1/9

Managing partner’s feedbacks through the web

Jean-Marc Viglino, IGN-France

1st EuroSDR Workshop

Crowd Sourcingfor UpdatingNational Databases

2/9

The Large Scale Reference system (RGE®)

Orthophoto component Topographic component

Parcel plan component Address component

from classical to on the fly updating

Main difficulties:• to be informed of all changes • to capture geometry of features

main roads, railways, major facilities

electric networks, administrative data, addresses, facilities

buildings, orography, hydrography, …

on the fly updating

annual updates

classical updatesevery 5 years (down to 3?)

3/9

The partnership policy Aim: to save public money by integrating data already produced and maintained by institutional partners.

Post Office, Cadastral Agency, Forestry Agency, Electric network company, Railroad network company, Provincial Councils, Fire departments

Partner

GIS application

!

Today’s workflowPeriodic bulk exchanges between GIS managers and IGN

4/9

The modified partnership policy

Partner

updates

Validation

Integration

GIS applicationValidation

Integration

What we want to do!

Aim: smooth and more continuous integration of partners’ information and data, based on feedback management.

5/9

Storage

Data basemanagement

Users controller

Query /statistics

Workflowvalidation

Syndication

Applicationservice

model

Consultation

Back Office Front Office

Expert

FeedbackApplication

service

DBMS

Customizationmodule

Security access

customers

Feedback Management System

CMS + Geoportal API

!?

6/9

Feedback Management System

Plugin Geoportail(virtual map API)

file uploadfeedback service

…

CMS functions : front/back office – publishing – forum – author – statistics – configuration…

CMS

7/9

1. Why would people contribute?

2. What will we expect in terms of accuracy, reliability or completeness?

• It is easy to participate• Civic contribution (national databases) • Professional interest

Remaining questions

• Because they are nice partners…

• Partners already return information• Expert professional or authority

3. What are they expecting?• To use the service for they own data• To secure the data to their group• To take advantage of other partner’s feedbacks• To plug they own process on the service (input/output format)• To add they own layer (WMS, WFS…)

GroupConcept

(community)

Social networkProfessional investment

Social reward

Involved in the validation workflow

4. How to manage the workflow?

8/9

Experiment

Feedback management Groups definition Web service connections Consulting partners (tests)

Refine the workflowDefine evaluation (rating)

Integration to existing processes

.   

http://ripart.ign.fr

Drawing tools Query tools …

9/9

Thank you for your attention