Making Middleboxes Someone Else’s Problem: Network Processing as a Cloud Service
52
Making Middleboxes Someone Else’s Problem: Network Processing as a Cloud Service Justine Sherry*, Shaddi Hasan*, Colin Scott*, Arvind Krishnamurthy†, Sylvia Ratnasamy*, and Vyas Sekar‡ ‡ * †
description
Making Middleboxes Someone Else’s Problem: Network Processing as a Cloud Service. Justine Sherry*, Shaddi Hasan * , Colin Scott * , Arvind Krishnamurthy † , Sylvia Ratnasamy * , and Vyas Sekar ‡. *. ‡. †. Typical Enterprise Networks. Internet. Typical Enterprise Networks. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Making Middleboxes Someone Else’s Problem: Network Processing as a Cloud Service
Making Middleboxes Someone Else’s Problem: Network Processing as a
Cloud Service
Justine Sherry*, Shaddi Hasan*, Colin Scott*, Arvind Krishnamurthy†, Sylvia Ratnasamy*, and Vyas Sekar‡
‡* †
Typical Enterprise Networks
Internet
Typical Enterprise Networks
Internet
A Survey• 57 enterprise network administrators
• Small (< 1k hosts) to XL ( >100k hosts)
• Asked about deployment size, expenses, complexity, and failures.
How many middleboxes do you deploy?
Typically on par with # routers and switches.
What kinds of middleboxes do you deploy?
Many kinds of devices, all with different functions and management expertise required.
How many networking personnel are there?
Average salary for a network engineer - $60-80k USD
How do administrators spend their time?
Misconfig. Overload Physical/Electrical
Firewalls 67.3% 16.3% 16.3%Proxies 63.2% 15.7% 21.1%
IDS 54.45% 11.4% 34%
Most administrators spent 1-5 hrs/week dealing with failures; 9% spent 6-10 hrs/week.
Recap• High Capital and Operating Expenses
• Time Consuming and Error-Prone
• Physical and Overload Failures
How can we improve this?
Our Proposal
Internet
Our Proposal
Internet
Cloud Provider
• High Capital and Operating Expenses
• Time Consuming and Error Prone
• Physical and Overload Failures
• Economies of scale and pay-per use
• Simplifies configuration and deployment
• Redundant resources for failover
A move to the cloud
Our Design
Challenges• Minimal Complexity at the Enterprise
• Functional Equivalence
• Low Performance Overhead
APLOMB“Appliance for Outsourcing Middleboxes”
Outsourcing Middleboxes with APLOMB
Internet
Cloud Provider
APLOMBGateway
NAT
Inbound Traffic
Internet
Cloud Provider
Web Server: www.enterprise.com 192.168.1.100
EnterpriseNetwork Admin.
Register:www.enterprise.com192.168.1.100
Inbound Traffic
Internet
Cloud Provider
DNSRegister:enterprise.com98.76.54.32
98.76.54.32
External Client
Choosing a Datacenter
Cloud Provider East
Cloud Provider West
Enterprise
Route through cloud datacenter that minimizes end to end latency.
APLOMB Gateway keeps a “routing table” to select best tunnel for every Internet prefix.External
Client
Caches and “Terminal Services”
Traffic destined to services like caches should be redirected to the nearest node.
Cloud Provider West
APLOMB“Appliance for Outsourcing Middleboxes”
• Place middleboxes in the cloud.• Use APLOMB devices and DNS to
redirect traffic to and from the cloud.• That’s it.
Can we outsource all middleboxes?
FirewallsIDSesLoad BalancersVPNsProxy/CachesWAN Optimizers
✔✔✔✔✗ Bandwidth?✗ Compression?
I
APLOMB+ for CompressionAdd generic compression to APLOMB gateway to reduce bandwidth consumption.
Cloud Provider
Internet
Can we outsource all middleboxes?
FirewallsIDSesLoad BalancersVPNsProxy/CachesWAN Optimizers
✔✔✔✔✗ Bandwidth?✗ Compression?✔✔
Does it work?
Our Deployment• Cloud provider: EC2 – 7 Datacenters
• OpenVPN for tunneling, Vyatta for middlebox services
• Two Types of Clients:– Software VPN client on laptops– Tunneling software router for wired hosts
Three Part EvaluationImplementation & Deployment
• Performance metrics
Case Study of a Large Enterprise• Impact in a real usage scenario
Wide-Area Measurements• Network latency
Does APLOMB inflate latency?
For PlanetLab nodes, 60% of pairs’ latency improves with redirection through EC2.
Latency at a Large EnterpriseMeasured redirection latency between enterprise sites.
• Median latency inflation: 1.13 ms• Sites experiencing inflation were
primarily in areas where EC2 does not have a wide footprint.
How does APLOMB impact other quality metrics, like bandwidth and jitter?
• Bandwidth: download times with BitTorrent increased on average 2.3%
• Jitter: consistently within industry standard bounds of 30ms
Does APLOMB negate the benefits of bandwidth-saving devices?
APLOMB+ incurs a median penalty of 3.8% bandwidth inflation over traditional WAN
Optimizers.
Does “elastic scaling” at the cloud provide real benefits?
Some sites generate as much as 13x traffic more than average at peak hours.
Recap• Good application performance–Latency median inflation 1.1ms–Download times increased only
2.3%• Generic redundancy elimination
saves bandwidth costs• Strong benefits from elasticity
ConclusionMoving middleboxes to the cloud is a practical and feasible solution to the complexity of enterprise networks.
What does it mean to “manage” middleboxes?
• Upgrades and Vendor Interaction• Monitoring and Diagnostics• Configuration– Appliance Configuration – Policy Configuration
• Training
Internal Firewalls
Cloud Provider
Internet
How many middleboxes can APLOMB outsource?
How much do middleboxes cost?
Thousands to millions of dollars / 5 years
Is maintaining multiple tunnels at the APLOMB gateway useful?
With multiple tunnels, the fraction of pairs with 0 inflation or better moves from 40% to 60%
How large must a provider’s datacenter footprint be to support middlebox services?
Minimal Improvement to E2E Latency with Larger Footprint.
How does APLOMB redirection impact web page load times?
Median: slightly worse; 90%-ile: slightly better.
Caches may require a larger footprint to provide nationwide service.
