Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis...

47
Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking- Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology Universiteit Maastricht Unit 3.7.1 Macro-Ergonomics: Evaluating human work

Transcript of Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis...

Page 1: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Thinking-Aloud &

Protocol Analysis

Margje van de WielDepartment of Experimental Psychology

Universiteit Maastricht

Unit 3.7.1Macro-Ergonomics: Evaluating human

work

Page 2: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Overview

• Research on cognitive processes underlying cognitive task performance:– Problem solving – Knowledge representation

• Focus on the think-aloud method– Collecting think-aloud protocols– Analyzing think-aloud protocols

Page 3: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Applications of cognitive psy-chological research methods• Fundamental psychological research

– Explorative– Testing theoretical hypotheses– Compare tasks or groups

• Cognitive task analysis• Building knowledge based systems• Usability research

Page 4: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Usability research

• How easy is it for people to set the time and alarm on a clock without a manual?

• How easy is it for them with the manual?• Do people understand the manual?• Do they use the manual?

• Video, computer program, web site etc. Compare conditions or groups

Page 5: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Problem solvingTower of HanoiThe objective of this game is to move all of the rings to the right most peg.You may only move one ring at a time; you must never allow a large ring to rest on a smaller ring.

Page 6: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Problem space (Newell & Simon, 1972)

Initial state

Goal state

Subgoalstate

Subgoalstate

Inter-mediate

states

Inter-mediate

states

Inter-mediate

states

Inter-mediate

states

Page 7: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on problem solving• Product evaluation• Observation and registration of

behavior (real-life, video, log files)

But Gives no direct information on cognitive processes

Page 8: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on problem solving• Introspection= Direct observation of mind

ButParticipants may give their interpretation of their cognitive processes when they prefer during task performance

Page 9: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on problem solving• Retrospection

ButParticipants may give their interpretation of their cognitive processes after task performance

Page 10: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on problem solving• Free recall • Stimulated recall

ButParticipants give their memories of the thoughts they had during problem solving after task performance

Page 11: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Instructions

• Retrospection– How did you proceed in solving the

problem?– What did you think during solving the

problem?

• Stimulated / Free recall– Report everything you can remember

about your thoughts during solving the problem

Page 12: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on problem solving• Questioning and prompting

ButParticipants may give their interpretation of their cognitive processes when prompted so that natural task performance may be disturbed

Page 13: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on problem solving• Dialogues in explanation and collaboration

ButThe cognitive processes might be different than in natural task performance

Page 14: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on problem solving• Thinking aloud=Saying everything that comes to mind

Advantages:• Concurrent verbalization• Close to natural task performance• Discourages interpretation and

explanation

Page 15: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Theoretical framework / verbalization theory (Ericsson & Simon, 1993)

=the information processing model

LTM

Verbal report

STM Taskperformance

Inputinfo

Page 16: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Theoretical framework

Verbal report

STM Taskperformance

Verbal encoding

VocalizationType of task- modality- verbalizability- instruction

Page 17: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

The type of problem and the role of knowledge

Well-defined problems Ill-defined problems

Weak problem solving methods

Strong problem solving methods

Novices Experts

Knowledge lean task Knowledge rich task

Page 18: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Focus on knowledge representationThe nature and organization of knowledge is central in problem solving and not the strategies used (e.g. Chi, 1997)

The representation of a problem determines the problem solving process

Page 19: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research on knowledge representation• Same methods as for investigating

cognitive processes, but analysis of the knowledge used

• Free recall– Report everything you remember about ...

=Reflection of the representation of (prior) knowledge, a text or a problem in the mind

Page 20: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

The think-aloud method

• Collecting think-aloud protocols• Transcribing the verbal protocols Verbal reports as data• Segmenting the transcribed

protocols• Analyzing the transcribed protocols

Page 21: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research questions

Gaining insight in cognitive processes and knowledge structures

• Explorative• Testing hypotheses

• Comparing types of problems• Comparing groups

Page 22: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Collecting think-aloud protocolsWhat do you need?• Experimenter• Participant• Problem• Tape-recorder and tape• Instructions

Page 23: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Instructions

• Make participant feel comfortable• Explain the purpose of the research• Explain the task• Explain thinking aloud• Emphasize that it is no test situation • Emphasize that the data are confidential• Practice problem(s) and talking out loud• Give feedback

Page 24: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Transcribing the protocols

• Type out the protocols as literally as possible, including – Natural punctuation– Eh, ehs– Thinking pauses; with dots or even better

to measure length– Indicate when something is said mumbling

so you don’t understand well

• Indicate interventions of experimenter

Page 25: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Example Tower of Hanoi (Anzai & Simon, 1979)

I’m not sure, but first I’ll take 1 from A and place it on B. And I’ll take 2 from A and place it on C. And then, I take 1 from B and place it n C. Experimenter: If you can, tell me where you place it there?Because there was no place else to go, I had to place 1 from B and C. Then, next, I placed 3 from A to B. …..

