Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used...

12
Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Transcript of Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used...

Page 1: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 2: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

100

200

300 PJ

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

total energy used

fossil fuel energy used

energy used for transportation

energy used to transport freight by road

Context

Manitoba Energy Use

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 3: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

0

3

6

9

12 Mt CO2e

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

greenhouse gases produced

GHGs produced by road freight transport

Context

Manitoba Greenhouse Gases

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Page 4: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

2

4

6

8

10 billion tonne-kilometers

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Context

Manitoba Road Freight Transportation

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 5: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

0

1

2

3

4

5 MegaJoules per tonne-kilometer

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Context

Manitoba Road Freight Energy Efficiency

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 6: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

Proposal

“Opportunities to Partner with the Manitoba Trucking Industry on GHG Reduction”• Prepared in response to “Tomorrow Now,

Manitoba’s Green Plan”, a policy document of the Government of Manitoba.

• Co-authored and jointly submitted by the Manitoba Trucking Association and 50by30.

• Submitted April 2014 to Manitoba government

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 7: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

Proposal - Goal

“double-green”• increase potential for profit in Manitoba trucking

industry by improving efficiency- reduce MegaJoules per tonne-kilometer

• reduce GHG emissions from road freight transportation- in Manitoba

- everywhere Manitoba trucks haul freight

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 8: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

Proposal - Elements

Regulatory1. Long Vehicle

Combinations

2. New Generation Wide-Base Tires

3. Full Length Boat Tails

Fiscal1. PST exemption on

aftermarket purchases

2. Grants defraying part of the cost of fuel-efficiency technologies

3. Loan guarantees or a PAYS-like program

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 9: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

2. New Generation Wide-Base Tires

goal: to permit NGWBT on select MB roads• all roads classified by MIT as RTAC routes

- http://www.gov.mb.ca/mit/mcd/mcpd/mhcs.html

• by “NGWBT” we mean 445 & 455, or wider

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 10: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

2. New Generation Wide-Base Tires

Material reviewed:• Pierre et al. (2003) “Characterization and Evaluation of Tire-Roadway Interface Stresses” (a

translation of “The Laval Study”)

• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) “Single wide-based tires”

• Al-Qadi et al. (2004) “Pavement damage due to different tires and vehicle configurations”

• Bachman et al. (2005) “Effect of single wide tires and trailer aerodynamics on fuel economy and NOx emissions of class 8 line-haul tractor-trailers”

• Knowles & Synectics (2008) “Analysis of the economic costs and benefits related to increasing the Ontario weight allowance for new-generation wide base single truck tires”

• Ponniah & Hass (2008) “Single wide-base tires in Ontario: Potential pavement damage cost analysis”

• Al-Qadi & Wang (2009) “Evaluation of pavement damage due to new tire designs”

• Surcel & Jokai (2010) “Evaluating components of the Canadian Trucking Alliance's enviroTruck concept”

• Grellet et al (2013?) “Comparison between wide base single tire and dual tires assembly based on experimental pavement response and predicted damage”

• Weaver et al (2011-2015) “The impact of wide-base tires on pavement damage: A national study”Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 11: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

2. New Generation Wide-Base Tires

variable effect

fuel efficiency improved

resource consumption reduced

cost to truck owner reduced

waste production reduced

GHG emissions reduced

noise reduced

effect on RTAC roads mixed

• fatigue damage • perhaps somewhat negative

• subgrade rutting • perhaps somewhat negative

• top-down cracking • positive

• near-surface cracking • positive

• hot-mix asphalt rutting • positive

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative

Page 12: Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative. 100 200 300 PJ 19901995200020052010 total energy used fossil fuel energy used energy used for transportation.

2. New Generation Wide-Base Tires

Effect on pavement, best current knowledge:• Al-Qadi & Wang (2009) “Evaluation of pavement damage

due to new tire designs”• https://apps.ict.illinois.edu/projects/getfile.asp?id=3007

- Wide-base tire causes greater fatigue damage and subgrade rutting than dual-tire assembly

» However, the relative damage ratios between various configurations at the same load decrease as the pavement thickness increases.

- Wide-base tire causes less top-down cracking, “near-surface” cracking, and HMA rutting damage than dual-tire assembly

- Using a wide-base 455 tire results in the least amount of pavement damage for an interstate road, slightly greater damage for a primary road, and more damage for a local road.

Manitoba Trucking Efficiency Initiative