March 2-4, 2016 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake … · March 2-4, 2016 Salt Palace...
Transcript of March 2-4, 2016 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake … · March 2-4, 2016 Salt Palace...
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake City, Utah
TRACK: A (PLANNING) WORKSHOP: 2
Title: Non-Traditional Airport Demand – Industrial Aerospace
Speaker: Rick Crider, A.A.E. - Port San Antonio / Kelly Field
Date: March 2, 2016
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Legacy of Defense
• Many of the industrial aerospace activities in the United States today are accomplished in facilities and/or at airports that were developed by the Department of Defense
• In fact, a significant number of airports within the National Airport System (NAS) today were developed to satisfy a military objective before being deemed surplus property and transferred to local public entities
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Emergence of a Coalition
Charleston, SC (Charleston International)
Fort Worth, TX (Alliance)
Houston, TX (Ellington Field)
Jacksonville, FL (Cecil Field)
Kinston, NC (Kinston Regional)
Melbourne, FL (Melbourne International)
Mobile, AL (Mobile Regional)
Peru, IN (Grissom ARB)
Phoenix, AZ (Phoenix Mesa Gateway)
Renton, WA (Renton Municipal Airport)
San Antonio, TX (Port San Antonio / Kelly Field)
Savannah, GA (Savannah / Hilton Head International Airport)
Seattle, WA (Boeing Field/King County International)
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Why do we Care?
• Economic Impact
– Job creation
– Quality employment opportunity
• Impact to the NAS
– Industrial Aviation often requires airport land
– Industrial Aviation, therefore, impacts airport planning
• Location matters
– Industrial aspects within all dimensions of Aviation
– Ambivalence weakens our nation’s position as an aerospace leader
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Creating the conditions for maintaining and growing quality jobs
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
GDC Technics
Boeing San Antonio
433rd Airlift Wing USAF Reserves
149th Fighter Wing Texas ANG
Former Kelly AFB
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Safran Engine Testing
Air Methods / AirLIFE Maintenance Base
GoAero MX Sat Comm
Kelly Field
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Kelly Field
Joint-Use Airfield
14.2 M Sq. Ft. Transferred 5.0 M Sq. Ft. Demolished ____________________
9.2 M Sq. Ft. Usable
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Hangars | Workshops | Warehouses | Offices | Workforce Housing
10 million square feet
95% Occupancy
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
1,900 acres
Established 2001
10 million sq. ft. of buildings
95% occupancy of leasable space
Foreign-Trade Zone (#80-10)
$500+ million capital investment
70 employers
12,000 workers
Over $4B annual economic impact
Port San Antonio Today
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
JOINT USE AIRFIELD
$4 BILLION+ ANNUAL IMPACT
Kelly Field/FTZ
Mixed-Use Center
East Kelly Railport
Air Force
St. Philip’s College SW Campus
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
41% Developed (620 acres)
16% Ready to Develop (242 acres)
43% Needs
Preparation (638 acres)
Preparing
171 acres
FY2015-16
Opportunities
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Tenants
• Located 6 miles from downtown Seattle and 4.5
miles from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
• 614 acres
• Dedicated to Common/Public Use – 366 acres
• Development Area for revenue generation – 248 acres
• 112 acres are under lease to The Boeing Company
• 25th busiest cargo airport in the U.S.
• 396 Based Aircraft
• 165,571 Operations
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Economic Impact
• 2013 Economic Impact $3.5 billion
• 5,200 direct jobs
• 16,336 indirect jobs
• $1.08 billion in total labor income in the region
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
KBFI Industrial activities
Boeing Military Flight Center
Cargo
Through the Fence Activities
Boeing 737 Commercial Delivery Center Boeing Flight Test
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
• Commercial delivery center for the Boeing 737
• Flight Test Center for all new aircraft, models
• Military Flight Center, Research and Development Programs
The Boeing Company
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake City, Utah
TRACK: A (PLANNING) WORKSHOP: 2
Title: Non-Traditional Airport Demand - UAS
Speaker: Todd McNamee County of Ventura Dept. of Airports
Date: March 2, 2016
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
• ECONOMIC IMPACT and INNOVATION
• AUVSI Study shows that commercial UAS could create 17,000 jobs in California and $2 Billion in positive economic impact annually over the next 10 years.
