Interprofessional Education (IPE):for Humanized Patient Home Care:

A Collaboration of Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy and

Faculty of Architecture, Urban design and Creative ArtsMahasarakham University (MSU)

การเรยนการสอนรวมระหวางวชาชพ:การเยยมบานผปวยดวยหวใจ

ความรวมมอระหวางคณะแพทยศาสตร คณะเภสชศาสตร และคณะสถาปตยกรรมศาสตร ผงเมอง และนฤมตศลป

มหาวทยาลยมหาสารคาม

IPE@

MSU

IPE@MSU team วนนจะขอมาแลกเปลยน…...5 ประเดน

What we will share with you today?….5 issues

Question 1:IPE@MSU มาจากไหน?

What IPE@MSU comes from?

Interprofessional Education in MSUcame from….

• National Health Professional Education Reform Theme of 2016 “IPE towards Thai Health Team”

• Interprofessional Research and Practice (IPP)

• Community-based learning (Generic learning Outcome of MSU)- Humanized care in community

- Patient –centered careLearning Outcomeof 3 faculties, MSU

มหาวทยาลยมหาสารคาม

มหาวทยาลยพฒนาสงคม

Interprofessional Research and Practice (IPP)

Home Modifications for People with Disabilities and Elderly: Recommendations from Policy to Practice

Sirinart Tongsiri, MD PhDChanuttha Ploylearmsang, PhD

Katanyu HawsuthisimaMahasarakham University, Thailand

5Journal of Health Systems Research Vol. 9 No. 4 October-December 2015, p 382-395.Published in

Need-------Trust-------Value

Before AfterBefore After

Before After

Faculty of Pharmacy Faculty of Medicine Faculty of Architecture, Urban design and

Creative Arts

Expert in Medicinesand Health Promotion(be able to integrate knowledge Into real practice in community

and adhere to professional ethics)

Family medicine and Community medicine

for Humanized Medicine in community

Philosophy Philosophy Philosophy

MSU Philosophy: “Public devotion is a virtue of the learned”ผมปญญา พงเปนอยเพอมหาชน

A Place where Education Culture and Community meet

Public devotion with Creativity is a virtue of the learned

Philosophy of 3 Faculties and MSU

Question 2:IPE@MSU เรมตนไดอยางไร?How IPE@MSU is initiated?

1. Administrative Initiation and SupportA formal meeting of 3 deansafter attending 2nd Health Professional EducationReform (HER) Conference - IPE concept and implementation - Supportive policy- Recommendation for a working group (small and sharp)

Dean of Faculty of Medicine, Assoc.Prof.Suchat Areemit

Dean of Faculty of Architecture, Urban Designs and Creative Arts

Asst.Prof.Poldej ChaowaratDean of Faculty of Pharmacy,

Asst.Prof.Junthip Kanjanasilp

2.Setting IPE Working group (small and sharp)

Strong togetherwith Hopeful heart

Week 2: Capacity building/Strengthening the Working group with “INHOMESSS concept”

- Practice in the real situation (Home visit)- Discuss and Share idea…Plan for patients

(Interprofessional practice)

อาจารยมารวมกนฝก

ลงเยยมบาน

การแลกเปลยน

และวางแผนการดแล

ผปวยรวมกน

Question 3:IPE@MSU ลงมอทากนอยางไร?

How to implement IPE@MSU?

IPE intra-curricula activities plan

TQF 2 Medicine TQF2 Pharmacy TQF2 Architecture

MSU Philosophy: “Public devotion is a virtue of the learned”ผมปญญา พงเปนอยเพอมหาชน

TQF3 Family Medicine 1

ďńý ŀ řďý Đŀ ę₣㟎ăĹşŽăĿď 1

TQF3 Public Health Pharmacy

วชาเภสชสาธารณสข

TQF3 Introduction to Urban Architecture &

Environment

Curriculum

IPE Course

The 2nd year students

Week 11 Home visit 1-2Week 12: Group Oral Presentation/ Reflection

Week 7: Activity-based Learning (Team building)Brief Lectures: (1) INHOMESSS, (2) Drug and Community

and (3) Universal design (UD) for patients in community IPE activities

(Week 7)

IPE activities(Week 11-12)

Student year

“Humanized Patient Home Care with INHOMESSS” (Set Competency & Assessment)

IPE Theme

IPE Program

Score: 20% Score: 25% Score: 20%

Student’s Competencies (Outcomes)

CommunicationSkills and

Problem solving

Patient carePlan and

Goal Setting

TeamworkTrust&

Respect(Attitude)

Leadership

SupportFacilitator

Humanized Patient

Home carewith

INHOMESSS

Question 4:IPE@MSU ในการเยยมบานวางแผนอยางไร?

How to prepare Home visit?

Methods: Patient Home Visit

1 group = 7-8 persons2MD+4PD+1or 2ARTotal 30 groups

Medical Student (MD)(n=60)

Pharmacy Student (PD)(n=123)

Architecture Student (AR)(n=50)

Student (n=233)

1 Community = 5 Patient’s houses

Each patient’s house = 1 group of students+ 1 Health volunteer

8 students

1 healthvolunteer

1 house

1 house

30 students5 health volunteers

1 Medicaldoctor

1 Pharmacist

1 Home care

nurse

Architect

Faciltators

Question 5:

กระบวนการ IPE@MSU ใหผลลพธเปนอยางไร?What are results of IPE@MSU Process?

- Students’ expectation- Students’ perception- Students’ learning- Students change

Our Process of Learning:1. กจกรรมแรกพบ เปดใจใหรจก รอยรก เรยนร รวมกน (Activity-based learning,

2 Games for Ice-breaking and Team building)- เกมหนสอใจ (Stone as communicator)- เกมแมนาแหงชวต (Crossing the river of life)

2. กจกรรมเสรมความรเบองตนเพอปรบความเขาใจระหวางวชาชพ

(Theme: Humanized Patient Home Carewith 3 Brief Concepts: (1) INHOMESSS (2) Drug in Community (3) Universal Design (UD) or Friendly design for patient)

3. กจกรรมลงชมชน เยยมบานผปวยดวยหวใจ (เขาใจและมใจอยากชวยเหลอ)

(Home visits in 2 semesters)

Week 7Activity-based(Team building)Ice-breaking activities-Stone as mind communicator หนสอใจ-Crossing the river of life แมนาแหงชวต

Brief Lectures เรยนความรเบองตนรวมกน-INHOMESSS-Drug and Community-Universal Design (UD) and case studies

Week 11-12Home Visit 1-2-INHOMESSS

I = ImmobilityN= NutritionH= HousingO= Other people

(Genogram)M= MedicationE= Physical

ExaminationS= Spiritual healthS= SafetyS= Services (health)

- Identify Problems- Set Goal and Plan

for QoL of patient

IPE@MSU and Key Success Factors• Need -----Leadership and Working group (Background) Teamwork/Experience/Shared vision

• Trust ----- Plan-Do-Check-Act together-Working group-Home visit team-Health volunteer-Health volunteer-Patient

• Value-----Student’s learning outcomesQuality of life of Patient & Family

The End

So now abide Faith, Hope, and Love, these three. But the greatest of these is LOVE.Love never fails Give your hands

What we expect in students?

Krathwohl, D. R.; Bloom, B. S.; Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals And revised in 2001.Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:

The classification of educational goals.

Education 4.0 (value-added, innovative)