Madhu Final Project
-
Upload
karunakar-panda -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
Transcript of Madhu Final Project
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
1/36
Socio Economic condition inUppalada & Ranipeta
Submitted By:
GROUP-4 Submitted To:
Madhu Parna Sen(s1005) Dr.Anita Patro
Sanjit Dal Behera(s10)
Karunakar Panda(s10)
Page 1 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
2/36
DECLARATION
We Madhu Parna Sen, Sanjit Dal Behera & Karunakar Panda do here
by declare that the project submitted by us entitled
SocioEconomic condition in Uppalada & Ranipeta toCenturion School Rural Enterprise Management, Paralakhemundi in
Partial Fulfillment Of The requirement for the 2nd trimester of PGDM
is of our own and it has not been submitted earlier to any other
institution including this college or published elsewhere.
DATE: ___/___/______
PLACE: PARALAKHEMUNDI Signature
Page 2 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
3/36
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Every successful event on earth bears the signature of not only the
man who has the man achieved it but also those who have been
instrumental in letting it accomplish it. And we believe due credit for
this report must go to the people who knowingly or unknowingly
have supported us during our project work.
We would like to thank Dr G C Patro (Director of CSREM) who has
given us such opportunity to undertake this project.
We wish to express my gratitude and sincere thanks to Dr.Anita
Patro for her valuable guidance help in completing this project.
Last but not the least we also sincerely acknowledge of all our
friends who supported us towards the successful completionof the
project.
Page 3 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
4/36
CONTENTSTOPIC PAGE NO
1. INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY (5)
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (5)
3. ANALYSIS (7-20)
4. HYPOTHESIS TESTING (21-27)
5. FINDINGS & CONCLUSION (28)
6. FEEDBACK AND RECOMENDATION (29)
7. ANNEXURE (30-31)
Page 4 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
5/36
INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY:
In India most of the people are living in rural villages. Though India is developing but itsvillages are still not developed It is may be due to fail of different schemes of State and Centralgovernment. The mind set of people are also not changed due to illiteracy and lack of propereducation.
So we the students of C.S.R.E.M conducted a study on the topic Income level of villagers ofUppalada and Ranipenta villages which is situated in Gajapati district of the state Odisha. Thestudy it was also want to find some information about the different income and saving pattern ofvillagers.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
1. To know education level in the villages.2. To know the source of income in villages.3. To determine monthly family income level of the villagers.4. To study the loan taking habit of the villagers.5. To know the saving habit of the villagers.6. To determine the amount of expenditure of the family of the villagers.7. To understand the socio economic condition of the villagers.8. To know whether the villagers are related with any self help groups or not
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
It is well known fact that the most important step in social research process is to define theproblem. Choose for investigation because a problem well defined is half solved. That was thereason that at most care was taken while defining various parameters of the problem. Aftergiving through brain storming session, objectives were selected and the set on the base of theseobjectives. A questionnaire was designed major emphasis of which was gathering new ideas orinsight so as to determine and bind out solution to the problems.
DATA SOURCE
Research included gathering primary data. Primary data is the first hand data, which are selecteda fresh and thus happen to be original in character. Primary Data was crucial to know variousinformation about the villagers.
Page 5 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
6/36
RESEARCH APPROACH
The research approach was used survey method which is a widely used method for datacollection and best suited for descriptive type of research survey includes research instrumentlike questionnaire which can be structured and unstructured. Target population is well identified
and personal interview method was used in the study.SAMPLING UNIT
It gives the target population that will be sampled. This research was conducted in Uppalada andRanipenta villages (Gajapati District).Out of 500 households the sample size was 40 households.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUEIn the study simple random sampling was used for taking the sample..
DATA COMPLETION AND ANALYSISAfter the data has been collected, it was tabulated and findings of the project were presentedfollowed by analysis and interpretation to reach certain conclusions.
SCOPEOur project was based on the income level of villagers of Uppalada and Ranipenta village.