• Nationally that number is over 100,000 jobs and $80 Billion in Economic Impact
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
• The 2012 FAA Modernization and Reform Act – Sec. 332 Integration of UAS into the NAS
• Establish 6 test sites
– Sec. 333 Special Rules – EXEMPTIONS – Sec. 336 Special Rules – MODEL AIRCRAFT
• More coming in Aviation Innovation Reform and Reauthorization Act of 2016!! – FAA to EXPEDITE!
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
The 3 Types of Users
• Public Aircraft
– Ventura County Sheriff operates AV Cube for Public safety under Jurisdiction wide COA
• Civil Aircraft
– Commercial operators
• Most operating under Section 333 exemption
• Exemption NOT CONSISTENT with Blanket COA
• Modelers
– Section 336
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Civil/Commercial Aircraft Operations
• This could be you!
• But… You must understand the Do’s and Don’ts
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Exemption versus COA
Exemption Letter
– Pilots License Req.
– Up to 400 ft AGL
– Closer than 5 nm to Airport with LOA
– File a NOTAM
Blanket COA
– No Mention of Pilots License
– Up to 200 ft AGL
– No closer than 5 nm to Airport
– LOA is not available
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Model Aircraft Operation
• Weigh less than 55 lbs.
• NOW – Register if more than 0.55 lbs.
• Below 400 ft. AGL
• Visual Line of Site
• Contact Airport and/or tower to operate within 5 miles of an airport
– Airport/ATC MAY OBJECT!
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Recent FAA Initiatives
• Modelers must register if they are operating UAS weighing more than 0.55 pounds
• Guidance to states and local communities to beware of passing legislation or ordinance that may be contrary to FAA regulations and authority
• Guidance to Law Enforcement to assist with enforcing FAA regulations
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Small UAS Rule
• This is what everyone is waiting for!
– Less than 55 lbs.
– Visual line of site
– Daytime only
– Yield right of way
– Below 500 ft AGL
– Ops in Class B, C, and D allowed with permission from ATC.
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Small UAS Rule
• What does this mean as a UAS pilot?
– Pilots of a small UAS would be considered “operators”.
– Operator Certification and Responsibilities Operators would be required to:
• Pass an initial aeronautical knowledge test at an FAA-approved knowledge testing center.
• Be vetted by the Transportation Security Administration.
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Airport Considerations
• Coordination and Outreach – Partnering with FAA on PSA – FAA B4UFly App – Townhall meetings – Website
• Training of staff on how to respond • Aeronautical versus Non-Aeronautical • Design standards • Grant Assurance implications • Other
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake City, Utah
TRACK: A (PLANNING) WORKSHOP: 2
Title: Non-Traditional Airport Demand - Space
Speaker: Ken Ibold, RS&H, Inc.
Date: March 2, 2016
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
– George Santayana
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away …
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away …
The Mos Eisley Spaceport – ‘A wretched hive of scum and villany’
Spaceports
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Not so long ago, not so far away… Not so long ago, not so far away…
V-2 was the first into space – ‘Today the spaceship was born’
Spaceports
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Only yesterday … Only yesterday …
The Space Shuttle – ‘It marks our entrance into a new era’
Spaceports
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Today … Today …
Commercial Spaceports – ‘It’s not a matter of if it’s going to happen, it’s when’
Spaceports
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Paradigm Shift
• Reduce costs
• Reusable vehicles
• Capture or create new launch business
• Did I say reduce costs?
• Amortize expenses more broadly
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Paradigm Shift
• Reduce costs
• Minimize dedicated infrastructure
• Use existing infrastructure and operational capability
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: License Elements
• Location
• Flight corridor
• Airspace
• Local support
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: License Elements
• Safety distances
• Flight corridor
• Risk analysis
• NEPA
– EA
– Sonic boom
Spaceports: License Elements
• Safety distances
• Think 1,250 feet
• Storage of fuel and oxidizer
• OLA
Spaceports: License Elements
• Airspace is a turf battle
• Expect TFRs
• The SUA dilemma
• No real- time traffic separation yet
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: License Elements
• Flight corridor
• Model vehicle data
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: License Elements
• Geocode flight corridor
• Perform risk analysis
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: License Elements
• NEPA: EIS or EA
– FAA / Agency coordination
– Low number of operations
– Aircraft-like operations
– Rocket ignition at altitude
– Sonic boom
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: License Elements
• Select subject vehicle
• What about concept vehicles?
