Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

20
6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012 1 - Input e+ beam from Monte Carlo (EGS) simulations - Field RF cavity – Poisson/Superfish - Focusing solenoid – Poisson/Superfish - Beam dynamics – General Particle Tracer Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland) Division of Accelerator Physics and Technology Positron deceleration using RF

description

Positron deceleration using RF. Input e+ beam from Monte Carlo (EGS) simulation s - Field RF cavity – Poisson/Superfish - Focusing solenoid – Poisson/Superfish - Beam dynamics – General Particle Tracer. Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

Page 1: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

1

- Input e+ beam from Monte Carlo (EGS) simulations - Field RF cavity – Poisson/Superfish- Focusing solenoid – Poisson/Superfish- Beam dynamics – General Particle Tracer

Marcin StaszczakNational Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

Division of Accelerator Physics and Technology

Positron deceleration using RF

Page 2: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012 2

- e+ production from primary e- 10 MeV beam on 1mm W target

- e+ production from primary e- 5 MeV beam on 0.5mm W target

Results of Monte Carlo simulations:

Page 3: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012 3

e+ production (10 MeV)

Mean energy ~ 2 MeVMost probable energy ~ 0.9 MeV

Primary beam e- - energy 10 MeV hits 1mm W target. The total production efficiency ~ 0.16%

Energy spectrum of produced e+ after living the target:

Energy [MeV]

N

Page 4: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

4

e+ production (10 MeV)

Angle distribution of e+ behind the target:

Spatial distribution of e+ behind the target. Almost identical as the primary electron beam:

N

x coordinate (for y=0) [cm]

Page 5: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

5

e+ production (5 MeV)

Primary beam e- - energy 5 MeV hits 0.5mm W target. The total production efficiency ~ 0.012%

Energy spectrum of produced e+ after living the target:

Mean energy ~ 1 MeVMost probable energy ~ 0.6 MeV

Energy [MeV]

N

Page 6: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

6

RF cavities

2 or 3 cavities (gap/L = 0.54) placed one after another were considered.

Different positions of cavities and focusing solenoid were tested.

L=45.7mm L=41mm L=18mm

Page 7: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

7

Focusing solenoid

There were analyzed 2 versions - shorter and longerMax Bz field ~ 0.7 TLower and higher values of magnetic field were also considered.

Additional compensating coil was used

Page 8: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

8

Focusing solenoid

Page 9: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

9

RF positron deceleration

To set the proper values of decelerating E field one can start from mono-energetic e+ beam 0.9MeV

Deceleration and acceleration by 2 RF cavities

Page 10: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

10

RF positron deceleration

The goal is to decelerate as many positrons as possible, close to the peak energy 0.9MeVUnfortunately the beam is divergent in all directions.

Page 11: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

11

RF positron deceleration

Focusing solenoid (without RF field) – shorter version

Bz ~ 0.7T

Bz ~ 7T

Page 12: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

12

Bz ~ 7T

Bz ~ 0.7T

RF positron deceleration

Focusing solenoid (without RF field) – longer version

Page 13: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

13

RF positron deceleration

Positron energy along the z axis

Bz ~ 0.7T

Bz ~ 7T

Page 14: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

14

RF positron deceleration

Bz ~ 0.7T, cavities start 100mm after the target

Page 15: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

15

RF positron deceleration

Bz ~ 0.7T, cavities start 1mm after the target

Page 16: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

16

RF positron deceleration

Energy spectrum, bin width E = 40 keV

energy spectrum

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3E [MeV]

Npositrons after decelerationpositrons before deceleration

Page 17: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

17

RF positron deceleration

Eav N before deceleration

N after deceleration

20 keV 0 660 keV 0 4100 keV 0 4140 keV 0 5180 keV 270 7220 keV 702 4260 keV 1368 8

Only about 10-4 of all positrons are decelerated below 100keV.

To get more accurate data of deceleration efficiency further optimizations of decelerating and focusing fields with higher number of initial particles have to be performed.

Page 18: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

18

RF positron deceleration

The beam aperture was small about 10mmAfter increasing the radius acceptance more positrons are focused and decelerating cavities can be placed farther.

This is the next step that will be considered

Page 19: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012 19

RF positron deceleration

First results with wider aperture at the beginning and RF cavities at the end:

Page 20: Marcin Staszczak National Centre for Nuclear Research (Poland)

6-th GBAR collaboration meeting, 18-19 April 2012

20

RF positron deceleration

CONCLUSIONS

1. Preliminary studies have been performed.2. Deceleration has been observed. Pulsed positron beam in

effect.3. Efficiency is still low.4. Main problem is geometry and positron divergence living the

target.5. More optimizations and further simulations must be performed.6. Higher initial electron energies should be considered.