Page 26: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Segmenting the protocol

• Use natural pauses indicated by punctuation

• Indicate each segment by a line number

• No interpretation

Page 27: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Example Tower of Hanoi (Anzai & Simon, 1979)

1. I’m not sure, 2. but first I’ll take 1 from A and place it on B. 3. And I’ll take 2 from A and place it on C. 4. And then, I take 1 from B and place it on C. Experimenter: If you can, tell me where you place it there?5. Because there was no place else to go,.. …..

Page 28: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Analyzing verbal protocols

(Transcribed) and segmentedverbal protocols

Interpretation

RAW DATA

DATA

Page 29: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Interpretation

• Qualitative analysis

• Analyzing qualitative data in an objective and quantifiable way

Compare experimental conditions– Groups– Tasks– Instructions

Page 30: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research question --> qualitative analysis• What comprehension strategies do

skilled readers use in reading a text?

Thinking aloud while reading a text Analysis: What strategies are used?

– Exploratory: describe the strategies used by the participants

Page 31: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research questions --> testing hypotheses (Rauenbush & Bereiter, 1991)• What strategies do skilled readers use in

dealing with degraded text?• Are these comparable to comprehension

strategies used in reading normal text? Thinking aloud while reading text with 3

types of instruction:– Just reading– + ‘Adults skim this type of material first’– Skim text for 60 sec and report the topic

Page 32: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Research questions --> testing hypotheses (Rauenbush & Bereiter, 1991) Analysis: what strategies are used?• Normal comprehension strategies

– Rereading – Reading ahead– Summing up

• Other comprehension strategies– (Letter generating strategy)– (Determining word type)

Page 33: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Analyzing verbal protocols 1

HypothesesCodingscheme

Verbalprotocols

Explore Test

Psychological theoryCognitive task analysis

Page 34: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Analyzing verbal protocols 1

HypothesesCodingscheme

Verbalprotocols

Problem solving <--> Knowledge representationprocesses (E&S, 93) (Chi, 97)

Page 35: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Cognitive task analysis

• What knowledge is available in the problem?

• What knowledge is necessary for problem solving?

• What steps need to be taken to solve the problem?

• What is the most efficient problem solving process?

• What strategies can be used?

Page 36: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Coding scheme

• Operationalizing hypotheses in coding categories

• Clearly defining coding categories and providing examples from pilot protocols

• Categories may differ in level of detail– Segments– Aggregations of segments

Page 37: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Analyzing verbal protocols 2• Code the verbal protocols• Determine interrater reliability (% of

correspondences, kappa, correlation)• Depict the results• Seek and interpret patterns in results

Eventually• Repeat process

Page 38: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Example medical diagnosis• Clinical case

Page 39: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Example of a case

A 70-year old female is admitted into hospital because of increasing shortness of breath. She has been very tired lately and tolerates her food badly. Sometimes she has chest pain, especially after dinner.Et cetera

Page 40: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Example medical diagnosis• Clinical case• Thinking aloud while diagnosing

the case– Problem solving process– The nature of the knowledge used

Page 41: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Analysis of think-aloud protocol

Problem solving process• Data examination• Data exploration• Data explanation• Hypothesis generation• Hypothesis evaluation• Discrepancy

processing• Meta-reasoning• Summarization

Nature of knowledge used

• Data interpretation• Clinical reasoning• Biomedical reasoning• Hypotheses (C or B)• (Repetitions)• Plans for actions• Metacognitive remarks

Page 42: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Example medical diagnosis• Clinical case• Thinking aloud while diagnosing

the case– Problem solving process– The nature of the knowledge used

• Free recall– Case representation

Page 43: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Analysis of free recall protocolsProposition analysis• Number of correct propositions• Number of inferences

(summarizing two or more propositions)

Page 44: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Proposition analysis

Proposition = single idea unit

Concept ConceptQualifier

CausalConditionalAttributeSpecificationIs a

Page 45: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Propositions in the case

Female - 70-year old (attribute)

- is admitted into hospital (attribute) - (because of) shortness of breath (attribute)

- increasing (specification)

- very tired (attribute)

- lately (specification)

- tolerates her food badly (attribute)

Page 46: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Other literature

• Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The journal of the learning sciences, 6(3), 271-315. SGT 3179

• Ericcsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (ch 6 & 7). SL BF 180

Page 47: Margje van de WielFaculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht Thinking-Aloud & Protocol Analysis Margje van de Wiel Department of Experimental Psychology.

Margje van de Wiel Faculty of Psychology, Universiteit Maastricht

Other literature

• Reitman Olson, J. & Biolsi, K. J. (1991). Techniques for representing expert knowledge. In: K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.) Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and Limits (pp. 240-285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ME EAM 374 / Margje