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
All 33 97,2 87,2 25 98 91,2 31 98,6 90,8 46 99 91,4 76 99,2 91,2 89 100 89,4
CHE - - - 3 93,6 91,2 5 95 91 5 93,4 92,2 4 95,4 93,2 4 91,4 90,8
ECO - - - - - - 1 91,8 - 2 96 91,6 - - - - - -
ENG - - - 2 94,8 91,8 4 97,2 93 4 96,6 92 3 98 92,4 8 98 91,6
ENV - - - 3 98 92 7 95,8 90,8 9 96,6 91,4 15 98,4 91,2 12 98 90
LIF - - - 9 98 92,8 5 96,6 93 9 97,4 92,4 16 99,2 91,4 12 99 90
MAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 96,2 89,8
PHY - - - 2 93,8 93,4 - - - - - - 1 97 - 3 94,8 90,2
SOC - - - 6 97,6 91,8 9 98,6 91 17 99 91,6 37 99 91,2 48 100 89,4
Total 33 25 31 46 76 89
IF-EF-Reintegration panel
9
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
No of eligible proposals 443 556 500 533 593 647
Main list (No of projects) 84 81 67 78 115 132
Success rate 18,96% 14,57% 13,40% 14,63% 19,39% 20,40%
Above threshold (No of
projects)369 469 425 442 509 548
Reserve list 19 21 20 11 37 43
IF-EF-RI Highest and lowest scores
10
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
PanelMain
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
All 84 98 90,8 81 99 92,2 67 100 92,6 78 100 93,4 115 99 92,4 132 100 93
CHE - - - 5 95 92,8 3 95,4 92,6 2 95,4 94,2 11 98,2 93,2 7 98,8 94
ECO - - - 2 97,6 94,2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
ENG - - - 6 99 92,6 11 98 92,8 2 95,4 94,2 10 97,8 92,8 8 98,6 93
ENV - - - 13 98 92,4 14 96,2 93 14 99,4 93,6 9 98,2 93,2 19 100 93,4
LIF - - - 33 98,4 92,4 30 98,2 92,8 46 100 93,4 64 98,6 92,4 67 100 93
MAT - - - - - - 1 100 - - - - 2 98 92,4 4 96,6 94,4
PHY - - - 9 99 92,2 5 97 93 3 96,8 93,8 8 96 92,4 13 98 93,4
SOC - - - 13 97,8 92,8 3 96,6 93,4 11 100 93,8 11 99 92,6 14 99,4 93,4
Total 84 81 67 78 115 132
IF-EF-Society and enterprise panel
11
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
No of eligible proposals N/A N/A 132 204 340 196
Main list (No of projects) N/A N/A 48 58 52 54
Success rate N/A N/A 36,40% 28,43% 15,29% 27,55%
Above threshold (No of
projects)N/A N/A 80 126 183 123
Reserve list N/A N/A 14 12 15 16
IF-EF-SE Highest and lowest scores
12
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
PanelMain
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
All - - - - - - 48 95,8 80,6 58 97 83,6 52 99,4 87 54 97,8 82,2
CHE - - - - - - 8 91,8 80,6 7 94 85 4 92,8 88,2 3 95,8 82,8
ECO - - - - - - 3 91,2 82,2 2 92,6 86 - - - - - -
ENG - - - - - - 9 92 81 11 92,2 84,8 9 97,2 88,6 13 95,4 82,4
ENV - - - - - - 3 91,8 81 7 94,2 84,4 4 96,8 88 5 95,8 82,2
LIF - - - - - - 19 95,8 82,2 26 97 83,6 30 99 87 24 97,8 82,4
MAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PHY - - - - - - 2 90,2 83,8 2 94,2 85,4 2 99,4 91,8 3 90,2 84,2
SOC - - - - - - 4 90,6 81,2 3 95,8 85,4 3 92,6 91,6 6 95,8 85,2
Total 0 0 48 58 52 54
IF- Global Fellowships
13
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
No of eligible proposals 1029 976 894 833 821 824
Main list (No of projects) 116 110 117 137 178 203
Success rate 11,27% 11,27% 13,10% 16,45% 21,68% 24,64%
Above threshold (No of
projects)874 796 747 685 669 661
Reserve list 40 50 41 34 73 66
IF-GF Highest and lowest scores
14
