Magnet Systems Overview
description
Transcript of Magnet Systems Overview
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 1
Magnet Systems Overview
GianLuca Sabbi
LARP Collaboration Meeting 17
November 16, 2011
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 2
LARP Magnet R&D Program
Goal: Develop Nb3Sn quadrupoles for the LHC luminosity upgrade
Potential to operate at higher field and/or larger temperature margin
R&D phases:
• 2004-2009: technology development using the SQ and TQ models• 2006-2012: length scale-up to 4 meters using the LR and LQ models• 2008-2014: incorporation of accelerator quality features in HQ/LHQ
Program achievements to date:
• TQ models (90 mm aperture, 1 m length) reached 240 T/m gradient• LQ models (90 mm aperture, 4 m length) reached 220 T/m gradient• HQ models (120 mm aperture, 1 m length) reached 170 T/m gradient
Current activities:
• Completion of LQ program: assembly and test of LQS03 • Optimization of HQ models: accelerator quality, process control• Engineering design and tooling/parts procurement for LHQ
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 3
Program Organization
WBS Description CoordinatorBNL FNAL LBNL
2.1 Design Studies Sabbi2.1.5.1 Hi-Lumi DS Wanderer Ambrosio Sabbi
2.2 Model Quadrupoles Sabbi2.2.2.2 Coil fabrication and instrumentation traces Schmalzle Bossert Hafalia2.2.2.5 Mechanical structure and assembly Anerella Bossert Felice2.2.2.6 Quench protection and test Chlachidze Martchevskii
2.3 Long Quadrupoles Ambrosio2.3.4 LQ
2.3.4.1 Coil & Collar Fab. (FNAL) Nobrega2.3.4.2 Coil Fab. (BNL) Schmalzle2.3.4.3 Shell fab. Felice2.3.4.4 Instruments & Quench Prot. Martchevskii2.3.4.5 Test Prep & Tests Chlachidze2.3.5 LHQ
2.3.5.2 Coil fabrication and instrumentation traces Schmalzle Bossert2.3.5.4 Mechanical structure and assembly Felice
2.4 Materials Ghosh2.4.1.1 Conductor qualification Ghosh Godeke2.4.1.2 Cable design and fabrication Dietderich2.4.1.3 Conductor procurement Ghosh Yamada Dietderich
Task Leader
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 4
Program Components
Long QuadrupoleLQS3.7 m long90 mm bore
Long High-Field Quadrupole (LHQ)120 mm bore – Length TBD (3.5-4.5m)
Long QuadrupoleLQS3.7 m long90 mm bore
Long High-Field Quadrupole (LHQ)120 mm bore – Length TBD (3.5-4.5m)
SM
TQS
HQ
LR
LQS
LHQ
• Racetrack coils, shell based structure• Technology R&D in simple geometry• Length scale up from 0.3 m to 4 m
• Cos2 coils with 90 mm aperture • Incorporation of more complex layout• Length scale up from 1 m to 4 m
• Cos2 coils with 120 mm aperture• Explore force/stress/energy limits• Address accelerator quality requirements
Reported by G. Chlachidze in PM session
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 5
High-Field Quadrupole (HQ) Design
• 120 mm aperture, coil peak field of 15.1 T at 219 T/m (1.9K SSL)• 190 MPa coil stress at SSL (150 MPa if preloaded for 180 T/m) • Stress minimization is primary goal at all design steps (from x-section) • Coil and yoke designed for small geometric and saturation harmonics• Full alignment during coil fabrication, magnet assembly and powering
Aluminum collar
Bladder location
Aluminum shellMaster key
Loading keys
Yoke-shell alignment
Pole alignment key
Quench heater
Coil
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 6
Contributions to the HQ Development
• Cable design and fabrication LBNL• Magnetic design & analysis FNAL, LBNL• Mechanical design & analysis LBNL• Coil parts design and procurement FNAL• Instrumentation & quench protection LBNL• Winding and curing tooling design LBNL, FNAL• Reaction and potting tooling design BNL• Coil winding and curing LBNL, (CERN)• Coil reaction and potting BNL, LBNL, (CERN)• Coil handling and shipping tooling BNL• Structures (quadrupole & mirror) LBNL, FNAL, BNL• Assembly (quadrupole & mirror) LBNL, FNAL, (BNL, CERN)• Magnet test LBNL, FNAL, (CERN)• Accelerator Integration BNL, LBNL, FNAL, (CERN)
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 7
HQ Timeline, Issues and Progress
2008 July Selection of 120 mm quadrupole aperture for Phase 1Nov. HQ design completed (cable, coil/tooling, structure)
2009 June Started winding of first coil
2010 May HQ01a test: reached 155 T/m @4.5K (~80%)June HQ01b test: coil damage due to inter-layer short Oct. HQ01c test: insulation OK, limited to 135 T/m by one coil Nov. Discovered broken strands in coil #10 after reactionDec. Started design iteration and fabrication of special coils
2011 Apr. HQ01d test: reached 170 T/m (86%) by coil selection/QAMay HQM01: promising results with lower compaction in coil 12June New cable and coil design approved for lower compaction July HQ01e test: confirms HQ01d, magnetic measurementsSept. HQM02 test: best result to date with coil 13 (one less turn)Oct. Completed first coil with new cable design
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 8
HQ01a-e Quench Training
NbTi operating target (120 T/m)
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 9
HQ Performance Issues
Time (s)
Extr
actio
n Vo
ltage
(V)
Mechanical issues:
•Ramp rate dependence of first three models is indicative of conductor damage
Electrical issues:
•Large number of insulation failures in coils, in particular inter-layer and coil to parts
HQ01b extraction voltageHQ01a-d Ramp Rate dependence