LIMITATIONS1. Research work was carried out in two villages only. The finding may not be applicable to theother parts of the country because of social and cultural differences.2. The sample was collected using simple random sampling techniques. As such result may notgive an exact representation of the population.3. Shortage of time is also reason for incomprehensiveness.4. The views of the people are biased therefore it doesnt reflect true picture.
Page 6 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
7/36
ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY
Q2) Gender of the respondents:-
Table-1
gender of the respondent
27 67.5 67.5 67.5
13 32.5 32.5 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
male
female
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Graph-1
Findings: From table- 1 it was found that among all the 40 respondents 67.5% peoplewere male and 32.5% people were female.
Q3) Age of the respondents Table -2
Page 7 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
8/36
age of the respondent
1 2.5 2.5 2.5
8 20.0 20.0 22.5
31 77.5 77.5 100.040 100.0 100.0
18-25
25-30
above 30Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Graph-2
Findings: From the table-2 it was found that among all the 40 respondents 2.5% peoplebelong to age group of 18-25 years,20% People belong to 25-30year and 77.5% peopleabove 30 years old.
Q4) Number of family members
Table-3
number of family members
14 35.0 35.0 35.0
26 65.0 65.0 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
2-4
more than4
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent
(Graph-3)
Page 8 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
9/36
number of famil members
morethan42-4
Count
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
Findings: From table -3 it was found that among all the respondent 35% house hold 2-4person & 65% house hold more than 4 person.
Q5)Number of male members in the family ?
Table-4
no of male in family
1 2.5 2.5 2.5
28 70.0 70.0 72.5
11 27.5 27.5 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
0-1
1-2
above 2
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-4)
Page 9 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
10/36
no of male in famil
above 21-20-1
Count
30
20
10
0
Finding: From table-4 it was found that no of male in family 2.5%
Q6) No. of female members in the familyTable-5
no of the female in family
1 2.5 2.5 2.5
24 60.0 60.0 62.5
15 37.5 37.5 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
0-1
1-2
above2
Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-5)
Page 10 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
11/36
no of the female in famil
above21-20-1
Count
30
20
10
0
Finding: From the table-5 it was found that there are more number of families belong to noof females 1-2
Q7)No of earning member of the family?
Table -6
Page 11 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
12/36
(Graph-6)
Finding: Fromthe table-6 we fond that there are most of the family have one earning member.
Q8) No of dependent members in the family(Table-7)
no of dependent
6 15.0 15.0 15.0
7 17.5 17.5 32.5
27 67.5 67.5 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
1
2
above2
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-7)
no of de endent
above221
Count
30
20
10
0
Page 12 of36
No of members Earning member 1 182 153 2Above then 3 5Total 40
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
13/36
Finding: This table says about the dependency rate of the households on the earned person i.e15% on one earned person,17.5 % on 2 earned persons and the rest 67.5 % on more than 2earned person.
Q9) loan taking habit of the respondents(Table-8)
taken any lone
4 10.0 10.0 10.0
36 90.0 90.0 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
yes
no
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-8
no
yes
Finding: The above graph says about the loan taken by households i.e. 10% out of the wholepopulation.
Q10) Have you repaid the loan?
Table-9
No 0Partially 2
Page 13 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
14/36
Fully 2Not taking loan 38Total 40
Graph-9
Finding: From this table-9 we found that every person whose are taking loan they tried torepay it in fully, partially manner.Q11) Saving habit of the respondents
(Table-10)
regular habit of saving
16 40.0 40.0 40.0
24 60.0 60.0 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
yes
no
Total
Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-10)
no
yes
Finding: From table-12 it was found that 40% people habit regular saving.
Q12)What is your monthly saving?
Table-11Graph-11
Page 14 of36
Amount of saving No of members200-300 10300-500 20Above 500 10Total 40
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
15/36
Finding: From this table -11 we found that most of the people monthly savings in between300-500 rs..