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
PanelMain
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
Main
List
Highest
score
Lowest
score
CHE 7 98 93,6 8 97,2 94 8 96,4 93,6 12 96,4 93,2 13 97,2 92,4 15 99,4 92
ECO 3 97,8 93,2 3 97 94 3 95 94,4 3 94,8 88,2 5 95,4 93,2 3 92 89,4
ENG 17 97,6 93,8 16 98,2 93,8 16 98,2 93,6 17 99,2 93 20 99 90 22 99,2 89,8
ENV 21 99,4 93,4 17 99 93,6 19 98,4 93,6 20 99,2 92,6 25 99,6 92,6 28 99,2 91,6
LIF 29 98 91,8 28 99,2 93,8 26 99 92 34 97,6 91,4 38 98,6 91 36 100 91,2
MAT 1 92,2 - 2 92,8 91,6 3 94,4 88,6 1 93,2 93,2 2 95,4 94,2 2 94,8 94,2
PHY 11 96,8 93 9 96,6 93,4 12 95,6 92,6 11 95,2 91,4 20 99 90,2 17 96,8 88,4
SOC 27 98,6 92,8 27 99,4 93,6 30 100 95 39 100 92,4 55 98,6 90,4 80 100 90
Total 116 110 117 137 178 203
IF-Main List Summary
15
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
EF-ST
EF-CAR
EF-RI
EF-SE
GF
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
EF-ST 1072 947 925 1029 930 997
EF-CAR 33 25 31 46 76 89
EF-RI 84 81 67 78 115 132
EF-SE N/A N/A 48 58 52 54
GF 116 110 117 137 178 203
Activity Type(Beneficiaries)
16
* Information is not available for 2014
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Type d'activité Main list (all panels) Total
Public Body 0 6 10 9 1 26
Research Organisations 224 248 294 282 314 1362
Higher or Secondary Education 887 867 974 991 1083 4802
Private for Profit 12 46 38 48 49 193
Other 40 21 32 21 28 142
Total 1163 1188 1348 1351 1475 6525
0%
21%
74%
3%
2%From 2015 to 2019
Public Body
Research Organisations
Higher or Secondary Education
Private for Profit
Other
GF : A-list per country (outgoing phase)
17
* Information is not available for one project in 2015
Country (outgoing phase) Code ISO 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
South Africa ZA 2 - - 1 2 7
Algeria DZ - 1 - - 1 -
Argentina AR 1 - - 1 1 3
Australia AU 6 7 5 15 13 21
Brazil BR 3 - - - 2 4
Canada CA 9 8 10 18 19 22
Chile CL - 2 - - - 1
China CN 2 - 1 - - 3
Colombia CO - - - 1 - -
Ecuador EC - 1 - - - -
Egypt EG - - - - - 2
India IN - - - - - 1
Indonesia ID - - 1 - - -
Japan JP 2 1 1 3 3 8
Kenya KE - 1 - - - -
Korea (the Republic of) KR - - - - 1 1
Lebanon LB - - - 1 1 1
Madagascar MG - 1 - - - -
Mali ML - - 1 - - -
Mexico MX - - - - 4 -
Morocco MA - - - - - 2
New Zealand NZ 2 3 2 1 4 2
Panama PA - 1 - - - -
Peru PE - - - - - 1
Russia RU - 1 - - - 1
Singapore SG - 1 - - 1 -
Switzerland CH 9 - - - - -
Taiwan TW - - - - - 1
Tanzania TZ 1 - - - - -
Ukraine UA 1 - - - - -
United States US 78 80 96 95 126 122
Urugay UY - 1 - - - -
Venezuela VN - - - 1 - -
Total 116 109 117 137 178 203
GF : Main list per country Top 3
18* In 2014 Canada and Switzerland are equal
78 80
96 95
126122
9 8 1018 19 22
6 7 5
15 1321
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Top 3 countries for the outgoing phase
US CA AU
Country (outgoing phase) Code ISO 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
United States US 78 80 96 95 126 122
Canada CA 9 8 10 18 19 22
Australia AU 6 7 5 15 13 21
80%
86%
95%93%
89%
81%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
In percentage, they represent more than 80% of all destinations...
