Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8
T o mee t a te st indic at or for gr ade s 3- 8 and1 0 , atlea st 7 5% of stud ent s te ste d mustscore proficientor highe r on that test . Other indicat or re quire ments are : 1 1 th gra de Ohio Gra duati on T ests, 85%; At te ndance Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%. State Indicators 2008-2009 School Year Report Card The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 85 percent The state requirement is 93 percent The state requirement is 90 percent 3rd Grade Achievement 1. Rea ding 2. Mathematics  4th Grade Achievement 3. Reading 4. Mathematics 5. Writing 5th Grade Achievement 6. Read ing 7. Mathematics 8. Science 9. Social Studies 6th Grade Achievement 10. Reading 11. Mathematics 7th Grade Achievement 12. Reading 13. Mathematics 14. Writing 8th Grade Achievement 15. Reading 16. Mathematics 17. Science 18. Social Studies Ohio Graduation Tests ( 10th Grade) 19. Reading 20. Mathematics 21. Writing 22. Science 23. Social Studies Ohio Graduation Tests ( 11th Grade) 24. Reading 25. Mathematics 26. Writing 27. Science 28. Social Studies  Attendance Rate 29. All Gra des  2007-08 Graduation Rate 30. District The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The six designations a re Excellent wit h Distinction Excellent Effective Continuous Improv ement Academic W atch Academic Emergency Value-Added Adequate Y early Progress Performance Index Indicators The D istr ict Re port Car d for the 2 008-2 009 school ye ar shows the progress district s h ave made based on four measure s of performance. The combinat ion of the four measures is the basis for assigning state designations to districts, buildings and community schools. Your District’s Designation: Number of State Indicators Met out of 30 Performance Index State Indicators Performance Index Value-Added Measure  Your District 2008-2009 Similar Districts 2008-2009 State 2008-2009 Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov Value-Added Measure State Indicators District Improve ment (0-120 points) A YP  Any result at or abo ve the state standard is ind icated b y a . SimilarDistrictsare basedon com paringdemog raphi c,socioec onomicand geog raphi cfactors. Cumulati ve resultsfor studentswho tookthe testsas 10th or 11thgrader s. -- =Not Calculated/Not Displ ayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. 95.7 % 95.0 % 95.6 % 91.8 % 91.7 % 95.5 % 91.4 % IRN # 047886 Effective 25 95.8 Not Met At Risk Madison Local School District 6741 N Ridge Rd, Madison, OH 44057-2656 - Lake County Current Superintendent: Roger J. Goudy (440) 428- 2166 78.4 % 78.4 % 82.5 % 80.5 % 89.1 % 80.2 % 66.0 % 66.0 % 69.8 % 81.3 % 76.1 % 84.3 % 80.1 % 79.7 % 85.1 % 81.5 % 71.2 % 62.0 % 91.9 % 89.2 % 93.3 % 81.8 % 88.1 % 84.3 % 86.5 % 77.4 % 81.3 % 87.4 % 84.3 % 88.5 % 82 % 78.4 % 84.4 % 76.8 % 70.6 % 76.9 % 66.7 % 72 % 62.3 % 70.6 % 61.6 % 81.3 % 75.2 % 87.4 % 83.0 % 76.6 % 74.3 % 80.5 % 82.1 % 82.7 % 84.3 % 72.4 % 70.6 % 62.8 % 51.1 % 76.9 % 78.5 % 70.0 % 55.8 % 84.5 % 81.4 % 89.7 % 76 % 81.6 % 88.5 % 87.8 % 92.5 % 83.3 % 86.3 % 92.8 % 88.4 % 93.2 % 84.2 % 88.6 % 94.3 % 84.6 % 94.7 % 93.2 % 95.3 % 90.2 % 92.4 % 95.1 % 94.3 % + = above

Transcript of Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

Page 1: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 1/8

To meet a testindicator for grades

3-8 and10, atleast75%of students

tested must score proficientor higher

on that test. Other indicator requirements are:

11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance

Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.

StateIndicators

2008-2009 School Year Report Card

The state requirement is 75 percent

The state requirement is 75 percent

The state requirement is 75 percent

The state requirement is 75 percent

The state requirement is 75 percent

The state requirement is 85 percent

The state requirement is 93 percent

The state requirement is 90 percent

3rd Grade Achievement

1. Reading2. Mathematics

 4th Grade Achievement

3. Reading

4. Mathematics

5. Writing

5th Grade Achievement

6. Reading

7. Mathematics

8. Science

9. Social Studies

6th Grade Achievement

10. Reading

11. Mathematics

7th Grade Achievement

12. Reading

13. Mathematics

14. Writing

8th Grade Achievement

15. Reading

16. Mathematics

17. Science

18. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)

19. Reading

20. Mathematics

21. Writing

22. Science23. Social Studies

Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)

24. Reading

25. Mathematics

26. Writing

27. Science

28. Social Studies

  Attendance Rate

29. All Grades

 2007-08 Graduation Rate

30. District

The state requirement is 75 percent

The state requirement is 75 percent

The six designations are• Excellent with Distinction• Excellent• Effective• Continuous Improvement• Academic Watch• Academic Emergency

Value-AddedAdequateYearly Progress

PerformanceIndex

Indicators

The District Report Card for the2008-2009school year showsthe progress districts have madebased on four measures of performance.