Q13) Educational qualification of the respondents(Table-12)
eduction of the respomdent
17 42.5 42.5 42.5
11 27.5 27.5 70.0
10 25.0 25.0 95.0
2 5.0 5.0 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
uneducated
metric
intermediate
above
Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-12)
above
intermediate
metric
uneducated
Finding: From table-12 it was found that 42.5% people uneducated,27.5% people metric ,25% people intermediate and 2% people above the intermediate.
Page 15 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
16/36
Q14) Income source of the respondents(Table-13)
source of income
16 40.0 40.0 40.0
11 27.5 27.5 67.5
2 5.0 5.0 72.5
11 27.5 27.5 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
agriculture
pvt.service
gvot service
other
Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-13)
Page 16 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
17/36
source of income
othergvot servicepvt.serviceagriculture
Count
20
10
0
Finding- From table-13 it was found that 40% people depend upon agriculture,27.5% peopledepend upon private service ,5% people depend upon Govt. service and 27.5% peopledepend upon other.
Q15)Monthly family income level of the respondent
(Table-14)
monthly family income level
8 20.0 20.0 20.0
15 37.5 37.5 57.5
11 27.5 27.5 85.0
6 15.0 15.0 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
less than 3000
3000-5000
5000-8000
above
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
(Graph-14)
Page 17 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
18/36
monthl famil income level
above5000-80003000-5000less than 3000
Count
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
Finding: from table-14 it was found that 20% people less than 3000 income,37.5% peoplethere income 3000-5000,27.5% people there income 5000-8000,15% people there incomemore than 8000.
Q16)Monthly expenditure of respondents households(Table-15)
monthly expenditure
7 17.5 17.5 17.5
17 42.5 42.5 60.0
16 40.0 40.0 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
below 2000
2000-3000
above 3000
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Graph-15
Page 18 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
19/36
monthl ex enditure
above 30002000-3000below 2000
Count
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
Finding: From table -13 it was found that 17.5% people expenditure below 2000,42.5%people expenditure 2000-3000 and 42% people above 3000 expenditure.
Q17) Family members relation with s.h.g(Table-16)
related with any s.h.g
26 65.0 65.0 65.0
14 35.0 35.0 100.0
40 100.0 100.0
yes
no
Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Graph-16
Page 19 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
20/36
no
yes
Finding: from table-16 shows that 65% people related with s.h.g group.
Crosstabs-1
monthly family income level * monthly expenditure Crosstabulation
Count
4 2 2 8
1 10 4 15
1 3 7 11
1 2 3 6
7 17 16 40
less than 3000
3000-5000
5000-8000
above
monthly family
income level
Total
below 2000 2000-3000 above 3000
monthly expenditure
Total
Case Processing Summary
40 100.0% 0 .0% 40 100.0%
monthly family
income level *
monthly expenditure
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
Graph-1
Page 20 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
21/36
monthl famil income level
above
5000-8000
3000-5000
less than 3000
Count
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
monthly expenditu
below 2000
2000-3000
above 3000
Crosstab2
Case Processing Summary
40 100.0% 0 .0% 40 100.0%source of income *
regular habit of saving
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
source of income * regular habit of saving Crosstabulation
Count
6 10 16
4 7 11
2 2
4 7 11
16 24 40
agriculture
pvt.service
gvot service
other
source of
income
Total
yes no
regular habit of saving
Total
(Graph-2)
Page 21 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
22/36
source of income
other
gvot service
pvt.service
agriculture
Count
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
regular habit of s
yes
no
HYPOTHESIS-1
Z TEST FOR PROPORTIONNull hypothesisA socioeconomic survey claims that 30% people depend upon agriculture for their incomein Ranipeta and Uppalada village .Alternate hypothesisThe people depend up on agriculture us not equal to 30%At 5% level of significanceN=200Check:n p= (200)(.3) = 60n(1-p) = (200)(.7) = 140.Solution: -
H0: p = 0.3 H1: p 0.3
Suppose that = 0.05, n = 200,sp
=0.4, are chosen for this test.
