Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities...
Transcript of Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities...
![Page 1: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Manure Pit Foaming Understanding and Solutions
Iowa Pork Congress
Jan 24, 2013
![Page 2: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Problem
• Six-year summary
• Lab studies
• Field study—Monensin
• Monensin recommendations
• Producer survey, fall 2012
• Future plans
![Page 3: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Foam
![Page 4: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Foam destruction
![Page 7: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Foaming needs
• Biogas generation
– CH4, CO2, H2S
• Surfactants
– Decrease surface tension
• Stabilizer
– Increases bubble stability
– Filamentous bacteria
– Small fiber
– Other hydrophobic particles
![Page 8: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
History—manure deep-pit foaming
• “Flash fires” and foaming
– 5-6 years ago
• 2009 summer/fall
– Barn explosions
– Flash fires
• Pit foaming related
![Page 9: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Common foaming situations
• Same farm
– One pit or barn foams
– Others don’t foam
• Problem over time (1-2 yr)
– Once established, very fast growing
• Sensitive trigger
![Page 10: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Producer survey
• 28% of producers, 26% of pits foam
– Limited to upper Midwest
– Isolated other locations
![Page 11: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Producer survey
• 28% of producers, 26% of pits foam
• No clue as to cause—facilities
– Building (room) type, size, or age
– Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or
feeder (dry/wet-dry)
– Room cleaning technique
– Pit additives or pumping frequency
– Genetics
– Diet
– Management
![Page 12: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Producer survey
• 28% of producers, 26% of pits foam
• No clue as to cause—manure character
– Manure crust presence
– pH
– Solids content
– Nutrients
– Strength—COD
– Lipid (fat) content (maybe)
![Page 13: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Lab summary
• Bacteria screening
• Differences in species
• Differences in communities
![Page 14: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Manure compositional change
Total Solids Percent
Organic Nitrogen
%DM
Total Nitrogen
%DM
Ammonia Nitrogen
%DM
Foaming layer
9.0 0.42 0.88 0.46
Foaming liquid
5.2 0.25 0.71 0.45
Non-foaming liquid
5.3 0.23 0.74 0.51
Total Solids %
Organic Nitrogen
%DM
Total Nitrogen
%DM
Ammonia Nitrogen
%DM
Foaming layer 9.0 0.42 0.88 0.46
Foaming liquid 5.2 0.25 0.71 0.45
Non-foaming liquid
5.3 0.23 0.74 0.51
![Page 15: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Foaming Index
![Page 16: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Fishing for ideas
Educated guess
![Page 17: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
FI results when added immediately
A: digested manure B: raw manure
![Page 18: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
One week
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Control Yeastextract
Corn oil DDGS VFA Tracemetals
Fo
am
ing
In
dex
Non-foamingdigested manure
Seeded digestedmanure
Non-foaming rawmanure
Seeded rawmanure
![Page 19: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Four weeks
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Control Yeastextract
Corn oil DDGS VFA Tracemetals
Fo
am
ing
in
dex
Non-foamingdigested manure
Seeded digestedmanure
Non-foaming rawmanure
Seeded rawmanure
![Page 20: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Current lab research—summary
• Surface oil addition
– Short-term benefit
– Long-term bigger problem
• Better carbon balance
![Page 21: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Current lab research—summary
• Surface oil addition
• No real impact
– Yeast extract
– DDGS
– VFA
– Trace metals
![Page 22: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Current lab research—summary
• Surface oil addition
• No real impact
– Yeast extract
– DDGS
– VFA
– Glycerol – short chain
– Oleic acid – long chain
– Trace metals
![Page 23: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Control Glycerol Oleic Acid Glycerol + OleicAcid
Fo
am
ing
In
dex
![Page 24: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Fo
am
in
dex
Oleic acid, ml/L
![Page 25: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Field research—monensin
![Page 26: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Foaming ↔ Bloat
• Borrowed from beef production
• Rumensin
– Alters biochemistry pathway in rumen
• Increased volatile fatty acids
• Decreased methane
• Bloat Guard
– Reduces frothy bloat in grazing cattle
![Page 27: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Experimental procedure
• Typical grow-finish buildings
– 1000- to 1100-head capacity
– Single- or double-wide barn layout
– 8-ft-deep pits
– Same or nearby sites, same producer
![Page 28: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Experimental procedure