Gender ofsupported researchers
19
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Action Main list Female Male Main list Female Male Main list Female Male Main list Female Male Main list Female Male Main list Female Male
EF-CAR 33 19 14 25 19 6 31 23 8 46 32 14 76 48 28 - - -
EF-RI 84 27 57 81 36 45 67 20 47 78 42 36 115 48 67 - - -
EF-SE - - - - - - 48 29 19 58 24 34 52 25 27 - - -
EF-ST 1072 420 652 947 420 527 925 393 532 1029 451 578 930 395 535 - - -
GF 116 47 69 110 44 66 117 45 72 137 51 86 178 90 88 - - -
Total 1305 513 792 1163 519 644 1188 510 678 1348 600 748 1351 606 745 1475 648 827
39%45% 43% 45% 45% 44%
61%55% 57% 55% 55% 56%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Evolution from 2014 to 2019
Female Male
Any detailed information for 2019
Gender ofsupervisors
20
20% 21% 22% 23% 23% 25%
79% 78% 77% 76% 75% 72%
1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Evolution from 2014 to 2019
Female Male N.G.I.
*N.G.I. = No Gender Information
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Action Main list Female Male N.G.I. Main list Female Male N.G.I. Main list Female Male N.G.I. Main list Female Male N.G.I. Main list Female Male N.G.I. Main list Female Male N.G.I.
EF-CAR 33 10 23 0 25 3 22 0 31 11 20 0 46 13 32 1 - - - - - - - -
EF-RI 84 11 71 2 81 16 64 1 67 14 51 2 78 15 62 1 - - - - - - - -
EF-SE - - - - - - - - 48 9 39 0 58 15 42 1 - - - - - - - -
EF-ST 1072 216 845 11 947 207 731 9 925 203 717 5 1029 234 787 8 - - - - - - - -
GF 116 22 94 0 110 16 91 3 117 24 92 1 137 29 105 3 - - - - - - - -
Total 1305 259 1033 13 1163 242 908 13 1188 261 919 8 1348 306 1028 14 1351 311 1015 25 1475 373 1067 35
Any detailed information for 2018 et 2019
Experts top five
Percentage of total experts Number of experts
21
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Italy 11,74% 12,24% 11,78% 11,16% 11,15% 13,29%
Germany 8,17% 8,75% 9,48% 9,46% 9,70% 9,70%
Spain 7,91% 8,24% 9,12% 9,21% 9,01% 11,06%
United Kingdom 9,53% 8,60% 8,39% 8,52% 7,75% 7,78%
France 8,51% 8,75% 7,30% 8,24% 7,99% 9,18%
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Evolution from 2014 to 2019
Italy Germany
Spain United Kingdom
France
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Italy 138 168 292 321 406 482
Germany 96 120 235 272 353 352
Spain 93 113 226 265 328 401
United Kingdom 112 118 208 245 282 282
France 100 120 181 237 291 333
All experts 1175 1372 2478 2876 3641 3627
6,00%
7,00%
8,00%
9,00%
10,00%
11,00%
12,00%
13,00%
14,00%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Evolution from 2014 to 2019
Italy Germany
Spain United Kingdom
France
IF 2014: Submitted (eligible)& A-list proposals
Withdrawals Ineligible InadmissibleST 7 16 5
CAR 2 5 2RI 0 7 0
EF 9 28 7
GF 1 9 8
Total 10 37 15
28
IF 2014: Research Area of funded proposals in CAR Panel
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
ECO ENG ENV CHE LIF PHY MAT SOC
29
IF 2014: Research Area of funded proposals in RI Panel
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
ECO ENG ENV CHE LIF PHY MAT SOC
30
IF-EF 2015: Success rate per panel
Panel LIF SOC CHE ENV PHY ENG ECO MAT RI CAR
Success rate 14,14% 14,30% 14,17% 14,15% 14,29% 14,12% 14,47% 14,38% 14,57% 13,81%32
IF-GF 2015: Success rate per panel
Panel LIF SOC ENV ENG PHY CHE ECO MAT
Success Rate 11,38% 11,54% 11,11% 11,27% 10,59% 10,67% 13,64% 10,53%33
IF 2015: Mobility of researchers
Country UK FR DE ES NL IT CH DK BE IE AT SE PT FI IL TR EL CY NO CZ PL LT EE HU RO SI BG IS LU