/2=0.025
Z tabulated:1.96
Page 22 of36
3.125
200
)3.01(3.0
3.04.0
n
)(1
pZs
=
=
=
pp
p
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
23/36
Page 23 of36
Income level/saving habit YES NO
Less than 5000 9.1 16.9
Above 5000 4.9 9.1
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
24/36
Page 24 of36
cRe
ject
Re
ject
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
25/36
z0
Page 25 of36
cRej
ect
Rej
ect
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
26/36
3.125Statistical conclusion: There is sufficient evidence not to accept the null hypothesis at 0.05level of significance. Hence the calculated value of Z = 3.125 is comes under the rejectionregion. Since Z = 3.125>1.96.
Managerial Conclusion: -Hence it was concluded that there are people who depend up on agriculture for their income isnot equal to 30%.
HYPOTHESIS-2
CHI-SQUARE TEST CROSS TAB
Income level/svg.hvt YES NO Total
Less than 5000 6 20 26Above 5000 8 6 14
Total 14 26 40
Solution:The null hypothesis is that there is no association between the saving habit and the income level(These two are independent). The alternative hypothesis is that the saving habit and income levelare associated (dependent).
H0: There is no association between the saving habit and the income levelH1: The saving habit and income level are associatedAt 5% level of significance
Degree of freedom: (m-1) (n-1)=1Expected Frequency- Row Total*column Total/ Grand Total
Income level/saving habit YES NO
Less than 5000 9.1 16.9
Above 5000 4.9 9.1Computed
= 4.641
The upper value at 5% level for 1 d.f =3.841
Page 26 of36
=
E
E)(O
22
2
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
27/36
Statistical conclusion-There is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% level ofsignificance.Managerial Decision-The managerial decision is that the saving habit and income level are
associated. HYPOTHESIS-3
CHI-SQUARE TEST FOR GOODNESS OF FIT
Source of income People associated
Agriculture 14
Pvt.service 11
Other 15
Total 40
Solution:-Null hypothesisH0: All the people are equally associated with the different source of incomeAlternate hypothesisH1: All the people are not equally associated to the different source of income
At 5% level of significance
Source of income Observed (O) Expected (E)
Page 27 of36
2E)(O
E
E)(O 2
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
28/36
Agriculture 14 13.33 .4489 .03
Pvt.service 11 13.33 5.42 .40
Other 15 13.33 2.78 .20
Total 40 40 .63
d.f=(n-1)=2 , = 0.05
2
tab=5.991
Statistical conclusionThe critical for 2 d.f at 5% level of significance is 5.99. Since the calculated value is less thancritical value at 5% level of significance, accept the null hypothesis.Managerial conclusionThe conclusion is that all the people are equally associated with the different source of income.
Page 28 of36
=
E
E)(O
22
2
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
29/36
Statistical conclusion-There is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% level ofsignificance.Managerial Decision-The managerial decision is that the saving habit and income level are
associated.
HYPOTHESIS-4H0: The average age of the people who lives in uppalada & ranipenta village is 10H1: The average age of the people who lives in uppalada & ranipenta village is not 10
Assumption
At 5% level of significancen=30
X
=13.33
=10
=0.9
Page 29 of36
n
X
Z
=
26.2016.0
33.3
30/9.0
1033.13
n
XZ ==
=
=
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
30/36
Reject H0 if Z < -1.96 or Z > 1.96; otherwise do not reject H0
+20.26
Statistical conclusion:There is sufficient evidence not to accept the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance . Hencethe calculated value of Z = 20.26 is comes under the rejection region. Since Z = 20.26>1.96.
Managerial Conclusion: -Hence it was concluded that the average age of people who lives in uppalada & ranipenta is notequal to 10.
HYPOTHESIS-5
H0:The average monthly expenditure of the respondent household lies between 2000-3000 is15.H1: The average monthly expenditure of the respondent household lies between 2000-3000 isnot 15.