The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designationsto districts, buildings andcommunity schools.

Your District’sDesignation: Number of State

IndicatorsMet out of 30

PerformanceIndex

StateIndicators Performance

Index

Value-AddedMeasure

 Your District

2008-2009

Similar Districts

2008-2009

State

2008-2009

Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Value-AddedMeasure

State

Indicators

District Improvement(0-120 points)

AYP

*

**

 Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .

SimilarDistrictsare basedon comparingdemographic,socioeconomicand geographicfactors. Cumulative resultsfor studentswho tookthe testsas 10th or 11thgraders.***

-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

95.7 %

95.0 %

95.6 %

91.8 %

91.7 %

95.5 %

91.4 %

IRN # 047886

Effective25

95.8

Not Met

At Risk

Madison Local School District6741 N Ridge Rd, Madison, OH 44057-2656 - Lake County

Current Superintendent: Roger J. Goudy (440) 428-2166

78.4 %78.4 %

82.5 %

80.5 %89.1 %

80.2 %

66.0 %

66.0 %

69.8 %

81.3 %

76.1 %

84.3 %

80.1 %

79.7 %

85.1 %

81.5 %

71.2 %

62.0 %

91.9 %

89.2 %

93.3 %

81.8 %88.1 %

84.3 %86.5 %

77.4 %81.3 %

87.4 %

84.3 %88.5 %

82 %

78.4 %84.4 %

76.8 %

70.6 %

76.9 %

66.7 %

72 %

62.3 %

70.6 %

61.6 %

81.3 %

75.2 %

87.4 %

83.0 %

76.6 %

74.3 %

80.5 %

82.1 %

82.7 %

84.3 %

72.4 %

70.6 %

62.8 %

51.1 %

76.9 %

78.5 %

70.0 %

55.8 %

84.5 %

81.4 %

89.7 %

76 %81.6 %

88.5 %

87.8 %

92.5 %

83.3 %86.3 %

92.8 %

88.4 %

93.2 %

84.2 %

88.6 %

94.3 %

84.6 %

94.7 %

93.2 %

95.3 %

90.2 %

92.4 %

95.1 %

94.3 %

+ = above

Page 2: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 2/8

Page 3: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 3/8

Overall CompositeScores reflect grade level and overall composite

ratings for the 2008-2009 school year.

Value-Added Measure

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Reading

Mathematics

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Your district’s Value-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students’ performance at apoint in time. A score of “Above” indicates greater than one year of 

progress has been achieved; “Met” indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; “Below” indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.

Value-AddedMeasure

-

+ AboveExpected Growth

MetExpected Growth

BelowExpected Growth

=

=

=

Legend

Performance Index

Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects

(Includes every student enrolled in

the district for a full academic year)

X =WeightPercentage Points

Your District’s Performance Index

0.0

0.3

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.2

Untested

Limited

Basic

Proficient

 Accelerated

 Advanced

X

X

X

X

X

X

=

=

=

=

=

=

The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievementof everystudentenrolled for the full academic

 year. The Performance Indexis a weighted average that includesall tested subjects and grades anduntested students. The greatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight of zero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to120points. The Performance Index can becompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.

PerformanceIndex

2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007

Performance Index Over Time

0.4

5.2

14.7

37.7

27.2

14.9

1.5

8.8

37.7

29.9

17.9

95.8 95.6 97.6

95.8

Madison Local School District, Lake Coun

+

- + - -

+ + +

0.0

Page 4: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 4/8

4

Grades 3-8 and 10

Readingand

Mathematics

Adequate YearlyProgress

  A  l  lS  t  u  d  e

  n  t  s

        P      e      r      c      e      n        t        P      r      o        f        i      c        i      e      n        t

        P      e      r      c      e      n        t        T      e      s        t      e        d

  E  c  o  n  o

  m  i  c  a

  l  l  yD  i  s  a  d

  v  a  n  t  a  g 

  e  d

  A  s  i  a  n  /  P

  a  c  i  f  i  c

I  s  l  a  n

  d  e  r

  B  l  a  c  k 

 ,  n  o  n

 -  H  i  s  p

  a  n  i  c

  A  m  e  r  i

  c  a  n I  n  d

  i  a  n  /  A  l

  a  s  k   a N  a

  t  i  v  e

  H  i  s  p  a

  n  i  c

  M  u  l  t  i -

  R  a  c  i  a

  l

  W  h  i  t  e

 ,  n  o  n

 -  H  i  s  p

  a  n  i  c

  S  t  u  d  e

  n  t  sw  i  t  h

D  i  s  a  b

  i  l  i  t  i  e  s

  L  i  m  i  t  e

  d E  n  g   l  i  s  h

P  r  o  f  i  c

  i  e  n  t

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Graduation Rate*

Attendance Rate*

Legend

Not applicable.