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 10
Coil Analysis Findings
Both mechanical and electrical issues were traced to excessive compaction during the coil reaction phase:
• HQ design assumed less space for inter-turn insulation than TQ/LQ Reaction cavity limits radial & azimuthal expansion
• No/insufficient gaps were included between pole parts to limit longitudinal strain
A detailed analysis will be presented by Helene Felice in the magnet parallel session
Coil spring back in tooling (Over) size measurements of completed coil
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 11
Individual Coil Tests in Mirror Structure
Mirror structure allows to test single coils:
Efficient way to study design variations Special coils bring special challenges
Two special coil were fabricated and tested: •#12-HQM01: larger cavity and cored cable•#13-HQM02: standard cavity, one less turn Iron Yoke
Iron Mirror Block
Stainless Skin
G-10 and Kaptonmidplane shims
Horizontal “side shims” are placed here
Side “ear”
• Coil 12 showed some performance limitations, probably related to splice fabrication oversight
• Coil 13: best performing HQ coil to date, at 4.5K and 1.9K, using RRP54/61
• Details will be presented by Rodger Bossert and Guram Chlachidze in PM session
Ramp rate dependence
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 12
Design Revisions and Next Steps
Presentations by Dan Dietderich, Helene Felice, Marta Bajko in PM session
Based on the analysis and tests results, the following changes were applied:
•A new cable design was developed using smaller strand diameter (from 0.800 mm to 0.778 mm, to decrease compaction without changes in parts and tooling •Longitudinal gaps were progressively increased and 4mm/m was selected•Some end part modifications to increase insulation layers, avoid sharp points•Increased inter-layer insulation layer thickness to 0.5 mm
Next steps:
•Test of coil 14 (first coil of the new design) in the mirror structure (Dec-Jan)•HQ01e test at CERN: evaluate 1.9K performance and perform independent magnetic measurements (Jan-Feb)•Test of coil 15 (new design and cored cable) in HQ or HQM (Mar-Apr)•A new effort is being organized to understand persisting electrical weaknesses (shorts in coil 14) and apply findings/corrections to both HQ and LHQ
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 13
Integration of HQ and LHQ Programs
HQ/LHQ schedule integration was a key discussion topic at the last DOE review
Practice coils
Spare coil test
LHQ01 coils
LQS03 test
HQ coil w new cable tested w mirror
HQ02 w new cable
LHQ
HQ
Will be presented in detail by Giorgio Ambrosio during the magnet parallel session
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 14
Accelerator Quality in LARP Models
Design Features LR SQ TQS/LQS TQC HQLHQ
(Goals)
Geometric field quality √ √
Structure alignment √ √ √ √ √
Coil alignment √ √ √
Saturation effects √ √ √
Persistent/eddy currents √
End optimization √ √ √
Cooling channels √ √
Helium containment √ √
Radiation hardness √
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 15
Accelerator Quality Requirements
Detailed specifications will be developed by the HL-LHC design study
Preliminary guidance was formulated by CERN in four areas:
Ramp rate: no quench at -150 A/s, starting from 80% of SSL
• Requires control of eddy current losses, particularly in cables
Transfer function: < 1 unit reproducibility in the operating range < 10 units spread for I< Imax/2 & <5 units for I>Imax/2
• Requires control of magnetization and eddy current effects
Persistent currents: injection |b6|<10 units, spread < 10 units
• Requires control of conductor magnetization
Magnetic center: stable during ramp-up within ± 0.04 mm
• Requires control of magnetization and eddy current effects
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 16
Current Accelerator Quality Developments
• Structure optimization for alignment, uniform pre-load, minimal training• Field quality measurements and new design features to meet requirements• Structure development oriented toward magnet production and installation • Quench protection, rad-hard epoxy and cooling system studies
PM session: Conductor and cable presentations by Arup Ghosh and Dan Dietderich Production structure and rad-hard epoxy discussion by Peter Wanderer
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 17
HQ Structure and Assembly Optimization
• HQ explores stress limits and test results confirm pre-load window is very narrow
• HQ01e: asymmetric loading for better stress uniformity
• Could also be used to optimize geometric field quality
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 18
HQ01d-e Magnetic Measurements
• Geometric harmonics are small, indicating good uniformity and alignment• Large persistent current effects indicate need for smaller filament conductors• Large dynamic effects indicate need to better control inter-strand resistance
Geometric and persistent current harmonics Eddy current harmonics for different ramp rates
Detailed presentation by Xiaorong Wang in the magnet parallel session
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 19
In previous phases of the program, conductor has been adequate to meet the key magnet R&D goals:
• RRP 54/61 for SQ, LR, and 1st generation TQ/LQ/HQ/HQM models• Enabled the 2009 milestone of >200 T/m in TQ and LQ