Assumption
At 5% level of significance
Page 30 of36
n
S
Xt 1-n
=
17.12300.9/1517
n
SXt 1n =
=
=
H0: = 15
H1: 15
Reject H0 Reject H0Do not reject H0
+Z= +1.96-Z= -1.96
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
31/36
n=30
s=standard deviation of sample-0.9
X
=17
is unknown, souse a t statistic
Critical Value:t29 =
/2=.025 /2=.025
+12.17
Statistical conclusion:There is sufficient evidence not to accept the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance . Hencethe calculated value of Z = 12.17 is comes under the rejection region. Since Z = 12.17>1.96.
Managerial Conclusion: -Hence it was concluded that the average age of people who lives in uppalada & ranipenta is notequal to 10.
Page 31 of36
Reject H0 Reject H0Do not reject H0 +t n-1,/2
-t n-1,/2
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
32/36
FINDINGS:1. Most number of people are uneducated in the villages.2. They mostly depend upon agriculture for their livelihood.3. Though more number of family members is associated with income generating activities theirfamily income level is between 3000 to 5000 per month only.4. Most of the people are not taking loans because of higher rate of interest of moneylenders andthey are not also taking loans from the banks because of unawareness.5. Majority of respondents are not involved in the habit of saving due to less income incomparison to expenditure.6. More number of people are associated with local self help groups but they are not fully awareabout the different activities of S.H.G. So association with S.H.Gs is not helping them much.
CONCLUSION:From the study it was concluded that most of the villagers are depending upon agriculture
for their income in the villages Uppalada and Ranipeta. Though they are getting fair amount ofreturn from the agriculture but it is not enough to fulfill their needs and also another thing is thatthe field like Agriculture is totally depend up on proper supply of water. So in some cases due toinadequate availability of water Agriculture is affected largely. More number of families havingmore than four members but most of them is not getting proper education.
So last but not the list it was concluded that only awareness about different factors likeeducation, saving are required and government should facilitate them to overcome this problems.If it will happen then this two villages have the capacity to become one of the ideal villages in
Odisha.
Page 32 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
33/36
FEEDBACK AND RECOMONDATIONS
Government should take some steps for providing more employment opportunities forthe villagers.
Some awareness activities must be conducted about different S.H.Gprograms in the village.
Proper agriculture facilities must be provided to the villagers.
Prominent people from the village should come forward with innovative incomegenerating activities.
Government should take strict actions in regard to the money lenders who lend money athigher rate of interest.
Different schemes like N.R.E.G.A and SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN must beimplemented properly.
Page 33 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
34/36
ANNEXURE-1
QUESTIONAIRE
We are students of CSREM doing a survey to know the income level of therural villagers in Uppalada & Ranipetha ,it will help us to make a projectreport and to do some analysis .finally we will draw a hypothesis from thedata and go for a conclusion
Project on Socio Economic condition in Uppalada &Ranipeta
Questionnaire1) Name of the respondent:
..2) Gender:
a. Male
b. Female
3) Age:
a. 18-25
b. 25-30
c. Above 30
4) No of Family members:a. 0-1
b. 2-4
c. More than 4
5) No of male members of the family?
a. 0-1
b. 1-2
c. Above 2
6) No of female members of the family?
a. 0-1
b. 1-2c. Above 2
7) No of earning members in the family?
a. 1
b. 2
Page 34 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
35/36
c. 3
d. Above 3
1) No of dependent in the family?
a. 1
b. 2
c. Above 21) Have you take loan?
a. Yes
b. No
2) Have you repaid the loan?
a. No
b. Partially
c. Fully
3) Do you have a regular habit of saving?
a. Yes
b. No4) What is your monthly saving?
a. 200-300
b. 300-500
c. Above 500
5) Education of the respondent?
a. Uneducated
b. Metric
c. Government service
d. Others
6) Main source of income for your family?a. Agriculture
b. Pvt. Service
c. Government Service
d. Others
7) Monthly family income level?
a. Less than 3000
b. 3000-5000
c. 5000-8000
d. Above
8) How much monthly expenditure:a. Below 2000
b. 2000-3000
c. Above 3000
9) If any members of your family related with any S.H.G?
Page 35 of36
-
8/3/2019 Madhu Final Project
36/36
a. Yes
b. No
Date- Signature:
Page 36 of36