Fellows hosted by country 412 113 98 92 75 61 58 49 38 30 24 24 20 12 8 8 7 6 6 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Residents leaving for IF2015 position -170 -98 -119 -103 -54 -97 -28 -26 -45 -24 -21 -25 -18 -16 -19 -10 -20 -6 -6 -6 -16 -1 -4 -7 -4 -2 -1 -2 -134
Success
rate
EF-SE 36,36%
EF-CAR 12,81%
EF-RI 13,40%
EF-ST 13,10%
CHE 13,19%
ENV 12,93%
ENG 13,10%
MAT 13,21%
PHY 13,20%
LIF 13,12%
ECO 12,69%
SOC 13,12%
40
IF-EF 2016: A-list proposals by panel
IF-GF 2016: A-list proposals by panel
Success
rate
GF 13,09%
CHE 12,31%
ENV 12,84%
ENG 12,70%
MAT 13,64%
PHY 13,19%
LIF 13,33%
ECO 11,54%
SOC 13,57%
42
48/132 proposals on main list (36%):
Submitted Main list Success rate
Companies (large + SMEs) 109 41 38%
Large companies 33 17 52%
SMEs 76 24 32%
Government bodies/agencies 8 4 50%
Headlines from SE panel
49
Countries funded:
Diversity: 17 from SE panel, 28 from standard European Fellowships
8 of the top 10 most successful countries in the SE panel are the same as for standard European Fellowships
Scores:
Highest SE score 95.8%, lowest SE score on the main list 80.6%.
The top 28 of SE scored 85% or above
Table with the ranking range of each IF panel is on the Participant Portal
Gender:
47% of applicants to the SE Panel are women. For the IF call as a whole, 39% of the applicants are women.
Success rate of women in the SE panel (47%) was higher than the success rate of men (27%).
Consistency with the rest of IF
50
Multidisciplinarity:
Preliminary analysis of the keyword of SE proposals to be funded suggested that about a quarter are multidisciplinary
This is broadly similar to the 2015 European Fellowships projects, a third of which were multidisciplinary
MSCA-IF-EF-SE MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Eval Panel
Name
Proposals to
be funded
Eval Panel
Name
Proposals to be
funded
LIF 19 40% LIF 233 25%
ENG 9 19% SOC 191 21%
CHE 8 17% CHE 124 13%
SOC 4 8% ENV 120 13%
ECO 3 6% ENG 109 12%
ENV 3 6% PHY 102 11%
PHY 2 4% ECO 25 3%
MAT 0 0% MAT 21 2%
Total 48 100% Total 925 100%
Success rates per panel
51
59
IF 2018 : Gender (2/2)
More male researchers applicants (59%) than female (41%)
Highest female % SOC (55%), LIF (49%), ENV (45%)
Highest male % in ENG (79%), PHY (78%), MAT (75%)
More male researchers in the Main list (55%) than female (45%)
Highest female % SOC (60%), ENV (56%), LIF (52%)
Highest male % in ENG (78%), PHY (76%), MAT (71%)
But, female researchers are more successful (15,32%) than male
researchers (13,02%)
63
WF 2018 results
• Proposals opted out from the WF call (5,8%)
• 402 proposals received a score of 70% or above, but were not funded
under call MSCA-IF-2018 call
• 33 proposals retained for funding
•Excellence prevailed:
• Experts evaluated all proposals regardless of the type of action/country
of origin of the applicants (i.e. WF proposals evaluated on equal footing
as IF)
• Scores of proposals retained for funding range from 90.2 to 92.6
894207
Secondmentsand PHD (2014)
• Secondments : – Of a total number of 7,409 evaluated proposals, 2,189 proposals
included a secondment phase (percentage 29.5%)
– Out of a total number of 1,305 retained proposals (main list), 441proposals included a secondment phase (percentage 33.7%)
• Fellows with PhD :– Out of a total number of 7,409 evaluated proposals, 6,803 fellows
had a PhD degree (percentage 91.8%).
– Out of a total number of 1,305 retained proposals (main list), 1,219fellows had a PhD degree (percentage 93.4%)
69