NR

N/A

Met

Not Met

Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically

reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

ReadingProficiency:

MathematicsProficiency:

ReadingParticipation:

Mathematics

Participation:

AttendanceRate:

AYP Determinatio

by Indicator

GraduationRate:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Everyschooland district must meet AYP goals thatare set for Reading and Mathematics

Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,

non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet

Rate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the state’s rating designation.

AYP

AYP Determination

by Subgroup

AYPDetermination

for Your District:

This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year’s AYP goals.

For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;

2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;

3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;

4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.

For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;

2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;

3) making improvement over the previous year.

* The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.

Black,non-Hispanic

HispanicWhite,

non-Hispanic

Asian or Pacific Islander 

American Indian/ Alaska Native

Econ.Disadvtgd

Limited EnglishProficient Multi-Racial

Federally RequiredGraduation Rate Information

The disaggregated graduation rates ofyour district are provided forinformational purposes onlyand are not used foryour AYPdetermination.

Students withDisabilities

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Madison Local School District, Lake County

Met

Met

Met

Met

 

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

 

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

 

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

 

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

 

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

 

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

 

Met

Not Met

Met

Met

Met

 

Not Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

 

NR

Not M

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Not M

0% 0% >95% 81.8%

66.7% 0% 0% 88.2% 92%

Page 5: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 5/8

Page 6: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 6/8

6

Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.

Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.

Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYPfor two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for two

consecutive years.

Name of the School & Years in Improvement

Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status

Schools in School Improvement 

Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum for the Class of 2008

Measure 2007-08 Graduates Data Source

EMIS - EducationManagement Information Systemof the Ohio Department of Education

ACT College Entrance Exam - Nonprofit organization that administerstheACT college entrance test

College Board (SAT)- Nonprofit association that administers the SAT exam

AP - Advanced Placement, a program offering courses/exams that provide

students the opportunity to earn credit or advanced standing at colleges anduniversities

Legend

The Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum are intended toreport on the completion of a rigorous curriculum and otherindicators of studentsuccess thatensure students leaveschool with the knowledgeand skills needed to succeed in

college, careers and citizenship. These indicators pertain toschools that have any combination of grades10, 11 and 12.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” is the only nationallyrepresentative and continuingassesssubject areas. Schools and students within each stateare selected randomly to be a part of theassessment. Not all students in the state or in a particularschool take the assessment.

, and there are no individual student or even schoolsummary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing,the arts, civics, economics, geography and U.S. history.

To view Ohio’s most recentNAEP results,

go to:

and search for key word “N AEP”

gov

91.4

Madison Local School District, Lake County

 No Schools Identified for Improvement in District

1026

85

69.9

11

21.1

17.1

22

%

%

%

%

%

Page 7: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 7/8

1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.

2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutive years and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no

higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the

preliminary designation. Thus, the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added, the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the district’s finaldesignation.

1. If your district’s rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will increase by one designation.

3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.

The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met by your district and your district’s performance index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation.

Determining Your District's Rating

Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or

or

or

or

or

and

and

and

and

and

andand

Met or Not Met Excellent

75%-93.9%

0%-74.9%

50%-74.9%

31%-49.9%

0%-30.9%

90 to 99.9

80 to 89.9

0 to 89.9

70 to 79.9

0 to 69.9

Met or Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Effective

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Continuous

Improvement

=

=

=

=

=

=

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation

Excellent

Effective

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

 Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand

and

and

and

and

Excellent with Distinction

Effective

 Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years

 Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years

Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years

 Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years

Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years

Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years

Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years

 Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years

Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years

Excellent

Continuous Improvement

Academic Emergency

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Effective

*In all other cases, including if your district’s designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will haveno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

or

or

or

or

or

Determiningyour district’s reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis to determinea preliminary designation,whichis basedon thefollowingcomponents:1)the percentageof indicators met, 2)theperformanceindex and 3)AYP determination.

Madison Local School District, Lake Coun

Page 8: Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

8/14/2019 Madison Schools State Report Card 2009

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/madison-schools-state-report-card-2009 8/8

8

Ohio Department of EducationReport Card Resources on the Web:

reportcard.ohio.govMadison Local School District, Lake County