Default: Shuttle Shape 8 Weight (Klbs) 187 Length (feet) 121
Customized: RLV Shape 8 Weight (Klbs) 25 Length (feet) 31
Spaceports: License Elements
• Demonstrate extent of boom
• No ‘acceptable’ level
• Where can it be heard?
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: The Next Generation
The Holy Grail – High-Speed Point-to-Point Transportation
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: The Next Generation
NASA’s New Aviation Horizons X-Plane Initiative
March 2-4, 2016 Salt Lake City, Utah
Spaceports: The Next Generation
For more information:
• Part 400
• Part 417
• Part 420
• But that’s only part of the story
Presented to:
By:
Date:
Federal Aviation Administration
Track: A (Planning) Workshop: 2
Non-Traditional Airport Demand –
Industrial Aerospace, Space and
UAS
ACC/AAAE Planning, Design and
Construction Symposium
Mike Hines, Manager
FAA Airport Planning and Environmental Division
March 2, 2016
Federal Aviation Administration 67
Industrial Aerospace Commercial Space
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
How does it all fit? Opportunity and challenges to
the existing airport ‘ecosystem’
Federal Aviation Administration 68
Context: The U.S. system of airports as of September 30, 2014
• 19,360 airports overall
• 14,212 airports designated as private-use
• 5,148 airports open to the public
• 3,331 existing airports in the National Plan of Integrated Airport
Systems (“NPIAS”)
• 544 airports certificated under Part 139 (commercial service by aircraft
with 9 or more seats)
• 389 primary airports (scheduled commercial service with at least 10,000
annual enplanements)
Federal Aviation Administration 70
Airport Definitions – contained in Statute
Statutory Definition
And Airports meeting
Definition
Criteria Also Referred to as:
Commercial Service Public owned airports with more than 2,500 annual enplanements and scheduled air carrier service
Large Hub Receives 1% or more of the annual U.S. commercial enplanements Primary
Medium Hub Receives 0.25 to 1.0% of the annual U.S. commercial enplanements Primary
Small Hub Receives 0.05 to 0.25% of the annual U.S. commercial enplanements Primary
Nonhub Receives less than 0.05% but more than 10,000 of the annual U.S. commercial
enplanements
Primary
395 Primary
Nonprimary
Commercial Service,
Nonhub
Also referred to as nonhub nonprimary, these airports have scheduled passenger service
and between 2,500 and 10,000 annual enplanements.
Nonprimary
Reliever An airport designated by the Secretary to relieve congestion at a commercial service airport
and to provide more general aviation access to the overall community.
Nonprimary
General Aviation A public airport that does not have scheduled service or has scheduled service with less than
2,500 passenger boardings each year.
Nonprimary
2,937 Nonprimary
Airports
Total NPIAS Airports Airports the FAA has determined are important to the national air transportation system and
as result eligible for AIP funding 3,332 NPIAS Airports
Federal Aviation Administration 71
General Aviation Airports: A National Asset released in May 2012
• Identified a broad range of aeronautical functions serving the public interest
• Established four categories: National, Regional, Local, Basic
• 2,455 airports were categorized
• 497 airports could not be categorized
ASSET 2: In-Depth Review of the 497 Unclassified Airports released in March 2014
• In-depth review of 497 Airports to determine the appropriate category for each airport
• Collected input from a broad group of industry stakeholders and each airport
• Reviewed information provided by airports & states
• 241 were categorized, 252 were not categorized but remain in NPIAS as unclassified, 4
closed/removed
Both ASSET reports are available at:
http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/ga_study/
Background: ASSET 1 and 2
Federal Aviation Administration 72
Nonprimary Airport Categories (at the end of ASSET II)
National (84) Supports the
national and
state system by
providing
communities
with access to
national and
international
markets in
multiple states
and throughout
the United
States.
Regional (459) Supports regional
economies by
connecting
communities to
statewide and
interstate markets.
Local (1,268) Supplements
communities by
providing
access to
primarily
intrastate and
some interstate
markets.
Basic (880) Links the
community with
national airport
system and
supports general
aviation activities
(e.g., emergency
services, charter or
critical passenger
service, cargo
operations, flight
training and
personal flying).
Unclassified (252)
Provide access to
the aviation
system
Federal Aviation Administration 73
Basic (880)
Links the community
with national airport
system and supports
general aviation
activities (e.g.,
emergency services,
charter or critical
passenger service,
cargo operations, flight
training and personal
flying).