• Added Rumensin-90 directly to the pit
– Similar rates to feeding
• Rates / 100,000 gal manure
– 0 lbs (control)
– 2.5 lbs
– 5.0 lbs
– 10.0 lbs
![Page 29: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Experimental procedure
• Rumensin-90
• Added Bloat Guard
– Rumensin-90 (control @ 5 lbs)
– 60 lbs
– 100 lbs
![Page 30: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Preapplication 3-wk post
Fo
am
dep
th (in
ch
)
Sampling period
Site C--Boat Guard
Rumensin
BG 60
BG 100A
BG 100B
Application
![Page 34: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Safety - Rumensin
• Human handling
– Causes eye burns
– Allergic skin reaction
– Harmful if swallowed
– Respiratory tract irritation
• Swine
– Lethal if enough consumed
– 0.1 lb product per 100 lbs liveweight
![Page 35: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Safety - Rumensin
• Environmental
– Toxicity to fish
– LC50 for 96 hr
• Lethal concentration 50% of population
– Rainbow trout: 9.0 mg/L
– Bluegill sunfish: 16.6 mg/L
![Page 36: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Safety - Rumensin
• Environmental
– Rainbow trout: 9.0 mg/L
• Playing the what if game
– 5 lb / 100,000 gal
– 50% reduction in pit
– 6000 gallons / acre; 10% runoff
– 1 inch rain; 75% runoff
– 0.018 mg/L (0.2%)
![Page 37: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Safety - Rumensin
• Environmental
– Rainbow trout: 9.0 mg/L
• Playing the what if game
• Half life in soil
– 7 days
![Page 38: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Regulations - Rumensin
• FDA
– None, not being fed
• MPCA
– No official statement
• MDA
– Non-Pesticide
![Page 39: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Bottom line
• Rumensin-90—Preventive
– 1-2 lbs after pumping pits
![Page 40: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Bottom line
• Rumensin-90—Preventive
• Rumensin-90—Active foam
– Suggest 5 lbs / 100,000 gallons
• Lower rate (< 5 lbs) may work
– Take additional material
– Longer period
– About 10-14 days to see response
• Maybe 30 days
![Page 41: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Bottom line
• Rumensin-90—Preventive
• Rumensin-90—Active foam
– Interaction with other pit additives
– No clue
![Page 42: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Research direction
• Multiple state
– Iowa
– Illinois
– Minnesota
• Multi-year project
![Page 43: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Research direction
• Multiple state / Multi-year project
• Producer survey
– Fall, 2012
– Fall, 2014
– Compare 2009
![Page 44: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Producer survey—Fall 2012
• 18 Producers
• Low response
– High prices
– Drought
– Not a concern
– PRRS
– ???
![Page 45: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Producer survey—Fall 2012
Commercial break
![Page 46: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Producer survey—Fall 2012
• 18 Producers
• 4 States
• 102 Rooms
– 71% grow-finish
– 29% wean-finish
• 80 pits
![Page 47: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Producer survey—Fall 2012
• 18 Producers
• 15 Producers had foam
– 39 foaming pits
– 49% of total pits in survey
– 29% in 2009
![Page 48: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Producer survey—Fall 2012
• 18 Producers
• 15 Producers had foam
• 3 Producers had flash fire
– Pumping / agitation
– Repair work
![Page 49: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Producer survey—Fall 2012
• Checking for foam
– Weekly – 53%
– Monthly – 33%
– Semi-annually – 13%
• Foaming first concerns
– Summer – 33%
– Fall – 50%
• Pumping frequency
– 33% once / year
– 61% twice / year
– 6% three / year
![Page 50: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Producer survey—Fall 2012
• Reducing foam
– Nothing – 27%
– Agitate – 7%
– Pumped out – 20%
– Sprayed water – 20%
– Pit additive – 53%
– Feed additive – 7%
– Mineral / Vegetable oil – 0%
– Diesel fuel – 7%
![Page 51: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Research direction
• Multiple state / Multi-year project
• Producer survey
• Extensive manure sampling
– Testing for everything
– Microbial communities
– Long chain fatty acids
– Lead by University of Illinois
![Page 52: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Research direction
• Multiple state / Multi-year project
• Producer survey
• Extensive manure sampling
• Dietary feeding trials
– Long chain fatty acids (forms bubbles)
– Micro-fiber (maintains bubble)
![Page 53: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Research direction
• Multiple state / Three-year project
• Producer survey
• Extension manure sampling
• Dietary feeding trials
– Micro-fiber
– Long chain fatty acids
![Page 54: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Questions??
![Page 55: Manure Pit Foaming · •28% of producers, 26% of pits foam •No clue as to cause—facilities –Building (room) type, size, or age –Type of waterer (nipple/cup) or feeder (dry/wet-dry)](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042118/5e9665f3de24da2f82100dc1/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)