• RRP 108/127 for optimized TQ, LQ, HQ/HQM, and LHQ• Smaller filament size, but needs further development
Accelerator requirements will be a priority in the next phase:
• HQ02: evaluate cored cables for control of dynamic effects• HQM: evaluate coils made with larger RRP stacks and PIT
For construction project, key production issues need to be addressed:
• Improve piece length (cable UL > 1km) and control of Jc, RRR
• Production volume: ~15 tons in a 3-4 year period
LARP Conductor Experience and Needs
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 20
Development of smaller filament wires
Work is currently underway to develop wires with smaller Deff
• RRP 169 and 217 stacks under development at OST • PIT (192 tubes) under development by Bruker-AES • Both routes can in principle deliver < 40 m at 0.8 mm
LARP plans – conductor procurement:
• About 20 kg. of RRP 217 wire are currently available• Additional RRP 217 wire is expected from CDP contracts• PIT wire is expected from an exchange with CERN
LARP plans – conductor evaluation:
• Fabricate and characterize HQ cables starting this year• If promising results are obtained, fabricate and test HQ coils
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 21
Conductor Jc and RRR vs. TimeE-2004 type high Jc RRP
Sampling of billets produced 2002-2007
no
n-C
u J
c (4
.2 K
), A
/mm
2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
12 T Jc 15 T Jc
12 T
15 T
< Jc >= 2960
< Jc >= 1550
Sampling of billets produced 2002-2007
RR
R
10
100
Residual Resistivity Ratio
Jc (
12T
, 4.2
K)
RRP 54/61: 2002-2007 RRP 108/127: 2008-2011
Both Jc and RRR for 108/127 are significantly lower than for 54/61, and no improvements are
observed for increased production quantity
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 22
Conductor Piece Length
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1 2 3 4 5
Pie
ce L
en
gth
, m
Piece #
10425
10428
10429
10433
12008
12878
12879
13091
• Cable UL for full scale magnets of 120 mm aperture will be ~1 km (considerably higher if aperture is increased to 150 mm)
• Cabling losses are large when strand piece length is comparable to cable UL• After optimization, RRP 54/61 achieved 1-2 pieces per billet (5-10 km
range)• RRP 108/127 is still delivered in relatively short pieces, with min spec 550
m Sample piece lengths for RRP 108/127 billets procured by LARP
Billet #
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 23
R&D and Construction Planning
• A CERN-US working group was established in August 2010: Following a request from last DOE review of LARP (7/2010) Composition: 3 US (BNL, FNAL, LBNL) and 2 CERN members
• Goals:
Discuss requirements and development plans for Nb3Sn
Present recommendations to LARP, DOE, CERN management
• Main topics covered: Magnet tests and success criteria for technology demonstration Contributions from US and CERN in the next R&D phase Infrastructure requirements for prototyping and production Baseline and backup options for final design and production
• Findings presented at the 2011 CERN-US meeting and DOE review
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 24
CERN and EU Participation
Several key contributions by CERN were discussed as part of this plan:
R&D and design phase:
• HL-LHC Design Study: o Finalize basic requirements (esp. aperture)o Radiation and heat transfer studies
• Conductor and materials development (with EU programs)• Participation in HQ model testing, assembly and fabrication
(preparation for prototyping and production)
Infrastructure and prototyping phase:
• Procure 10 m coil infrastructure at CERN • Full length prototype will be built at CERN by a combined US-
CERN team with target completion by the end of 2015
Production and installation phase:
• CERN to participate in production & lead integration/installation
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 25
ID Task Name
1 R&D & Design (US+CERN)2 LQS01/2 tests (RRP 54/61)3 LQS03 tests (RRP 108/127)4 HQ/HQM tests5 LHQ design and fabrication6 LHQ tests7 IR Quad Aperture selection8 IR Quad short model9 HL-LHC Design Study10 IR specification finalized11 IR Construction Project (US+CERN)12 Prototype infrastructure & tooling13 Construction project start14 IR Quad Prototype 15 Production infrastructure & tooling16 Coil and structure fabrication17 Magnet assembly18 Cryostat assembly & test19 String Tests20 Installation
10/1
1/1
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
R&D and Construction Schedule
• Target date for installation of new IR Quadrupoles in LHC is 2021• Target date for technology decision (Nb3Sn vs. NbTi) is 2014
As of June 2011(DOE review)
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011 Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 26
Summary
• Fundamental aspects of Nb3Sn technology have been demonstrated
• R&D effort is now focusing on increased reliability, accelerator integration and production requirements
• Systematic testing of LARP Nb3Sn models and CERN NbTi models will provide a direct comparison for the 2014 technology selection
• Next few years will be critical and much work is still left to do
- Integrate R&D efforts with EuCARD, KEK, US core programs
- Need close participation and direct contributions by CERN
Acknowledgement