Airports in this category are:
• Public Owned
• And 10 or more based aircraft or if
heliport 4 based helicopters.
• OR owned by or serving a Native
American Community
• OR Provide a Federal Service such as
U.S. Forest, U.S Marshal Service,
U.S. Post Office (Air Stop), U.S.
Customs/Border Patrol, U.S.
DOT/EAS
• OR Rural/Remote (e.g., 27 or more
miles from another NPIAS Airport;
island with no road connection;
surrounded by mountains)
Considered Activity outside the Usual Operational
Numbers
Federal Aviation Administration 75
UAS – Impact on Facilities
Coming to an airport near you?
Regulatory Issues Airport Planning, Financial,
and Compliance Issues
• Definitions of
aeronautical
activity.
• Emergency
response.
• Facility
requirements
• Airport grant
assurances.
• Eligibility for AIP
or PFC funds
• Part 139
• Part 77
• Environmental
Impact
• Other regulations
affecting airport
operations
• Implementing SMS
Federal Aviation Administration 76
Commercial Space
• FAA Office of Airport (ARP)’s mission is to ensure the
national airport system is safe, efficient, and
environmentally responsible and meets the needs of the
traveling public.
• FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST)’s
mission is to ensure protection of the public, property, and
the national security and foreign policy interests of the
United States during commercial launch or reentry
activities, and to encourage, facilitate, and promote U.S.
commercial space transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 77
U.S. Launch Sites – “Spaceports”
FAA has granted launch site operator
licenses to 10 commercial space
launch sites; 5 launch sites are co-
located with public-use NPIAS airports
Federal Aviation Administration 78
• Proposals for a launch site operator license
(LSOL) at a Federally-obligated Airport,
requires an ALP approval.
• The LSOL requires a Site Boundary
delineation (and other proposed
infrastructure improvements)
• The ALP approval change also requires an
environmental action.
• ARP and AST continue to work together to
identify and proactively resolve technical,
legal, or policy challenges associated with
the proposed activities.
Commercial Space
Federal Aviation Administration 79
• Many airports seeking to diversify revenue through non-
aviation related development.
industrial development
commercial development
Oil and gas
• Requires ALP approval (federally obligated airports)
• ALP changes require environmental action.
• Compliance and grant assurances still apply
Non-Aviation Related Economic Development
Opportunities
Federal Aviation Administration 80
Competing Financial Interests
• Traditional aviation demands
• Emerging non-traditional aviation demands on NAS
and airport funding
o UAS
o Commercial Space
o Aviation, Non-Aviation related development
Federal Aviation Administration 81
How much funding is available?
• AIP funding has exceeded $3 billion annually since 2001
• FAA funds up to 75% of the eligible project cost at major airports and up to 90% at small airports (Some exceptions)
• Other funding sources for commercial service airports include:
o Passenger Facility Charges (PFC), bonds, aeronautical fees, & airport operating revenue.
The latest estimate of
AIP eligible
development
indicates an annual
need of about $6.7B
at 3,332 NPIAS
airports
Federal Aviation Administration 82
How is AIP Funding Distributed?
• Statute-driven
• Entitlement
Primary Entitlement Cargo State Apportionment/ Nonprimary Entitlement Alaska Supplemental
• Discretionary
40% is for specific set-asides Noise Reliever Military Airport Program
Remaining 60% is for other discretionary projects
Approximately
1/3 of AIP
Approximately
2/3 of AIP
Federal Aviation Administration 83
Airport Improvement Program (AIP) structure
Capacity-Safety-Security-
Noise (CSSN)
10.5% Noise
8.1%
Reliever
0.2%
MAP
0.4%
Remaining Discretionary
3.5%
Primary Entitlements
24.7%
State Apportionment
7.9%
Protected Entitlements
13.8%
Cargo Entitlements
3.5%
Nonprimary Entitlements
12.1%
Alaska Supplemental
0.6%
Small Airport Fund
14.2%
Federal Aviation Administration 84
Industrial Aerospace
Commercial Space
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
• There are overlapping interests in the airport
‘ecosystem’.
• There is a competing interest for limited financial
resources
• Activity Measures (aircraft, passenger, operations) provide
one means to categorize airports. However, we are
open to have consider other factors that highlight the
unique roles of airports in our decision making
processes.
• As the system evolves, we will continue to adapt.
Summary